830°

Titanfall is Yet Another Game Rushed Out the Door By EA

CraveOnline: "Battlefield 4, Warhammer Online, Mass Effect 3, and Titanfall all have something in common. Can you guess what it is? Well, not only were they AAA titles published by EA, but they were pushed out to market before they were ready to walk."

Read Full Story >>
craveonline.com
3685d ago Replies(11)
-Alpha3685d ago (Edited 3685d ago )

What do the dinosaurs have to do with "rushed out the door"? They are there in the backdrop, there isn't anything to suggest they were supposed to be anything more.

It's a new IP and the focus isn't going to be on making Halo 3-level content. Those things take time and come with sequels. A new IP focuses on getting the core mechanics to work, and that likely takes a lot of time. Not sure why this article is complaining about a lack of co-op, it's unfair to expect that or cite it as a sign of a rushed job.

New modes would definitely be nice, and I'm sure they will be added through the lifetime of the game. You really can take any new IP and ask "Why isn't there more content", but a lot of the times, that potential is realized through sequels or patches, after your core mechanics are already nailed down and you focus resources on other things.

It's very dramatic to compare it to Battlefield 4's rush job. That game is a whole different level of disaster. Titanfall isn't "ready to walk"? I really don't understand the hyperbole.

porkChop3685d ago (Edited 3685d ago )

The first in-game screen shot that Respawn ever released, that very blurred one, seemed to have a monster/dinosaur in it. And now that I see what the monsters look like, that's definitely what it was. So they were in fact in the game at one point, then were taken out, and are now apparently going to be sold as DLC.

I do agree though that Titanfall cannot be compared to BF4. That game was completely broken on release, and is still broken in many ways.

-Alpha3685d ago (Edited 3685d ago )

What picture? I think I recall, but that does not mean a) it was ever planned to be a core concept of the game, b) that it wasn't what it already was: a scene in the backdrop of the maps.

Nowhere in development was the game hinted to have dinosaurs play a major role in the game. That only came with the beta leaks, which got hyped by people. I also don't recall any suggestion that they would be DLC.

This does not prove a "rush" job. It's an incredible desperate nitpick by the author.

3685d ago
badboy7763685d ago (Edited 3685d ago )

EA+Micro$oft= We don't give a Damn

esemce3685d ago (Edited 3685d ago )

Yep once they get your money first that is, EA + Microsoft what a beautiful marriage made in hell.

And Xbox one owners do you think you will ever get great polished games when you lap up, praise and defend shoddy workmanship?

Gozer3685d ago

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the X1s worksmanship. The X1 works great and plays great games. I wouldn't even attempt to compare sony and MS or PC and MS. They are all out to make money. You are coming off as a troll.

Rachel_Alucard3684d ago

@Gozer

"There is absolutely nothing wrong with the X1s worksmanship."

At least attempt to google or read more before you sit down and decide to write "intelligent" comments like this.

PSVita3685d ago

"It's a new IP and the focus isn't going to be on making Halo 3-level content. Those things take time and come with sequels. A new IP focuses on getting the core mechanics to work, and that likely takes a lot of time. Not sure why this article is complaining about a lack of co-op, it's unfair to expect that or cite it as a sign of a rushed job. "

New IP or not that doesn't give you a pass to release a half assed game. Being that it's online only and still $60 it should have everything if not more than a game with a campaign too like halo 3. "Wait for the sequel" "wait for Ryse" "wait for E3" "wait for Halo" "wait for Black Tusks new game" "oh wait nevermind wait for the new Gears instead" "wait for the cloud" "wait etc etc etc"

Frankly I'm tired of waiting.

-Alpha3685d ago (Edited 3685d ago )

So you expect a new IP to somehow match everything an IP that has had 3 iterations to perfect has? And you judge the game on stuff like lack of co-op, when it was never advertised to have such a thing?

Any game that doesn't have a set list of features is "rushed"? "Unfinished"? Just curious, because a number of games would fail to reach this arbitrary list of demands. If a complete list of features like Halo 3 is your standard, then nearly all games fall short.

These articles that criticize co-op, dinosaurs, and whatever else are really grabbing at straws. I can understand complaints about a lack of modes or not feeling the overall package is worth $60, but it seems really silly to call the game rushed and compare it to Battlefield

Kribwalker3685d ago

Funny how it's 90% PS4 fanboys in here complaining about it. Not many xbox fans insight. Prolly cause we are all to busy playing Titanfall. I'm only on here because I am on the can, back to titanfall once I'm done 😉

PSVita3685d ago (Edited 3685d ago )

@-alpha- my complaint is about it being $60. If it had been $30 I wouldn't expect as much from it as I would a full priced game. Not saying it a game bad or anything like that but it should be top notch. The gameplay honestly looks great but overall its not worth $60 IMO. It doesn't matter what system it's on I'd say the same if it was a PS exclusive or multiplatform. As next gen title it has no excuses seeing as they were able to solely focus on multiplayer and had plenty of other game to go off of and improve on.

Same goes for KZ:SF it's a great looking game, has a fun multiplayer but GG needs to talk to ND about their storylines because it was a mess and that killed it for me personally same with KZ3. Those games have so much potential...

@kirbwalker- check your facts I'm nothing near a fanboy. Maybe next time you reply to a comment you can actually put something that contributes to the conversation.

Kribwalker3685d ago

Not calling you a fanboy, or anyone, just said sony fans, and it was just a general reply to the article and everyone, not just you.

-Alpha3685d ago

Fair enough, I can understand the $60 complaint and can side with you on that. I just don't think it's fair to call it rushed, or pick the game apart for not having something like co-op.

mydyingparadiselost3685d ago

That's why I wait for price drops, wait for reviews, wait to hear other people's experiences, wait for GotY editions, wait for the patches to be released, wait, and wait to see what's bullshot. I'm tired of waiting too, the industry does nothing but hurt itself when it cuts content or pushes games out early for the sake of profit.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3685d ago
corvusmd3685d ago

I don't like it when people write reviews without playing the game. "Xbox On...go to Titanfall"

Summons753685d ago

So because they don't like it and point out it's faults and how it's a bad game....you know the TRUTH. They clearly didn't play it, great logic /S

Take off the rose colored glasses and see the game as it is, a mediocre rushed game.

kevinsheeks3685d ago

it isn't mediocre at all still a great game put on your glasses and go read some reviews instead of taking one article and trying to push your own agenda

Summons753685d ago

@kevinsheeks

I have played the beta and rented the full game. It's mediocre, it's not a bad game but it's too easy taking no skill to accomplish anything and it's just rehashed boring COD controls. It gets boring after a few hours because you don't get a sense a sense of accomplishment having everything nearly done for you.

I don't need to read reviews because most feedback from sponsored sites is fake and a lot of people are disappointed in it because of the 'making it easy for casuals'.

I'm not saying it's a bad game, it's perfect for the COD crew who don't understand how to play real games and can learn to get better, but because they have poor design choices for that reason it makes it much less than a great game.

Flutterby3685d ago

The lack of interesting modes makes it average at best , and that's ignoring all the other issues such as frame drops ,awful graphics and worst A.I I have ever seen. I really don't understand all the hype , this game will be forgotten within a couple months and all the zone owners will go back to cod and bf.

Pinkdolphinyfg3685d ago

Lmao a bad game. The whole fuxking internet disagrees with you. But thats ok because the media is paid off so its all an illusion. Lol the only person hiding fromthe truth is you my friend. We all know you didn't play the game so shuuut upppp.... Lol

moparful993685d ago

@kevinsheeks Face the facts that this game isn't the world stopping "omg" exclusive that Microsoft has hyped it to be.. Its currently sitting at an 86 on Metacritic..

http://www.metacritic.com/g...

I know a few people that have played the game some love it the rest had meh reactions to it.. There is a lot of shooter fatigue anymore and aside from the Mech/pilot mechanic this game literally does nothing new or exciting.. Once the awe of seeing the Titan fall from space this game becomes tedious very quickly.. If this game had a single player or co op component I would be thrilled about it but an online only competititve shooter that is lacking features and having framerate issues despite "the power of the cloud" is dissapointing..

Gunstar753685d ago

I've been playing games for 30 years and Titanfall is far from mediocre

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3685d ago
EZMickey3685d ago

Titanfall had minimum 3 years in development, that game wasn't rushed. It was a new studio building a new, engine building and a new game- it was badly optimized, not haphazardly put together in an unreasonably short amount of time.

If you open up a studio and get a publisher like EA to fund your game, 3 years is more than reasonable especially considering they're taking on all the financial risk. Any longer and your game just isn't going to earn what it cost to make.

People must seriously get over thinking EA is this literally evil corporation that loves pushing out flawed products almost as much as it loves killing kittens, 'cause at the end of the day we're still left with an extremely playable and highly rated game.

stuna13685d ago

TitanFall was in development for 4 years, the engine is a modified engine, not a new engine. And we're talking the makers of Call of Duty 4 here! At least that is the reason so many were saying why Respawn should automatically be considered trustworthy and infallible. There are thing about the game that weren't achieved that should have been achieved! Especially after all the hype surrounding it, and now there are some out there giving the full picture of how things really are.

DevilishSix3685d ago

I find it concerning that it took 4 years to come up with multiplayer only game with 15 maps and 5 game modes and it has some frame rate issues. I am fans of these developers from their COD days, but the time in development vs the content received doesn't add up. Something happened during development we are not being told. I know Jason West left half way thru development, which makes me wonder if original development on this game was scrapped and they restarted.

Hellsvacancy3685d ago (Edited 3685d ago )

Ouch, it hurt me reading that, someone actually DEFENDING EA?

Besides you lost me when you said Respawn built a new engine, I knew then you don't know what you're talking about

djplonker3685d ago

Titanfall uses a heavily moddified source engine that is from 2004 so it was never going to be a graphical powerhouse or have a high player count like bf4

Surley if titanfall had used frostbite 3.0 then it could have been epic!

Pandamobile3685d ago

Try 2011. It's using the Portal 2 version of Source, not the Half-Life 2 version...

Eddie201013685d ago (Edited 3685d ago )

@Pandamobile

You have seen portal 2 not a graphics powerhouse by no means, In fact Half Life 2 looked much better than portal 2. If you are trying to make an excuse it's a poor one. If you are saying it's updated version (Not a completely new engine in 2011) and you think it still looks sub par, then I would agree. Although compared to portal 2 (A last gen game) Titanfall slightly looks better.

Pandamobile3684d ago

Lol, are you seriously implying that Half-Life 2 looks better than Portal 2?

Christ, some of you guys are seriously out of touch.

Z_-_D_-_33685d ago

I dunno about that one there, Freddy. Don't get me wrong, EA did a good thing scooping up the core CoD team and funding their project, but the way they handled it was just annoyingly seedy, deceptive, and downright dumb on their own part. Their little exclusivity deal with Microsoft was just wrong, and the entire industry knows it. The fans, other developers, media publication, EVERYONE - has voiced their distain with the exclusivity. EA even shot their own damn selves in the foot, losing a massive amount of profit that could have been gained on Playstation platforms.

This in-turn forced Respawn to prioritize the X1 as its flagship version which we all know had botched dev kits thanks to Microsoft along with terrible ES ram. They limited their reach, wasted marketshare, signed a deal behind their backs and f*cked it up for everybody except Microsoft and their fanboys. It's actually pretty hilarious they did all of this to these guys after they had just been stiffed by Activision.

moparful993685d ago

"extremely playable and highly rated game."

First and foremost there were widespread issues logging into the game on launch. Secondly there have been a lot of users claiming framerate issues sometimes dipping into the single digits! Even digital foundry confirmed this.. Third the resolution is only 792. Very very poor for a game dependent on the "Power of the cloud" to run and is a multiplayer only game with 15 maps and 5 play modes.. So much hype and very underwhelming in reality... Oh and as far as "highly rated" its sitting at an 86 on metacritic, thats above average but not "highly rated"...

Pandamobile3685d ago

Christ, what world do you live in where an 86 meta rating isn't considered "highly rated"?

What happens when Infamous: Second Son comes out and lands at an 86? Is that still only going to be "Above average"?

bababrooks3685d ago

Metacritic scores are duff pulled down by people with agendas! The only folk that should comment are the ones that pay and play the game. The word from fellow gamers that have actually played is positive and good times are had by more or else all. The sad thing is many green eyed gamers don't get what upset the false criticism does for individuals that have spent many hours trying to make a game to give guys like you and me enjoyment.

Down with the fanboys....long live the gamers!!!!!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3684d ago
AutoCad3685d ago

Titanfall is an amazing game and despite some of the framerate drop sometimes, it still is one heck of a fun game to play.

Titancrack.

Show all comments (156)
90°

15 Underrated FPS Games You May Want to Try

Popularized by Doom in 1993 and still making video game haters gnash their teeth today, first-person shooter games are the best thing to happen to gamers since pizza rolls. So here are 15 underrated first-person shooter games you may have missed.

Read Full Story >>
ghettogamer.net
Jiub585d ago

Although the late 2000s Turok wasn't my favorite, I would love a new entry. Open world survival with shotguns and dinosaurs. Not sure how we'd get the fusion cannon, but that would be pretty sweet too.

MadLad585d ago

Lol

All of these games are pretty much universally praised. Outside of Timeshift I literally own all of these.

Venoxn4g585d ago (Edited 585d ago )

XIII, The Darkness 2, Far Cry: Blood Dragon, Timesplitters: future perfect, Bulletstorm are awesome games

60°

An ode to Titanfall: The last twitch shooter I'll probably ever enjoy

Windows Central: "Titanfall 1 is being sunset, taken off storefronts by EA. While the servers remain live for now, one has to wonder just how much time it has left. I look back and pay tribute to the last "twitch"-styled shooter I ever truly loved."

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
90°

Respawn Entertainment is Discontinuing Sales of Original Titanfall

Sales for the original Titanfall are being discontinued.
It will be pulled from subscription services on March 1, 2022.

Ethereal866d ago

Physical media. Unfortunately the way games are going these days game servers will eventually be shut down and you can stare at the menu and wish you could play the game again.

littletad865d ago

This is why reading is so important. Nothing to do with digital or physical media. The game, which is online only, is being delisted because of DDOS and other hacker attacks. The case got so bad that only six players in the world log on. For PC. Rather than fix it, they continued to sell the game, broken as it is, and only now just decided to call it quits. But please, go on thinking what you will.

Ethereal864d ago

I'm aware of the DDOS attacks and that this case is not typical. This game would eventually have it's servers shutdown regardless of the current situation so that is a moot point. My comment was in a general sense and that there are instances in which games can be preserved physically when official support ends.

Let's recap your first sentence. I said, "the way GAMES are going these days" indicating a broader stroke than just this game. I agree, reading IS important. I was simply stating the obvious downsides of the digital marketplaces and online only trends in games these days. I could even make the argument that the online only offering which has allowed hacker manipulation has impacted the preservation of this great game. My comment is valid in the general sense and thank you for your permission to continue to think what I will.