1200°

Xbox One's Driver Update To Bring 10% Performance Boost, Devs Were Speechless With PS4 8GB GDDR5 RAM

"NeoGAF member and industry insider thuway is back with more information, especially clarifying the Xbox One driver update mentioned earlier this week. According to thuway, it seems that a 10 percent performance boost should be available at the very least."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
ThatCanadianGuy5143764d ago ShowReplies(15)
Agent_hitman3764d ago

That 8GB GDDR5 inside ps4 is insane. If Developers could max it out, the resolution could go beyond 1080p

AndroidVageta3764d ago

Are you being sarcastic or do you really know nothing about what memory does?

windblowsagain3764d ago

Exactly android.

Ram - textures, game assets.

But GPU Power is the most important thing in any games console or PC.

It's the thing that divides us, that binds us, sorry was into the matrix just then.

Heck you can run BF4 @ 1080p @ medium/high settings at 45-60fps with an ati 6870./

hellvaguy3764d ago

@agent

ps4 can maybe hang with low and then higher 1080p settings down the road. Doutful will ever see ultra settings and zero chance of 4k. Other components like the cpu will cause the bottleneck to prevent 4k from ever happening.

Agent_hitman3764d ago

OH yeah you're right about that. Next gen hardwares have bottleneck that is the CPU and it's clockspeed.

Eonjay3764d ago

Thats why efforts are being made to push more and more CPU related activities onto the GPU.

This may allow for 4k gaming one day. Parallel processing is the future.

kneon3764d ago

Well they could both do 4k games now, as long as they are relatively simple. The problem is that neither box shipped with hdmi 2 so they are limited to 24 fps.

Death3764d ago

By pushing CPU functions to the GPU it will not increase resolution, it's the opposite. It's taking GPU resources away to help the weaker CPU.

Eonjay3764d ago

@Death
I understand what you are saying but thats not how it works. The concept is that there are certain operations that the GPU does that don't utilize the GPU at anywhere near 100%. During execution of these operations, you can have the GPU calculating things such as physics. It doesn't take anything away from the graphics being processed. It merely allows unused resources to be assigned CPU tasks.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3764d ago
hkgamer3764d ago

Not a tech guy at all. But I am guessing devs will concentrate more on using more cores than using more gpu ram.. Not . Tech guy at all and have a few pints down me

Eonjay3764d ago

If I were developing on the Xbox my primary concern would be maximizing the utility of the memory. If I were developing on the PS4 my goal would be to maximizing the utility of the GPU.

Why:
1. Xbox One has to master ESRam to overcome DDR3 bottleneck.
2. PS4 has to master Computer to fully utilize the power of its GPU.

Beastforlifenoob3763d ago

GPU is way, way, way, way more important then the CPU when playing games (99% of the time). Without a proper GPU it doesnt matter how good your CPU is it will lag, even if you had 32 cores running at 8ghz it will still lag if you dont have proper GPU. Infact the reason why SONY threw away conventinal ram out of the window and changed it to unified graphical ram and a lower power cpu they could get far greater FPS.

Gazondaily3764d ago

And it will be for the rest of its life-cycle. No amount of optimisation will ever result in it surpassing the PS4, it will only just match it (if that).

BALLBAGS3764d ago

@septic it will never match the ps4,no amount of optimisation can make up for the difference in ram, weaker GPU and CPU.

you have to remember Sony will be optimising the driver's for the ps4 also that's how console cycles work.

regardless Microsoft have a back catalogue that can make up for the weaker hardware, that's all I care about.. the games

windblowsagain3764d ago

Seriously septic, match it?

xboxone will never match PS4, it's just not possible.

There is a very big gulf gpu/ram wise, compute is also much higher on PS4.

That's not saying there isn't or won't be good looking games on xb1.

Both consoles will get better driver wise, and programs that run on them will get better and use less resources.

But I've played all the top titles on PC.

Imo graphics wise.

CRYSIS3,BF3,BF4,KILLZONESF.

As for racing games. PC,DRIVECLUB. Look the best graphically.

Gazondaily3764d ago (Edited 3764d ago )

@windblowsagain

Yeah what I meant was, a game could potentially run identically on both consoles but this would be owing to the developers not the hardware.

The X1 will never match it, I agree. Sorry for the confusion.

JodyCones3764d ago

The PS4 will always be more powerful on paper. It's games will look better in the long run. And of course they'll both get better. But it's no argument which one is more powerful.

Death3764d ago

Theoretical power is useless. The deciding factor on consoles is always the lowest common denominator. In the long term, only first party games will benefit from any hardware differences. The first wave of software is hardly representative of each systems potential.

Look at the first couple gens of games on the PS3. Not even close to what we seen at the end of the PS3's life cycle. The Xbox One is the more complex system this time around. It has more ground to make up. Both systems will see improvement over the next few years, but the Xbox One has more room to grow since it will take more time to master.

MorePowerOfGreen3764d ago (Edited 3764d ago )

"weaker CPU" ???

You trolls believe that made up BS LOL. XB1 having a stronger CPU was bugging some PS4 troll so he made up that BS and tried to spread it around. He spun XB1 using more resources due to XB1 doing much more than PS4 at any given time.

Clearly this news/rumor is bugging the sh!t out of PS4 fans. Just enjoy your PS4, dam. Is there games to play or something?

This local spec war is moot, XB1 will be using cloud compute and PS4 will never be able to catch up to XB1.

Now 50% more powerful is fact? Despite devs saying they are basically the same power. One guy lies about resource use of the consoles and suddenly the PS4 CPU is more powerful? LOL

XB1 is a all around more powerful platform, PS4 would crash then melt if it tried to do what XB1 is doing all at once. Boasting GPU capability then claiming the PS4 is more powerful all around because of it is silly.

So sick of hearing about the PS4's gddr5, XB1 has more RAM bandwidth and a better CPU. If Sony has the better(clocked) CPU they would have been boasting about it. PS4's case is too small for things like that.

Utalkin2me3763d ago (Edited 3763d ago )

@Death

My goodness guy, you're taking the cake today. It took longer for the Ps3 to hit its potential due to it's architecture. Dev's was having a hard time with the cell and how it was designed.

But both X1 and PS4 have x86 architecture so first release of games on both systems is fairly representative of the gap and it will be that way the rest of this generation. Hence why all the multiplatform games are lower resolution on X1.

MysticStrummer3763d ago

@Death

"The deciding factor on consoles is always the lowest common denominator. In the long term, only first party games will benefit from any hardware differences."

…except that multiplats already show a PS4 advantage. Last gen PS3 was more powerful but harder to work with. 360 sold more until nearly the end so there was no real incentive for multiplat devs to utilize the Cell properly.

This gen, the better selling PS4 is both more powerful and easier to develop for. Some devs will no doubt still go for parity though.

DoesUs3763d ago

@Green Ok, step away from the computer and get some fresh air. $100 more for an inferior machine! OUCH! XB1 the more powerful huh? Which titles are you playing? AC4? BF4? COD? just to keep you upto date. I'm afraid yes, devs get more out of the PS4 CPU than the XB1's, they also get around 50% more from the GPU and the superior memory setup has them smiling from ear to ear 8) YOWSERS!!!!!

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3763d ago
iiwii3764d ago

Well, even if that's true, still good news for those who decided to buy the MS system. Congrats, because it should have been able to do more than what we have seen so far. Happy gaming.

bobsmith3764d ago

ur paying way more than 100 dollars for ur kinect lol

Death3764d ago

It makes up for that 50% more power that is so hard to see.

GTgamer3764d ago

Yeah because all games are native 1080p on PS4 except BF4 yup that %50 power is soooooo hard to see/s
I bet money Watch dogs Destiny The Division and witcher 3 will be 1080p on the PS4 and some won't on the X1 count on it.

Hercules1893763d ago

In my eyes resolution is just a small part of what makes a game look good. Are they going to take away the realistic lighting system, are they going to take away the smooth textures, if not then 900p or even 720p doesnt bother me really.Which would you say looks better super mario bros at 4K or Ryse at 900p.

GTgamer3763d ago

@hercules
Your comparison makes no sense Mario a cartoon style game next to Ryse a game dedicated to looking realistic :/ also Ryse fps performance is lacking, and I'm all for gameplay over Resolution but were talking about power in a console so when one game runs at 1080p on one console and lower on another console then don't act like you don't see a difference in power.

lawgone3763d ago

Thanks for that intelligent comment @bobsmith.

FRAKISTAN3764d ago

Xbone can never catchup with the PS4's GDDR5 RAM, you guys shold remeber Sony's firmware updates are very very powerful.

Look at the current FW and the original 1.5 of the PS3 and you will know

KillerByte233764d ago (Edited 3764d ago )

firmware update's so powerful it has a risk of bricking your console

Utalkin2me3764d ago

Look at MS Track record, all it takes is just play the machine to brick it.

See how silly that is? Two can play that game, so maybe you should chill on trolling.

PFFT3764d ago (Edited 3764d ago )

Ive never hard a problem with my PS updates. Something tells me those bricked systems were user error and nothing more.

Show all comments (236)
50°

How to recruit Lam in Eiyuden Chronicle: Hundred Heroes

Lam is among the 120 characters available for recruitment in Eiyuden Chronicle: Hundred Heroes. While she is one of the many straightforward recruits, a known bug may prevent players from recruiting her if certain conditions are met. Despite developers’ assurances of fixing the bug, some early access players still encounter issues with recruiting Lam despite attempting the standard method.

Read Full Story >>
infinitestart.com
290°

Tomb Raider Remastered just quietly censored one in-game detail

Tomb Raider 1-3 Remastered players are ticked off by the game’s most recent patch, which censors in-game pin-up posters of Lara Croft.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbible.com
rlow19h ago

This is why gaming is screwed. When people change things to fit someone’s agenda, it’s a slippery slope downhill.

Christopher9h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Even if that agenda is of the developer? Way to remove developer rights.

***One player called it a “huge problem with modern games,” saying they can now be “ruined AFTER people buy them”.***

The level of drama. Yes, I recall sitting there for more hours than I did anything else in the game. These two pinups are the core of the game, after all!

coolbeans7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

rlow1's cringe catastrophizing aside, I do think developers *ought* to strive to maintain an original work to the best of their ability. The language of a "remaster" tacitly implies that - for good or ill - what's being resold is what fans remember but better.

Profchaos7h ago

Games can be ruined after purchasing them yeah we know this not from this but from GTA IV which had half it's radio content patched out due to licensing expirations and to me that was a huge deal.

This pin up poster is a bit of nonsense but the whole argument of modern games can be ruined post launch is Absol true.

DedicatedDark6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

It's not their work to censor. They are incharge of restoration & remastering the work, not overwriting it.

Barlos5h ago

It's not the agenda of the developer though, they're pandering and trying to increase their ESG score.

Way to support censorship...

victorMaje5h ago

It’s not the end of the world for sure, but I understand the hate towards this kind of change. I believe it’s also a matter of principle.

Imagine a Picasso painting being restored & the restorer deciding there aren’t enough strokes, or some lines aren’t straight enough or curved enough…not sure it would/should sit well with people.

Have all original devs signed off on this change? Even if it’s the case, are we saying older gamers are better mentally equipped to process what was there than current gamers, hence the change?

Enough time ago the case was made that games are an art form. We’re supposed to have won that case.
So which is it? Are games art or not?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5h ago
Eidolon5h ago

Hasn't this been happened for over a decade since remasters? I can't see that it's any worse now. Maybe if Sweet Baby starts getting their hands on remasters we will definitely have a problem.

Rebel_Scum8h ago

tbh I dont see something like this as censorship. Does anyone else not find it strange for someone to stick pin ups of themsleves in a locker room?

Now of it was a pin up of some half naked firefighters it might make sense as Lara might like that, and if they removed that I would cry censorship. But removing pin ups of the main character, yeah I get it.

Barlos5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

It's a game, and they were placed there for the audience. It's not real life. If it was, she wouldn't have fought a T-Rex now would she?

Yes, it's censorship but it's a bit less in your face. If they were in the original game, then they should have been in the remasters. It's bad enough that they have that ridiculous unnecessary warning at the start, but then they start removing things post launch. I don't care how small the change, they shouldn't be doing it. It's nothing but ESG pandering but in a subtle way.

Rebel_Scum3h ago

Look bro, if you have pictures of yourself naked on a bear skin rug up in your house let me tell you, its not normal.

jambola2h ago

I wasn't aware censorship was based on what made sense to you

Rebel_Scum2h ago

Likewise, what a stupid comment.

jambola2h ago

I agree
Your comment was pretty stupid

Rebel_Scum1h ago

I never said censorship is based on what I say dumbass. Just because I dont see this as censorship doesnt mean I’m saying others cant.

How about you come at me with your opinion rather than snarky comments with no thought on the matter.

SimpleDad4h ago

By the year 2030, this remaster collection will totally be changed and censored. Probably will remove Lara as a playable character. It's ridiculous. Glad that my family didn't buy this.
I still have Tomb Raider 2 PS1 as a memory.

jambola2h ago

Those shorts are a little revealing
Should probably make them snow pants

Barlos2h ago

They'll probably make her trans

CobraKai4h ago

It’s mentioned in the article, and it’s a point i 100% agree with, it’s the fact that they can censor a game after you buy it. That’s total bullshit.

Killer2020UK4h ago

Whilst it's an overreaction to say this has "ruined" the game, it's still problematic that this has happened post launch and for many, post-purchase.

I don't want someone to change a product for the worse after I've bought it. The same goes for implementing micro transactions after reviews.

I wonder why they did this? Nobody was kicking up a fuss as far as I'm aware.

maykhausonninh3h ago

Nobody was kicking up a fuss as far as I'm aware.

Show all comments (26)
100°

Final Fantasy III Pixel Remaster Review – You Are Your Job, Apparently

Gary Green said: In a time where an enhanced, 3D remake of Final Fantasy III already exists, it’s hard to argue that Final Fantasy III Pixel Remaster is the definitive version we were expecting. With Final Fantasy III already being the last in the series to be translated and make its way west, this is something of a slap in the face for the fans. Still, let’s not be disheartened. There may be many shortfalls in this edition of Final Fantasy III, however there’s no denying that this classic JRPG still holds some nostalgic value, even if it struggles to break away from its original hardware limitations.

Read Full Story >>
pslegends.com
FACTUAL evidence9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

It’s funny I’m seeing these articles about pixel remaster, and I just platinumed 1-4 within 8 days lol. I’ve been on FF5 for about a week now. Let’s just say 5 was the start of FF having content like crazy. I should have the plat within 2-3 days.

MrBaskerville23m ago

The game being an accurate represantation of the original was not a slap in the face to the fans. The 3D remasters looked like ass (visually) tbh.