120°

Should You Get a PS Vita with a PS4?

Gameranx: "It’s more than just a “yes” or “no” answer, because it depends on what you’re getting it for. Here are some ideas that might help you decide if it’s time to buy a PS Vita when the PS4 comes out."

Read Full Story >>
gameranx.com
Faustek3816d ago

What? You should already own one.

JoGam3816d ago

I'll say if you have the money to spend on both then yes. Vita has a BIG library of game and with the remote play feature you'll be good to go.

0ut1awed3816d ago (Edited 3816d ago )

I've been saying this for a while but if you're not a fan of the $200 price point, look for one on ebay and craigslist.

I have found both mine and my roommates that way for around $120 each. They were both practically brand new and came wtih a few extras too!

That way it brings it down to around the $500 price point with PS4. Hmm do I want a X1 and kinect or a PS4 and Vita that not only functions with the PS4 but is badass enough on its own...

Eonjay3816d ago (Edited 3816d ago )

I own one so I would say yes... but in reality:
Wait to see how the Remote Play feature pans out. Then see if it appeals to you.

memots3816d ago

What appeals to me??

Shadowfall on oled screen in bed !!

Kydawg3816d ago (Edited 3816d ago )

Just think of all the crazy games that you can play while taking a crap!
(Wipes a tear away, then wipes again, the future is finally here.)

leahcim3816d ago

My actual dream is play Demon´s Souls 2 in my VITA

OlgerO3816d ago

If you want to play great games like Destiny, infamous second son, battlefield 4, the witcher 3, Uncharted 4, The order 1886, fallout 4 on your Vita anywhere in your house whenever you want, and play a great selection of Vita games everywere in the world Then yes. if you dont like any of these things then no.

Elda3816d ago

Bought 3 already lost the first 2.

JoGam3816d ago

Dude how did you lose them?

Elda3816d ago (Edited 3816d ago )

1st one fell out my back pocket carelessly,while riding my bike,the 2nd fell in the toilet,all this happened within 5 weeks,something in the cards didn't want me to have a Vita.

SonyStyled3816d ago

thats almost as bad as my lil bro losing both his car keys and cell phone in the same toilet flush. and no im not kidding. phone stayed in the bowl. keys are somewhere between the toilet and the water treatment facility

Blaze9293816d ago

I love the PS4 to Vita connectivity, but I'm still not seeing any impressive titles on the Vita that scream BUY ME! The remote play feature is cool but not for $200

dcj05243815d ago

Gravity Rush is the best game of 2012 ( Virtue's Last Reward a close second)IMO.

Neonridr3816d ago

Depends on if the Remote Play features work accordingly, and if it's something that you want. Asking someone to spend an additional $200+ when they've already spent close to $500 already with their PS4 (console, game) could be pushing it.

Down the road perhaps.

Show all comments (34)
60°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

60°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

170°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot10h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

Duke194h ago(Edited 4h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke1938m ago(Edited 35m ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

mandf2h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor3h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave2h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor33m ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

Duke1937m ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai2h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris1h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (17)