460°

PS4 vs Xbox One: which is better?

The launches of Xbox One and PS4 are imminent, as both next-generation consoles are about to go toe-to-toe.

Read Full Story >>
techradar.com
BadboyCivic3818d ago

Been a Xbox 360 owner but the facts are the facts and PS4 is the better machine. Now my only question is how to get a PS4 at launch without a pre-order?

mikeslemonade3818d ago (Edited 3818d ago )

Xbox One is better.. XD

ziggurcat3817d ago

@ badboy:

go to places that people wouldn't normally think about going to get their console.

for example, in canada, you would probably easily find a PS4 at a london drugs, shoppers drug mart or superstore.

ShinMaster3817d ago (Edited 3817d ago )

The PS4 is undeniably the better console, technically.

But which ever is best for you is dependent on preference, like certain games and friends who will own one as well.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3817d ago
4lc4pon33818d ago

+bubble for being intelligent. PS4 nuff said

Utalkin2me3818d ago

Gotta love rhetorical titles...

Lwhit63818d ago

Oh and just thought id share this...

Recently when i was on a chat with an amazon representative I asked her when i would be charged for my ps4. She said on the 13th of november when it would ship. I asked her if i could get it early by any chance and she said once it ships you should be able to contact the carrier and get it early.

I live 30 minutes away from the warehouse in Fernley where the PS4's are and i might be able to get it on the 13th!

Boody-Bandit3818d ago (Edited 3818d ago )

Be careful not to take it online before the 15th. You might get banned. Oh wait........

Sorry, couldn't resist.

You will be one lucky mofo to get it even a day early. I haven't been this excited for a new generation since the PS2. Camped out 2 nights straight and was the 2nd in line Best Buy. So glad I don't have to do that again. It was a blast but I'm too old for that sh*t now.

cooperdnizzle3818d ago

Brutally honest. You haven't been this excited for a new gen since the ps2. Woahh man one hole generation. J/K Just thought that was kinda funny. Being there has only been one gen since the ps2. Lol.

Boody-Bandit3818d ago (Edited 3818d ago )

cooper
13 years is a long time.
When the PS launched in Japan I rented one from an electronics shop and after playing it a couple hours I imported one from Japan. I imported several games they had out at the time. So when the PS launched in America I already played most of the games by importing them from Japan so I wasn't too excited to get one then.

I've been gaming since pong so I owned every console except the virtual boy. I wasn't really that excited for the 360 and was a little set back by the PS3's hefty price tag.

The PS2 was my most anticipated console of all time when it released. My 2nd favorite launch was the SNES. So yeah 13 years passed, gave you a little glimpse into my history and here we are. The PS2 was my favorite overall launch and I actually want the PS4 even more.

Pope_Kaz_Hirai_II3818d ago

The console that doesnt do year 2002 resolution.

megalonagyix3818d ago

I wouldn't come up with resolutions as 1080p is pretty much the past as well.

PixelKnot3818d ago

PS4 is my choice as well. I was thinking about switching back to PlayStation after the 360 even before the new consoles were even revealed.

The huge amount of mistakes Microsoft have made with the One have made the final decision much easier. Even with the DRM gone, I don't want the Kinect. Forza 5 is pretty much the only game that interests me, but the amount of content it has in comparison with past Forza titles is rather disappointing.

Here's some of the PS4 games that I'm definitely getting:

- Rime
- Resogun
- DriveClub
- Killzone Shadowfall
- Infamous Second Son
- The Order 1886
- Transistor
- Kingdom Hearts III (multiplat)
- Final Fantasy XV (multiplat)
And maybe Witcher 3.

Ezz20133818d ago

Ps4 is just the Better system all round

mrnice3817d ago

looking forward to you guys getting it first let us no if the lag has been sorted out on ghosts and battlfield.

bornsinner3817d ago

slightly more powerful... but no games... you can count pixels on it tho

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3817d ago
GreenRanger3818d ago

I'm getting both. I prefer the PS4 over the Xbox One, though.

Lwhit63818d ago

I'd hate to be your wallet.

cooperdnizzle3818d ago

It's only 900 bucks. People act like consoles cost the price of a house or car or something.

tanis_halfelven3818d ago

@cooper

Bro in this economy thats alot of cash

rainslacker3818d ago

That's a lot of cash in any economy.

-Foxtrot3818d ago

I'll get both....once Microsoft release a Kinect-less Xbox One bundle in the far future.

No point giving a company who has f***** up since the reveal my money on day one. It would send out the wrong type of message

JodyCones3818d ago

I really have no interest in the Xbone. I'm getting the PS4 day 1! And I'm going to save up for a PC as well instead, it's a way better investment than the xbone honestly. You can get labtops than run better than the xbone! Hahaha. And steam has great deals and amazing games. Can't wait to get my PS4 though!!

Rockstar3818d ago

I've learned you should sit back for a few months when it comes to MS consoles, see whats gonna pop up.

KrisButtar3818d ago

I'm planning on getting both but I only pre-ordered a PS4. It will be a year or 2 before I get a X1, after the exclusives add up. I waited till E3 to see which one I wanted 1st and then Microsoft made it easy with its DRM. 99% of the games I play and like are 3rd party games. Last gen I bought most of them on the 360 and this gen it looks like I will be buying them on the PS4.

Khajiit863818d ago

Same here im hoping for 2014 holiday season they sell a kinectless version for 300 usd. I do not want a gaming camera, virtual reality? Yes. Motion? No. I do not want to yell or waive my hands the controller is good enough.

KrisButtar3817d ago

As much as you and others want a Kinectless bundle, I just don't see it happening at all. Even after the launch their if there sales were nonexistent. I would see them dropping the price even below $300 and just taking a bigger loss per sale before they take the Kinect from the bundle. Kinect is just to integrated.

What features are left if they removed the Kinect from the bundle?

rainslacker3818d ago

I'll probably get a X1 once the Kinect can be used with a PC. I enjoy programming for the thing oddly enough. That's of course if the Kinect isn't available separately by then.

Otherwise, PS4 day one, and lots of PS3 exclusive titles coming out into next year should keep me occupied.

KrisButtar3817d ago

If I could understand programming you can bet I would be tinkering around with it. I can build houses from the foundation to the roof and do everything in between but programming just escapes me.

I'm going to the PS4 midnight launch, its my 1st time going to one. The game I wanted was delayed (WatchDogs.) I bought Ghosts and another controller as I wanted a local multiplayer game to go along with AC4.

The stores around here, still don't have X1 kiosks yet and I want to get some hands on with their new controller as the DS4 is truly impressive.

Enemy3818d ago

PS4 is the only console I've ever preordered.

GiggMan3818d ago

That's funny, me too.

I use to enjoy the thrill of the hunt but I'm getting older lol.

scott1823818d ago

Ps4 is the only console I ever wanted to pre order, I missed my chance :(

teedogg803818d ago

PS4 is the first console I will be getting on day one.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3818d ago
Show all comments (99)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

190°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot13h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke197h ago(Edited 7h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke193h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

-Foxtrot1h ago

"Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs"

He's literally just told you why

We're waiting like 15 years before a sequel comes out, it's insane

Skyrim came out in 2011, the next game is expected to come out in 2027 at the earliest so that's 16 years apart while Fallout 4 came out in 2015 and might not release until 2031, again 16 years.

We're fine with Bethesda trying new things and doing new IPs like Starfield but adding a new game to the cycle now means a bigger wait. Also Starfield didn't meet most peoples expectations, can you imagine waiting 15 years or so for a sequel and it's disappointing? It would feel even worse because you would have to wait another 15 years to see if they manage to come back from it.

They need to give it to another developer, we don't need main numbered titles but a spin off of Fallout and Elder Scrolls should be cycled in between the long gaps of the main releases.

Once again you are making out people want these games as quick as possible when all we want is a standard development time of at least 4 years or so rather than waiting 15.

mandf5h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor6h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave5h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor3h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

-Foxtrot1h ago

@Skuletor

Who's saying to rush the releases? No one is saying that...

People just don't want to be waiting 15 years for a sequel, they aren't working on the game for that long, you do realise that right? The issue isn't coming down to them working on the game and us "rushing them", it's the fact they are working on other games like Starfield now meaning bigger gaps before they even get started on them.

I bet you any more Elder Scrolls VI only entered full development last year when Starfield was finished despite being announced in 2018.

Duke193h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai5h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris4h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (22)