110°

Slightly Mad: WiiU can fully deliver the Project Cars Experience

Slightly Mad Studios seems confident that WiiU's hardware is strong enough to fully deliver the core Project CARS experience on the system.

Read Full Story >>
worldsfactory.net
Razjin3775d ago

But yet the Wii U is not being compare to a high end pc? if I recall the last article talking about PS4.

Alexious3775d ago

I'm not sure what do you mean, of course WiiU can't be compared to a high-end PC, only PS4 can among consoles and even then a $/€ 1000+ PC will likely be more powerful anyway.

Dehnus3775d ago

That's bullshit, if you do not get an Intel CPU and know what you're buying, you can easily pass the PS4 for under 500 dollars.

People are just so addicted to Intel CPU's of 250 big ones, even though the PS4 only uses a Mobile CPU, okay 8 cores but still the amount of cores don't matter as much as what each core can do.

But you certainly do not need 1000 bucks to build yourself a PC that can beat it.

Muerte24943775d ago

@Dehnus,

no, just no. Please stop. I build my own gaming PCs and what you're suggesting isn't feasible price/performance-wise. CPU/DDR3/MOBO/SSD/GFXcard all for under $400 or even $500 wouldn't get you close to similar performance. Stop spreading misinformation. PC's brute force their games with little to no optimization.

Chrischi19883775d ago

The amount of cores does not matter, as long as games only run on four or less cores. The Intel I5-3570K with 4 cores was more powerful than an AMD 8 Core FX8150, but the AMD had higher clockspeed, higher speed-up, more cores and all, what does that tell us, that people, who used amount of cores and clockspeed as an argument for their console, are just trolling and acting like they understand any of it, because the number is higher.

starfox0793775d ago (Edited 3775d ago )

WiiU is and has always been compared to the best pc version available and here are some details on wiiu version remember its running Native720p with all settings and physics except a few tiny things on 1 core and it's not been maximized yet ??? so Native 720p 30fps with all graphics in place on 1 core witj no optimizing done yet....

http://www.cinemablend.com/...

Also SMS have been playing around with wiiu devits developing the game for 2 years now.....a pre alpha tester for wiiu said the wiiu cpu makes an i5 sweat....here read

http://thewiiu.com/topic/15...

NeoTribe3775d ago

Wii u has not and will never be compared to a high end pc. Get a life bro. Wii u is super weak sauce. Has no games, no third party, worst controller ive seen. Crappy online service even if it is free, which it damn well better be for being so bad. I gotta say, ive never seen a dedicated nintendo troll lol. Must be hard being a troll of the weakest piece of hardware around. Id rather be a texas instrument calculater troll.

TruthInsider 3775d ago

Its 720p @ 30fps, i should hope it could do a driving game at that seeing as even PS3 has GT6 running at 1440x1080p @ 60fps with dynamic weather, night & day cycle, tessellation etc etc..

PCars should be 1080p @ 60fps on PS4 then.

starfox0793775d ago (Edited 3775d ago )

The WiiU version has been confirmed ages ago its using dx11 assets get a life wow WiiU has more dx11 games then ps4 or xbox1

Here is the full article....don't know why N4G isn't directing you here..

http://www.nintendolife.com...

Alexious3775d ago

Lol man, you are so wrong on all levels I don't even know where to start. I guess with that nickname, it was to be expected.

mcstorm3775d ago

Sounds good to me look forward to seeing the difference between the wiiu, ps4/xbox one and pc versions.

jay23775d ago

PMSL! erm..........This was coming out on ps3/360 so yeah Wii U's more powerful than those like 0.00000001% but still.

wonderfulmonkeyman3775d ago

From the article:
"The Wii U is more than capable of providing the core Project CARS experience. Sure, some super-high-level graphical effects may not be possible but in comparison it also offers a unique interaction experience via the GamePad controller, with the second screen potentially becoming your track map overview, rear-view mirror, telemetry, or simply mimicking a real race car steering wheel whilst you use the gyroscope to drive.

Plus there are great possibilities to extend our existing WMD community into the Mii Community with discussion and sharing of content and ideas."

So, short version; they'll be giving up on a bit of the graphics in trade for more gameplay features, and on top of that they'll be using Miiverse for idea hunting and info gathering about the title.

Sounds like a fair trade-off to me. What's a few extra sparkles, after all?
I just hope they remember to include all the modes and any DLC that might come alongside it.

mamotte3775d ago

Finally, someone who actually read the article, instead of jumping to conclusions like "They're promising the same graphics as a high end PC"

wonderfulmonkeyman3775d ago (Edited 3775d ago )

I'm just one of those types that doesn't give a crap about having the super high end graphics, that's all.
It's why I'm not an early adopter of the PS4; it takes more than pretty sparkles and [so far] empty promises of being "the future of gaming" to entice me to plop down $450+.
I'm waiting for more games that will make the purchase worthwhile.

starfox0793775d ago

He clearly said some super high level graphics might did you read might means not final yet so wiiu version might still get those effects but even without it's basically saying wiiu will be 95% matching the high end pc....

wonderfulmonkeyman3775d ago

Doubt that.
I think you're reading too much into a "might".
There's definitely going to be a few spots where the graphics aren't the same, but you know what?
WHO CARES?
Only the console war fanboy soldiers and graphics whores really give that much of a crap over this issue.

IT'S JUST SPARKLES.

Fluff meant to attract sheeple by snaring interest at a glance.

It's the gameplay and support that will determine whether or not the game gets good sales, in the end.

Show all comments (31)
170°

Why did EA Kill Project CARS?

This video explains why we think Electronic Arts didn't see a future in the sim racing title Project CARS and promptly cancelled the fourth instalment.

Jin_Sakai530d ago

After the last installment I’d say most hardcore fans left. It’s just not that good anymore so I can’t really blame EA this time.

masterfox530d ago

because it was always a project and it never got finished :D

ChubbyBlade528d ago

Every game is a project. Your joke doesn’t make sense

InUrFoxHole528d ago

It makes perfect sense. It's obviously a play on the title. Jesus christ you must be a blast at parties.

ApocalypseShadow529d ago (Edited 529d ago )

Ask Bullfrog or Black Box or Tiburon or Studio 33 or Criterion or any of the previously acquired developers who made racing games as competition, or as developers of EA games, then eventually dissolved into oblivion or reassigned. Just ask them. They'll tell you why.

ApocalypseShadow528d ago

Oh. I forgot. Even Code Masters were absorbed into Criterion. Another racing developer EA took over.

Every racing developer either absorbed by EA or eventually destroyed by them. They either kill competition or have them in the end make Need 4 Speed for them.

MadLad528d ago

EA only cancels projects for one reason.
They didn't see enough money in it.

Kombatologist528d ago (Edited 528d ago )

Not when it's because it didn't meet some crazy margin. It's like if something doesn't make EA a billion dollars on day one (I'm exaggerating that figure of course), they swiftly put it out to pasture.

SurgicalMenace528d ago (Edited 528d ago )

Much like if you're spending money on what's a bad investment for your desired goals, you'd do away with it, if you're wise. We should try to get away from thinking we know more about business than individuals that have been doing it for decades. Perhaps you could benefit from going into business instead of wasting all of your talents in comment sections. It's clear that you're the missing piece that EA's been looking for.

MadLad527d ago

I've made a good amount of money betting on underdog investments over the years.

EA sets unrealistic expectations of their more niche developers, yet continue to fund absolute blunders like DICE and the Battlefield series year after year.

dumahim528d ago

EA butted in and messed with the formula and act shocked when it doesn't work out.

Show all comments (16)
90°

Original Project CARS creator trying to re-hire EA team

Ian Bell, the founder of Slightly Mad Studios, is aiming to hire former Project CARS employees to work on his upcoming GTR Revival project.

Sgt_Slaughter532d ago

If it's just going to be another sim-cade that doesn't do either one correctly then no thanks.

Project CARS 2 was a step in the right direction but the physics still aren't where they should have been, so what did they do for PC3? Go completely arcade. That killed the franchise.

220°

EA dropping Project CARS

From GI.biz: "EA is dropping Project CARS, GamesIndustry.biz can reveal.

The Slightly Mad Studios-developed series was launched in 2015, with EA confirming today that it has made the decision to "stop further development and investment" in the franchise.

The announcement was made internally and it's unclear at this stage to which extent staff could be affected. EA said that employees working on Project CARS will be moved into "suitable" roles "wherever [they] can.""

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Terry_B534d ago

Typical for EA. They buy studios that created nice games..and are sooner or later destroying them and move the people to work on the old same 5+ EA series.

italiangamer534d ago

They will put the developers on the 1000th Need for Speed for the rest of their entire careers, just like Criterion.

SurgicalMenace533d ago

To be fair, it's not EAs fault it falls directly on the consumer. Everytime these companies choose to drop a series they're met with backlash though the gamers didn't support said series enough to justify its continuation. Attempting to paint every company as evil all because they're in it to succeed is ridiculous. They have to make money just like each of us typing in this section. If a job wasn't supporting you well you'd quit and find a new one, this is the same mentality concerning series.

TheColbertinator533d ago

@SurgicalMenace

No it is their fault. They don't listen to fans and burn the franchise to the ground by introducing elements that nobody wanted instead of increasing support for said respected franchises.

I order a steak, they make a steak. 1st sale
I order a steak again, they vomit on my steak and charge me more for it. No sale.

EA in a nutshell.

Tapani533d ago

@TheColbinator Well how do you think they make the billions then?

Their fans ARE buying their games. You are just not their focus group, and I can guarantee their customer insights team is more thorough and detailed in their reaearch than any N4G commentors’ opinion on the matter. Otherwise EA would not exist as a company, and they’d be bankrupt.

deleted533d ago

The one that still hurts the most though was Criterion w the Burnout series. Acquired Criterion's tech for their own existing IP, then shut em down. It's basically parasitic. I sure do miss Burnout's crash mode!

Hofstaderman533d ago

Sounds eerily similar to another large unnamed corporation hey. I believe some EA bigwigs shifted to that company back in the day, would explain the similarities.

rlow1533d ago

Must be talking about Sony

peppeaccardo533d ago

and instead they come out with that piece of shit of Need for Speed which looks like an Anna & Barbera cartoon. C'mon .... PC2 was my go to game for VR racing and the first one i played for tens of hours. i was so lookiing forward to PC4 after that failure of PC3 ... what a shame EA, they are bombing all the good games and stick to the garbage ones. EA when you think you have reached maximum of disappointment they top it off with style .... screw them!

SurgicalMenace533d ago

Need for Speed continues to sell so why would they get rid of what's producing what they need to maintain stability?

EazyC533d ago

What they did to this series was idiotic. The premise was great -- a sim/simcade game that GENUINELY got developed in line with its community. There is a huge gap in the market for this...I mean, PD hasn't listened to fans at all over the last year with regard to simple Gran Turismo 7 tweaks. Sim racing fans are screaming for a title where they actually give a shit about their users.

Project Cars 2 was genuinely on to something, it just needed some refinement. But instead they followed up by selling off to EA with a braindead GRID clone with Project Cars 3. Again...idiotic.

SurgicalMenace533d ago

Well since you're the authority on properly managing a million dollar company, why don't you just call them to let them know of your divine wisdom?

Hardcore sim racers are the ones who are competing acrossed the globe, no company in their right mind would focus on a forever moving casual market. They have to focus on those dedicated to supporting their efforts. Notice how you're speaking from a perspective of self opposed to the collective. Perhaps they sold out because they, like us, needed the money knowing that they could reinvest it into something new. PC was a decent racer but very few people mainlined it over GT or Forza.

EazyC533d ago

I'm not a divine authority but I notice a pattern where these huge corporations turn completely tone deaf of what the "average fan" wants.

vallencer533d ago

Hate to break it to you but project cars 3 was published by Bandai in 2020. EA didn't buy codemasters, which owned slightly mad studios, until 2021. Either way the sales were super poor for the game and it's not surprising EA would just drop the game. BUT it still sucks because it's one less sim racing game on the market. Especially because the first 2 were really good.

Tzuno533d ago

and focuses more on cartoon network games

Show all comments (19)