810°

Grand Theft Auto Online micro-transaction pack prices revealed

You'll be able to spend between £1.99 and £13.49 in Grand Theft Auto Online for individual packs of in-game money, people with early access to the mode have told Eurogamer.

The four GTA Online currency cards spotted yesterday in the code of Rockstar's own site are still to be officially announced, but we understand they will have UK prices of the following amounts:
$100,000 Red Shark Cash Card - £1.99
$200,000 Tiger Shark Cash Card - £3.49
$500,000 Bull Shark Cash Card - £6.99
$1,250,000 Great White Shark Cash Card - £13.49

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
majiebeast3858d ago (Edited 3858d ago )

Well that just killed my hype for GTA online, if this is really in the game. It wasnt cool when Deadspace 3 did it and it isnt cool here. Like paying 50-60$ dollars isnt enough anymore.

Fake money for real money you know what that means goldfarmers gonna be invading GTA online.

black0o3858d ago (Edited 3858d ago )

they didnt kill the hype .. they r going to kill the efforts that hardcore players puts into the MP

pompombrum3858d ago (Edited 3858d ago )

And that's killing the hype for many people. Hardcore player spends 100 ingame hours earning all this vanity stuff and feels proud of his accomplishments, then someone achieves the same thing in the time it takes for him to buy the dlc packs without spending a single minute ingame.. that's a new low for DLC from such a big game.

caseh3858d ago

You can still earn this cash online by grinding it out though right?

Kind of like how Planetside works? Earn it the hard way over time or pay real moneys but get the same equipment?

xPhearR3dx3858d ago (Edited 3858d ago )

You still have to rank up and unlock everything. So even if you spend $100 day 1, you're not going to be able to buy everything without ranking up first.

Not to mention this is LEAKED. Look at all the leaked GTA V footage that turned out to be fake (well not fake, just not entirely true) like car damage, not being able to rob stores etc. This is why R* hates leaks because people (like in the comments below) jump to conclusions without knowing all the facts, then feel stupid afterwards.

SirBradders3858d ago

@caseh planetside 2 is ftp though so they need revenue from somewhere.

Gta online can still be great as long as purchasing money doesn't give players god like status.

Still bummed by this though because the story mode is great.

KumquatGOATBEEF3858d ago

@xPhearR3dx

If this weren't true, Rockstar would probably have come out and denied it already. I'm sure they are already aware of the press they are getting regarding microtransactions. It seems like it would be in their best interest to come out and deny it already since we are less than a week away before online launches if it weren't true.

The sad thing is that people will "buy" into this idea and they'll make millions more. Gone are the days of working hard for your money... disappointing.

Angrymorgan3858d ago

Isnt that the main idea?
Earn money..so if I just buy money....whT im I supposed to do?

fredrikpedersen3858d ago

@Caseh

But PlanetSide 2 is FREE! That's the difference.

xPhearR3dx3858d ago (Edited 3858d ago )

Oh what's this? Like I said, you all jump to conclusion and now feel stupid. You're welcome.

"There is no in-game paywall and nothing that should disrupt the balance of the game. You don’t have to spend real money to attain the cars, guns, clothes, flash and style of a high-roller in Los Santos, but can if you wish to get them a little quicker."

http://www.rockstargames.co...

Christopher3858d ago

***they didnt kill the hype .. they r going to kill the efforts that hardcore players puts into the MP***

I disagree that it will kill the effort. What a person earns is not about others who take the easy way out, it's about what they accomplish. Whether someone else sees it or not, it doesn't really matter. You know you did it. That's what counts.

The age of achievements has made some people forget that some accomplishments aren't about what others see out of it but what you gain from it.

KiLLeRCLaM3858d ago

They did the same crap with BF3 as well..

mikeslemonade3857d ago

This doesn't matter. Auto-aim is going to ruin online gameplay and Rockstar North doesn't realize this. It's just one simple feature that is going to lose them money.

PoSTedUP3857d ago

ill prob get the 100,000 card, and tell me i aint a hard core gamer ill run circles around you in a tshirt and no shoes in cops n crooks. yall make the hardcore gamer sound like a concieded "look at me, look at me!" gamer. its the mentality of a trophy whore. im going to have what i want from the jump which is awesome, so i can get an earlier start on playing cops n crooks for hours on end. the hardcore gamer plays for his own satisfaction. this aint WoW, its not gonna take so long to acquire money. this is the last game id take seriously, its just fun. i take hardcore games seriously, and by the sound of that autoaim, this sint going to be as nearly as hardcore as i like. matter in fact i dont know any hardcore game that i play that lets you do something like this.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3857d ago
KonsoruMasuta3858d ago

Although I am dissapointed in this, I do have to point out that Rockstar has been advertising these as two desperate things.

I was wondering how they were going to profit off of something like this. They plan on constantly updating it with new missions and content and that costs money. It's kind of like a MMO.

pompombrum3858d ago

Yeah and the majority of MMOs don't even stoop this low for making money. They could have easily added some well thought out content through DLC, they just went for the easy, effective and most damaging for the gamers.

Assuming everything is available from the get go and you don't need to meet any other requirements, what people spend hours upon hours to earn, little cocky underaged brat can get in seconds thanks to Daddy's credit card. That's seriously low.. I'd even go as far to say that not even EA would stoop that low and that's saying something.

majiebeast3858d ago (Edited 3858d ago )

So if these are 2 seperate things how come it isnt free to download or sold seperately? It says multiplayer on the back of my game box dont know about yours.

They could have done a better job and keep it at cosmetics like cameo outfits from Bioshock borderlands weapons skins stuff like that. This directly influences the game. What they did is the sleazy f2p mobile games monetization.

Why they want this to count seperate, is because it probably would have taken off the singleplayer review scores.

PSPMAN073858d ago

@aiBreeze

I was with you until you threw EA in there. EA wouldn't even stoop this low, is like what? They are the kings of microtransaction hell they are the ones that took the concept and started applying it to their games on a regular basis at one point.

But as far as the topic goes its definitely saddening such an anticipated and (I assume from the storyline gameplay) quality game to include microtransaction which can absolutely deteriorate a game. It is said that you still have to unlock everything, which I hope is true to mitigate the loss of integrity, otherwise it'll just be a game to pass the time until the next big thing comes out (Battlefield 4 and COD Ghost on the horizon)

medman3858d ago

I think you meant disparate?

H0RSE3858d ago (Edited 3858d ago )

@aiBreeze

"Assuming everything is available from the get go and you don't need to meet any other requirements, what people spend hours upon hours to earn, little cocky underaged brat can get in seconds thanks to Daddy's credit card."

- So now dedicated "hardcore's" can't boast their achievements and stroke their epeen, because other players utilized an optional feature and obtained the same results hassle free? Get over yourself...

If you want to do things the traditional way, there's nothing stopping you from doing that. The "need" for some sort of satisfaction or pride that comes from boasting said accomplishments, are problems that lie more with the gamer, not the game. This sort of mindset is similar to the FPS crowd labeling certain guns a "noob" weapons, as some sort of justification for choosing the hard/traditional way to obtain the same or similar results.

Rockstar isn't here to cater to your ego. They are offering optional features for those who want them, without removing the traditional alternative. They are adding options, not taking anything away. The recognition you and others might crave for your efforts, are your own problems, not theirs.

Corpser3858d ago

You either spend time grinding or spend real money, I don't see the difference

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3858d ago
cleft53858d ago

Not everyone has the time to dedicate the hours needed to get to the top in order to afford the best stuff. So long as I can get all of this stuff naturally, then I am okay with them doing this move. It becomes a problem if I am locked out of cool stuff because I am not willing to pay for microtransactions.

dmeador3858d ago

Why such outrage? If you dont want to spend the money, then play the game and have fun. If you do, go for it and give more $$ to the people who have spent 5 years making an incredible single player, and probably a fantastic multi. I guarantee they are going to support the multi, so the people who are willing to pay will add to the value of the game for people who dont want to (like me).

There wont be any locks or limits on what you can do if you dont pay, other than the obvious. Lets not be outraged just for the sake of being outraged, and look at the positives.

KillrateOmega3858d ago

The outrage should be pretty obvious to any hardcore players out there or at least anyone who has worked hard to get something.

People are wary of micro-transactions, because they can very easily lead to a 'pay-to-win' scenario. A scenario wherein the man with the most money to blow on the game is king and the guys who work hard to attain an award or an achievement have all their efforts rendered meaningless.

People are worried that GTA Online will become a 'pay-to-win' game. Their worries are understandable, after all, the name of the game in GTA Online is to make as much money as possible. With these micro-transactions, people will be able to bypass most of the hard work just be cracking open their wallets and dropping a few bucks.

H0RSE3858d ago (Edited 3858d ago )

@KillrateOmega

The sense of entitlement or recognition you describe, is not a characteristic of a "hardcore" player, is a trait of a self absorbed one, where they believe their choice to do things "the hard way," should be met with special treatment. It seems more and more that people are using the phrase "hardcore gamer," to represent, well, essentially elitist assholes, who only play games to win, wouldn't dare play a game that isn't skill based or challenging, and on occasion, mock those who don't follow the same mindset.

The term "hardcore" should essentially be interchangeable with "enthusiast", since that is what they are - gaming enthusiasts. they love everything games, not just playing them, but gaming news and other happenings in the community. The fact that some people don't play on super hardcore difficulty mode or put in 40hr. a week gaming to earn $1,000,000 of in-game currency opposed to spending $2 in real world currency to achieve the same result, doesn't change this.

Maddens Raiders3858d ago (Edited 3858d ago )

@H0RSE - "The term "hardcore" should essentially be interchangeable with "enthusiast", since that is what they are - gaming enthusiasts. they love everything games, not just playing them, but gaming news and other happenings in the community. The fact that some people don't play on super hardcore difficulty mode or put in 40hr. a week gaming to earn $1,000,000 of in-game currency opposed to spending $2 in real world currency to achieve the same result, doesn't change this."

No, no, no. This makes no sense /at all/ and you proved >> no point. In fact you sound like, well, an elitist asshole. Just saying.

dmeador3856d ago

@KillrateOmega

Worked hard to get something? Its a video game, if you have to work hard then you are missing the point, haha. If you mean "put in a crap ton of time", then I would agree with you. They have already said how they are going to prevent the "pay-to-win" scenario. And if your opponents are dropping real money to be better off in a video game, then you are winning in real life

@Maddens Raiders
An opinion cant really be proved. Also I think you need to read up on what an elitist asshole is, as he doesnt say anything that claims he is better than someone else

KillrateOmega3856d ago (Edited 3856d ago )

@dmeador

Maybe for you working may not be an enticing prospect, but for many gamers, the challenge is their main incentive to play the game.

You say that it's not fun if you have to work hard? I counter by saying that it's no fun if I don't have to work at all.

@H0RSE

"The sense of entitlement or recognition you describe, is not a characteristic of a "hardcore" player, is a trait of a self absorbed one, where they believe their choice to do things "the hard way," should be met with special treatment."

So you're saying that if I were to put in a lot of time and effort into something, that I shouldn't be any more rewarded for my efforts than some lazy ass who just threw money at the issue for the sake of an unfair shortcut?

Sorry, but that is a steaming pile of fecal matter if you ask me.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3856d ago
360ICE3858d ago (Edited 3858d ago )

It's not enough anymore, btw.
Still. This is lame.
Then again, GTA didn't even have multiplayer until GTAIV...

rdgneoz33858d ago

Not really true. San Andreas had one form of multiplayer, co-op.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

360ICE3857d ago

True enough, my mistake. I meant online multiplayer though, and I think San Andreas was only offline? At least on console. Anyway, there's the step from same-screen co-op offline to 32 player open world multiplayer online

AngelicIceDiamond3858d ago (Edited 3858d ago )

My only solution for this is avoiding friends who will opt to this.

I personally won't be playing with any of my friends who will use this cheap easy way out method.

Its sad because its ALL in the game, that you can unlock if you just, well, lets see play it?

Looks like I'll be avoiding and kicking rich A holes in the game.

Ryto3858d ago

I just do not like micro transactions. It feels wrong, and it feels like a cheap addition.

I'll be honest, even if you can play GTA online and never need to spend a real penny to get the best stuff without grinding, it's still sort of killed it for me. I mean, isn't making over 1billion on your game enough? Why add this in too?

Very disappointed :/

BX813858d ago

Maybe I'm old school but I can't stand when you can pay to get a leg up/ unlock things early. If this is how gta online is going to work then ill trade it in after I finish the story.

ion6663858d ago

You would think a billion dollars would garner something free for the fans who bought the game.

Lord_Sloth3858d ago

So don't use it. I won't be using it and neither will my crew. We're gonna go through the effort and have a blast while doing so.

If somebody else wants to give money to kill their journey that's on them.

KwietStorm_BLM3858d ago

Not killing the hype for me. I'm playing to have fun with my friends. Couldn't care less what other people do.

3858d ago
Godmars2903858d ago

Or things could go the EVE Online route: Wind up with virtual robberies which involve real money.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 3856d ago
Prcko3858d ago (Edited 3858d ago )

the fuc* rockstar?
disappointed....

majiebeast3858d ago

Rockstar let it happen so guess what blame both.

Benjammin253858d ago

It's disappointing to see a company as respected as Rockstar stoop to this level. Whether or not Rockstar is to blame, this clearly didn't need to happen. The game has already made a billion dollars. This is just pure greed.

360ICE3858d ago (Edited 3858d ago )

No, this is every single game company ever. Believe it or not, even though Take-Twos turn insanely much profit on GTA, they have traditionally posted losses every non-GTA year, so it's fairly decent of them to actually spend five years on GTAV and not make an annual installment.

ion6663858d ago

I guess i will never be able to buy the airport and golf course.

Sci0n3857d ago

Wow im disappointed as well, as if the auto aim online wasn't enough to please the casuals they are now going to allow people to purchase money!? Damn im pissed and I was so hyped for GTA Online. Money is going to be the most important aspect of GTA Online, the rich people will have the nicest cars, properties and unlimited weapons, designer clothes etc and now instead of having to earn the in game money I can just buy it... smh. My PS4 can't come soon enough.

grassyknoll3858d ago

It's sad to see Rockstar / Take Two go this route, especially as they were one of the few companies to get DLC right with the last GTA.

Tornadobounce3858d ago

I just wish there was a 'simulation handling pack'

Show all comments (161)
80°

GTA 6 Still Set for 2025, Significant Cost Cuts Coming but No Current Layoff Plans

"Grand Theft Auto" publisher Take-Two Interactive is working on an "significant" cost reduction plan following mixed earnings results for its October-December 2023 quarter

100°

Mainline Grand Theft Auto trailers ranked from best to worst

As we have all been graced by the release of Grand Theft Auto 6's trailer, we're ranking the best and worst GTA trailers to date.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
purple101134d ago

We be getting these posts All week now lads. Someone noticed a number plate ... Someone noticed a billboard... I can see it now

Just go on YouTube and watch one of the many videos dissecting the whole 1minite 30secs worth.

This site supposed to be for news.

roadkillers134d ago

These updates on N4G are going to ruin whats rest of this site. Unfortunate since I was one of the first members.. The site shows unsecure when i login as well.

320°

Take Two Boss: Grand Theft Auto Games Make So Much Money, Making A GTA Movie Not Worth The Hassle

PC Gamer writes: "Grand Theft Auto 6 is coming, but don't hold your breath waiting for a Grand Theft Auto Hollywood blockbuster."

banger88159d ago ShowReplies(2)
Crazyglues159d ago

Imagine being so rich that another Billion is just not worth the hassle... LoL :) -Sorry just can't relate...

thorstein159d ago

Reminds me of the story of some ultra rich d-bag that had so much wine that he couldn't possibly drink it all so he had to sell like 10 million dollars worth of it. No one has earned that much wealth without exploiting others.

Roarke158d ago

Thats not true.. there are ppl who for example discovered cure are super rich due patent..

Cacabunga158d ago

A GTA movie will end like a fast and furious.. omg one of the worst movie series ever..

Notellin158d ago

@Roarke The scientist that discoveres the cure doesn't become rich. The patent will belong to Lilly, Pfizer, Merck, or Roche.

The money made is then disseminated amongst the executive board members and administration teams who provide zero value to the company. The scientists will continue to be exploited receiving raises and bonuses that do not beat inflation.

Again exploiting others in order to become rich.

gold_drake159d ago (Edited 159d ago )

isnt he also the guy that said that games are way too cheap? haha.

i mean i agree with him saying the gta games make them bank ha.

XiNatsuDragnel159d ago

Well gta is too successful to get a movie can't relate 🙃

northpaws158d ago

Which is fine, I would much rather all gaming companies just focus on making good games.

Show all comments (23)