580°

Marvel Games Are Disappearing From Steam, PSN, and Xbox Live

Ricky writes, "Gamers took notice early this morning after a NeoGAF user pointed out that the High Moon Studios’ adaptation of Marvel Comics’ Deadpool had conspicuously disappeared off every major digital gaming platform; Steam, Playstation Network, and Xbox Live are all missing the Merc with a Mouth’s latest video game outing, which received less than stellar reviews when it launched earlier this year. But that’s hardly a reason to drop a game from every digital network imaginable, so what happened?"

Read Full Story >>
gameinformer.com
Godmars2903761d ago

DISNEY!!

On the other hand, by review scores and sales is anyone really going to miss this game? And those who do doesn't either already own it or can buy a physical copy?

PeaSFor3761d ago

they better not touch my Marvel themed tables in Zen Pinball 2

*Shake both fists in the air*

rambi803761d ago

*In best "Dan VS" inpression*

DISNEEEEY!!!!!!!!

Larry L3761d ago

This is not a Disney thing, I know that for sure. I've personally had these exact issues with whatever Marvel's digital entertainment group is called YEARS ago with multiple titles, long before the Disney deal happened.

The first time they did it and it affected me was with MARVEL Ultimate Alliance 2 DLC. I got the game when it came out with the pre-order bonuses and when the DLC came out I planned on buying it, but I was broke. I was gonna buy it with my christmas money, I bought a PSN card the next business day for it, by chance they took it down THAT DAY (it was a Wednsday and this was when PSN updated on Wednsdays), and they didn't mention they were going to take it down or anything, and also the pre-order DLC was no longer downloadable when I reinstalled the game to play the DLC.

I sent them an email about it and amazingly (some of you may remember this), they made an announcement on the PSBlog (and I assume Xbox as well) that they were putting the DLC back up for a month, so anyone who wants it can get it before it's gone forever. Which was nice, because I did enjoy that DLC.......still pissed and bitter I never got the extra characters Xbox got for that game though, lol.

I think it's just that MARVEL doesn't really have alot of money to burn so to speak. And as soon as things aren't selling, they pull the content because it does cost them money to keep that content for sale on Sony, MS and Valve's servers.

MightyNoX3761d ago

I still have my physical copies of Deadpool and UMvC3. The first one is disposable fun, I do plan on replaying it on someday.

Digital is susceptible to too many factors like loss of license, loss of internet etc and poof, it's gone.
Hence, why I love retail. :D

Volkama3760d ago

People that bought the digital copies still have them too. They will have a problem if they need another copy, but then so will you.

You can still sell yours though, if that's your thing.

KwietStorm_BLM3761d ago

It might be bigger than that. It's not just about scores. Activision published superhero games have been crap for years, it's not like that's new. But with the rumor that Capcom losing their Marvel license (and I don't care what anyone has to say about Capcom, their fighting games have been proven successes for decades and the Marvel vs Capcom series is no different), it seems like either Marvel or Disney (ack) might be making some questionable moves behind the curtain.

Volkama3760d ago

They're rolling all the characters into the next Star Wars film.

awi59513760d ago

Disney ruins everything! Like how they canceled the great tv show starwars the clone was and put crappy lego starwars in its place WTH.

Dannycr3760d ago

I do. I was hoping for a PS+ release

MadLad3760d ago

Well, I bought it during the sale and am actually really enjoying it.
Melee could be a bit more in-depth, but that's really my only complaint.

Not to mention the game is pretty damn funny.

DeadlyFire3760d ago

I wouldn't blame Disney. Its likely the publisher lost the license or transferred it to a new company. The new company will want their logo on all of the branded merchandise. Essentially they will just rerelease the games and possibly patch their logo over the current product in an update.

SeanScythe3760d ago

*Sad Music Plays*

For $1 a day you could help save these poor games. With your contributions you will help save the lives of these endangered games becoming extinct.

*More Sad Music Plays*

Games like Deadpool are fading away and without your help may never have a chance to survive. Please find it in our hearts to give $30 a month. For donating you will receive and t-shirt that shows others how much you care and they don't.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3760d ago
DanielGearSolid3761d ago

Disney could pay someone to make a decent marvel game. Activision wasnt doing anything notable with the IP

nirwanda3760d ago

That's completely the opposite to how licenceing works.
That's like saying McDonald's/KFC/subway whoever should pay the owner to run a franchise.

ExCest3760d ago (Edited 3760d ago )

Can you explain that analogy? It seems that your analogy explains something that kinda... works and is already done.

nirwanda3760d ago (Edited 3760d ago )

My point is Disney wouldn't pay anyone to make a marvel game when Activision is paying them for the licence to make marvel games.
It just ain't how businesses are run.
I.e. you buy into a franchise to benefit from their branding not the other way around.

DanielGearSolid3760d ago

Could go both ways... Depends on the strength of the IP.

If no-ones interested in purchasing the license, they go out and make use of it themselves

awi59513760d ago

If it was a good game they would cancel it anway! Because stupid Disney doesnt want it competing with their crappy kids games of the same I.P. This is why tolken banned disney from having anything to do with the lord of the rings books because he knew back then they were a crappy company that turned everything they touched into a kiddy joke and no room for depth or adult themes in entertainment.

JoeSchmoh3761d ago

its all about the movies coming out. certain movie studios own rights to those characters in those games so now that they're proposing all these comic movies now with venom, new xmen movie, etc.. a deadpool movie is gonna be made. marvel/disney still dont have movie rights to xmen and spiderman..i think fantastic four too.

Soldierone3761d ago

Sony has rights to SpiderMan and gave rights to Activision to make games based off their movies. SpiderMan in general must have went back to Disney which means Activision can only use him if it's based on a movie from Sony.

CorndogBurglar3760d ago

Spider-Man's rights, in general, never left Marvel. Only his MOVIE rights.

The reason ALL Spider-Man games are made through Activision is because Marvel is the one that gave them the rights to make games. Even Spidey's non-movie based games are made by Activision.

You have to remember that even though Sony and Fox may have the film rights, Marvel still has a dog in the race because they are still making money off the movies that get made. Its the reason Marvel still advertises and promotes the Sony/Fox made films. Making games based on the films would also benefit them.

Soldierone3760d ago

Sony has rights to videogames based off the movies.That's why their logo appears on the games based on their movies.

CorndogBurglar3760d ago

Actually, Sony owns the MOVIE rights to Spider-Man. Fox owns the MOVIE rights to X-Men and their related characters, and Fantastic Four.

The movie studios don't fully own the characters' rights, they only own the rights to make movies based on them.

Any games that get made are being done through a completely different deal between Marvel and said video game company.

AHall883761d ago

I take it Marvel Heroes is safe from all this?

jackwei223761d ago

I just made sure I downloaded all my marvel ultimate alliance 2 content I purchased a while ago on PSN, so if you guys have marvel content on PSN or Xbox Live Arcade would recommend you download it all now.

Show all comments (58)
70°

Why Are Steam's Recommendations Dogpoop?

Blindfolding myself and clicking a Steam page at random would serve me better recommendations than Steam’s algorithm

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
UltimateOwnage9d ago

Hmm, not sure I agree with that. The recommendations I get are usually pretty good, but then again I have pretty large library of games on Steam and hundreds of them in my wish list, along with lots of curators I follow for it to build recommendations off of. On occasion it will throw me a random FIFA game or something I've never bought or shown interest in, but mostly its decent IMO.

80°

5 Best Metroidvania Games on Steam (March 2024)

Dive into the best Metroidvania games on Steam, from hidden gems to top-rated classics, and embark on unforgettable adventures!

jznrpg20d ago

Skul is a metroidvania ? It’s on PS+ soon I’ll check it out. If it’s good I’ll buy a copy physically if they have one

Nacho_Z19d ago

If Pseudoregalia is one of the best I'd hate to see what the worst look like.

330°

Dragon’s Dogma 2 releases to mixed user reviews, as microtransactions criticised

Players can pay to edit their character, resurrect the dead and other actions.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
AdonisIsBeast28d ago

Who cares as long as it’s optional

phoenixwing28d ago

paying to edit your character is kind of crap as far as microtransactions go

Xristo28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

I hate any/all MTX in a paid game (especially a full-price game)... but know that you can spend in-game currency (RC), which you get from killing mobs, to completely remake your character.

phoenixwing27d ago

@xRisto how much did it change the gameplay though? Changing your character would have probably not cost any rc if they weren't hellbent on getting money by making it inconvenient

koga8827d ago

You can literally edit your character using in-game gold, dropped from monsters or obtained from selling items, as soon as you reach the first main town. You can even use Rift Crystals obtained from other people using your pawn or dropped from monsters to change your entire character or Pawn. It's paying to avoid doing something that is literally in the game.

PRIMORDUS27d ago

They are lucky there using Denuvo or their game and all future DLC etc. would be for free. 🤣

phoenixwing27d ago

@koga you completely missed the point i was making but go ahead and act like i'm being the wrong one

lucian22927d ago

you can pay ingame currency though; why are ya so derp

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 27d ago
Crows9028d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Capcom cares quite a bit....hence why it was kept from reviewers and initial impressions.

As far as optional...yeah...ALL mtx are optional. That's not the problem. The miss the mark entirely.

Heck buying the game is "optional" too.

The fact that they were hiding this is scummy as hell. I was going to buy this day 1 or day 3. Now I'm reconsidering the purchase entirely because as the reviews point out...there are certain design decisions which have not changed but funnily enough seem to be remedied by these mtx...

In other words they may have left certain features in the game in order to monetize them. So the mtx affected the development of the game in a negative way.

garos8228d ago

I'm certainly not buying it anymore. It has affected at least one sale from me. I'll pick it up second hand

peppeaccardo28d ago

Very close to buy the game at a discounted price but not anymore.
Bad business practice and hence they do not get my support/money !

warriorcase27d ago

It wasn't kept fromreviewers s though. Twitter reviewers are saying there was mention of mtx's in the reviewers guide

-Foxtrot28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

STOP. USING. THAT. SHITTY. EXCUSE

God damn man

Look how DLC changed after Oblivions horse armour, within 10 years most developers took the absolute p***. What was said then aswell? “It’s only optional who cares?” Now look where we all are.

There’s no half measures with these things, when will people realise this.

jwillj2k428d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Oh it’s gonna get worse. Ng+ locked behind mtx, “cool downs” preventing you from playing for more than 3 hours at a time unless u pay the mtx for unlimited access, main campaign bosses, in-game music, certain dialog, difficulty modes, certain npc interactions, all locked behind mtx, etc.. etc. gonna end up being like the NBA 2k games eventually paying for cross overs and shit… They gon get mid-evil on our asses.

OMGitzThatGuy27d ago

I can guarantee most of the items you can buy with mtx and ingame currency wouldn’t exist in ANY paid form if the main goal wasn't monetization. If the goal is to give idiots who are willing to pay for basic game features as mtx a way to do things faster then the only ones the mtx hurt are the non paying players as you are now locking features behind a grind that you chose to put in the game that you are essentially admitting to creating some type of time sink. I have never heard of a game locking basic character editing behind a ingame paywall, it’s usually just an option.

Chard27d ago

Takes two to tango though - unfortunately people buy this garbage which incentivises the behaviour. It's an inevitable outcome of the profit motive

thorstein28d ago

@Mario

Yes. And so are resurrection "Wakestones." You can find them but they're rare.

victorMaje28d ago

Buying the game is now very optional too. If you don’t know why then you don’t get it.

shinoff218328d ago

Because it's only a door way. That's why we care. We've already seen some shit since Mtx was introduced.

Rimeskeem28d ago

1. DD2 is an ARPG with 8 different playable classes
2. There is no multiplayer aspect to the game
3. You can only have one character (have to pay for more)
4. You cannot delete the character unless you go into the game files
5. The game is $70 dollars upfront

Having to pay for more character slots in a game that *features* 8 playable classes is pretty much not optional for an ARPG.

Angyobangyo27d ago

Judging from steam reviews, gamers care. Not plastic gamers. Why didn’t Itsuno mention such MTX would be available in-game? Why weren’t the MTXs there for review copies?

Kiryu199227d ago

Who cares is how all this started. The many many excuses. Please keep defending these greedy publishers and unfair tactics. We be gamers are the problem

Horse armor

$10 online passes if buying a used copy

Cheat codes gone and are replaced by micro transactions

Unlocking stuff by playing games behind micro transactions and XP boosters

It’s only cosmetic

No one is being forced to spend even though publishers are literally making their games more grindy to force people to play

Full priced games have mobile game type micro transactions

$70 priced games because higher development costs while making record profits and laying off record number of employees

And to play the game early pay us extra $20-30 on top of full price

Release games now and promise to maybe fix them later only to abandon the game

Day one patches that make the games worst

If it’s your favorite game defend the publisher if it’s not hate on another publisher for similar content

SixFrvgz27d ago Show
+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 27d ago
kenpachi28d ago

Must have picked up some EA crew to put this in the game

robtion28d ago

Yeah these are really bad ones. Directly impacting gameplay too. Super scummy move. I hope nobody buys them.

CrimsonWing6928d ago

Yet Helldivers 2 gets a pass? Y’know a GotY contender by the name of RE4 had them and so does Devil May Cry V. The funny thing is I enjoyed both of those games thoroughly without having to buy a single microtransaction.

What I do consider a valid complaint is not being able to start a new game or being able to edit your character. That’s kind of a seriously baffling decision, but then I think how I played Dragon’s Dogma 1 and I never edited my character and I just did a 100% playthrough on a single file and didn’t start a NG since. So, I don’t think these are really going to impact me, but I can see how it will others.

Crows9028d ago

Helldivers 2 is a live service game where everything is obtainable in game with incredible ease.

Not sure about re4 or DMC but nobody is giving anyone a pass ...this article is about dragons dogma 2...not those games.

What is valid are in game features made to supposedly force you to think carefully only to have a surprise online store offer solutions to built in problems for more money.

Goosejuice28d ago

Those same things they are selling can be found Ingame as well. U can buy the character editor through merchants with gold. Don't get me wrong..I dislike these mtx they are doing but you don't need to buy them to be able to get them.

CrimsonWing6928d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Oh my bad, I can’t bring up games with microtransactions that nobody had a sh*t fit over. My mistake.

I love how people move the goalpost.

Crows9027d ago

@goose
@crimson

All mtx sucks. I'd rather helldiver's not have them because it makes me wonder if the rate at which you collect materials. That said. The games features are all fully enjoyable and aren't affected by the mtx.

That's not the case with dragons dogma 2...they left in place features that are supposedly part of the challenge of the game only to let you buy your way out very conveniently. I didn't look through all of them but I've heard some are rare but can be purchased with more money now. Even more so in a game about managing weight load there's a tent, I believe, that you can pay more money for that weighs less than your typical tent...not all sure on all the mtx and I'm aware that you can purchase many through in game vendor but they're incredibly useful mtx that are obtained much more slowly in game...or even a limited amount of them.

Instead is selling fast travel...just let us don't for free....or instead of selling cosmetic changes...how about letting us do it for free...

Nothing in helldivers comes close to this abomination

Angyobangyo27d ago

One is a single player game and one is a live service game. One is $40 vs$70. And most importantly, one game is there to spread democracy.

Ironmike27d ago

It's not incredibly easy for certain things in helldivers though u still have grind quite bit but u ate correct in saying u can eventually get enough medals to purchase stuff

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 27d ago
Moegooner28d ago

Read your comment again and maybe, just maybe you might realise how dumb it was.

CrimsonWing6928d ago (Edited 28d ago )

What was dumb about it? That I pointed out the hypocrisy?

garos8228d ago

It was extremely scummy that capcom hid this from reviewers. I have no doubt this game is good but these type of microtransactions don't sit well with me. They've lost a sale from me

Lionsguard28d ago

I was going to pay full price to support this game because I've been waiting for it for forever but I think I'll wait until I get it for free from Epic or a Humblebundle monthly.

Redemption-6428d ago

I am not defending Capcom, as I am not a fan of MTX in single player games. I do however belive they were open to reviewers about having MTX in their game. The reviewers just decided to leave that part out. Which is very disingenuous. There are some companies that get away with these things. Image if this was done by EA, Ubisoft, or even Activision? I am positive those defending Capcom, would have had their pitchforks ready if the companies listed above did this

anast28d ago

That's why reviewers can't be trusted. In fact, they are not reviewers at all. They get free codes to talk about stuff they don't understand nor care about.

Sanctusone27d ago

I mean it was pretty obvious to anyone with eyes...one of the items you get from deluxe edition was in game items.
1500 Rift Crystals - Points to Spend Beyond the Rift (A)
Which honestly I figured they kept a similar mtx system like DMC5 and the optional red orbs.

Lionsguard27d ago

1500 Rift Crystals doesn't mean anything. The first game had Rift crystals too, you just earned them by people hiring your Pawn and you get it from certain quests.

anast27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

A reviewer's job is to point out the obvious of a product as though they were the consumer. This means reviewers, to do their actual job, would need to review the complete game: the edition they are reviewing, how they got the game, technical aspects, story, and monetization scheme. Since, it is obvious that MT's are a part of the game, it would need to be reviewed. This way people can be informed, so they can decide if they want to play this style of game/monetization scheme.

For example, AC Origins was bad with Mt's. I had to farm side missions or pay to advance the story. This was after I already did close to 25 or more side missions. While I was grinding there were constant reminders that I could pay to ease the grind. I would have never bought the game if it were reviewed properly.

Show all comments (78)