710°

Assassin's Creed 4: Xbox One 900p vs. PS4 1080p Graphics Comparison

IGN: Is the PS4's native 1080p resolution a significant improvement over Xbox One's 900p? You be the judge.

Neonridr3801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

you mean I can compare the graphics between the two versions myself using a compressed video as the source??

Please can I?

GarrusVakarian3801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

I know, so pointless, YouTube's 1080p is horrible. Where's Gribblegrunger with those comparisons GIF's? They were much better.

Found them:
http://i.minus.com/ida3SiBB...
http://i.minus.com/ibmkI64o...
http://i.minus.com/iTgfydPM...
http://i.minus.com/ibtoNgg6...

The 1080p ones don't look softer to me Neonridr, quite the opposite.

Neonridr3801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

that being said Lukas, I watched the video and for the most part, they look pretty similar. PS4 utilizes a softer look so the colors blend a little better. It makes the edges not as definitive as on the One and gives it a more natural feel I guess. The shaders look a little bit better on the PS4 too, but not significantly or anything.

All in all, they both look good regardless.

Also, I don't know if it's how the consoles are set up, but anyone else notice the backgrounds in the XB1 version look a little more vibrant and colorful than the PS4 version? Maybe it's just my eyes, who knows. (Use the 35 second mark with the boat as reference)

Kayant3801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

Yep the one difference I see is that XB1 has more jaggies. Also what Neonridr said about the colours but that can be tweaked with your TV/monitor settings.. But the differences don't seem big with this. It will be interesting to see uncompressed footage on TVs.

pedrof933801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

Well Ps4 has better detail models and better resolution on a far distance.

Also X1 has more aliasiang though really small compared.

But its minimum. Also I believe that X1 don't have Ambient Occlusion.

kiz26943801d ago

@Neonridr To your last point, I think its just bad colour calibration on IGN's part tbh. Haven't seen it that washed out on all of the streams/gameplay videos.

Conzul3801d ago

My PS4 won't update to 1.03, it's stuck on 1.02...
Or is 1.02 the correct one for the 1080p update?

Neonridr3801d ago

@Lukas - yeah those definitely show more blur on the X1 versions. I was more implying the edges of the characters vs the backgrounds. On the X1 it looks like a very sharp line distinguishing them. Makes it look almost fake. The PS4 looks like it softens the edges a little bit to make it a little more natural.

Again, it could just be my eyes. And I am referring to the IGN video by the way.

Gamer19823801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

from the video you can never tell resolution details in stuff like close scenes (IGN likes to show them to hide xbox ones frailty's)however when zoomed out thats when the jaggys seep through
http://i.imgur.com/66aHHtl....

Check that screeny. A lot of clouds are missing too, to take some pressure off the memory. Only a minor detail but its there. Check the video to notice it more.

LonChaneyTV3801d ago Show
Boody-Bandit3801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

Wow this is a horrible comparison. You know IGN there are these things called menus on displays. You might wanna open a display manual and try it out. You make the PS4 version look low in contrast, gamma set too high and less color. The first thing I did after the update on my PS4 was go into the PS4 display settings and my LED menu display.

When I play ACIV on my display it looks more vibrant than the XBOX ONE version they are showing here. If you're going to do a comparison don't make it look like one has an advantage with something it literally takes 2 mins to adjust. Too much gamma drowns details and washing out the colors. I mean seriously.

Anyone that knows thing one about devices hooked up to a display is every individual device needs to be tweaked. This is as bad as gametrailers comparisons years ago.

Bathyj3801d ago

Man, going off those gifs, and I could be talking total bollocks because theyre not marked.

But one is sharp and detailed with clean edges. One is blurry and Jaggy.

I'm assuming PS4 is the former.

BBBirdistheWord3801d ago

going by the video, the ps4 version definitely has a softer look. I would almost go so far as to say it is more blurry.

The xbo seems to be a lot sharper and I feel the textures are clearly defined.

Going by the comments in this section, it appears I am not the only one who noticed this, straight off the bat.

We can extrapolate that the blurry images in the gifs (which aren't marked) would seem to belong to the ps4.

But then again, it's pointless to point out what we are all seeing.
There is no way in the world the ps4 fans will consider this possibility, so really we are just wasting our time.

GarrusVakarian3801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

@BBBirdistheword

"We can extrapolate that the blurry images in the gifs (which aren't marked) would seem to belong to the ps4."

Lol, what? Both GIFS are PS4 screenshots, the sharper images are taken from AFTER the 1080p update, the blurry ones from BEFORE the update. You really think 1080p is that blurry? You must have never played at 1080p native. You should refrain from commenting on things you know nothing about, you just presumed the GIFs i posted where X1 vs PS4 GIFs, but they weren't.

1080p is blurry he says!

Accept the fact that the X1 version is 900p, blurrier and jaggier...unless you class jaggies as "sharp"?

"But then again, it's pointless to point out what we are all seeing.
There is no way in the world the ps4 fans will consider this possibility, so really we are just wasting our time."

There is nothing to consider, the PS4 version is higher res, resulting is a sharper image and better details of distant objects. You can't doubt the GIF's i posted, difference between 900p and 1080p is clear as day.

UltimateMaster3801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

We already knew it.
Oh really? The PS4 is 1080p when the PC is 960p?

Yeah, the PS4 has better background animation.

Ultimately, we're all going to play the same game with the same game play, that goes for the Wii U as well.

BBBirdistheWord3800d ago

@ Lukas

Sorry, I have to call it like I see it and the PS4 screens of Assassin's creed definitely have a softer (blurred) look to them.

Others have noticed too.

Don't pop a vein, dude.

GarrusVakarian3800d ago (Edited 3800d ago )

@BBBistheword

Nope, every comparison ive seen on neogaf shows the PS4 version clearly being sharper and more detailed. No idea why it looks like it has a "fog" effect in this video because every livestream/youtube video ive watched looks vivid and not foggy at all.

The screens/GIF's i posted are BOTH PS4 screens, before and after 900p to 1080p clearly showing the 1080p update making the image super sharp,i think im going to believe the direct feed GIF comparisons and people who have played the game in native 1080p from neogaf to IGN's video. I won't be popping a vein next week when im playing superior versions of every single multiplat game on a cheaper, more powerful console.

"Others have noticed too."

Yeah, just like people noticed that the Digital Foundry BF4 footage looked blurry and washed out too.....but then went straight to youtube to see Jackfrags playing it on the PS4 looking nothing like it did on the DF comparison. I have the direct feed footage, looks vivid, sharp, and not washed out whatsoever.

Just accept the fact that multiplats are always going to look better on the PS4. The fact you actually thought the GIF's i posted were X1 vs PS4 GIF's is hilarious....then you went on to say the blurry ones were the PS4 ones (which technically they were, but before the 1080p patch).

Ju3800d ago

Difference is not that much, but IMO you can see it in motion with fine details, like window decoration or ropes on ships, etc. where those "shimmer" in the XO version but stay completely sharp in the PS4. Rest is the same, same effects and all. But finer details show quite a bit (incl. better AA due to pixel granularity).

NewMonday3800d ago

the difference shows in the playable parts not the cut-scenes, also notice better AA on the PS4.

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 3800d ago
Heisenburger3801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

Ah snap.

;)

On the day that the 1080p/improved AA patch went live I had been playing ACIV for an hour or two. I take a break and come on here only to see that the patch was live.

I went and restarted the game immediately, and to me the difference was very noticeable.

My eyes didn't have to strain like they were before. What's baffling is why it was launched in the state it was in the first place.

I'm so glad they patched it in though. I've been playing this with my vita ear buds plugged into my controller. It's just pure fun, plain and simple.

:)

*I reworded a sentence I wasn't too fond of.

Beastforlifenoob3801d ago

i love how as soon as someone says the PC version will still have the best graphics they get blown to bits.

GuruMeditation3800d ago

@Beastforlifenoob indeed and rightly so, because PC isn't the subject of discussion in any way. People are well aware that PC graphics are superior and are mostly beyond caring. These are people comparing CONSOLE features, because they choose to own a console. The 'PC will always look better' chiming is off-topic dullardry at best, not far removed from turning up at the special Olympics and chastising their world class athletes for being unable to smash the records of the able bodied...

Pintheshadows3800d ago

It looks so much cleaner in 1080p. Look how messy the backgrounds look on the X1 version.

GribbleGrunger3801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

If you look into the distance on the X1 version, you can see it has no ante-aliasing and now imagine enlaging that to a 40' - 50' TV. You cannot see the difference on compressed video at that size.

TheGreatAndPowerful3801d ago

Holy cow xb version is 900p??? I'm only now finding out about this. :( MS you f*** up, homie. You can't even run a game like AC4 that was specifically developed for last gen on your new hardware. :/

imt5583801d ago

Well, it's not a good comparison. Read the Anadtech article about XO/PS4 comparison ( HIGHLY RECOMMENDED ) : http://anandtech.com/show/7...

or here :

http://www.neogaf.com/forum...

Well, there is a difference in NBA2K14 to ( a minor difference ).

assdan3801d ago

Totally true. I dont even know why I still look at these.

thisismyaccount3800d ago (Edited 3800d ago )

Well... if they for ONCE uploaded their videos with 10mbit or a higher bitrate, then notbody had anything to bitch about it.

These people are lazy as fuck, having premium twitch account and what not and great connection to upload better looking videos.. yet for some reason these #"|@·$! keep uploading their "intellectuality garbage" with 2 - 5mbit.

btw here the YT version
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

thisismyaccount3800d ago

Really weird... comparison. It looks like the XB1 is much sharper than the PS4 version. 900p better than 1080p ?!

http://vsoh.com/a1:wtf2.jpg...
http://vsoh.com/a0:wtf1.jpg...

Ju3800d ago (Edited 3800d ago )

Which leaves you even more baffled when you actually play this game thinking this looks nothing like it on my monitor while playing. Even the MP dropped my char. Are those character models gorgeous. Impressive. And yet, looking at the PS3 comparison videos makes you think it's almost the same.

We have an issue with these videos: games have upgraded massively, but video equipment hasn't.

harrisk9543800d ago

Yeah... IGN has the WORST video player.

For a technology-oriented company, IGN needs to upgrade their video player. Even their audio on podcasts is lacking. I listen to Beyond every week, and it such low quality audio more often than not. (or maybe it is just that Greg and Colin don't know how to use the equipment!).

XboxPS3800d ago

Who confirmed that the X1 version is 900p?
Did I miss something?

XboxPS3800d ago

Why disagree?
I really don't know that this have been confirmed.

PSX043800d ago

ps4 looks really better .... sharper, more details, and better color effect

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3800d ago
hello123801d ago

frame rate is more important than resolution, PC gamers would choose frame rate over resolution everyday.

MasterCornholio3801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

And the PS4 version runs at a rock solid 30FPS.

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

So whats the problem?

BTW You lose.

Kayant3801d ago

Well it's 30fps SP on both & no reports on the added res affecting the performance on PS4 after the patch so.....

memots3801d ago

i would choose 1080p and steady frame rate over anything.

Bathyj3801d ago

If the framerate is a steady 30 on both than resolution does make a difference. Assassins Creed has large crowds and a lot of geometry. Being able to distinguish things clearly is definitely a plus.

thisismyaccount3800d ago

Yes, last time i asked evey friggin Steam User how they played their games, they too said frame rate is much more important than a higher resolution.

Are_The_MaDNess3800d ago

well for PC gamers nowadays we can just have it 1080p and use FXAA instead of normal AA and it will run alot faster.....
no need to drop resolution nowadays. even in a game like AC4.
my GTX 580 pulls it at around 80fps with everything max except the AA, dont really bother me that much IMO

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3800d ago
Idba3801d ago

As Lukas as already stated, videos by IGN or Youtube shouldnt be used in comparisons. Start making comparisons them put them up for download.

Statix3801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

This game doesn't look all that demanding or graphically intensive to begin with, so it may not be the best basis for comparing power. Also, the jump from 900p to 1080p doesn't seem as major as going from the last-gen 720p.

Call of Duty: Ghosts being 720p on one console, and 1080p on the other--now THAT'S a hugely noticeable difference:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum...

MasterCornholio3801d ago

OMG the Xbox One looks horrible.

Dont get me wrong COD Ghosts is an ugly game but the XBOX One looks horrid.

ZBlacktt3801d ago

So in other words what you are trying to say is 900 is just as good as 1080. That they are just meaningless numbers. What happens when you start to stretch the images out to a 50" and bigger screen?

GarrusVakarian3801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

Exactly, even on my 42" it becomes obvious...even from sitting 10 feet away. Can only imagine it gets even worse the larger you go....

Some people say they can't tell the difference, but ive always had an eye when it comes to things like this.

kiz26943801d ago

If you find the gifs Lukas attached at the top, and put them on a large HD screen and scale them so its 1:1, there is such a difference. Man i'm glad I chose PS4 for my multiplats, hate playing something that I know looks worse.

megalonagyix3801d ago

" hate playing something that I know looks worse."

PS4 looks worse than PC, so why don't you play on PC?

DarkHeroZX3801d ago

@megalonagyix

Yeah you do know that the majority of PC gamers dont have a great gaming PC that can out perform these consoles right. Only a small minority like myself actually have a setup that can give you much better yields then the ps4 and even then I didn't pay $399 for my rig either.

Silly Mammo3801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

@megalonagyix- we get it! You're proud of your PC rig. But this is an article comparing the PS4 and X1. Quit trolling with your PC agenda.

Show all comments (101)
120°

Leaked Early Prototype Footage Reveals Development Stages Of Several Assassin's Creed Games

Prototype footage from several of Ubisoft's Assassin's Creed titles has leaked, revealing early stages of their development.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
90°

The Best Pirate-Themed Video Games (Not Skull and Bones)

BY JASON MONROE: The very best pirate-themed video games that you should play instead of the disappointment that is Skull and Bones.

Read Full Story >>
growngaming.com
thorstein48d ago

PoE: Deadfire, Unless you have a or PS5 or an SSD don't bother, loading times are insane. A minute and a half to go into a room to investigate a desk in an inn and then an additional 1 1/2 minutes to leave the room and then load to leave the inn???

And they never fixed it.

220°

Assassin’s Creed: Black Flag vs Skull and Bones Video Comparison Is an Eye-Opener

Ubisoft has just released Skull and Bones on PC and consoles. And, from the looks of it, the game wasn’t received well by some gamers. Not only that but it appears that Skull and Bones can be worse than Assassin’s Creed: Black Flag, a game that came out a decade ago.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
OtterX62d ago (Edited 62d ago )

I wanted a Black Flag sequel so bad. It's still my favorite AC entry. The fact that they ignored everything that we loved about that game in this "spiritual successor" is making me enjoy watching this game crash and burn quite a bit. Either do it right or don't do it at all. (I understand the legal binding they got themselves into with the Singapore government to release this game at all costs)

/grabs popcorn

isarai62d ago

My thing is, if the Singapore govt was forcing you to do it at all cost, why not make what people wanted? How did ubi delay it for 5yrs, then again for 1yr and not just make a similar experience to black flag? How do you spend so much time and make so little?

Chocoburger61d ago

Ubisoft did make a sequel, Assassin's Creed: Rogue. It has a short campaign, and its packed with filler side quests for upgrades, but it's still a decent time.

It released on the same day as Assassin's Creed: Unity, so it was mostly forgotten.

porkChop61d ago

11 years of development. Multiple restarts. All the while people have been saying they don't want some pirate game where you can't even get off your ship. 11 years of people telling Ubisoft all they want is a pirate game that's basically Black Flag without any of the assassin or animus stuff. Yet they still served up this trash that no one wanted, charged $70 for it, and had the balls to call it AAAA.

The Guillemot family honestly needs to be forced out of Ubisoft. They've doubled down on everything players don't like about their games, they want AI to create "rough drafts" of their stories rather than letting their writers do their jobs, and they literally do not give a shit what their playerbase actually wants. 5-6 years ago their stock was worth more than 4x what it's currently worth. The company is dying.

Jin_Sakai61d ago (Edited 61d ago )

What has happened to developers? How can you possible make a worse looking game 11 years later? It’s honestly mind boggling.

darksky61d ago

It's because the older developers were better at it. The new generation pass most of their exams by copying code from around the web so are not nearly as good at understanding what they are developing.

LucasRuinedChildhood61d ago (Edited 61d ago )

No, here's the truth:
https://www.channelnewsasia...
This was made in Singapore and it's the first game of this scale to be made there. Ubisoft would probably cancel it normally since it clearly wasn't shaping up well but they were getting government grants to try build up the industry there.

Do you really think game developers are radically different than just 10 years ago? And this game has been development since Black Flag released.

Using one crap game to trash a whole industry of developers is stupid. It's like saying "Alien Colonial Marines proves that game developers suck now."

yeahokwhatever61d ago

i know this to be at least part of the puzzle from experience.

senorfartcushion60d ago

It's the multiplayer aspect of the world. MP games look worse than single player games, period. Every comparison we keep seeing are for games like Gotham Knights, Suicide Squad and Skull and Bones. They all have multiplayer focusses.

SyntheticForm61d ago

God, I'd love a remake of Black Flag.

Yi-Long61d ago

Enough has been said about this game already. The gaming world shrugged when it was announced so many years ago, and instead of listening to all the criticisms from the community back then, Ubi just sailed on and kept making a game nobody really wanted. What a waste of money and effort.

Show all comments (16)