110°

PS4 vs Xbox One: The Importance of a High Frame Rate in Games

gamrReview's Zach Frimpong: "My advice to developers is to ensure that 60 frames per second is the goal with every game. Put resolution aside and focus on ensuring that your game runs buttery smooth and in a way that ensures reaction time is not hindered, because graphics age faster than gameplay. Games like Devil May Cry and even Ratchet and Clank strived for 60 frames on reasonably dated hardware, and to be honest, the gameplay in those titles feels a lot smoother and more enjoyable than some recently released titles."

Read Full Story >>
gamrreview.com
Sammy7773694d ago

ofcourse both resolutions and frame rates matter, see Tomb Raider/Thief sales and in the future MGS sales

Edit : Whats with the bubble snatchers?

Bigpappy3694d ago

Frame rate is way more important.

Sammy7773694d ago

resolution is more important than frame rate . Try playing a 720p game at 1080p . Looks like a complete jagfest . Having said that 60 fps is preferrable over 30 fps, but 30 fps is fine too. This is 2014 man , no excuse for a sub 1080p game

Geekman3694d ago (Edited 3694d ago )

No. How many times must I say this. 720p looks FINE. You'll get over so called "amazing" 1080p graphics after a week. You won't have any trouble playing a game at 720p. But at the same time playing a game at 30fps or subfps renders it UNPLAYABLE. You can PLAY a game if it's 720p, 900p, or whatever, because you can TELL what your shooting or jumping on or reading. You CAN'T play a game if it keeps chopping and moving way slower than you would like.

MysticStrummer3694d ago (Edited 3694d ago )

"at the same time playing a game at 30fps or subfps renders it UNPLAYABLE."

I agree with the "sub fps" part, depending on how low it drops, but a 30fps game is certainly not UNPLAYABLE. That's just silly. Some genres do benefit from faster fps more than others though.

gamer78043694d ago (Edited 3694d ago )

Resolution and Frame rates are totally separate things. Of course frame rate is important, much more than resolution. You need a steady framerate, whether its 30 for cinematic game, or 60 for competitive or sports games.

Of course resolution to a certain degree is important, but up converting 720-900p to 1080p isn't nearly as important.

Hicken3694d ago

I really don't see how framerate would matter in a puzzle game. I mean, it'd be nice to have, but what would the advantage be?

Obviously, there are genres that benefit more from a higher framerate than others. But's it's not a necessity across the board, which means it's not important for every game.

N4GJD3694d ago

A game's framerate should always be prioritized over it's resolution. Not only does a higher framerate make a game smoother and more responsive, but it reduces judder and moving images are noticeably less blurry.

60fps/720p > 30fps/1080p

TominatorXX3694d ago

If That's the case then, What about the Fanboys
that say, "Call of Duty Runs at a "always 60 FPS" ?

Show all comments (11)
130°

These Call of Duty games are officially dead as servers go offline

Following the Wii U and 3DS servers being taken offline, Call of Duty Black Ops 2 and Ghosts are officially dead.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
90°

Call of Duty players are playing this game for the last time before it's taken offline

Call of Duty players are jumping into Black Ops 2 for the final time before its Wii U servers go offline for good.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
250°

Xbox backwards compatibility sends old Call of Duty games back into the Top Five | UK Monthly Charts

GTA 5 and Red Dead Redemption 2 leap up due to summer sales

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
shadowT249d ago

Xbox $70 billion bet paid out

fr0sty248d ago

Guess that's what happens when there's no good new games to play...

4Sh0w248d ago (Edited 248d ago )

Well regardless of exclusives, or whatever else there is to play on Xbox or ps, CoD has has still been the top selling game on ps platform since forever also.....so no surprise that the most popular game franchise on any console could easily have a revival due to servers coming back online...this is just credit to xbox backwards compatibility & thats good thing for Xbox gamers.

wiz7191248d ago

@Frosty orrrr maybe it’s a breath of fresh air to be able to go back to the peak of the series .. and it’s beem great lol

mkis007248d ago

It's going to take 10 years for xbox to generate that much profit...

Rhythmattic248d ago

Why worry when they have OS, Server and Background Data in their hands...
Gaming is just the small piece, at the top left in a few K piece jigsaw.

EasilyTheBest248d ago

If you buy a house with cash for 1 million dollars you still own the house. Microsoft don't need to make the money back.

Rhythmattic246d ago

But its not money back, its about how it goes missing.

jznrpg248d ago

Shooters is what Xbox people play most of the time and that’s about it by the numbers and sales of games.

shinoff2183249d ago

Atkeast older gamers nostalgia is good. Jeez.

Jin_Sakai248d ago

Mostly because the new CoD games are garbage. The old games were much better.

Rutaprkl248d ago

Agree 100%. Cod 4, WaW, Black ops 1 & 2, those were the days.

Rhythmattic248d ago

For MP, Unreal tournament , QIII Arena (loved the UT mod) FTW!

RaidenBlack247d ago

Unreal Tournament and Quake III were simply amazing ... CoD's and CoD-likes' rise killed the arena shooter popularity ...
Unreal Tournament 2004 is my favorite in the series.
Didn't enjoy Unreal Tournament III, Quake Champions that much.
Too bad Epic cancelled Unreal Tournament 2014 becoz of Fortnite

Rhythmattic247d ago (Edited 247d ago )

I got hooked on the QIII Urban Terror mod (and my work colleagues I introduced them to)... LAN Sessions at the closing of the doors at work, into the night , sinking beers and eating pizza..... Good times.

thesoftware730248d ago

Wow, good games never get old I guess.

CoD will always be a beast of a franchise, and how awesome is it that you can just boot it up or pop it into your Xbox and play, MS BC is really a neat feature.

CrimsonWing69248d ago

Shows you that backwards compatibility is a worthwhile feature.

1Victor248d ago

@crimson:” Shows you that backwards compatibility is a worthwhile feature.”
I agree it’s worthy at the start of the generation when there’s few new generation games but halfway through the generation it’s not a feature.
Now it’s good that this game is finding a renewed life for its fan but it shows a mayor flaw in new games release when a close decade old game is toppling the charts

CrimsonWing69247d ago

I don't know if I understand what you mean. It's a feature regardless of the time into the generation.

Let's take Armored Core 6 for example. Let's say I'm interested in checking out the previous Armored Core games, sure would be nice if I could play them on my current-gen console.

We're about 3 years into current-gen and old games are hitting in the top 5 for sales charts in the month.

I do get where you're coming from with older games possibly being better than the newer games, but the feature stays the feature. I can only speak for myself, but when there's a lull in game releases or nothing great is out, I like to go back to old titles. It's just nice to not have to have a bunch of consoles out to do so.

I think moving forward it'll be less and less of an issue as like with the PS5 you can access most all of the PS4 games, but I like going back to PS1 and PS2. Would be awesome to kind of make backwards compatibility a prioritized feature moving forward. Hell, Sony was the first to implement it.

Show all comments (26)