150°

'The Witcher 3' dev on 360 and PS3: 'We've been limited for quite some time now'

Examiner: "The Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 held back game developers towards the end of their life cycles. So when the Xbox One and PS4 released, CD Projekt RED found itself liberated. In an exclusive interview with Examiner, Gameplay Designer Andrzej Kwiatkowski describes how the studio feels without such heavy reigns placed on them."

Read Full Story >>
examiner.com
ado9083703d ago

No you haven't. Point and shoot they had a hard time programming for the ps3. Thats why the witcher 2 never made it on the ps3

webeblazing3703d ago

yes they did. a lot of devs stated this. only people that didnt want to believe this were the people who wanted their platform to seem like its the greatest. when did the last consoles came out around '05-06... when the new consoles came out?

ado9083702d ago (Edited 3702d ago )

Then explain why not release the game on the ps3 after stating the complicity of the PS3 yet games like GTA V were released. The can create games at a caliber of the last of us or close to it, and release it exclusively on the ps3 like they did with the 360. I'm not saying the ps3 is the greatest, but it is a greater console last genof the other two in my opinion.

webeblazing3702d ago (Edited 3702d ago )

ado908
im going to state what everybody know. they are pc devs. they are not beat working hard for results that they are not going to get, they seen they wasnt going to get no where from the results on xb360 vs what they was getting from pcs. when the game launched it had the most advance gfx effect. its even hard for ps4 to do supersampling, let alone the the graphical detail and effects. why would they continue, its the same thing just ps3 is a little bit better but compared to pc its too much work for a vision you just dont want.

this time the new console is up to pc standard with gfx effects, but it will soon be in the pass by the end of this year(im not even going to state a lot of pc dev want higher resolution and frame rate). i hate to admit it but no matter what the platform, devs move as a community. even tho consoles isnt as powerful as pc the dev still progress with them no matter how ahead they are. every time a new gen starts for consoles, pc leap frog it with pc gfx, tech, and gameplay. it like a big brother, hes better than you but tells you what to do while telling you to keep up.

im not point the finger at you but a lot of people think that since these devs work on consoles the dont love the graphic fidelity pc give or even like what pcs gives.

candy_mafia3703d ago (Edited 3703d ago )

Yup, understandable they were limited with Xbox 360 for Witcher 2 (PS3 could have handled it, CDPK were under resourced) as 360 was then already 5 year old hardware and peaking like a duck.

But, I'm more interested in the difference's (if any) between PC, Xbox One & PS4 versions. The Witcher 3 looks like a super demanding game, visually and in scope.

Aloren3703d ago

Don't kid yourself, they'd felt limited on ps3 too.

candy_mafia3703d ago (Edited 3703d ago )

I wasn't implying PS3 wasn't limiting to them (don't put words in my mouth), both 360/PS3 probably were.

I'm saying, had CD Projekt the resources at the time of Witcher 2's development, then PS3 could have handled a version of it too.

I wasn't kiddin' myself, you just read into it what you wanted to ;/

MidnytRain3702d ago

candy_mafia

"...they were limited with Xbox 360 for Witcher 2 (PS3 could have handled it..."

I think you can see how this could have been misread...

SixtyNine3703d ago

They can say that now that new gen hardware is available. Otherwise the statement would be, "there's still a lot of untapped potential in the ps3 and 360".

webeblazing3703d ago

i think if the new consoles didnt release it would be pc exclusive like the 1st one

Eldyraen3703d ago

They are PC first (historically anyways)--they have been one of the more vocal companies about last gen weaknesses actually. Witcher 2 on 360 was a solid achievement but not a surprise they wanted more (ps3 had its strengths but still not near as varied as PS4/One apparently are). W2 on the 360 was first real entry to consoles so was a good icebreaker without going for multiplatform development all at once.

I look forward to W3 in general but still plan on going with PC.

Truehellfire3703d ago

If this was any other company I would agree with your statement. However CDPR was one of the few companies stating how underpowered the PS360 were. Even though they got the Witcher 2 running on the 360, they said that they had to do a lot of engine reworking to get it to run properly. I'm sure if the new consoles weren't out yet, CDPR would still not release the Witcher 3 for current gen.

Irishguy953702d ago

CDPR are one of the most trustworthy companies right now. They state exactly what they think. They aren't overhyping the Witcher 3 and are stating exactly what they're trying to achieve with it and exactly what bringing it to open world is changing from W2. Remember Todd howard and all his BS about Skyrim and Oblivion? CDPR never do that.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3702d ago
A_Gamer3702d ago

iust picked up both witcher 1 and 2 on steam for just under 6 bucks, hopefully i can beat them before 3 comes out

110°

The 7 Best Western RPGs: Immersive Adventures

RPGs are often huge, sprawling endeavours. With limited playtime, we have to choose wisely, so here's the best western RPGs available today.

SimpleSlave13d ago

"I started playing games yesterday" the List... Meh!

How about a few RPGs that deserve some love instead?
1 - Alpha Protocol - Now on GOG
2 - else Heart.Break()
3 - Shadowrun Trilogy
4 - Wasteland 2
5 - UnderRail
6 - Tyranny
7 - Torment: Tides of Numenera

And for a bonus game that flew under the radar:
8 - Banishers: Ghosts of New Eden

DustMan13d ago

Loved Alpha Protocol in all it's glorious jank. Great game.

SimpleSlave12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Not only glorious jank, but the idea that the story can completely change depending on what you do, or say, or side with, makes it one of the most forward thinking games ever. The amount of story permutation is the equivalent of a Hitman level but in Story Form. And it wasn't just that the story changed, no, it was that you met completely new characters, or missed them, depending on your choices. Made Mass Effect feel static in comparison.

Alpha Protocol was absolutely glorious, indeed. And it was, and still is, more Next Gen than most anything out there these days. In this regard at least.

Pity.

230°

All the Essential Video Games Everyone Needs To Play At Least Once

Given the medium's wild diversity, this primer of the essential video games everyone should try is a good place to start.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
thorstein37d ago

.... from the 2000s (mostly).

shinoff218336d ago

I can't fk with this list. They missed on alot of games probably before the writers times. Also I know people loved some portal but I was never a fan.

Cacabunga36d ago

Tomb Raider 1
Driver 1
Abe’s Odyssey
FF6
King of Fighters 94
Mortal Kombat OG
LINK 2 the past
Street Fighter 2
Resident Evil 1

Inverno36d ago

Infinite but not the first two games? Witcher 3 but not the first two games?? GTA V but not literally any of the games before it??? Portal 2 but not the first? Also if you're going to play Shadow of The Colossus play the remaster and not the remake. Can't say I disagree with the list but my man it's all over the place.

Name Last Name36d ago

I mean some sequels are objectively better and you don’t need to play the whole series.

Inverno36d ago

But most of these games have a story to follow, sure you can catch up with a YouTube vid but where's the fun in that?

LucasRuinedChildhood36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

A list like this isn't telling you not to play the previous games if you want to. It's just giving you legendary games to play.

But tbh, you don't always have to force yourself to play every entry in a franchise to get to the better ones.

- The vast majority of Witcher 3 players never played the first 2 and had a great time. The first 2 games aren't in the same league.
- The GTA games are self-contained with the odd fun reference. You can easily jump into any of them.
- The Shadow Of The Colossus remake looks and controls better than the original (plus it has a 60fps option while the remaster is just 30fps). New players will enjoy it more.
- Portal 2 is a lot better than Portal 1 and takes the concept much further gameplay-wise. Storywise, Portal 1 is fairly light too. Not that you shouldn't play it but realistically ... you'd love Portal 2 whether you play it or not (at lot of Portal 2 players have never played 1).

Bioshock 1 is the only one I agree with you on simply because it's one the best games of all time and arguably better than Infinite. No other setting like Rapture.

Looking at the list, I'd recommend playing Uncharted 1 before 2 but no doubt, 2 is the legendary one you have to play.

Inverno36d ago

I get it, but that's just my opinion on his opinion. I just think that before you play a sequel you should still play what came before it. Maybe it's just me but i find it fascinating playing through the first game in a series and seeing how it has evolved through its sequels. Like I said I don't disagree with the list, other than SoTC which I strongly believe the remaster of the original should be played above the remake.

AuraAbjure36d ago

Awesome list! Hot take on Fear (and it's hard af expansion Persaus Mandate!) Bioshock Infinite is stellar, so is the Witcher 3 and you nailed it by having Ocarina of Time. So many fantastic games! Gotta play 'em all! Next one on my list is Prey after I beat Dead Space 2 and Splinter Cell Conviction.

Show all comments (11)
80°

The Best Video Game Romances of All Time

Wealth of Geeks explores some of the best gaming romances that have stolen our hearts over the years.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com