570°

Sledgehammer’s Call of Duty is “Next-Gen First”

Speaking with IGN, Activision Publishing’s CEO, Eric Hirshberg, confirmed Sledgehammer’s upcoming Call of Duty game is being developed primarily for next-gen platforms. The news came after last week’s earnings call, during which Activision revealed that Sledgehammer was developing 2014’s Call of Duty game.

“Sledgehammer is approaching this as a next-gen-first development,” says Hirschberg. “Obviously in the console-transition year, anyone who developed a cross-generational game last year had to deal with the fact that the technology of the next-gen platforms was still coming into focus and changing quite a bit during the development process…. Now that we have the next-gen hardware out in the marketplace and solid, that is our primary development.”

megazero123725d ago

and they will still manage to reuse the same textures and assets.

Palitera3725d ago

Ain't it beautiful that the community completely lost hope on them?

Still, ain't it curious that it keeps selling more than almost any game?

Argh!

xHeavYx3725d ago

The sad thing is that, no matter how many things are wrong with COD, they keep making a ton of profit

NarooN3725d ago

Yep, even after so many gamers are well-aware of how bad this series has become, the game sells a bazillion copies every year anyway. It's just madness.

Nocando3725d ago

I am still feeling the burn from buying Ghost. I am ashamed that I have contributed to furthering this god awful franchise.

mewhy323725d ago Show
Akuma073724d ago

And I have contributed to that.....

Not proud of it, not ashamed of it, it is what it is.

alexkoepp3724d ago (Edited 3724d ago )

How about instead of "next-gen first" you go "current generation only, not available on last generation platforms" and use the selling power of COD to stir up a nice wave of PS4 and X1 consoles and help last generation die and current generation flourish?

Who the F is Sledgehammer?

Edit -after reading the article, their solution to COD being stale is to bring in another studio so the other teams have more time to make their titles so you can still push a game every year? Wow, just wow... terrible solution

Just make or lease a new engine already...

Pixel_Enemy3724d ago (Edited 3724d ago )

Here's an idea.. Vote with your wallet. Don't like it? Don't buy it!

I haven't bought a COD since MW2 and I haven't looked back. I don't feel like I am missing out on much either.

LOL_WUT3724d ago

So only ps4 and X1 confirmed? I'm ok with that... ;)

jetlian3724d ago (Edited 3724d ago )

Ghost real issue was perks and killstreaks changes. I still got value from the game. Extinction is better than zombies.

Guess ghost gonna be done by IW,Modern warfare by SH, and black ops by TA

Dee_913724d ago

a lot of people care about textures , reusing old assets, lame story etc.. A lot of people don't. Its like Justin beiber.Very popular, so a lot of people hate it but at the same time a lot of people love it... for what ever reasons..

thereapersson3724d ago

Palitera, comments like yours are the reason why the "interesting" bubble was created.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3724d ago
frostypants3725d ago (Edited 3725d ago )

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1 Part 7

famoussasjohn3725d ago

I wish the games were like Modern Warfare 1, those were the good days of COD.

SaturdayNightBeaver3725d ago

Wait, ghosts was left for sequel right? I don't think we are going anywhere new in the future.. gonna be same shit ghosts 2 , hopefully they dont release on PC and waste my time

escott0133724d ago

Watch, the bad guys will be the Russians again -_-

Retard3725d ago

Iconic series... Die madden! Eek COD!

Crazyglues3724d ago (Edited 3724d ago )

What happen to Trearch I was really hoping to get my hands on Call of Duty Black Ops 27.... Dam.. -_-

.____........___...
.____||......||.......|___||
||.........___||............ ||

Cloudyday713724d ago

By developing for next-gen first it should mean they can optimize the game so that there is visual parity between Xbone and PS4.

Ricegum3724d ago

Or they can continue to allow the PS4 to have the superior versions because it has superior hardware? That sounds more fair.

Gamer19823724d ago

What there basically saying is the same old drivel they been saying for years.. Its all PR BS..

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3724d ago
NYC_Gamer3725d ago

It's time for Activision to build an engine for COD and stop being cheap

porkChop3725d ago (Edited 3725d ago )

Why do you think they're switching to 3 year dev cycles? More time to improve/create engines, and more time to actually innovate. It'll likely be 1 year focused on engine development, and then 2 full years on game development. Sledgehammer's CoD will have been in development for 3 years by the time it comes out, so I'm expecting it to be a decent game.

Btw I agreed with you, they definitely need a new, proper next gen engine to work off of.

Akuma073724d ago

You don't know how it works.

The extra year is more likely to be used for more polish and more time to tweak the Quake 3 engine.

It would take 2-3 years for a dedicated team to complete building a brand new engine from the ground up, it is not a simple thing like you seem to think.

porkChop3724d ago

@Akuma07, when I said "improve/create engines" I meant iterate new engine versions, not entirely new engines built from the ground up. That takes a ton of time that they don't have.

Palitera3725d ago (Edited 3725d ago )

I don't know. Every year their games are getting worse and worse, so if you let THESE teams do a brand new game, it might very be the worst CoD games ever.

After IW cracked, nothing really good was done.

Patrick_pk443725d ago

Are you not forgetting they used the new IW Engine and Havok? The developers are just pure shit at developing anything of quality.

4ShotKing3725d ago

Hopefully this means a new engine for the franchse

matgrowcott3725d ago

More likely that's why Treyarch have been given an extra year for their next game.

Sevir3725d ago

Yeah, MW3-BO2-Ghost....

IW with Raven and Sledgehammer, then Treyarch, then IW with Neversoft and Raven. I was expecting Treyarch but Sledgehammer has been toiling away since MW3 and they are the ones leading the charge.

Next year should be Treyarch, and 2016 should be IW.

USA0073724d ago

That's awful! Was really looking forward to the next Treyarch game this year! They seem to be the only ones able to do competitive gaming right. Ghosts is just ridiculous, how the maps are laid out and gun balance

ichdich3725d ago

Titanfall will be the new addictive fun shooter. CoD sucks! After Ghost I'll never touch that shit again.

WeAreLegion3725d ago

Totally agree. Sadly though, I think COD will be adding titans, jet packs, and wall running to keep up.

ElementX3725d ago

I like Ghost MP. The last CoD game I played was MW3. I don't buy every CoD so the online doesn't get old.

Black-Helghast3725d ago

Ghost is kinda alright. Most people hate on it cause it's cod and its the cool thing to do but I honestly like it a bit. Specially on PS4, dat 1080p is beautiful.

AceBlazer133725d ago

Ghost is shitloads better than MW3, that game was rancid.

Cryptcuzz3724d ago

I have been enjoying CoD Ghosts MP on the PS4 as well. Never had gotten into it with the past games on the PS3, so I too am not fatigued by its gameplay like others have seem to be.

In their next game, I hope they improve how the spawning works. I hate how sometimes you would spawn from a death only to have someone blast you from the back shortly after.

I also hope they have better maps as well. Some of them are okay, but I feel like making maps that are catered to all game play modes is not the way to go. For example, they should have Team Deathmatch specific maps and Domination specific maps, etc.

_FantasmA_3725d ago

Titanfail is COD with robots. They couldn't call it Call of Duty: Mech Warfare because then people wouldn't be suckered into buying it with the COD in the title.

WilDRangeRrfc3724d ago

Pal I have PS4 as you obviously do(or PS3) don't be such a fanboy if it was on PS you would be shouting from rooftops,the fact your talking about it at all tells me your pissed its on MS platforms only!!!
We have great games also so stop contributing to this stupid fanboy fake war it's retarded

qu1ckset3725d ago

It's not like they don't have the money , cod has made them millions!

Show all comments (79)
200°

Players claim Fortnite ruined Call of Duty by letting in more corporate greed

Do you remember what gaming was like before Fortnite entered the gaming space? One of the biggest arguments was about loot boxes. Now we have conversations about crossovers, battle passes, and community outreach.

Read Full Story >>
gamesandwich.com
GoodGuy096d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Idk. Loot boxes did disappear and battle passes and in game purchases are all cosmetic. We get free weapons and maps post launch, any gameplay affecting content. I could care less about all the cosmetics.
I absolutely hated the days where weapons were locked behind a less than 1% chance lootbox pull where it'd take 5+ hours to have enough tokens to do a single pull and lazy remastered/remake maps cost you $15 each wave or $50 for the season pass that you didn't know what you'd get and these maps were only available to those that bought it so you get a smaller pool of players match with.

Tacoboto4d ago

The "good ole days" are actually what drove me away from COD and Halo 3/Reach. Halo 4 becoming a COD-like drove me away from that only a week or so after it launched and I beat its campaign.

It sucked way back then, going a month or two without playing online-shooter-of-the-moment, and then needing to buy a $15 map pack to play with the majority of the population or your favorite playlist. The "community" rejecting Spartan Points in MCC killed that game's support, too. No revenue = no support, plain and simple.

Cacabunga4d ago

That headline could easily be something Spencer could have said 😅 I had to check if it was really an opinion piece

KyRo4d ago

As times gone on, the COD battle pass has got ALOT worse so they can push people to buy the more premium battle pass which itself is a huge rip off and nearly half the price of the base game.

The cosmetics can be fine but they've taken it to far to the point of no return. Why make a military themed game then have rabbits, dinosaurs, cats, rats & z list rappers as skins? You wouldn't add a Lamborghini to a fantasy RPG to replace a horse and you would never see Mario have limb dismemberment because they know what they are. COD is having identity crisis but kids and streamer but then all

franwex4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Call of duty can simply not copy the bad aspects of Fortnite? Or is that too out of this world? Like COD, a realistic shooter-just HAD to have Nicki Minaj running around? Or super heroes?

Inverno4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Exactly! Trends don't all need to be followed. Plus where Fortnite got somewhat better with it's monetization, Acti got worse. Or at least Fortnite has lended itself more to the wacky stuff, and has put more effort and quality into that stuff.

jjb19814d ago

I prefer the battle passes with free maps than the $50 season pass that divided the community. I definitely feel that Fortnite had some influence on CoD having loot boxes with Blackout being introduced in 2018 with Black Ops 4.

PRIMORDUS4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Actually Fortnite bullshit ruined Unreal Tournament. Epic are sellouts and I will never have that shitty store on my PC, fuck them and that shit bag Tim Sweeney. At least the community keeps the games alive, I still play UT2004.

StoneTitan4d ago

I mean cant really blame them for supporting the game that made them the most money and the most people player...ever?

Psychonaut854d ago

Call of Duty ruined Call of Duty. They needed no outside assistance.

Ra30303d ago

100% correct! The makers of Call of Duty ran out of ideas long, long ago so they take ideas from other games like Ghost Recon, Fortnite and any other FPS game hat had success hell CoD remasters maps that they've remastered several times already then charge you again for it. Call of Duty is simply a cut, copy and paste and then put the $70 price on it every year. Activision and now Microsoft has been essentially remastering Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare every year since it was released in 2007 its to the point it's worse than the sports game like the Madden, NBA and others yearly sports franchises.
@Psychonaut85 is spot on "Call of Duty ruined Call of Duty. They needed no outside assistance"!

Show all comments (24)
100°

Massive new COD Black Ops Gulf War leak lifts the lid on loadouts

The Black Ops Gulf War leaks continue with a list of weapon descriptions giving more info on what you can expect from new and returning weapons.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
80°

Call of Duty Players Disappointed by $80 B.E.A.S.T. Glove Bundle Deal

Recently, players of Modern Warfare 3 and Warzone were met with a new bundle featuring the B.E.A.S.T. Glove, inspired by King Kong's armament in the Godzilla x Kong movie. However, the $80 price tag attached to this themed accessory left many Call of Duty fans feeling underwhelmed.

Read Full Story >>
xpgained.co.uk
Kaii12d ago

Morons that allow themselves to be milked continuously by this company is the definition of irony.
Spend more $$ and you'll end up In easier lobbies so you win both ways when ya spend that cash

melons12d ago

Controversy in the COD community feels like it happens within an alternate timeline. Activision will take the piss with something, there will be a momentary fuss about it, and then they will forget about it and carry on anyway. Repeat this cycle literally every year for the rest of time.

Gridknac12d ago

They call that a crack head! Thats what this is really about, its an addiction. People who dont smoke cigarettes look and laugh at the addicts that spend $8-$10 a pack, but they cant help themselves, they are addicted. That same analogy applies perfectly to the whole MT industry. Only an addict that was not thinking clearly would spend this kind of money on something so frivolous. A round of multiplayer provides the same high a person gets from scratching a lotto ticket, or putting money on a sports bet. MT in general need to really be regulated because you have a generation of kids becoming adults who grew up only knowing the MT era of gaming. Its normal to them and they will in turn teach their kids the same by just being a gaming parent and getting their kids involved with them in gaming. Thats why no matter how ridiculous the headlines keep getting out of the MT industry, it never seems to fade or go away.

X-2310d ago

I'm so tired of hearing about what they're doing with this game, its never going to change and it's never going to value the consumer over money, furthermore the people who engage so heavily in the microtransactions I guess allegedly are having a blast and can't wait to do it some more this year when the new version of the game drops.