200°

How Valve’s SteamOS Can Save Console Gaming

SteamOS will potentially provide the same level of convenience that console games have mastered for years, yet still provide the freedom and flexibility of PC gaming. Freedom is the key theme of Valve’s new direction. The open operating system allows any manufacturer to build their own Steambox. Hell, consumers can even build their own Steambox. As someone who has been building PC’s for years, this is very exciting.

Read Full Story >>
ministeamreviews.com
mushroomwig3854d ago

Console gaming needs saving? I think the figures of GTA might prove otherwise.

ministeamreviews3854d ago

Maybe "revive" is the better term. Consoles are stale. It's the same old thing every time with a bump in technical specs. For me personally, the console love is just simply gone. What valve is offering is the most excited I've been for a console since the Gamecube was announced.

jujubee883854d ago (Edited 3854d ago )

I've had a gamecube and it wasn't exciting at all. So stop it.

PS4 is more than hype enough for me. More than hype enough. HYYYYYPPPPEEE!!!

http://i.minus.com/iTVrmWrR...

ministeamreviews3854d ago

That's what I'm saying. Consoles aren't exciting any more. The Gamecube was exciting to me because it was a pretty significant leap from the N64. Now the difference isn't really that outstanding. I'm burned out. Tired. I want my game collection to be useful beyond one piece of hardware. Enter SteamOS/Steambox.

Hicken3854d ago

So, because you're not excited, all the strong sales of the current gen, plus all the hype for the upcoming consoles, and somehow it needs saving?

Yeah, I'm gonna call BS.

admiralvic3854d ago

@ Ministreamreviews

Were they ever THAT interesting in the first place? Throughout gaming history we pretty much just see current things get implemented (like CD playback) and bumps in graphics. At the end of the day, it's the games that are interesting, not the systems themselves. In that respect I don't see SteamOS making a difference. It simply seems like a mid point between PC and Console, though not one I would say is a completely game changing and earth shattering event. Now if they get Half Life 3, Portal 3, Left for Dead 3 and such exclusively... it might become interesting, though this all goes back to my point about the games.

ministeamreviews3854d ago

@admiralvic
I agree that at the end of the day it's about the games. Yes, Valve needs to show some strong exclusives to win people over. I play a lot of indie games, though, so this is already a win for me. Valve is way more friendly to independent developers than console manufacturers are.

InTheLab3854d ago

"It's the same old thing every time with a bump in technical specs. "

The definition of PC gaming...

UltimateMaster3854d ago

The PS4 never pre-ordered as much, or sold ever in it's first week in it's history and the last champion was the PS2 with 1.5 Million the first week and the PS4 is already beating that.

Sure, NOBODY wants the next gen console./s
Yeah right.
The numbers proves otherwise.

thisismyaccount3853d ago

But... but PC has no games!

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3853d ago
GmIsOnPt3603854d ago

or the 300 million combined units sold last gen between the wii,360 and ps3 proved other wise ...and GTA selling a billion worth in 3 days, PC gamers petitioning to get said game currently ;)...LOL this is funny

GrizzliS19873854d ago

dude nothing worse than a PC elitist. Bunch of idiots spending thousands of hardware and then begging for games that might test their stuff, when 99% of the games that come out are hardly any different visually than anything on a console.

They are fighting for frames per second and 1080p crap when they play on a 19 inch monitor where 1080p is IDENTICAL to 720p.

its becoming sad really

but what can you do when you feel like you built your own rig and think youre smarter than the average gamer as if going to newegg is rocket science.

3854d ago
solar3854d ago (Edited 3854d ago )

GrizzliS1987 says:

"They are fighting for frames per second and 1080p crap when they play on a 19 inch monitor where 1080p is IDENTICAL to 720p."

Fighting for FPS at 1080P?! LOL, we are fighting for FPS's at more and twice that resolution.

and if you cant tell the difference between 1080p and 720p then either you need glasses or you are delusional.

LackTrue4K3854d ago

If there's one system that needs saving its a Wii U!

thebudgetgamer3854d ago

Saving it from selling three hundred plus million units?

4logpc3854d ago

People are really putting far too much thought into Vslves Steam Machines.

Steam Machines are in no way consoles. They are PC's with a case design to fit under your tv.

And since when did console gaming need saving....

admiralvic3854d ago

"And since when did console gaming need saving...."

This is one of those "I feel this way, which is obviously how everyone else feels." No different than the guy who said that CoD is dead (would that mean GTA V is the only alive game?), the person saying Black Flag might revitalize the AC series and now this. Consoles don't need to be interesting, games do. Specs might not say much, but they give developers the chance to make bigger games, flashier levels and unique experiences. This is what makes a new generation interesting. The promise of better tomorrows.

Tundra3854d ago

Lol @ console gaming needing to be "saved".

RyuCloudStrife3854d ago

Console gaming needs to be saved? Best joke I've heard in a week.

Show all comments (35)
70°

Why Are Steam's Recommendations Dogpoop?

Blindfolding myself and clicking a Steam page at random would serve me better recommendations than Steam’s algorithm

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
UltimateOwnage13d ago

Hmm, not sure I agree with that. The recommendations I get are usually pretty good, but then again I have pretty large library of games on Steam and hundreds of them in my wish list, along with lots of curators I follow for it to build recommendations off of. On occasion it will throw me a random FIFA game or something I've never bought or shown interest in, but mostly its decent IMO.

80°

5 Best Metroidvania Games on Steam (March 2024)

Dive into the best Metroidvania games on Steam, from hidden gems to top-rated classics, and embark on unforgettable adventures!

jznrpg24d ago

Skul is a metroidvania ? It’s on PS+ soon I’ll check it out. If it’s good I’ll buy a copy physically if they have one

Nacho_Z23d ago

If Pseudoregalia is one of the best I'd hate to see what the worst look like.

330°

Dragon’s Dogma 2 releases to mixed user reviews, as microtransactions criticised

Players can pay to edit their character, resurrect the dead and other actions.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
AdonisIsBeast32d ago

Who cares as long as it’s optional

phoenixwing32d ago

paying to edit your character is kind of crap as far as microtransactions go

Xristo32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

I hate any/all MTX in a paid game (especially a full-price game)... but know that you can spend in-game currency (RC), which you get from killing mobs, to completely remake your character.

phoenixwing31d ago

@xRisto how much did it change the gameplay though? Changing your character would have probably not cost any rc if they weren't hellbent on getting money by making it inconvenient

koga8831d ago

You can literally edit your character using in-game gold, dropped from monsters or obtained from selling items, as soon as you reach the first main town. You can even use Rift Crystals obtained from other people using your pawn or dropped from monsters to change your entire character or Pawn. It's paying to avoid doing something that is literally in the game.

PRIMORDUS31d ago

They are lucky there using Denuvo or their game and all future DLC etc. would be for free. 🤣

phoenixwing31d ago

@koga you completely missed the point i was making but go ahead and act like i'm being the wrong one

lucian22931d ago

you can pay ingame currency though; why are ya so derp

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 31d ago
Crows9032d ago (Edited 32d ago )

Capcom cares quite a bit....hence why it was kept from reviewers and initial impressions.

As far as optional...yeah...ALL mtx are optional. That's not the problem. The miss the mark entirely.

Heck buying the game is "optional" too.

The fact that they were hiding this is scummy as hell. I was going to buy this day 1 or day 3. Now I'm reconsidering the purchase entirely because as the reviews point out...there are certain design decisions which have not changed but funnily enough seem to be remedied by these mtx...

In other words they may have left certain features in the game in order to monetize them. So the mtx affected the development of the game in a negative way.

garos8232d ago

I'm certainly not buying it anymore. It has affected at least one sale from me. I'll pick it up second hand

peppeaccardo32d ago

Very close to buy the game at a discounted price but not anymore.
Bad business practice and hence they do not get my support/money !

warriorcase31d ago

It wasn't kept fromreviewers s though. Twitter reviewers are saying there was mention of mtx's in the reviewers guide

-Foxtrot32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

STOP. USING. THAT. SHITTY. EXCUSE

God damn man

Look how DLC changed after Oblivions horse armour, within 10 years most developers took the absolute p***. What was said then aswell? “It’s only optional who cares?” Now look where we all are.

There’s no half measures with these things, when will people realise this.

jwillj2k432d ago (Edited 32d ago )

Oh it’s gonna get worse. Ng+ locked behind mtx, “cool downs” preventing you from playing for more than 3 hours at a time unless u pay the mtx for unlimited access, main campaign bosses, in-game music, certain dialog, difficulty modes, certain npc interactions, all locked behind mtx, etc.. etc. gonna end up being like the NBA 2k games eventually paying for cross overs and shit… They gon get mid-evil on our asses.

OMGitzThatGuy31d ago

I can guarantee most of the items you can buy with mtx and ingame currency wouldn’t exist in ANY paid form if the main goal wasn't monetization. If the goal is to give idiots who are willing to pay for basic game features as mtx a way to do things faster then the only ones the mtx hurt are the non paying players as you are now locking features behind a grind that you chose to put in the game that you are essentially admitting to creating some type of time sink. I have never heard of a game locking basic character editing behind a ingame paywall, it’s usually just an option.

Chard31d ago

Takes two to tango though - unfortunately people buy this garbage which incentivises the behaviour. It's an inevitable outcome of the profit motive

thorstein32d ago

@Mario

Yes. And so are resurrection "Wakestones." You can find them but they're rare.

victorMaje32d ago

Buying the game is now very optional too. If you don’t know why then you don’t get it.

shinoff218332d ago

Because it's only a door way. That's why we care. We've already seen some shit since Mtx was introduced.

Rimeskeem32d ago

1. DD2 is an ARPG with 8 different playable classes
2. There is no multiplayer aspect to the game
3. You can only have one character (have to pay for more)
4. You cannot delete the character unless you go into the game files
5. The game is $70 dollars upfront

Having to pay for more character slots in a game that *features* 8 playable classes is pretty much not optional for an ARPG.

Angyobangyo31d ago

Judging from steam reviews, gamers care. Not plastic gamers. Why didn’t Itsuno mention such MTX would be available in-game? Why weren’t the MTXs there for review copies?

Kiryu199231d ago

Who cares is how all this started. The many many excuses. Please keep defending these greedy publishers and unfair tactics. We be gamers are the problem

Horse armor

$10 online passes if buying a used copy

Cheat codes gone and are replaced by micro transactions

Unlocking stuff by playing games behind micro transactions and XP boosters

It’s only cosmetic

No one is being forced to spend even though publishers are literally making their games more grindy to force people to play

Full priced games have mobile game type micro transactions

$70 priced games because higher development costs while making record profits and laying off record number of employees

And to play the game early pay us extra $20-30 on top of full price

Release games now and promise to maybe fix them later only to abandon the game

Day one patches that make the games worst

If it’s your favorite game defend the publisher if it’s not hate on another publisher for similar content

SixFrvgz31d ago Show
+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 31d ago
kenpachi32d ago

Must have picked up some EA crew to put this in the game

robtion32d ago

Yeah these are really bad ones. Directly impacting gameplay too. Super scummy move. I hope nobody buys them.

CrimsonWing6932d ago

Yet Helldivers 2 gets a pass? Y’know a GotY contender by the name of RE4 had them and so does Devil May Cry V. The funny thing is I enjoyed both of those games thoroughly without having to buy a single microtransaction.

What I do consider a valid complaint is not being able to start a new game or being able to edit your character. That’s kind of a seriously baffling decision, but then I think how I played Dragon’s Dogma 1 and I never edited my character and I just did a 100% playthrough on a single file and didn’t start a NG since. So, I don’t think these are really going to impact me, but I can see how it will others.

Crows9032d ago

Helldivers 2 is a live service game where everything is obtainable in game with incredible ease.

Not sure about re4 or DMC but nobody is giving anyone a pass ...this article is about dragons dogma 2...not those games.

What is valid are in game features made to supposedly force you to think carefully only to have a surprise online store offer solutions to built in problems for more money.

Goosejuice32d ago

Those same things they are selling can be found Ingame as well. U can buy the character editor through merchants with gold. Don't get me wrong..I dislike these mtx they are doing but you don't need to buy them to be able to get them.

CrimsonWing6932d ago (Edited 32d ago )

Oh my bad, I can’t bring up games with microtransactions that nobody had a sh*t fit over. My mistake.

I love how people move the goalpost.

Crows9031d ago

@goose
@crimson

All mtx sucks. I'd rather helldiver's not have them because it makes me wonder if the rate at which you collect materials. That said. The games features are all fully enjoyable and aren't affected by the mtx.

That's not the case with dragons dogma 2...they left in place features that are supposedly part of the challenge of the game only to let you buy your way out very conveniently. I didn't look through all of them but I've heard some are rare but can be purchased with more money now. Even more so in a game about managing weight load there's a tent, I believe, that you can pay more money for that weighs less than your typical tent...not all sure on all the mtx and I'm aware that you can purchase many through in game vendor but they're incredibly useful mtx that are obtained much more slowly in game...or even a limited amount of them.

Instead is selling fast travel...just let us don't for free....or instead of selling cosmetic changes...how about letting us do it for free...

Nothing in helldivers comes close to this abomination

Angyobangyo31d ago

One is a single player game and one is a live service game. One is $40 vs$70. And most importantly, one game is there to spread democracy.

Ironmike31d ago

It's not incredibly easy for certain things in helldivers though u still have grind quite bit but u ate correct in saying u can eventually get enough medals to purchase stuff

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 31d ago
Moegooner32d ago

Read your comment again and maybe, just maybe you might realise how dumb it was.

CrimsonWing6932d ago (Edited 32d ago )

What was dumb about it? That I pointed out the hypocrisy?

garos8232d ago

It was extremely scummy that capcom hid this from reviewers. I have no doubt this game is good but these type of microtransactions don't sit well with me. They've lost a sale from me

Lionsguard32d ago

I was going to pay full price to support this game because I've been waiting for it for forever but I think I'll wait until I get it for free from Epic or a Humblebundle monthly.

Redemption-6432d ago

I am not defending Capcom, as I am not a fan of MTX in single player games. I do however belive they were open to reviewers about having MTX in their game. The reviewers just decided to leave that part out. Which is very disingenuous. There are some companies that get away with these things. Image if this was done by EA, Ubisoft, or even Activision? I am positive those defending Capcom, would have had their pitchforks ready if the companies listed above did this

anast32d ago

That's why reviewers can't be trusted. In fact, they are not reviewers at all. They get free codes to talk about stuff they don't understand nor care about.

Sanctusone31d ago

I mean it was pretty obvious to anyone with eyes...one of the items you get from deluxe edition was in game items.
1500 Rift Crystals - Points to Spend Beyond the Rift (A)
Which honestly I figured they kept a similar mtx system like DMC5 and the optional red orbs.

Lionsguard31d ago

1500 Rift Crystals doesn't mean anything. The first game had Rift crystals too, you just earned them by people hiring your Pawn and you get it from certain quests.

anast31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

A reviewer's job is to point out the obvious of a product as though they were the consumer. This means reviewers, to do their actual job, would need to review the complete game: the edition they are reviewing, how they got the game, technical aspects, story, and monetization scheme. Since, it is obvious that MT's are a part of the game, it would need to be reviewed. This way people can be informed, so they can decide if they want to play this style of game/monetization scheme.

For example, AC Origins was bad with Mt's. I had to farm side missions or pay to advance the story. This was after I already did close to 25 or more side missions. While I was grinding there were constant reminders that I could pay to ease the grind. I would have never bought the game if it were reviewed properly.

Show all comments (78)