850°

Microsoft CEO candidate Stephen Elop said to consider selling Xbox business, killing Bing

Bloomberg also suggests that Elop is willing to shut down or sell some major Microsoft businesses. Elop would reportedly considering killing off the company’s Bing search engine, while contemplating selling the Xbox business. Some investors and analysts have previously called for the software giant to split off its Xbox business and give up on search. Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen appears to feel the same way. Allen’s $15 billion asset manager, Paul Ghaffari, revealed recently that Bing and Xbox have been distractions for Microsoft. "My view is there are some parts of that operation they should probably spin out, get rid of, to focus on the enterprise and focus on the cloud." Nomura analyst Rick Sherlund claims Microsoft’s financial earnings could be boosted by 40 percent in fiscal 2015 if the company sold its Bing and Xbox businesses.

Read Full Story >>
bloomberg.com
joeyisback3814d ago

Go ahead sell the Xbox business wont be missed :-D sell it to Sony :-D

thrust3814d ago

The dreamcast 2 one can only dream of it.

theBAWSE3814d ago

agreed sell it to a company who can turn this bad image around, the lies, crap PR and who cares about games

dreamcast 2 would be a dream

decrypt3814d ago (Edited 3814d ago )

This is amazing news.

Nintendo is dead
Ms Goes down

Just one more to go lol and the industry can start progressing again.

Dehnus3814d ago

@Helpfulgamer
That is about the only way I can see it working out properly. But Sony Ponies and MS Xbots cream by the thought of having the other's company go bankrupt.

That a majority of people would loose their jobs isn't important to them.

OsirisBlack3814d ago

Honestly as an older gamer I would be beyond happy if Sega could sneak back into the war. Ever since they stopped producing consoles the quality of their games has suffered significantly. I would LOVE to see Sega get back on the horse and make some good games.

theBAWSE3814d ago

@decrypt

Nintendo isn't dead their handhelds have kept them in the game

I really hope they make a new console and learn from this wii rubbish...

if Sega got xbox it would be a dream Nintendo /PlayStation /Sega three great companies with real exclusives fighting for our money

Microsoft are just an inconvenience with no passion for gaming, hardly any first party studio's.. they just wanted the living room... guess what? xbone has had the worst launch of any console and I sincerely hope it fails hard. Microsoft deserve it after the crap they have pulled with xbone.

thrust3814d ago

Bawse,

Stop chatting bubbles you sound like a fool, MS is not going anywhere if anything in real world sony will go first it's all about money!

Just look how much each company is worth.

MS is a good company provides millions of jobs to people and family's but you can see passed that all you see is Xbox live is £25 a year, whineeeee

mikeslemonade3814d ago

^Thrust

It's Microsoft's xbox division. We're not talking about the entire corporation going down.

.....

There's not many companies that can buy a Microsoft Game Studios. If Sony bought Microsoft Game Studios they would never make the money back. People saying Sega can buy it!? Sega has no money. I can probably buy Sega myself XD

dedicatedtogamers3814d ago

Certain gamers see this and cringe, but let's be serious. Microsoft hasn't brought anything significant to the gaming industry as a whole. They've simply...well, they've simply done what Microsoft does best:

They've bought and aped everything the Xbox brand has. To see them go would simply make room for another console manufacturer to step in. Oh noez! A console world without MICROSOFT!?!?!?! Consoles were fine prior to Xbox, and consoles will be fine after Xbox is gone.

Eonjay3814d ago

Sorry kids its all about money. Microsoft makes alot of money selling software to other businesses and by collecting licensing fees and royalties. The Xbox division looses money but Live generates money (without the need to pay pubishers and and developers for the amount of content that PSN offers).

So when the board is discussing whether to stay in the hardware business or not, they will be weighting the potential boost in profit by selling the brand and sheding the losses, versus loosing a dedicated stream of paying subscribers.

Personally I would like to see them stay in the business to keep Sony competitive.

theBAWSE3814d ago Show
specialguest3814d ago

Yes exactly. Let Xbox die off, sell it to Sony, etc....because a one console gaming world with no competition is exactly what we need for the industry. /s

The Xbox was a factor in making PS what it is today, a gaming division that listens to devs needs, the fans, not over priced, and less arrogant, because of competition and the lesson learned from the 360 taking a huge chunk of the PS market last gen.

pyramidshead3814d ago

Perhaps that analyst leak told some truth about MS covering up huge Xbox division losses with other profits.

If he gets appointed...oh boy lol.

Guwapo773814d ago

What is this one console system BS? Nintendo isn't gone... Nintendo has mad bad systems in the past and recovered nicely. Someone might even help Sega get back into the hardware business if Xbox is no more.

Or Xbox is sold and the name changes to something else, the company is still there.

malol3814d ago

"selling Xbox business, killing Bing"
best decisions they could make now

then turn to the old fanbase which is already established ... PC

devwan3814d ago (Edited 3814d ago )

@thrust

Microsoft isn't a charity and xbox has and seemingly always will cost them more than it brings in, given what has happened so far. They'd do well to flip it to the likes of Samsung while they can.

MS has been striving to position itself to win the war of the living room for years now, but that war ended as a fizzled-out fart some time ago, it's increasingly irrelevant. There are newer, bigger and more important battlegrounds they need to fight for if they intend to stay a part of the converging gaming arena.

The xbox one was designed to be the centrepiece to this faded vision of what they saw consumers desired from their converging entertainment... the core aspects they should be challenging in, gaming, has been severely hindered as all the additional aspects have taken a front seat, leaving the all-in-one-media-box gimped as a gaming device... they ignored their established userbase as they sought to capture an imaginary larger one.

abzdine3814d ago

I miss the Sega vs. NINTENDO Times, and Sega vs Nintendo vs Sony. Competition was very healthy!!

mistertwoturbo3814d ago

I don't want the Xbox business to go away, I just don't want them to be dominate. Hopefully that will drive them to be a better company and start making better products and start thinking about the consumers. That means better hardware, better customer service, and more original first party software support.

All of which I don't see happening anytime soon sadly. Mostly because we have hordes and hordes and hordes of blind followers that eat up everything the sell even if they put poison in it.

Patrick3814d ago

@devwan
Yeah I have to agree, Sell it to Samsung, they make great products and it would be an awesome console. The Samsung Galaxy XBox ...lol Do it MS, sell it off to a company that creates and innovates hardware.

Ezz20133814d ago

are you "Gamers" wish for gaming companies you don't like to bow out of gaming business ?!

i hate MS....any one know me here know that
and i will never support them
but this is a little extreme guys
this will make us no better than xbox fanboys who wished sony leave the gaming business

darthv723814d ago

Xbox maybe but what do people have against bing? I mean seriously. I gave up using google 2 years ago and have been using bing for all my searches.

People get the google redirect virus but you never hear about a bing redirect virus. Plus I earn points with all my searches. Points that I have used to get xbox point (now real $$$).

Hell, i even use the bing app on my galaxy phone instead of google. No doubt google is the one more people use but that could be because they are to set in their ways. Like the ipod/iphone craze.

There are better alternatives that most just dont know about. I will admit that MS makes their decisions to jump into a market after its established but some of their offerings are really good if people can get past the fact they are MS.

blackbeld3814d ago

Right choice. Bing is worthless and Xbox is already dead (DOA).

They should focus on software only.

gaffyh3814d ago

Sony recently made gaming integral to their business, meaning they cannot get rid of PlayStation, and they wouldn't considering it is one of their most profitable businesses most of the time.

There have been several people saying MS should sell the Xbox business, and if a CEO candidate is saying, that is a major warning sign. Maybe it's not worth investing in an Xbone, I was considering get one after a price cut, but if they are going to shut it down, then there is no future.

KillrateOmega3813d ago

Dreamcast 2? Oh man, James Small would be in Utopia...

*Insert heavy British accent*

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN...AND THE DREAMCAST!

Omegasyde3813d ago

@ I agree sell Xbox to Sega!

That would be awesome. I don't want any consoles to drop out because it would limit competition, but I wouldn't mind if Microsoft left the gaming scene.

PoSTedUP3813d ago

i know from experience that, what takes years to build can be destroyed in a minute, if you dont play the game right you might as well not be in it...

ZodTheRipper3813d ago

I look forward to this. They don't know how to run this businness, he would them and Steam/Nintendo a big favour.

prodg523813d ago

The only company that I see that would be interested and have enough capital to purchase XBOX would be Google.

ThanatosDMC3813d ago

Nail in the coffin all ready? Not good for Xbox fans.

They need to get rid of Bing. It's more of annoyance to people. Heck, Comcast promotes that we dont use Bing. (I work for XSS)

UltimateMaster3813d ago

Killing Bing, best decision ever made.

BISHOP-BRASIL3813d ago

The problem you guys dismissing this are missing is that it's not the first we heard about that latelly. Even worse, most times it had came from shareholders. Now, it's a possible future CEO opinion. Couple shareholders with CEO and you have enough of board to actually go ahead and cut the bleeding limb off if Elop gets the job.

The fact that Live still gives some profitable is hardly helps, they could very well keep Live, try to pass that as PC or Tablet service, or license the hardware standard for other manufactures forcing Live there (which sounds great 'till you remember what happened to the 3DO, manufacturers would want a profit and the price would rise even further, third party support was also a no go, and that was actually conceived by EA none the less).

I'm not saying they'll go through with it, in fact, if past is anything to go by, Xbox division was never profitable and many times it was suggested to be cut off, yet it remained, so it may pass quietly by this again. But don't fool yourselves thinking this is a minor issue, every other time the majority of the board (and specially the CEO) were agaisnt cutting off Xbox, if Elop actually gets the job this will be a whole new conversation going on that room (at the very least, he can deeply hurt Xbox division by restricting investments, or even give it an ultimatum).

GameSpawn3813d ago

@Darthv72
"Xbox maybe but what do people have against bing?"

Hey if you like Bing then use it. I've tried, but I keep going back to Google. In my experience with Google, I can type the vaguest search (3 random words related to what I'm searching for) and I have had great luck getting what I want in the first 3 search hits.

Bing on the other hand, even with the MOST specific search hasn't always given me what I'm looking for. I like Bing's image search, but that is where the buck stops.

In the end whatever you're comfortable with use.

Ritsujun3813d ago

Xbone180'd.
Sell it to Nintendo. Xbosh's heading down the casual/Beeburr route, anyway.

Xavilend3813d ago

Am I the only one here that knows that the original Xbox was the spiritual successor to the Dreamcast? #TheMoreYouKnow

Anon19743813d ago

When Microsoft investors are continually hearing things like "the sale of Bing and Xbox, along with other moves, could lift fiscal 2015 earnings by 40 percent" it's not surprising that something has to give. Especially now with Valueact on the board and Ballmer on his way out.

I think it's not so much a question of "if" but "when" will Microsoft sell or spin off the Xbox business.

UltimateMaster3813d ago

@Ritsujun
Nintendo doesn't want that.

I'm just guessing maybe Apple or Google might be interested in the franchise logo.
Or maybe they'll do their own thing like Steam.

Why not sell it to Steam?

P0werVR3813d ago

"He would consider ending Microsoft’s costly effort to take on Google with its Bing search engine, and would also consider selling healthy businesses such as the Xbox game console if he determined they weren’t critical to the company’s strategy, "the people" said."

Funny how they missed that detail, and yet with all this talk of doom and gloom this week has driven Microsoft's market value since a couple years back. Hmmmm....I wonder why?

Anyways, Bing I can understand. Xbox Division is a money maker for Microsoft and the potential is there, simply because there going up against Sony. Who are lackluster in innovation for next gen. Xbox One is more than prepared because of it's dynamism. Bing however is going up against Google...you don't mess with Google, their too nice.

dmeador3813d ago

It really is amazing how ignorant many posters on this board are. If you in any way think that the xbox going away is good for gaming, you need to learn how things work.

Its sad that you somehow have a personal stake in a company, for no real reason at all. Its just like a Burger King eater cheers about McDonalds shutting down, or a Dodge Ram driver going crazy if GM went bankrupt. One day you might understand that you aren't "wining"

pixelsword3813d ago (Edited 3813d ago )

If it has to go, I hope Nintendo buys the Xbox and not Sony; that would put Nintendo near the cutting edge in terms of advanced technology, plus there should always be two consoles, two rivals to constantly sharpen each other's claws to make sure they aren't dropping the ball.

The best liked Superhero out of DC, Marvel, etc., is batman; conversely, the best liked villain is The Joker.

Not because of their powers or even their intellect, but because of the finely-tuned balance of good and evil, the evenly-matched rivalry that can take a city already teetering on the edge one way all the way to another; and even in the video game world that shows: the best rivalry of all time so far has been the Sega/Nintendo era.

Oh sure, you can have one console, but either you'll get huge upgrades every 15+ years or you get upgrades every couple of years, having maybe three to five consoles in 10 years.

WolfOfDarknesss3813d ago (Edited 3813d ago )

This man is playing really REALLY stupid ?, He's is CEO candidate too ! My God.

It's not a good time to talk about Xbox and Bing business situation like that Specially just weeks before the release of Xbox One !

He should support Microsoft and NEVER mention anything about the company financial earnings .

If Xbox one is out , The it will be bad news for Gaming industry .

BattleAxe3813d ago

Samsung would probably be interested in buying the Xbox Division.

rainslacker3813d ago

I really don't see why Samsung would buy the Xbox brand. They have enough money and know-how to make their own console, and if Xbox were to leave the market, it would be wide open for the next competitor to step in.

Google seems more interested in providing services and not hardware, and quite honestly, given the way they have their google phone set up, it would probably make the Xbox brand just what MS intended the X1 to be in the first place, an all digital marketplace with substandard quality control.

Anyone that would have the money to buy the XBox brand would be a company that has the resources, but not the infrastructure to produce their own console, and actually wanted to get into the console marketplace. It's hard to imagine many companies wanting to do this since they aren't already. From the looks of it, it isn't a hugely profitable venture for any company on the home console level.

@Darth

OK, now it's hard not to think of you as a shill when you say how great Bing is, and try to downplay Google due to a redirect virus...really?

scott1823813d ago

I hope Sony never considers buying the Xbox division... They are fine with PlayStation, they would never need anything Xbox.

Prime1573813d ago

Any of you who don't understand that competition is a good thing need to stop commenting.

You think business hinders it now? See how it stagnates after there's only one.

Chris_GTR13813d ago

why the hell would sony want xbox? lolol.

nukeitall3813d ago (Edited 3813d ago )

Why would anyone want Xbox division split out is beyond me.

If it wasn't for MS and it's push, you would have a $800 PS4 right now with almost no network connectivity and PS Home version 2!

After all, Nintendo isn't pushing the online space, and nobody has cloud servers like MS.

+ Show (44) more repliesLast reply 3813d ago
hiredhelp3814d ago

Lol this would be one my favourite Days if come true.

Dehnus3814d ago

Why? So people can loose their jobs? Seriously?

Eonjay3814d ago

@Dehnus

Wrong... selling a business doesn't mean everyone loses their jobs.

dmeador3813d ago

@Eonjay

Many people would lose their jobs

sobotz3814d ago

It would've been terrible. Competition is always good.

hiredhelp3814d ago

You got nintendo steam apple may join in then theres possible sega come back.

sobotz3814d ago (Edited 3814d ago )

You know Nintendo can't beat Sony when it comes to console. And apple is no difference than Microsoft.

I think Valve is the most suited rival to Sony if Microsoft left.

combatcash3814d ago (Edited 3814d ago )

@Sobotz,

Very true, honestly if it hadn't been for the xbox 360 the ps3 wouldn't have seen all of the major price cuts that helped get it into peoples homes.

It helped humble Sony quite a bit. Imagine if sony had left the business we would be stuck with all that DRM stuff from MS.

Competition is always good keeps companies on their toes and benefits us the most.

@sobotz

Really valve?!!!!!! No bro they have worst restrictions than the xbox one did and you saw how people cried about that. It's all digital and while they would make a formidable opponent, they themselves don't make enough exclusive games or (AAA) experiences.

tiffac0083814d ago

Sega coming back? Lets be realistic here, they can't even localize their games.

Baltar3814d ago

I wonder if Nintendo could buy the xbox division, Sony Vs Nintendo+Xbox that would be a hell of a competition!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3814d ago
Concertoine3814d ago (Edited 3814d ago )

yeah, let sony LITERALLY monopolize the industry, surely they won't pull anything tricky then. When they near monopolized the the industry with the ps1 they took to using anti developer architectures to make it harder to port to competitor's systems on the ps2 and ps3. the ps4 is a different story, but if they dominate like it looks, who knows what the ps5 will be about. Hopefully not like the ps3.
i will miss it, the first xbox is one of my favorite systems ever. ports of half life 2, morrowind, deus ex 2, thief 2, along with bitchin' exclusives like jet grind radio 2, panzer dragoon orta, shenmue 2 (NA),or all the Microsoft game studios games. Also better multiplats like fatal frame and silent hill 2. Then the hundreds of hours of memories on halo 1 and 2, the first GOOD online console network, from which every one today owes at least something.
even the 360 was a great system. MS was cool before the xbox one. I believe they could've come back with something special after this diappointment.

DARK WITNESS3814d ago

those were the good old days when the xbox was really about gaming and it showed !!... those days feel long gone now...

Irishguy953814d ago

MS were cool till about 2010 and 11, till Kinect reared it's ugly head and MS wanted a Piece of Nintendo's new found casual made pie.

Xbox and Xbox 360 were great for gamers(again until 2010/11 for 360)

The way Ps4 is now, is how the Xbox 360 was at it's launch. Cheaper, better games, stealing exclusives from Sony, much better online(although next gen they are about equal online), better multiplats etc etc

Hayabusa 1173814d ago

Yeah, I loved the original Xbox, and it seems I missed a lot of decent games on the PS2 as well...a brilliant era in gaming, I think having the Gamecude on the same level as the XBox and PS2 might have had something to do with it too...competition is good.

I agree with Irishguy95, the 360 is a fantastic console, but it all started to go downhill round about when they started pushing the kinect and all the shovelware that came with it. The PS3 started in a mudslide, but has steadily climbed at a consistent rate.

I have hopes for the Xbox One but I seriously want to see Microsoft change their attitude towards their costumers and the games.

Omegasyde3813d ago

I agree more competition is better for gamers wallets and choice, but say keep Xbox and remove the Microsoft. Sell the console division to google perhaps?

rainslacker3813d ago (Edited 3813d ago )

Everyone was using RISC chips back in those days. Sony made in the PS1 a system architecture that was geared almost exclusively for 3D gaming. It wasn't meant as an anti-competitive measure. In fact, the PS1 used a pretty standard MIPS-R3000A 32-bit RISC chip, and RISC was all the rage at the time. The Saturn had one, and the SNES had a coprocessor RISC chip, among many others.

The PS2's chip was designed to streamline game programming overall, and the emotion engine was highly praised for it's capabilities in this regard. It still used common RISC architecture which has been used in every single console for the past 20 years except the original Xbox, but was adopted into the 360. The emotion engine simply put multiple processor cores onto one die and each of those cores was uniquely suited to certain tasks. It wasn't that complicated to figure out. The fact that Sony provided functionality that wasn't available in the more general purpose CPU's of their competitors isn't their fault, but their competitors fault for using more general purpose processors.

The PS3 was a gamble, and a vastly different way of programming from the standard PowerPC/x86 chips that everyone was used to, which is why it got so much heat. However, the design and processes capable within the Cell were uniquely capable of smoking what any other architecture could do at the time. Just very few developers took the time to really utilize it because it was so different and Sony lost it's hold on the market so there was no reason to even try.

In fact, many of the common things done now with new CPU's, including APU's in both the X1 and PS4 are designed around the functions that the Cell started off with and pioneered. The Cell hasn't died, it just evolved into what we will be using in the next gen, only in a more common architecture.

So before you go spouting off random nonsense, learn what you're talking about, because it's very apparent you know nothing of computer architecture.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3813d ago
CynicalKelly3814d ago

You have no idea how bad it would be to eliminate competition and grant any company a monopoly on anything.

Competition is great. It pushes Microsoft and Sony to do better because they have to compete for us.

Rainstorm813814d ago

If Sony has a Monopoly...Sony will just become the new MS

If they do ever sell the Xbox brand i just hope its to a company that cares about gaming

SignifiedSix913814d ago

Sony wouldnt be able to afford the Xbox brand lmao.

Besides, I'd rather it be sold to samsung if this ever happened.

LordMaim3814d ago

Sony wouldn't NEED the Xbox brand. All of its good games are third party.

jocomat93813d ago

LMAO you just got owned.

Death3814d ago

Be careful what you wish. Who would be in the market for a game console/brand and has the money to acquire it? EA? Activision? Ubisoft? If any of the larger third parties bought the brand, Playstation would have problems.

abzdine3814d ago

None of them has enough money than Microsoft has, and let's be honest buying a Ubisoft console to play assassin's creed..... NO way!!

Death3814d ago

Xbox is the brand. The company that would buy them wouldn't change that. You would still be buying an Xbox, but the exclusives would be made by Ubi instead of Microsoft. I would imagine EA or Activision would be a better prospect though. Disney is another possible buyer. On the hardware front, Samsung has been very aggressive in going after Sony's marketshare in other formats. They might also be interested.

Brix903813d ago

@Death

Your right Samsung would seem like the best competitor if MS left considering there company has many products directly competing with Sony.

Dehnus3814d ago

WoW....
Wishing people to loose their jobs to save a fund like Value Act, just because you are a fanboy.

New lows, I suppose for you "smallnes" awaits, for your mind that is.

Competition is good, no matter how much you hate it.

G20WLY3814d ago (Edited 3814d ago )

3 posts from you, all about losing jobs? Why must there be job losses? Mergers create job losses. Reorganisation of internal hierarchy creates job losses.

Buying/selling a business, in itself, simply doesn't. It's an acquisition, not a closure!

As for competition, yes, it is a good thing - and if MS sold Xbox the competition would STILL EXIST!! smdh...

Omegasyde3813d ago

I don't want to see people lose jobs. I just wish for a smooth transition to another company which includes all studios and their employees.

RTheRebel3814d ago (Edited 3814d ago )

Yea Sony they have alot of cash.... oh wait their burning cash lol!!
Samsung BUYYYYYY XBOX.

THEDON82z13813d ago

As a PlayStation man, I can personally say it would be Sony's worst nightmare if Samsung bought XBOX...if they did buy XBOX, They could keep it alive long enough to learn and tweak the system and relaunch a brand new console geared toward taking Sony's last major business.I for one think that would be the bloodiest battle ever.

rainslacker3813d ago

I honestly don't know why Samsung would want to buy the XBox brand. They could quite easily make their own console, and try to make their own imprint on the gaming industry. Same goes for Apple, or any other major electronics company with enough money to buy the XBox brand.

I know the Xbox has brand recognition, but I'd imagine most of those companies would want to be seen as innovators and bringing their own thing to the field.

I could possibly see some of those big companies buying off certain parts of the Xbox brand, namely the developers or IP's that MS owns.

Rainstorm813814d ago (Edited 3814d ago )

No No sell it to Steam

Edit below...

LMAO silly mistake....I was thinking SteamBox the entire time

SignifiedSix913814d ago

You mean Valve? Steam is a platform, not a company. Lol.

Hayabusa 1173814d ago

I often make that mistake too :P

Nekroo913814d ago

Oh Frigid?! what did i told yesterday? and xbox fans last week?

And how do i know this? because its my area i have to study companies and markets.

And now the serious stuff, neither Sega or Nintendo or Even Sony can afford the Xbox.

The first contender interested in this market is Apple or Samsung, but since Apple want a more casual thing it leaves the space to Samsung. And hey..its not a bad thing Samsung is a huge company and even their motion recognition on tvs is better than Kinect so we just have to wait and see.

But if Samsung buys the Xbox realistically Sony will be in trouble because it will be face to face with another product company

G20WLY3814d ago

Very true. Even Samsung's motion recognition on the phones is better than Kinect!

It's responsive in terms of recognising the movements every time and translating them into a software command instantly - two things the new Kinect still appears to fail at, if their new fighter is anything to go by...

rainslacker3813d ago

Why would Samsung want the brand itself? Maybe the tech and the properties owned by MS, but the brand itself? It will always be associated with MS.

Samsung has the know how to bring their own console to market, and they can do so with their own vision without being held back by all the negative brand recognition that MS has lumped onto the Xbox brand over the years.

Imagine the announcement if Samsung announced a console along with some fresh new AAA IP's and some major 3rd party support. Samsung is known to make quality products, and has a high customer satisfaction rating. As a gamer, it would be quite exciting to see if they could bring something fresh to the industry, as opposed to just carrying on what someone else started.

isa_scout3814d ago

While I'm more of a playstation fan selling it to Sony would be the absolute worst thing that could happen. I may not be particularly fond of the Xbox One but I cannot deny that it's presence is needed.
Competition drives this industry, without it we wouldn't get bigger better games every year while these corporations duke it out for our hard earned cash. Sega and Sony couldn't afford to buy the Xbox division. If it is sold(it wont be) the most likely canidate would be Apple in all likelyhood. Just my two cents.

gamer78043814d ago

This would be terrible. Who like less competition. Few brands have the capital to take on Sony and Nintendo . 99.9% sure this will never happen tho.

twinspectre3814d ago (Edited 3814d ago )

SEGA deserve to buy XBOX and change name in Sega DreamCast 2 , so we will have a Big Competition Sega vs Nintendo vs Playstation

3814d ago
yellowgerbil3814d ago

Sony wouldn't buy it, most likely someone like Google or Apple would buy it, neither of which I think would be any better than MS

Brix903813d ago

I think if Apple made a console it would do way better MS for the fact look at how popular there products are and beating MS products like surface, etc...
People would buy an Apple console for the name alone but price would be the biggest question.

thisismyaccount3814d ago

Another 10 years of Fable, Halo and Gays of Wars on the Dreamcast 2? FAKU!

2001 Microsoft jumps into the console market, noticed that they have no pedigree... so they robbed PC player and got Halo on their huge VCR.

What a shitstorm that caused ..... but PC ppl. are hypocrites anyway.. 3 years later they drop the support of the old Box, every xbox owner was pissed a microsoft but it´s okay... after a horrendus 24mio consoles sold world wide (to retail?).

2005 Sony partnes with IBM and Toshiba to make their next gen CELL. Thru some loophole > IBM faggots handed over some or ever "CELL Blueprints" over to M$, M$ made something less powerful and got away with it... but Karma is a bitch:

º1 2005 306 had up to 60% failure rate
º2 Some or many were forced to re-buy a new 360 (first edition had no HDMI! NO WIFI... was cheaper right?)
º3 The got the rights for RARE back in 2003? Everyone working at Conkers 64 left the studio long time ago... 400 Mio. well spent M$.
º4 They try ton enforce upon all of us some shady DRM strategyconcept
º5 they spent over 2 Bio. of Dollars to come up with a weaker System than its competitor
º6 The brand is making losses since its "conception"..

if the PS3 didnt come with CELL.. it would have prolly equaled the PS1 sales or maybe even surpased it.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Krazy Kan! Take a nap...

Blaze9293814d ago

yall acting like the things MS did with Xbox 360 today arent the reason you see the capabilities the PS4 features compared to the PS3.

Yeah, kill competition so that we only have one stale option every generation with no incentive to innovate. Kinda like....EA Sports titles like Madden.

otherZinc3814d ago

Read the Bloomberg link, Elop said no such thing.
This is the view of a single analyst named Selund.

This is being sensationalized at n4g. Selund is a radical who probably has zero knowledge of the gaming industry. He even contradicts himself in the Bloomberg link.
Read it.

Mosiac773814d ago (Edited 3814d ago )

Sorry bud, Sony is in more bigger trouble than Microsoft. Sony needs the playstation to survive and Microsoft don't. All the microsoft investors care about is their money and not gamers like us. I mean if it wasn't for MS online multiplayer wouldn't be like it is today. Look at Sony now they are catching up to microsoft and still they need to prove it with the PS4 because PS3 was a mess. Online multiplayer has been great on XB live since the first xbox. 12 years thats how many years Sony is behind in online multiplayer quality.

AndrewLB3814d ago

Sony couldn't afford it considering they're down 10-30% across the board compared to last year.

Look... techinasia.com/wp-content/uplo ads/2013/10/Sony-sells-10-milli on-smartphones-in-Q3-2-million- PS3s-but-cuts-profit-forecast-f or-2013-graph2.jpg

They also just cut their earnings projection from 50 billion yen to 30 billion. (not to be confused with dollars)

FITgamer3814d ago

They should sell it to Samsung, another good hardware company.

ajax173813d ago

Sell it to Apple. Sure there'll be a new one every year,(with only minute changes)but that won't stop them from selling out! XD

lokirevamped3813d ago (Edited 3813d ago )

It amazes me how SCUM that don't care about one brand, make sure he/she show their face in that brands forum. I will miss the competition it brings, no company would be where they are today without competition.

fiveby93813d ago

Selling to Sony is a bad idea for consumers. Fewer competitors in the market eventually leads to more expensive consoles and poor quality. Of course Sony would probably not be interested in purchasing the XBox business for a multitude of reasons.

mochachino3813d ago

I'm getting a PS4 but xbox would certainly be missed. Remember they set the standard for online console gaming and having it be a multimedia device.

Sony had to play catch up in terms if PSN when PS3 launched.

Xbox has made A LOT of bad decisions in the past 5 years (and obviously is getting worse) but they were leading in innovation not too long ago.

UncleGermrod3813d ago

People do not realize both companies are losing huge amount of money with their respective gaming divisions. The difference is that from a business standpoint, MS simply does not need xbox, as they make tons on software and patents. So basically, a lot of investors feel that MS should simply cut it loose. Sony has more riding on the ps4 than ever, and after all, they are a devices company.

Anyways, just saying...don't act like this has anything to do with the actual system itself. The choice to sell or not to sell the xbox division would be based on choice the majority of us know nothing about.

iceman063813d ago

You are 100% correct. MS could afford to dabble in the games industry. As, it was not a primary source of income. They thought it would be a quick dollar. But, it turned out to be more of a less reliable, long term investment. As you said, Sony is a devices company and relies on these devices (services and software) for income. Simply put. MS can afford to "trim the fat" and Sony includes this "fat" as part of the overall meal. It's not about the Xbox, 360, or even Xbox 1 failing so much as it is about profit margins. At this point, at least for investors, the profit margin could be much higher without having to service the Xbox branch.

Magicite3813d ago

Sell it to Samsung, it will be worth that.

2v13813d ago

even Ms dont want the xbox

MazzingerZ3813d ago

He probably means get rid of third party studios and probably Kinetec games as well, XBL is profitable....focus in TV and multiplatforms....

static3603813d ago

that won't be good on the long run having only sony as a gaming platform...well that is unless you count Nintendo

awesomeisjayell3813d ago

just sell your mother to me i use her more than you anyways LOL.

whome3813d ago

the ironic thing about this, they're going to sell alot of xboners, but will it be enough. sony will still dominate. so i believe they will sell, when the going gets tough. simple as that.

Retroman3813d ago

They should of done this when first sign of RROD issues in 2006.........

xxthe1andonlyxx13813d ago

Plz dont sell xbox we need fanboy wars!

redwin3813d ago

So, I see that the problem is Microsoft not the Xbox. I think Microsoft has done lots of good. There had been more advancements since MS came to the table. More jobs and the Americans are making great games again and that's since MS came to the table. I think the best thing would be for MS to keep the Xbox and battle it out with Sony , if so, then we all win. No one has the resources that they have and the hunger . I don't want to hear about the DRM, Steam and Ouya are doing the same thing and no one said anything. But I know that MS doing the DRM is a threat to Sony but steam and Ouya not as much. Remember, Japanese people don't buy American games, if MS sells, America will not have the best programmers anymore. That's too much to loose. But I'm a gamer, so I'll buy games anyway, they'll be mainly Japanese games though because we ousted the American . We need Ms .... Sadly .

Beahmscream3813d ago

Hey dumb fuck, without COMPETITION, gaming will not get better.

DOOMZ3813d ago

From Aaron Greenberg (via Twitter) regarding the rumors of selling Xbox:
That is just silly...

“We appreciate Bloomberg’s foray into fiction and look forward to future episodes,” said Frank Shaw, a spokesman for Microsoft.

DialgaMarine3813d ago

Sell the core IPs to Sony and Nintendo, and then sell the actual brand name to Samsung. Make a pretty penny there, and then go back to turning a profit on their other products, and then everyone's happy. Good day gents.

Seraphim3813d ago

their business model won't be missed. Who's to say the next is any better. There shouldn't be a lack of potential suitors that's for sure. I have to agree about Bing though, scrap that useless crap. No one wants or uses it and if they do it's because they're PC illiterate.

Azzanation3813d ago

Sony wouldn't be able to afford it.

Kornholic3813d ago

Stephen Elop, the man who killed Nokia.

+ Show (45) more repliesLast reply 3813d ago
Mikelarry3814d ago (Edited 3814d ago )

i hope he doesn't and this is just rumours and if he does sell it hopefully its to someone who is passionate about a games console and gaming in general as i like the idea of the big three, or even 4 when the steam box launches.

MRMagoo1233814d ago

anyone at all besides MS imo , what about sega lol

Rainstorm813814d ago

Alot of people say Sega.... but they have been shown to be incompetent console manufacturers After the Genesis...... I think Sega should continue being publishers, i think its best for everyone involved

Hayabusa 1173814d ago

Even as publishers, they haven't proven to be especially competent of late. I loved my Mega Drive back in the day, but I business wise, I don't see any reason why Sega should get back into consoles.

ABizzel13814d ago

I completely disagree, as it is now there's really no need for a "Big 3" considering M$ and Sony share 90% of their game library. The PS3 and XBO are proof that "MANY" gamers are in the know and most won't settle for a console that's priced too high or doesn't have the specs. to back it up. And the PS4 is proof that Sony at least is willing to listen to the people who matter most when it comes to making games & consoles (The Developers & The Consumer).

If M$ leaves I seriously doubt Sony will become this evil pseudo M$ charing $200 / yr. for online, and making a mid-range PC console w. mandatory Camera, mandatory 3D head-display, and other required peripherals for $1,000. I just don't see it, they learned price is of the upmost importance with the PS3 disaster at launch (which is why so called "journalist" should be giving XBO grief). On top of that there's still Nintendo (who need to get their console business together) and PC gaming.

If M$ were to leave the console division, I say they should focus on integrating XBL infrastructure into PSN ($$$), continue making their first party games for PlayStation and PC ($$$), and make Xbox-like peripherals for gamers who don't like the PlayStation controller layout ($$$). Those 3 things are nothing but profit markets, since XBL is coding & software, games are software, and controllers have an insane mark-up compared to manufacturing cost.

PSN + Gaikai + XBL = Amazing online gaming
PS Hardware + PlayBox Software = Amazing games, OS, and services

I'm pretty sure the console will cost $499, games should technically stay the same price (only publisher greed will raise them), PS+ will probably cost $50 - $60 (split 50% / 50% between M$ and Sony),

I really see nothing but good from this, and only "fearist" and fanboys who only own one console and don't want to see any kind of alliance form are against this.

Thehyph3814d ago

I'll agree with this.

I'm no analyst, but I can see Microsoft turning Xbox into something more profitable by doing away with hardware R&D and production.

Microsoft made its fortune strictly from software and licensing, not from selling Xbox consoles. There's no reason they couldn't do the same to the brand.

Dudebro903814d ago

You have no idea what you are talking about.

DevilishSix3814d ago (Edited 3814d ago )

Dudbro

Actually he does know what he is talking about. Microsoft got into the console market in the first place because Sony refused to use a Microsoft OS in their consoles. That ticked Billy off and they created Xbox not only as revenge on Sony, but to secure their interests in the living room. If Sony and Microsoft finally resolved this and had an interest I could see Microsoft getting out of the hardware side of the business.

Also, no industry is immune to consolidation, Microsoft has been in a no growth position for nearly a decade now and one of the major reasons Balmer is leaving and Billy left years ago. Billy has been selling off his shares for years now and will be competely divested in the next couple, he saw this position years ago and stepped down.

rainslacker3813d ago (Edited 3813d ago )

I still see Sony making a lot of moves that seem to be directly aimed at giving them a broader spectrum of services to offer their customers. Things like Gaikai to compete with all the cloud providers out there is just one example. Music Unlimited, PSN(SEN), PS+, etc are all service oriented ventures which is where the money is. I don't see why at this point they would have to get MS on their platform when they have already circumvented the biggest thing MS could offer them, and that's the cloud. Sony has no real need to offer MS Windows on their system, as they seem capable enough to make their own OS.

I can see Sony allowing MS to make controllers for their system, after all it costs them nothing and they get liscensing fees. I can see Sony allowing MS to release games on their system for the same reason.

I can also see Sony offering Live as a service on PSN, as Live is a much bigger service than XBL itself. Skype is already on PS platforms(which seems poised to replace Live completely), and there is really no reason for Sony to have to pay for it. What I can't see is Sony opting to forgo it's own online social service(PSN-SEN) to integrate a different companies into it on a system wide level. It seems like if they did this it would be more like the social media outlets they are integrating into the PS4. Connectivity, but still managed by PSN.

As far as people speculating Sony will become this totalitarian dictator of a company in the console space, I just don't see it happening. They were dominant for close to two generations, and despite what most people say, the PS3 actually had a lot of power, and the value was there when taken as a whole. There was nothing draconian about the PS3 at all. Same goes for the PS1 and PS2.

The cost of services going up is a given. It has to just to keep up with inflation. Same with game prices which have remained relatively stagnant compared to the increase in development costs. However, with all these services and game prices(which are more handled by the publisher), there is only so high you can go before the consumer just says no. They may try to over-inflate the costs, but in the end, the market can only bare so much, and it will never really go over that point.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3813d ago
mewhy323813d ago

It's true that the games business is brutal recently microsoft is striking out at the plate. But if they sell and xbox is done away with it'll be bad for gamers. That means there won't be as much competition and thus less innovation. I hope that he doesn't sell off xbox for that reason only. He could right the boat by not putting the kinect in every box and reducing the price to 349.99 to better enable microsoft's inferior console hardware to better compete with the smartly priced and hugely more superior PS4.

MajorAly3814d ago

They're already killing the Xbox One sales with news like this. Man, Microsoft, as a whole company, should really take a one week vacation to Bahamas and cool down and think rationally.

obelix013814d ago

The majority of people buying the X1 will never know or care about this years drama.

Rainstorm813814d ago

Allen’s $15 billion asset manager, Paul Ghaffari, revealed recently that Bing and Xbox have been distractions for Microsoft.

"My view is there are some parts of that operation they should probably spin out, get rid of, to focus on the enterprise and focus on the cloud."

Damn Xbox has been a distraction???? Im glad i plan on waiting to get one

quarkist3814d ago

who will buy this white elephant????

mdluffy3814d ago

Sony... then it's sony vs nintendo.
but that would be bad for gaming, because sony would have the whole console gaming to them selves, and won't have to try so hard anymore.

Killjoy30003814d ago

I'm sorry, but Sony has absolutely no use for the Xbox brand. They're just fine on their own. I think they're keen on watching the Xbox division off itself.

quarkist3814d ago

well, this was a serious question. It can very well be Nintendo to save the sinking Wii U console. Or it could be one Valve?

ABizzel13814d ago

Stop with the Monopoly fears. If anything Sony proved with the PS4 that they listen to developers and consumers, and if the Xbox brand was sold off it doesn't mean we would see the end of the brand.

Better yet, it should be spent off into it's own Micro division. Focusing on software (XBL, OS, and games) and small scale hardware (Controllers, Kinect?????, ......other.....)

Sony proved they learned their lesson, and even if they were the only "HARDCORE" console I seriously doubt they "won't have to try so hard anymore". Software sales still matter and last time I checked there were still tons of amazing games from plenty of developers out there, and they would still have to evolve their console to offer an alternative to PC gaming and Nintendo, on top of giving developers the power and tools they needs to make better games while focusing on a price point consumers can agree with.

Just because your biggest direct competitor goes out of business doesn't mean your career is a walk in the park. As Best Buy (Circuit City), Toy R Us (KB Toys), and more.

king_george3814d ago

I dont understand the whole monopoly fear thing. u guys do remember that sony almost did that back in the ps2 days right? and did being on top with 150 million consoles sold stop them from giving us incredible games? nope.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3814d ago
Show all comments (283)
70°

10 Weirdest Video Games of All Time

Plenty of unforgettable games have completely messed up their players throughout the years, all the way back from the PS1 days to the dark recesses of the modern internet.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
70°

6 Games That Genuinely Deserve A Current-Gen Upgrade

Games such as Mad Max, Red Dead Redemption 2, and Batman: Arkham Knight desperately deserve a modern-day revisit.

80°

Hammerwatch II Will Stop Dilly-Dallying and Head to Xbox and PS4 on April 23

"Hammerwatch II's journey to Xbox has been long and perilous. After first launching on Steam in the fall of 2023, the game finally turned up on PlayStation 5 last December. Since then, Xbox gamers who enjoyed the original Hammerwatch and the sublime Heroes of Hammerwatch have been anxiously awaiting their turn at the long-promised sequel. At last, the wait is nearly over because Hammerwatch II will hit Xbox and PlayStation 4 on April 23," says Co-Optimus.

Read Full Story >>
co-optimus.com