380°

Xbox One's Reviews in 7 Hours (6am Pacific)

With the Xbox One launch a week away, many have been asking when our Xbox One reviews will be posting. Here are your answers.

Mikelarry3809d ago (Edited 3809d ago )

It's definitely gonna be interesting. We can see what ms has been cooking up all this time. Anyone coming to n4g for the next couple of weeks for mature topics is out of luck I predict bloody battles from both camps

come_bom3809d ago

Absolutely not. Everybody on N4G are civilized people that respect others opinions. /s

HammerKong3809d ago

we dont know but its true that here are many fanboys ,who only takes one side people must understand that what matters is games and experince and its on them what they likes the most we people dont want to hear their fanboy voices.have good dissussins.

ZodTheRipper3809d ago

I'm expecting Polygon to go full retard and the other media to rate everything in favour for MS just as always.

sincitysir13809d ago

After playing knack an loving it I decided reviews are stupid for all games. If ur undecided screw reviews. Watch a stream and it'll help u decide. Knack is an awesome game an the reviewers did it a disservice. So if any Xbox games get low scores just watch a stream and ill realize how great streaming is. Honestly guys.

Thehyph3809d ago

@sincity
I know what you mean.
I bought killzone and knack, but killzone isn't getting any love yet. Knack is so satisfying.

Forget the media. Ironic that I say that on a news aggregate. I've encountered numerous people on this site that are more knowledgeable and realistic than some of the idiots disguised as journalists. Don't get me wrong, there are moronic posters here, too.

Felonycarclub83809d ago

At the two above me, knack is awesome I really don't understand some of the reviews is like they were expecting something out of this world. Knack is like a tribute game to crash bandicoot and I loved bandicoot and I like games like this where I don't have to be so serious all the time and just have fun. When I read reviews for games I try to look for things that should be a concern and separate the BS that the reviewer has with the game.

Thehyph3809d ago

@felony

I think it's one of the beautiful things about live from PlayStation.
At any point you can just fire that up and there are countless streams out there for any games available on ps4. I think it's a great thing because many out there already do that with YouTube.
It's like you can review a ps4 game on your ps4 before you actually pay for it.

P0werVR3809d ago

I predict a quiet crowd on the other side, because we'll be playing a lot of FUN games.

Day One Gaming Stamina...plus more

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3809d ago
sobotz3809d ago (Edited 3809d ago )

No matter what the scores are, there will be fanboys blood spilled today.

jackanderson19853809d ago

this will be interesting... are those times just IGNs times or does it apply to the rest aswell like eurogamer etc etc?

DeadManIV3809d ago

I assume the embargo ends for everyone at the same time - makes sense.

GreenRanger3809d ago

Give us a fair, non-biased, non-bribed review please.

colonel1793809d ago

You are asking for way too much!

thrust3809d ago

Yeah because on this site any good review for the xbox will be because they have been paid off

sobotz3809d ago (Edited 3809d ago )

Even the negatives one for PS games are because they've been paid by MS, such logic

colonel1793809d ago

Woah, coming to defend the Xbox and assuming things that weren't even written.

My comment was about gaming journalism in general, not Xbox reviews. Since when have you seen a fair, non-biased, non-bribed review on any site? If you have, it is definitely an exception. Since last generation, gaming journalism has been crap.

Moncole3809d ago (Edited 3809d ago )

Most sites do that but when ever a person doesn't agree with the score the site must have gotten payed.

Moncole3809d ago (Edited 3809d ago )

the site did a double post.

Evil_Abed3809d ago

What you WANT is average scores for Xbox On exclusives. You aren't going to get them, they aren't average.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3809d ago
nope1113809d ago

Sound the alarms, grab your shields!!!!

Show all comments (76)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

180°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot12h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack35m ago(Edited 34m ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke196h ago(Edited 6h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke192h ago(Edited 2h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

mandf3h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor5h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave4h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor2h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

Duke192h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai4h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris3h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (19)