1050°

How to Double Your DualShock 4 Charge Life

Sick of your DualShock 4's battery? Here's how to get many more game play hours out of your controller.

Read Full Story >>
worldsfactory.net
pheature3751d ago

keep it on the plug and charge?

have 2 pads?

Alexious3751d ago

These are options too, but they come with a cost, obviously.
In the first case, you lose the wireless capability. In the second case, you lose money

Transporter473751d ago

Gaming is a loss of money anyways. I tend to have two controllers for any console I own, so having another controller is a long term investment on something you don't need in the first place. Its entertainment so you're going to lose money either way. Nothing wrong with buying another controller.

CuddlyREDRUM3751d ago

Transporter - you realize that makes no sense?

Entertainment costs money, so you should buy an extra controller anyway? That is like saying you may as well buy a spare TV for your living room, because you already bought one.

paidadvertiser3751d ago

He said you're going to lose money on something that isn't a necessity in life, which entertainment isn't. He's simply saying, you already lost money on something you don't need, so there isn't much harm in losing a little more. Gaming isn't an actual investment at all or necessary in order to live, so there isn't a return of any kind. Everything he said makes perfect sense. If money is a priority for you over entertainment, that's pretty illogical or just impossible if you already own a 400 dollar toy. If you can't understand such a basic statement, then I'd have to just assume your parents pay for your entertainment and they never explained that it isn't an asset in life.

abzdine3751d ago (Edited 3751d ago )

isn't it just a matter of exchanging PS3 battery and PS4 battery?
i personaly always have it plugged to micro USB directly from PS4 while playing

pheature3750d ago

where are you loosing money?
buy purchasing another joypad?

we are all not loners :p

Orange3750d ago

In the second case, if your laptop is nearby you can charge via the USB port on the laptop.

Pixel_Enemy3750d ago

Yeah, I have a charge dock and two controllers so when one dies I switch to the other. This is really a non issue for me. I don't think there would be an instance where I would need to use both (two player) for more than 8 hours.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3750d ago
GarrusVakarian3751d ago (Edited 3751d ago )

I bought a 3 meter USB to micro USB cable for like £3 so i can charge while i play, no more having to sit really close to my TV to charge my controller with the super short cable that comes with the PS4.

DeadMansHand3751d ago

Me too. Honestly, before I did though I never had the controller die on me. 7 hours straight is a pretty serious gaming session. I usually put 3-4 in then either get up to get blood flowing or eat. I put the controller on charger and it was good to go in an hour or so.

BattleTorn3750d ago

I will never play with my controller plugged in. never.

SSJBen3751d ago

1) We're in 2014 and we're supposed to go back to having our controllers wired? Then at the same time gamers wants to bask in future technologies?

2) 2 pads makes sense yes and that's a solution. But when you look at the DS4 costing $60, having poor battery life and mediocre rubber on the analog sticks, that's a stupid investment. The DS3 I bought as an extra in 2008 still works fine today with no cosmetic damaages. Don't see that happening with the DS4 in 2018.

Concertoine3751d ago

i agree, but i think the rubber feels fine, its the battery that just feels inexcusable and we shouldnt have to compensate for it.

dsswoosh3751d ago

The battery option like what is used on the XB1 controller is still the better solution to wireless controllers -

1 - You never need to plug your controller in, no cables. Ever.

2 - You have one set of batteries on charge while you play and swap them over when needed.

Rechargeable batteries and a charger are cheap as chips.

Also, the XB1 controller lasts about 50 hours on a single charge. Meaning you only need swap them over once per week or more.

Gremdude3751d ago

Nobody wants to swap batteries. That is so 1995. And rechargeable batteries suck. They do not last 50 hours. IN other words, everything you said is inaccurate. Well at least you are making yourself happy with your purchase of that Xbox One! There is that!

mwjw6963751d ago

dsswoosh is about right. 50 hours of charge on my brand new Eneloop batteries.

@Gremdude
You want to swap $10 batteries or a $60 controller?

Use shit rechargeable/charger get shit use out of them. I already have to have them for my XP500. So this does not affect me or anyone else with half a brain.

nukeitall3751d ago (Edited 3751d ago )

@Gremdude:

"Nobody wants to swap batteries. That is so 1995. And rechargeable batteries suck."

And playing tethered to a cable is not 1995 on the DS4 cause you ran out of battery after only 6-7 hours?

That 6-7 hours will reduce to 4-5 hours in about a year.

That said, the Xbox One controller do have a play and charge kit for $20, and it works just like the DS4, but with a long charge cord.

If convenience is 1995, I will take that!

G20WLY3751d ago

Look, I love gaming as much as anyone else here. But if you spend more than 7 hours per session playing games, you should seriously consider reassessing the way you live your life.

Moreover, if you decide that IS how you want to live your life, I would suggest an additional pad is a negligible additional cost.

Volkama3751d ago (Edited 3751d ago )

The One controllers do actually last a ridiculous amount of time on a set of AAs. It was about 3 weeks of heavy use before I had to swap out the ones it came with.

But the best solution (imo) is a charging dock to just leave the controller (or battery pack) on between sessions. That's available for both consoles, and takes battery life issues out of the equation.

T23750d ago

Who doesn't want two controllers? don't people have real friends anymore? and no AA batteries are not in any way a better solution. I went through 8 pairs of rechargeable lithium bats in about four years of x360 use... meanwhile my 4 ds3 all still work perfectly

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3750d ago
ITPython3751d ago

It would be really cool if the DS4 took 18650 li-ion batteries. Not only could they be charged via USB just as the battery is now, but 3400mAh 18650's are widely available right now.

Although it probably wouldn't be too difficult to drill a little hole in the back of the controller and run the battery wires out to an external case which attached to the back of the controller and housed a battery such as an 18650 (or any other 3.6v li-ion battery).

If my controller ever kicks the bucket, I may do some experimenting on it. As a small 18650 case on the back running vertically wouldn't affect my hand placement on the controller at all.

MrPoopyPants3751d ago

OMG! Ok people here's an idea, after your'e done playing it for the day, put your PS4 on low power standby mode and plug your controller in. Not only will your controller now be fully charged, your PS4 will be completely updated! I know guys, it's hard to use that thing in your head sometimes. It's ok.

leogets3750d ago

I know right... what's wrong with people

SmielmaN3751d ago

I bought the extra controller at the time I bought the system (along with a game). I learned from the PS3 that I kill my controllers and need another one to tag in every now and then haha.

3750d ago
360ICE3750d ago (Edited 3750d ago )

None of which actually increase the battery life.

Anyway, I actually think the battery life in DS4 is a minor annoyance. DS3's battery life was really awesome, and I wasn't expecting DS4 to be that much worse.

Gamer19823750d ago

2 pads was my answer for ps3 and PC and will be for ps4. Though you can get a pack that attaches to the back already that more than doubles its charge.

Pro Racer3750d ago (Edited 3750d ago )

That's good to know. All you have to do is swap the battery and disable that useless light and you're set!

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 3750d ago
karamsoul3751d ago

I just wish Sony devs would find some way to make it possible to turn that annoying controller light off. :P

Transporter473751d ago

Don't point it on your face ? lol. It never bothers me when I play since i sit, usually the light shines down or forward.

Deadpoolio3751d ago

People with cheap ass Tvs cry about the glare...Either that or they are sitting a foot away from it. Never noticed it myself since I don't have a cheap costco or Dynex TV and I sit about 10 feet away from it like your supposed to

neoandrew3751d ago (Edited 3751d ago )

But why the hell he must use if he don't want to use it, just simple as that?

Not providing such feature it just silly, it only drains the battery, coz sony say they know better than you, what you want.

The battery size is also a joke, the ds3 battery work near 2 times longer!

Srly what were they thinking? Have someone any valid logical point?

Alexious3751d ago

Never bothered me as well. Then again, I play with my monitor and it's obviously above the level of my DS4.

UnHoly_One3751d ago

You don't have to point it at your face for it to be annoying. I play in a dimly lit room and it's super annoying when it lights my crotch up like I have a spotlight on it.

And I don't know how much the light affects the battery life, but every little bit counts. I've now owned 5 wireless controllers, (wavebird, ds3, ds4, XB 360, XB1), and the DS4 has the most pathetically short battery life ever.

I used to regularly run my DS3 dead in one gaming session, and it lasted literally twice as long as a DS4. It's REALLY bad.

And it just makes me love my replaceable Xbox batteries all the more.

MysticStrummer3751d ago

"it's super annoying when it lights my crotch up like I have a spotlight on it."

That's some bizarre reasoning there, and quite a stretch to find something to whine about. Shorter battery life, glare on the monitor, or too much light in a dark room are valid reasons to complain about the light. Lighting up your own crotch, which you really shouldn't be spending too much time looking at anyway, isn't much of a reason.

But, you should be able to turn that light off if you want to.

DragonKnight3751d ago

It's an LED light for goodness sake, it's not draining the battery as much as you think. I do agree that there should be an option to turn it off though, only because it's pointless to have an unnecessary power drain on the controller, no matter how small it is.

Boody-Bandit3751d ago

I've played a couple hundred hours on the PS4 with the DS4 and I never even notice the light being even on.

Volkama3751d ago

Lights bug me. I play in a dark room, and any light source besides the TV is noticable. It's not a "cheap-ass TV", it's an expensive high-quality home AV setup.

The DS4 should let you turn the light off (and really shouldn't have the light in the first place, there are more elegant solutions).

The consoles themselves shouldn't light up either.

And the Kinect, that might be the most annoying of all as it is a requirement that you have it by the TV.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3751d ago
moujahed3751d ago

Sony specifically said they left it up to the game developers to make that option.

ThatEnglishDude3751d ago

I sit about 8ft away from the TV and don't even see the reflection. If I hold my hand against the light and gradually move it away, it stops showing on my palm about 3-4ft away, so the range really isn't that distracting at all.

kaiserfranz3751d ago

I agree, it surely seems an overblown issue to me.

dsswoosh3751d ago ShowReplies(3)
ITPython3751d ago

The light itself doesn't bother me while playing, but it is probably sucking down at least 100mA of juice, which even if the light was the only thing being used on the controller that is 10 hours till the battery goes 100% dead.

I have absolutely no need for the light, and should be able to turn it off to get a few extra hours of battery juice.

Also while we can turn the speaker volume 100% down, the little amplifier inside the controller (which works for the speaker and the headphone jack) is still on, which may be the biggest reason for the short battery life.

Options to turn off as much or little as we want is the best solution for everybody.

kaiserfranz3751d ago

This is an intelligent comment, Sony would do great if they let us switch off the lights and the speaker.

BABY-JEDI3751d ago

I like the light. It reminds me that I have a controller in my hand.
; P
LoL

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3751d ago
Why o why3751d ago (Edited 3751d ago )

The winner, ;)

Its annoying sony couldn't use a more efficient battery to at least match the ds3. I'm not even sure if locking off the light will put it on par with the ds3......seems I underappreciated the ds3 in regards to battery life. I hope they make a revised version with a more stronger battery.

wsoutlaw873751d ago

if you want a version with a stronger battery the just do what the article says and replace the battery, its just a battery.

Alexious3750d ago

It seems very likely, considering the complaints.
Also, would probably guarantee them a lot of new controllers sold.

Relientk773751d ago

I have 2 controllers, if one dies I'll just switch

guitarded773751d ago

That's how I roll too. The only system I have an issue with is the Wii U... just one gamepad, and it bleeds juice. If they'd ever come out with a standalone gamepad, I'd buy a second one of them too. If the price isn't too high.

SaffronCurse3751d ago

Question, What if the WIIU gamepad breaks since they don't sell them individually.

guitarded773751d ago

@ SaffronCurse

I have no idea... I guess you would have to call Nintendo Customer Support and see what your options would be.

MysticStrummer3751d ago

Yeah it's good to have two controllers for those games that allow local co-op or competitive multiplayer, and you can always have one charging as you use the other.

Adolph Fitler3751d ago

How can the light on the controller be annoying???? It points the opposite way to your face & EYEBALLS......And you'd have to be looking down at it notice, instead of looking up at your screen actually playing your game....
It's not exactly a f^cking strobe light!!!!!
I've been absolutely hooked on just playing NFS:Rivals on my PS4 & I have been sadly ignoring my 6-7 other games (although I've also indulged in the brilliant Resogun), & whether I play in the day or at night with all lights off, the controller light HAS NEVER inhibited my gameplay or even caught my notice whilst I'm engaged in a game...
The only feature on the controller I've noticed that is kind of off putting (in a good way), is the speakers in the controller & when suddenly voices sound like they are right next to you in KZ:SF or the like....I absolutely love that feature, even though it takes some getting used to at first...
But, the new controller is THE BEST controller I've ever laid hands on, & is a big part of the reason Sony will most likely dominate this gen. The controller feels absolutely brilliant in hand & although NOTHING can be perfect, the DS4 is getting close to that, & the only real area I can fault it, is the battery life is substantially less impressive than the DS3 & 360 controllers. But, they last long enough, being that they can go for a 8-10hr heavy gaming session.. So, put it on charge after every session, & if you play for longer than 8-10hrs at a time, THEN SEEK PROFESSIONAL HELP.

UnHoly_One3751d ago

I can't get 6 hours out of either of my DS4's. I wish I could get the 8-10 you are talking about.

MysticStrummer3751d ago

"I can't get 6 hours out of either of my DS4's"

Try spending less time looking at your own crotch and more time gaming.

DragonKnight3751d ago

@Mystic: Lol, you're never going to let him live that one down are you?

UnHoly_One3751d ago

If you saw my crotch you'd be staring at it, too.

It's magnificent.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3751d ago
Show all comments (113)
230°

Tomb Raider Remastered just quietly censored one in-game detail

Tomb Raider 1-3 Remastered players are ticked off by the game’s most recent patch, which censors in-game pin-up posters of Lara Croft.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbible.com
rlow16h ago

This is why gaming is screwed. When people change things to fit someone’s agenda, it’s a slippery slope downhill.

Christopher5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Even if that agenda is of the developer? Way to remove developer rights.

***One player called it a “huge problem with modern games,” saying they can now be “ruined AFTER people buy them”.***

The level of drama. Yes, I recall sitting there for more hours than I did anything else in the game. These two pinups are the core of the game, after all!

coolbeans4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

rlow1's cringe catastrophizing aside, I do think developers *ought* to strive to maintain an original work to the best of their ability. The language of a "remaster" tacitly implies that - for good or ill - what's being resold is what fans remember but better.

Profchaos4h ago

Games can be ruined after purchasing them yeah we know this not from this but from GTA IV which had half it's radio content patched out due to licensing expirations and to me that was a huge deal.

This pin up poster is a bit of nonsense but the whole argument of modern games can be ruined post launch is Absol true.

DedicatedDark3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

It's not their work to censor. They are incharge of restoration & remastering the work, not overwriting it.

Barlos2h ago

It's not the agenda of the developer though, they're pandering and trying to increase their ESG score.

Way to support censorship...

victorMaje2h ago

It’s not the end of the world for sure, but I understand the hate towards this kind of change. I believe it’s also a matter of principle.

Imagine a Picasso painting being restored & the restorer deciding there aren’t enough strokes, or some lines aren’t straight enough or curved enough…not sure it would/should sit well with people.

Have all original devs signed off on this change? Even if it’s the case, are we saying older gamers are better mentally equipped to process what was there than current gamers, hence the change?

Enough time ago the case was made that games are an art form. We’re supposed to have won that case.
So which is it? Are games art or not?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2h ago
Eidolon2h ago

Hasn't this been happened for over a decade since remasters? I can't see that it's any worse now. Maybe if Sweet Baby starts getting their hands on remasters we will definitely have a problem.

Rebel_Scum5h ago

tbh I dont see something like this as censorship. Does anyone else not find it strange for someone to stick pin ups of themsleves in a locker room?

Now of it was a pin up of some half naked firefighters it might make sense as Lara might like that, and if they removed that I would cry censorship. But removing pin ups of the main character, yeah I get it.

Barlos2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

It's a game, and they were placed there for the audience. It's not real life. If it was, she wouldn't have fought a T-Rex now would she?

Yes, it's censorship but it's a bit less in your face. If they were in the original game, then they should have been in the remasters. It's bad enough that they have that ridiculous unnecessary warning at the start, but then they start removing things post launch. I don't care how small the change, they shouldn't be doing it. It's nothing but ESG pandering but in a subtle way.

Rebel_Scum47m ago

Look bro, if you have pictures of yourself naked on a bear skin rug up in your house let me tell you, its not normal.

SimpleDad1h ago

By the year 2030, this remaster collection will totally be changed and censored. Probably will remove Lara as a playable character. It's ridiculous. Glad that my family didn't buy this.
I still have Tomb Raider 2 PS1 as a memory.

CobraKai1h ago

It’s mentioned in the article, and it’s a point i 100% agree with, it’s the fact that they can censor a game after you buy it. That’s total bullshit.

Killer2020UK52m ago

Whilst it's an overreaction to say this has "ruined" the game, it's still problematic that this has happened post launch and for many, post-purchase.

I don't want someone to change a product for the worse after I've bought it. The same goes for implementing micro transactions after reviews.

I wonder why they did this? Nobody was kicking up a fuss as far as I'm aware.

maykhausonninh45m ago

Nobody was kicking up a fuss as far as I'm aware.

Show all comments (16)
100°

Final Fantasy III Pixel Remaster Review – You Are Your Job, Apparently

Gary Green said: In a time where an enhanced, 3D remake of Final Fantasy III already exists, it’s hard to argue that Final Fantasy III Pixel Remaster is the definitive version we were expecting. With Final Fantasy III already being the last in the series to be translated and make its way west, this is something of a slap in the face for the fans. Still, let’s not be disheartened. There may be many shortfalls in this edition of Final Fantasy III, however there’s no denying that this classic JRPG still holds some nostalgic value, even if it struggles to break away from its original hardware limitations.

Read Full Story >>
pslegends.com
FACTUAL evidence6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

It’s funny I’m seeing these articles about pixel remaster, and I just platinumed 1-4 within 8 days lol. I’ve been on FF5 for about a week now. Let’s just say 5 was the start of FF having content like crazy. I should have the plat within 2-3 days.

70°

Warframe's Protea Prime Access launches on all platforms on May 1st, 2024

"Digital Extremes are today very happy and proud to announce that Warframe’s next highlightly anticipated Prime form launches soon with Protea Prime Access arriving on all platforms on May 1st, 2024." - Digital Extremes.