150°

Sony unconcerned by Xbox One's seven-day UK head start over PS4

That Xbox One will arrive in the UK a week before PS4 does not give it an advantage, Sony has said.

xHeavYx3861d ago

I don't think a week advantage is going be that much of a problem

Xsilver3861d ago

true especially since they have 32 places for the Ps4 to launch in Sony will be good.

UltimateMaster3861d ago

7 days won't make much of a difference anywhere.
The fact they have it in 32 countries is more than enough to compensate.

Boody-Bandit3861d ago (Edited 3861d ago )

Sony has ALL the momentum behind them right now and that wont change any time soon. Sony is releasing their new console in nearly 3 times more areas than the X1. Sony has their vision etched in granite and is unwavering in the direction they have chosen to go. They, unlike their competitor, are not making it up as they go along (slinging every and anything at the wall and going with whatever sticks).

They have the more powerful console, cheaper than their direct competitor, less restrictive, more consumer friendly, more developer friendly (they gave the devs the console they asked for), WAY more support out of the gate with indies, more 1st party studios and a much better and proven track record of producing high quality brand new block buster IPs throughout their consoles life cycle. They are STILL releasing brand new block buster IPs on the PS3 right now (TLOU & Beyond: Two Souls).

So it all comes down to production. Sony will sell as many units as they can produce in the first year. All indications is this is another area where Sony is far ahead of their competition.

Recap this generation (PS3 / X360)
PS3 - 12 to 18 months release disadvantage, higher price point, more difficult and expensive to develop for, a tsunami of bad press throughout most of this generation, and yet they pulled ahead of MS with the PS3 worldwide. Yet here we are saying Sony isn't concerned about a week head start in one region. Talk about an understatement of the year.

MasterCornholio3861d ago

You mean 36 and whatever countries its launching in the middle east.

Sony is ready for launch.

Nexus 7 2013

Muerte24943861d ago (Edited 3861d ago )

there are European markets where Xbox isn't even launching until next year. Microsoft is only launching in 13 markets while Sony is launching in 32 markets.

vigilante_man3861d ago

To answer the question: YES

It does matter that XB1 is released a week earlier in the UK. At least it matters to me. I have got to wait a whole week while all I hear about on the news and in the press is XB1, XB1, XB1.

But I guess I will live. It's just going to be a really loooong week!

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney3861d ago

Probably them pre order number got them feeling good lol.

People who pre ordered ps4 can wait a week for more power, better devs & save $100.

georgeenoob3861d ago

Agreed. Same goes for PS4 launching a week early in the U.S.

xHeavYx3861d ago

Hey, look who's back.
You may be right, but what is going to make a difference is being $100 cheaper and being the most powerful console

GrandpaSnake3861d ago

if the xboxone was really awesome it would matter but i guess not.

MysticStrummer3861d ago

Yeah there is no launch date advantage this time either way. Even launching in more markets doesn't necessarily give Sony an advantage, since that depends on the production capabilities of both companies, though it sounds to me like Sony will have more ready for launch day than MS will. That's just the impression that I get anyway.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3861d ago
Belking3861d ago (Edited 3861d ago )

That's because they know the US is the most important market. That's something that they ignored the last time around. They learned that lesson the hard way. It's funny because this gen all sony fanboys say "the world" is more important but now it's all about the US. Now, what do we have here....lol

Don't let the usual PR fool you though they are concerned about xbox one everywhere except japan......where nintendo currently dominates.

xHeavYx3861d ago

Really? Usual PR? Because lately, MS has been doing a lot of nonsensical PR, but you are probably ok with that

AceBlazer133861d ago

Or maybe cause the US is the only market where they haven't completely dominated yet so their going balls deep this gen to change that.Let me translate to Xbox.Cod,domination,capture,en emy,territory,teabag.

KonsoruMasuta3861d ago

The US isn't the only place that matters.

You will see that when Xbox lands in 3rd place worldwide.

Wikkid6663861d ago (Edited 3861d ago )

Really... you really think it won't sell more than the Wii U. It will sell more the Wii U the day it's released.

Sevir3861d ago

I don't know why they would be worried, 32 > 13.... MS isn't launching in the other European markets till next year, so they are more concerned with shipping to those regions than a 7 day head start in a region where they are sure to sell out...

They aren't bothered

Hicken3861d ago

One bubble is one too many for you.

I can't even begin to break down your comment. It makes so little sense I can't figure out how to refute you without sounding ridiculous, myself.

I feel ridiculous just responding to you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3861d ago
meatysausage3861d ago

it remains to be seen which is a better approach, but no doubt sony is more organised for launch with better supply.

GribbleGrunger3861d ago

Of course they're not worried. Unlike fans of a certain console, they see the region as Europe. I always find it odd that some people are prepared to imagine the UK as separate from Europe, but they never use France or Germany ... Why would that be?

paul-p19883861d ago

Funnily enough, i live in the UK, and i find we are ALWAYS trying to seperate ourselves from Europe... yet i am not entirely certain why lol.

I would guess it stems from the UK being 2 islands away from mainland europe, but am not sure...

On topic, Sony don't need to worry, Europe has always been Sony territory, and i bet the UK will be no different this time around either. 1 week's difference might sway a few twitchy people who need the newest things NOW NOW NOW, but definitely not a majority.

GribbleGrunger3861d ago (Edited 3861d ago )

Yep, the fact that they're releasing only one week later and not 16 months later, is going to make a huge difference -- as well as price, power, looks and potential exclusives of course.

DeadManIV3861d ago

Well we dont use the euro

mcstorm3861d ago

@paul-p1988 You do know the 360 has sold better in the UK than the PS3? This is a market Sony wants back this gen. The feed back I am getting is the people who have a PS3 are going to get a 4 and the people who have a 360 are getting a One so it should be interesting to see how it plays out in the uk.

SuperWeeb3861d ago

It's hard to say. The last generation, both US and UK were dominated by Xbox... I would only play with one or two of my mates on the PS3, but everyone was on the 360.

Of course this generation, Microsoft have faced some very negative publicity which they haven't fully recovered from.
Coupled with that the majority of people in the UK don't even know that the WiiU exists (I'm being serious, when we saw ads in the cinema, everyone would always ask what the hell it is), the PS4 seems like the only major choice this holiday.
Microsoft even had to bundle Fifa 14 with it just to get it to sell.

I know a few lads who will be picking it up, and no doubt a lot of fans will be too because it's an Xbox... Though the week headstart, I can only assume it won't give any significant advantage.

Show all comments (45)
250°

Tomb Raider Remastered just quietly censored one in-game detail

Tomb Raider 1-3 Remastered players are ticked off by the game’s most recent patch, which censors in-game pin-up posters of Lara Croft.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbible.com
rlow17h ago

This is why gaming is screwed. When people change things to fit someone’s agenda, it’s a slippery slope downhill.

Christopher6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Even if that agenda is of the developer? Way to remove developer rights.

***One player called it a “huge problem with modern games,” saying they can now be “ruined AFTER people buy them”.***

The level of drama. Yes, I recall sitting there for more hours than I did anything else in the game. These two pinups are the core of the game, after all!

coolbeans5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

rlow1's cringe catastrophizing aside, I do think developers *ought* to strive to maintain an original work to the best of their ability. The language of a "remaster" tacitly implies that - for good or ill - what's being resold is what fans remember but better.

Profchaos5h ago

Games can be ruined after purchasing them yeah we know this not from this but from GTA IV which had half it's radio content patched out due to licensing expirations and to me that was a huge deal.

This pin up poster is a bit of nonsense but the whole argument of modern games can be ruined post launch is Absol true.

DedicatedDark4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

It's not their work to censor. They are incharge of restoration & remastering the work, not overwriting it.

Barlos3h ago

It's not the agenda of the developer though, they're pandering and trying to increase their ESG score.

Way to support censorship...

victorMaje3h ago

It’s not the end of the world for sure, but I understand the hate towards this kind of change. I believe it’s also a matter of principle.

Imagine a Picasso painting being restored & the restorer deciding there aren’t enough strokes, or some lines aren’t straight enough or curved enough…not sure it would/should sit well with people.

Have all original devs signed off on this change? Even if it’s the case, are we saying older gamers are better mentally equipped to process what was there than current gamers, hence the change?

Enough time ago the case was made that games are an art form. We’re supposed to have won that case.
So which is it? Are games art or not?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3h ago
Eidolon3h ago

Hasn't this been happened for over a decade since remasters? I can't see that it's any worse now. Maybe if Sweet Baby starts getting their hands on remasters we will definitely have a problem.

Rebel_Scum6h ago

tbh I dont see something like this as censorship. Does anyone else not find it strange for someone to stick pin ups of themsleves in a locker room?

Now of it was a pin up of some half naked firefighters it might make sense as Lara might like that, and if they removed that I would cry censorship. But removing pin ups of the main character, yeah I get it.

Barlos3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

It's a game, and they were placed there for the audience. It's not real life. If it was, she wouldn't have fought a T-Rex now would she?

Yes, it's censorship but it's a bit less in your face. If they were in the original game, then they should have been in the remasters. It's bad enough that they have that ridiculous unnecessary warning at the start, but then they start removing things post launch. I don't care how small the change, they shouldn't be doing it. It's nothing but ESG pandering but in a subtle way.

Rebel_Scum1h ago

Look bro, if you have pictures of yourself naked on a bear skin rug up in your house let me tell you, its not normal.

jambola41m ago

I wasn't aware censorship was based on what made sense to you

Rebel_Scum28m ago

Likewise, what a stupid comment.

jambola18m ago

I agree
Your comment was pretty stupid

SimpleDad2h ago

By the year 2030, this remaster collection will totally be changed and censored. Probably will remove Lara as a playable character. It's ridiculous. Glad that my family didn't buy this.
I still have Tomb Raider 2 PS1 as a memory.

jambola40m ago

Those shorts are a little revealing
Should probably make them snow pants

Barlos30m ago

They'll probably make her trans

CobraKai2h ago

It’s mentioned in the article, and it’s a point i 100% agree with, it’s the fact that they can censor a game after you buy it. That’s total bullshit.

Killer2020UK1h ago

Whilst it's an overreaction to say this has "ruined" the game, it's still problematic that this has happened post launch and for many, post-purchase.

I don't want someone to change a product for the worse after I've bought it. The same goes for implementing micro transactions after reviews.

I wonder why they did this? Nobody was kicking up a fuss as far as I'm aware.

maykhausonninh1h ago

Nobody was kicking up a fuss as far as I'm aware.

Show all comments (22)
100°

Final Fantasy III Pixel Remaster Review – You Are Your Job, Apparently

Gary Green said: In a time where an enhanced, 3D remake of Final Fantasy III already exists, it’s hard to argue that Final Fantasy III Pixel Remaster is the definitive version we were expecting. With Final Fantasy III already being the last in the series to be translated and make its way west, this is something of a slap in the face for the fans. Still, let’s not be disheartened. There may be many shortfalls in this edition of Final Fantasy III, however there’s no denying that this classic JRPG still holds some nostalgic value, even if it struggles to break away from its original hardware limitations.

Read Full Story >>
pslegends.com
FACTUAL evidence7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

It’s funny I’m seeing these articles about pixel remaster, and I just platinumed 1-4 within 8 days lol. I’ve been on FF5 for about a week now. Let’s just say 5 was the start of FF having content like crazy. I should have the plat within 2-3 days.

70°

Warframe's Protea Prime Access launches on all platforms on May 1st, 2024

"Digital Extremes are today very happy and proud to announce that Warframe’s next highlightly anticipated Prime form launches soon with Protea Prime Access arriving on all platforms on May 1st, 2024." - Digital Extremes.