400°

AMD announces new flagship model GPUs, includes Xbox One-esque programmable audio chip

The flagship models also boast a programmable audio chip in them. AMD also provides GPUs for the next-gen consoles i.e. for the PlayStation 4 and the Xbox One.

Read Full Story >>
gearnuke.com
Philaroni3863d ago

I hope AMD makes a come back, I use to use them only back in the Athon x64 days. Wonder what that audio chip can do, maybe GPU's will replace dedicated sound cars (Not like you need them much anymore with how good Mobo ones can be.)

aceitman3863d ago

whats interesting is they are using gddr5. so is that the future of gaming.

Letros3863d ago

That's 5 year old tech, GDDR6 is the future, expect it on the next card after this.

Dasteru3863d ago

How is it interesting? GDDR5 has been standard as VRam for about 5 years now.

aceitman3863d ago (Edited 3863d ago )

there goes another troll(Sonyclearlylistens) look at the dam pic it shows gddr5 , its newer than gddr3 u call someone a ps4 fanboy for what saying is the gddr5 the future of gaming grow the hell up. and stop creating troll problems and flame baiting. http://gearnuke.com/amd-ann...
and by the way I do this to u http://www.youtube.com/watc...

SkullBlade1693863d ago

No, it isn't the future of gaming. It's the past of gaming.

I had a Radeon HD 4870 card back in 2008 which had GDDR5, that's not exactly new.

starchild3863d ago

People are disagreeing with you because you are acting like GDDR5 is something new when in fact it has been standard on PC graphics cards for years.

The PC gaming world will be moving on to GDDR6.

aceitman3863d ago

@ starchild , thank u for explaining it to me , I don't game on pc and bubbles to u for telling me in a mature way, not like Sonyclearlylistens , I thought they where going to use gddr6 so that is what was so interesting with them coming out with gddr5 on there new cards.

AliTheSnake13863d ago

LOL even PC fanboys don't know what they are talking about. GDDR5 is 5 years old. but it has changed over the years.
Your graphics card from 5 years ago had only 512mb running at 3.6 Gbit/s.

PS4 has for gpu around 4.5 gb. Running at 176GB/s.

GDDR6 won't be much of a jump at he beginning. most likely power saving and small improvements here and there.
And YES it is the future of gaming for consoles.And most people game on consoles. And most games are made with consoles in mind so YES it is THE future of gaming.

kewlkat0073863d ago

"whats interesting is they are using gddr5. so is that the future of gaming."

You "console" only gamer are funny..I think it was the first time many ever heard of GDDR5 when it was announced Sony was using it...

P0werVR3862d ago (Edited 3862d ago )

^

EXACTLY! LMAO!!

Ps4Console3862d ago

Believe it or not GDDR 5 has been round a long time .

Bolts3862d ago

Lmao. Classic fanboy comment. Welcome to 5 years ago "nextgen" consoles. Speaking of 5 years ago can the PS4 lock in 1080p for all content yet or are they saving this feature for 2023?

When they say Greatness Awaits, I didn't think I will be waiting that long for a true 1080p console.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 3862d ago
WarThunder3863d ago (Edited 3863d ago )

AMD makes a come back? really?

AMD right now has the best Price/performance CPU ($185), its beats Intel i7 ($319) http://youtu.be/eu8Sekdb-IE...

And AMD GPUs are also the best Price/performance ratio on the market.

starchild3863d ago

These look fantastic, but I'm still going to wait until 2014 to upgrade. For now my HD 7950 is doing very well. We'll see how the first round of next gen games run on it.

Philaroni3863d ago

I hate to even bother commenting to the people in this thread, but, GDDR5, GDDRX*2 means little. Yes it will improve graphics and what we can track in games as far as variables but the real future is expanding the market to people that have yet to play games or don't play them as an everyday form of entertainment like music and movies have done for years. Yes those forms of media have much more history but I feel games are growing at a faster rate. If technology is the only driver / future of the game industry then what is the point of gameplay, story, characters, emotion, and so on? Graphics get out dated on a yearly bases. They are a poor and to be honest an irrelivent gague on the 'future of games' hardware helps but its the design and demand of gamers that drive the indsutry.

ATi_Elite3863d ago

Nice but I'm not buying a GPU until GDDR6 arrives in 2014!

HD7970ghz CFX and 660ti SLI are GREAT for a long time.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney3862d ago (Edited 3862d ago )

U mean a comeback in cpu performance or just market share. They can't beat intel.. Intel will be market leader as they should till amd ups their game.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3862d ago
windblowsagain3863d ago

Strange i'm the other way. Prefer AMD.

Nvidia are just to full of it, But AMD Smokes NVIDIA in compute.

Dasteru3863d ago

AMD sometimes has more powerful hardware, it is about a 50/50 in that regard. Nvidia always has much better drivers though and they release new drivers to increase performance with new games far more often.

Nvidia also provides much larger gains in SLI vs Crossfire and is alot more stable.

ziggurcat3863d ago ShowReplies(2)
Ninjamonkey823863d ago

But but but PhysX for me this is where Nvidia wins out. Compare any game that supports that feature to an AMD(ATI)game and basically you get what you pay for. For me BF3 is a good example and this will follow to BF4 as well.

steve30x3863d ago

The PhysX is just a load of rubbish. There arent many games that have it and it has nothing to do with physics anyway. Just something to add extra graphical effects that you would hardly notice while gaming anyway. I know because I have a GTX680

Dasteru3863d ago (Edited 3863d ago )

PhysX does have to do with physics, the graphical effects are part of it.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Watch at 0:45 and 1:09 for some good examples.

Feralkitsune3862d ago

ARMA 3 uses Physx for the vehicle physics.

Ninjamonkey823862d ago

@Steve30x Play without your card and come back and tell me how rubbish it is. Except for good frame rates that by the way my 770gtx does deliver by the bucket load on anything i throw at it. The ATI cards miss out on PhysX.

Its a game changer for me when it comes to Graphic Cards. Hell expect for the games being 1920 1080 on PC with mental fps. It may as well be the same as the console version off a game without the effects that nvidia provide if you stick with AMD.

Its just more Cost effective to be an AMD gamer while bei9ng a PC gamer that's all. Me personally when i do a low flyby in my jet in BF3 i want every tree to bend with the wind my plane is creating.

In Batman i want when i run around there to be crap loads off stuff on the ground that is affected by my cape that i can knock around. I don't want to being plain and lifeless. Alice Madness this is represented as well. There's many games on PC that takes advantage off Nvidias PhysX.

Remember even the new line off AMD cards are still behind Nvidia in these regards. So when it comes to PC gaming my first and only choice is Nvidia and i recommend them to anyone. It dosen't mater what consoles use what this is where N4G gets a bit twisted really.

You all forget there are difference between PC and console. I own the current gen consoles and i plan on getting the next gen ones as well.

Well the PS4 i was going for the xb1 but I'm not gonna trust something that hasn't been live tested with less than two months to go till release. I'd be a fool to part with £500.

MarkusMcNugen3862d ago

@ninjagoat
A decent CPU can easily make up for the lack of a Physx chip built onto the card. There is a reason why you can download the software for Physx and use it without an Nvidia GPU. A decent Core i5 or Core i7 will work just fine in that regard.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3862d ago
Erdrick3862d ago

i thought bf4 was partnered with amd, no? it wouldn't use physx

ProjectVulcan3863d ago

Graphics cards have incorporated onboard sound processing for several years now, mainly due to offering all in one HDMI out for home theatres. Its usually only on par with integrated sound, which is why a lot of people still go with a dedicated sound card for the best audio from their machines.

It seemed inevitable that graphics cards would eventually incorporate superior sound processing, its quite welcome if it raises the bar above your standard motherboard integrated fare.

Show all comments (57)
100°

Make your next GPU upgrade AMD as these latest-gen Radeon cards receive a special promotion

AMD has long been the best value option if you're looking for a new GPU. Now even their latest Radeon RX 7000 series is getting cheaper.

Father__Merrin1d 5h ago

Best for the money is the Arc cards

just_looken1d 3h ago

In the past yes but last gen amd has gotten cheaper and there new cards are on the horizon making 6k even cheaper.

The arc cards are no longer made by intel but asus/asrock has some the next line battlemage is coming out prices tbd.

Do to the longer software development its always best to go amd over intel if its not to much more money even though intel is a strong gpu i own 2/4 card versions.

270°

AMD FSR 3.1 Announced at GDC 2024, FSR 3 Available and Upcoming in 40 Games

Last September, we unleashed AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution 3 (FSR 3)1 on the gaming world, delivering massive FPS improvements in supported games.

Read Full Story >>
community.amd.com
Eonjay32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

So to put 2 and 2 together... FSR 3.1 is releasing later this year and the launch game to support it is Rachet and Clank: Rift Apart. In Sony's DevNet documentation it shows Rachet and Clank: Rift Apart as the example for PSSR. PS5 Pro also launches later this year... but there is something else coming too: AMD RDNA 4 Cards (The very same technology thats in the Pro). So, PSSR is either FSR 3.1 or its a direct collaboration with AMD for that builds on FSR 3.1. Somehow they are related. I think PSSR is FSR 3.1 with the bonus of AI... now lets see if RDNA 4 cards also include an AI block.

More details:
FSR 3.1 fixes Frame Generation
If you have a 30 series RTX card you can now use DLSS3 with FSR Frame Generation (No 40 Series required!)
Its Available on all Cards (we assume it will come to console)
Fixes Temporal stability

MrDead31d ago

I've been using a mod that allows dlss frame gen on my 3080 it works on all rtx series. It'll be good not to rely on mods for the future.

darksky30d ago

The mods avaiable are actually using FSR3 frame gen but with DLSS or FSR2 upscaling.

Babadook730d ago (Edited 30d ago )

I think that the leaks about the 5 Pro would debunk the notion that the two (FSR 3.1 and PSSR) are the same technology. PSSR is a Sony technology.

MrDead31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

I wonder how much they fixed the ghosting in dark areas as Nvidia are leaving them in the dust with image quality. Still good that they are improving in big leaps, I'll have to see when the RTX5000 series is released who I go with... at the moment the RTX5000's are sounding like monsters.

just_looken31d ago

Did you see the dell leaks were they are trying to cool cards using over 1k watts of power.

We are going to need 220 lines for next gen pcs lol

MrDead31d ago

That's crazy! Sounds like heating my house won't be a problem next winter.

porkChop30d ago

As much as I hate supporting Nvidia, AMD just doesn't even try to compete. Their whole business model is to beat Nvidia purely on price. But I'd rather pay for better performance and better features. AMD also doesn't even try to innovate. They just follow Nvidia's lead and make their own version of whatever Nvidia is doing. But they're always 1 or 2 generations behind when it comes to those software/driver innovations, so Nvidia is always miles ahead in quality and performance.

MrDead30d ago

I do a lot of work on photoshop so an Intel Nvidia set up has been the got to because of performance edge, more expensive but far more stable too. Intel also have the edge over AMD processors with better load distribution on the cores, less spikes and jitters. When you're working large format you don't want lag or spikes when you're editing or drawing.

I do think AMD has improved massively though and whist I don't think they threaten Nvidia on the tech side they do make very well priced cards and processors for the power. I'm probably going with a 5080 or 5090 but AMD will get a little side look from me, which is a first in a long time... but like you said they are a generation or two behind at the moment.

Goosejuice30d ago

While I can't argue for amd gpu, they aren't bad but they aren't great either. The cpu for amd have great. I would argue the 7800x3d as one of the best cpu for gaming right now. Idk about editing so I take ur word for that but gaming amd cpu is a great option these days.

porkChop30d ago

@Goosejuice

I have a 7800X3D. It certainly is great for gaming. Though for video editing, rendering, etc, I think Intel have the advantage from what I remember. I just mean from a GPU standpoint I can't support them.

70°

AMD storm Nvidia's Super launch party with temporary price cut to RX 7900 XT

Now that the RTX 4070 Super has launched, AMD have chopped the price of the RX 7900 XT to new lows.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com