820°

Ryse: Son of Rome runs at Native 900p, but Xbox One upscales all titles to 1080p clarifies Microsoft

Aaron Greenberg, Chief of Staff for Devices and Studios Group at Microsoft has confirmed that Ryse: Son of Rome runs at native 900p but Xbox One upscales the game to 1080p.

Muerte24943864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

That has to sting a little. But the game looks great none the less. Given the hardware limitations at the moment, Crytek still managed to impress. Microsoft needs to get better optimized drivers for the EsRAM. It's still a good looking game though.

@lying_cake,

It's far above 720p output and only slightly below 1080p. Developers haven't really gotten a chance to wrap their heads around getting the most out of EsRAM, so unfortunately this is what we can expect ATM.

lying_cake3864d ago

i agree, this is a launch game i will be picking up... but it just seems odd why that resolution and not 720

tuglu_pati3864d ago

Oh my... this thread is going to go places.

ErcsYou3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

MS needs to get their sh!t together and stop posting false information http://n4g.com/news/1354297...
Very unprofessional.

tuglu_pati3864d ago

@ ErcsYou

What are u complaining about. Didn't they just tell you how it is.

ErcsYou3864d ago

@tuglu_pati

They sure did, but what are they going to say two days from now? Makes you wonder if there is any communication at MS. If there was they would have had their facts straight before posting BS.

Skips3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

So is Forza 5 the only exclusive on Xbone that runs in 1080p right now? But Turn 10 getting it to run in 1080p and 60fps shouldn't be hard with baked lighting and static environments/weather IMO.

@ErcsYou

"They sure did, but what are they going to say two days from now? Makes you wonder if there is any communication at MS."

Agreed, wouldn't be surprised if we here the same with Halo 5 later down the line. : /

Like Killer Instinct, a basic fighter only running in 720p, after supposedly running in "1080p/6fps", and now this...

EDIT: Not that anyone believed it... I guess this confirms MS has no such "secret sauce" left to reveal that's supposedly hidden in their console. Something not even DEVELOPERS working on EXCLUSIVES know about. lol

I remember someone saying "wait for the end of the month", forgot who it was though... Most people spouting such nonsense, just sorta blended into one giant blob.

badz1493864d ago

900p?? after "confirming" 1080p a couple days back? (link provided by ErcsYou) LOL

not that 900p is bad but do they HAD to lie back then? there will be blood int hhis comment section for sure.

***grab popcorn***

thechosenone3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

And after all the BS they've been talking these last few weeks about how the Xbone and PS4 are neck and neck performance wise and then we get this new little nugget of info...man I hope Gabe/Steam crush the Xbone next gen and finally kick MS out the console business.

|Performance-wise, the target is 30fps, with v-sync engaged

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

ShwankyShpanky3864d ago

"It's far above 720p output and only slightly below 1080p."

I didn't know "far" and "slightly" were synonyms.

900-720=180
1080-900=180

http://i.qkme.me/3pf0wi.jpg

aCasualGamer3864d ago

I still think it's crazy that we're starting a new generation and still.. we don't have 1080p native as standard. I'm kind of confused... In what way is this new gen revolutionary if the games can't even run at 1080p native? Aren't these consoles basically Xbox 360 1.5 and PS3 1.5?

I don't know for sure the res PS4 games will run at natively. But it's still quite the turnoff if Microsoft has to clarify and tell us they only upscale the games to 1080p.

NukaCola3864d ago

This was a 360 title. Thought it would of been a cake walk to run I on the Xbone.

FamilyGuy3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

LOL, I love seeing these things right before they blow up. They're lucky GTA 5 just came out so this won't get as much attention.

It's not even like 900p is so bad, it's just after all the bragging this whole time and then Aarons 1080p twitter post just 2 freakin days ago. And don't go giving him credit for clearing it up, he had to. If he didn't digital foundry would have as soon as they got the game.

It really is best to just keep quiet.

@badz149

HOLY CRAP!! I didn't even think about that. 180s everywhere! It's almost scary O.O

Aaron just pulled a 180 on his twitter post
the resolution has exactly 180 less vertical lines than what he claimed.

The 3rd console curse is REAL!!!
wait a minute... 3rd console... 3... 3 times the desired 60 frames per second = 180!!!

*In Scooby Doo voice*
I'm g-g-g-gettting outta here!

badz1493864d ago

@ShwankyShpanky

OMG...the 180 is strong with this ONE! LOLOLOLOL

grassyknoll3864d ago

900p is just over 2/3's of 1080p. That's quite significant.

BitbyDeath3864d ago

This is why Sony haven't guaranteed 1080P/60FPS for their games. Wait til it hits and then confirm, not before.

devwan3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

@Muerte2494 "It's far above 720p output and only slightly below 1080p."

Hey with that kind of statement you're potentially a leading candidate for a senior position on the xbox one PR team.

It's 180 either way...

1080 - 180 = 900
720 + 180 = 900

180... hmm, now why does that number ring a bell...

@grassyknoll "900p is just over 2/3's of 1080p. That's quite significant."

Well it's 5/6ths, it's directly between 2/3rds and the full 1080. 720P is 2/3rds of 1080P.

mikeslemonade3864d ago

Ryse is gonna be a 7.5 meta score game. Move on..

devwan3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

It's interesting to see what the difference is here, between 1080P and 900P and those resolutions at 60fps and 30fps. Some people suggested it's not really that much, but when you add up the amount of pixels being pushed:

1600x900 = 1,440,000 (just under 1.5m pixels)

1920x1080 = 2,073,600 (just over 2m pixels)

Ryse is doing only 3/4 the work the previous claim stated in terms of pure resolution.

When you factor in 900P @ 30fps and 1080P @60fps (although I'm not sure Ryse was ever stated to be 60frames), things look much worse:

1600x900x30 = just over 43m pixels per frame

1920x1080x60 = just over 124m pixels per frame

Every frame, 1600x900x30 is only doing about 1/3rd the work of 1920x1080x60.

"only 180 pixels difference " doesn't begin to tell the story.

black0o3864d ago

Q: since most of the xbone exclusive are doing less then 1080p, what about the malti-plat titles ??

I kinda see why MS didn't show any demos so FaR ... a lot of ppl will get angry on 23rd of Nov

JimmyLmao3864d ago

@Muerte2494

"It's far above 720p output and only slightly below 1080p."

last time i checked,

1080 - 900 = 180
900 - 720 = 180

And then you can add on the fact that it's framerate isn't even locked at 30fps

pyramidshead3864d ago

Oh boy. After confirming native 1080p. Gotta hope Forza is 1080p native :x.

Wheres frigy? What happened to 2K and 4K gaming aye? :P. Maybe that's a lie too?

jay23864d ago

Erm, No, they've had Dev-kits for 3 years.

Angeljuice3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

" It's far above 720p output and only slightly below 1080p."

Lol, it is EXACTLY half way between the two!

720+180=900
900+180=1080

Rose tinted spectacles?

Edit: Sorry JimmyLmao, I jumped on that without reading your reply.

NarooN3864d ago

They need to wrap their heads around the EsRAM? No, what needs to happen is people need to stop thinking that the EsRAM is some magical thing that will boost graphics performance tenfold or something.

Ryse started out as a 360 game, has been in development longer than most other X1 titles, yet they couldn't even get it at 1080p native, even though MS themselves "confirmed" it was 1080p native not too long ago. Come on, they've been lying about a lot of things (as they always do) lately. Can't trust anything they say anymore.

1600x900 isn't bad, but why did they lie and say it was 1080p not too long ago? Smoke and mirrors.

mikeslemonade3864d ago

I think it's unacceptable to have the majority of the games under 1080p this generation. This generation that should be the standard. Arcade games and innovative centric games can be under 1080p but if you are a blockbuster or flagship title you better be 1080p.

dantesparda3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

@ Muerte

1080p is around 30% higher resolution than 900p, so its not that "slight"

And next up is Titanfall, which a guarantee 60fps yet (or even developed by Respawn)
http://www.eurogamer.net/ar... (read the last 2 questions)

Edit: I see Dewvan beat me to it, well said man

dantesparda3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

Hey Devwan

I just saw your second post and I like where you took it, cuz its technically true, however you did make a mistake, its not "per frame" but per second"

1600x900x30 = just over 43m pixels per sec

1920x1080x60 = just over 124m pixels per sec

Either way, its doing a hell of lot more processing

oops typo on my previous comment, I mean to say
that Titanfall ISNT a guarantee 60fps yet

JokesOnYou3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

Well they need to be accurate the first time they speak specifically about things like this....so really its just a stupid mistake on Aaron Greenburgs part. That said this won't take anything away from my enthusiasm for this game, those graphics look superb in action as we've all seen, and everyone with hands on have noted.

ProjectVulcan3864d ago

I mooted this exact scenario ages ago. I said that devs on Xbox one are probably going to target 1600 X 900 and pixels will be stolen. It's a launch game but expect to see more games like this.

I predicted PS4 would have 1080p versions of games while Xbox one settled for 1600 X 900 more often than not on multi and exclusives just because it's hardware is much more suited to lesser resolutions.

SonyPS3603864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

"ouch"?

It's still better than native 720p.

SilentNegotiator3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

"So is Forza 5 the only exclusive on Xbone that runs in 1080p right now?"

We had racing games LAST gen that were almost 1080p60fps. If Forza is the only game at 1080p on Xbox, I'm not impressed.

shadow27973864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

"720+180=900
900+180=1080 "

I can't believe this was repeated as many times as it was. It's math. It's extremely simple to check.

1280x720 = 921,600 pixels
1600x900 = 1,440,000 pixels
1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels

900p - 720p = 518,400 pixels
1080p - 900p = 633,600 pixels

So 900p is actually 115,200 pixels closer to 720p than it is to 1080p. Whether or not that's significant to you or not is up to you, but it's definitely not exactly in between.

I realize I'm just adding fuel to this fire, but I can't stand by and let that silly 180 lie be repeated when the math is so easy.

Here's an image I whipped up that shows the difference:
http://s24.postimg.org/ip5h...

mewhy323864d ago

Well now come on. This isn't any surprise. Developers have already been quoted stating that code running at 30fps 1920X1080p on the PS4 would only run 20fps 1600X900p on the bone. For the record that's 10fps less at a 1/3 resolution reduction. Thats from a developer. you know, people that make games?

u got owned3864d ago

for all of you talking smack... Did you now The Order is said to be running at 800p.

Haules3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

LOL! You call that next gen? lol
Ryse is 1600x900 and runs at 23-25fps so much for "next gen"

Xboone = FAIL!

Tk7313864d ago

@ShwankyShpanky

That isn't how it works.
720p is 1280 * 720 = 921,600 pixels
900p is 1600 * 900 = 1,440,000 pixels
1080p is 1920 * 1080 = 2,073,600 pixels

nveenio3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

@Muerte2494

You said: "It's far above 720p output and only slightly below 1080p."

I want to show you something real quick. Ready?

900-720=180
1080-900=180

It's smack dab in the middle on the horizontal lines. Try not to spin numbers. Numbers don't lie.

EDIT: I see this is already being said over and over.

@shadow2797

You don't factor in the screen width when comparing resolution, because that is ratio dependent. For instance, a game running 1600x900 will look just as good on screen as a game running 1200x900. It's the height in pixels that delivers the better image.

ramiuk13864d ago

why or how can your comment get disagrees?
full of fekwits this site.

devwan3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

@dantesparda Yeah, sorry. I made typos/brain farts - I wrote "frame" instead of "second" a whole three times, lol, but it was too late to edit by the time I noticed. I think people understood what I was getting at and spotted the typos as you did. Oh well :)

@shadow2797 "I can't believe this was repeated as many times as it was. It's math. It's extremely simple to check.

1280x720 = 921,600 pixels
1600x900 = 1,440,000 pixels
1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels"

Good point well made, 1600x900 is closer to 1280x720 than 1920x1080 in terms of pixel array, people were obviously comparing vertical resolution only and to be fair to them that's all we know 100% for sure. Assuming Greenberg means 1600x900 when he says 900P is sensible as that's the same aspect ratio, but given his track record now I don't think we should even assume 1600 horizontal pixels until he explicitly says so (or better still, someone who actually knows his stuff does so).

devwan3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

@u got owned
"for all of you talking smack... Did you now The Order is said to be running at 800p"

It might be using 800 pixels vertically, but it isn't rendering the frame at 800 and stretching to 1080 in a bid to cheat, it's an artistic choice - read any interview with the devs, they'll use the word "filmic" or "cinematic" more than ms throwing around TV TV TV at a console launch.

The Order 1886 is displaying a 1080P screen and using only the 800 central pixels with a black border of 140 pixels above and below in order to achieve an effective screen ratio of 2.40:1 and give it a cinematic feel. If that's something you don't like, go complain about it in a relevant topic instead of damage controlling and trolling this one with your half-baked tales of woe.

Skips3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

@u got owned

"Did you now The Order is said to be running at 800p."

The Order doesn't even have a release date yet, and is nowhere CLOSE to being finished, or even optimized. lol

Nice try though. :D

EDIT: btw

Ready At Dawn = Studio who's only had experience with handhelds until now.
Cyrtek = Studio that's had MUCH experience on PC and focuses on nothing but visuals.

esemce3864d ago

It's a bit sad to think that we will have these consoles for 5-8 years and they cannot give us exclusives that easily run at 1080p@60fps.

imt5583864d ago

Drivers can't help!!! eSRAM is a pain in the ass in XO. Read this article :

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

Joe9133864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

Remember after the announcement of Xbone when they told us about the DRM thing didn’t someone I believe a dev say that because the Xbox need internet connection that when not playing online the games would be a lower resolution but when on the internet the cloud is supposed to bump your game to 1080p 60fps I wonder if this anything to do with that.

.

schubacca3864d ago

Haterz gonna hate.

1) The game is pretty but the gameplay is sh1t.

2) The game is only 900p

If the game was slated before, then why does this matter at all considering that it is a launch title?

mewhy323864d ago

Well upscaling is alright i guess. but I'd much prefer that my games be in native 1080p (PS4). That was there's no blur, no upscale artifacting, etc. But hey if all the power you can muster will only get you 1600X900 then ...... well.....

Gaming1013864d ago

lol I'm not sure if you can do math, but 900 is exactly in between 720 and 1080. Literally, add or subtract 180. So much for objectivity!

solidjun53863d ago

@u got owned

"for all of you talking smack... Did you now The Order is said to be running at 800p."

The game isn't even close to being done. Sounds like you're doing damage control for Microsoft. I wonder if they paid you.

ShinMaster3863d ago (Edited 3863d ago )

900p @ 24fps?
http://youtu.be/VzVlVRe9QYI...

It's no biggie for those who weren't overhyping "Codename Kingdoms", the Kinect game for 360... I mean "Ryse".

dantesparda3863d ago (Edited 3863d ago )

I here ya, Devwan, that happens to me all the time

And @ Vulcan, i remember you saying that

And i dont think Ryse looks bad 9definitely the best looking game on X1), but damn are the animations stiff and choppy, GOW/GOW:A, definitely has better animation than that, and graphically GOW/GOW:A definitely give it a good run for its money

InactiveUser3863d ago

@inveni0
"You don't factor in the screen width when comparing resolution, because that is ratio dependent. For instance, a game running 1600x900 will look just as good on screen as a game running 1200x900. It's the height in pixels that delivers the better image."

So you're telling me a game running 1x900 is going to look great and not just be a line?

One dimension may be 78% more important visually (16/9), but that doesn't mean the other makes no difference.

In your example, 1600 would look 1/3rd better than 1200 (you'd see more to the sides).

Your example is the same as saying 1600x900 is no better than 1600x675. Both are false (it's basically your example turned 90*).

Enemy3863d ago (Edited 3863d ago )

@ u got owned: Wow, you should seriously be banned for spreading false information about The Order. This is actually the first time that I've seen an Xbox fanboy lie about the resolution of a game to deceive readers, which says a lot about you, really.

Nothing is known about the The Order's resolution, or even gameplay. No one but Ready At Dawn has seen it in motion, so the fact that you're spreading BS without source shows how pathetically bitter you are that Ryse, as expected, is going to fail.

christocolus3863d ago

i just want the damn game out already...900, 720, 1080 who cares..ms should just kep investing in getting more great devs to the platform,new ips and creating more studios in addition to those already announced..

+ Show (51) more repliesLast reply 3863d ago
FamilyGuy3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

Wow, the news just keeps on rolling in.

Isn't this the same resolution in that "unoptimized" scenario where devs claimed the PS4 to have a 50% more power/speed advantage?

Seems rather coincidental

*doesn't believe in coincidences*

And after all that boasting about Ryse being 1080p.
Smh
I've never seen two competing companies where one just kept stumbling over itself so bad. Still waiting for someone to draw up a gif with a foot in penellos mouth.

FordGTGuy3864d ago

That same scenario says unoptimized PS4 games were running at 1080p@30fps but all PS4 games are running at 30 fps does that mean all of them are unoptimized?

Also how does that explain Forza Motorsport 5 running at 1080p@60fps?

svoulis3864d ago

@fordGTguy

Look at any off-screen gameplay. The amount of post-processings is what is making the game run @ 60FPS.

Also no real-time lighting, no weather effects and basically a static skybox.

It will look and play good but the limitations are clearly noticeable.

Even the Forza 5 devs said expect jaggies on the back of some cars cause its impossible to hide.

M-M3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

@FordGTGuy,

From the tweet.

"@deaconblade Update from team, Forza 5 is native @1080p, Ryse is native @900p, but >>>Xbox One upscales all titles to 1080p<<< & they look amazing"

They said Forza is native 1080p, even though all games are upscaled to 1080p? What? Kind of like how they said Ryse was native 1080p a few days ago.

FamilyGuy3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

That's not even what I was saying.

It's more like it gives validation to that claim. It's the exact same number.

Also shows that the devs for Ryse aren't putting much effort into optimizing it for a better resolution. They figured 900p is "good enough". I don't really blame them either, given all the glitches and frame-rate issues they have to clean up before launch.

Forza devs obviously set 1080p as their target/goal and made whatever sacrifices they had to in order to achieve that goal. There's a pretty big difference between the special effects in all other next gen racers and Forza. I'm not wasting my time getting into that debate again though.

monkeyDzoro3864d ago

@FordGTGuy
People talk about those 60fps on Forza5, like it has reached the moon.
Listen, GT6 on PS3 actually runs at 720p/60fps on a 7-year old hardware. With all the same post-processings in that game.
No denial, it's very good to see Forza5 running at 1080p/60fps BUT according to what devs have put in that game (which is near to nothing except that Drivatar), it's just NORMAL.

shoddy3864d ago

I heard that teh clowdz can increase the resolution 2160p when they update for 4k tv.
joke

black0o3864d ago

+up
was thinking the same thing .. man now if Watch dogs or AC4 happened to run at 1080p on ps4 and 900p on the x1 u'll see some fanboys spinning it as well

the launch week gonna be very interstIng

sync903864d ago

Your, in a scooby doo voice 'im outta here' cracked me up!

husomc3864d ago

very soon MS will try to make 900p the industry standard for gaming

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3864d ago
Irishguy953864d ago

That's because it's a very common resolution...

badz1493864d ago

not THAT common. 1366X736 is far more common as many HD ready tvs were on that resolution. there are no native 1600X900 tv out there and even pc monitors with that resolution is pretty rare. laptops maybe but there are more 1600X1050 monitors out there than 900.

it's common resolution for recent pc games but tvs are not designed to run at that resolution and will show "input unsupported".

SilentNegotiator3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

Not in TVs...

assdan3864d ago

lol, they're talking about how this game will have the best visuals ever when it can't even pull of 1080p. And to anyone that things upscaling means anything, it doesn't. Games have been doing that forever.

T23864d ago

cant they just release it on xbox 360 ? i mean it started there and I may even play it on 360
...release it on 360 and I may give it a try... it's not coming for 360 ,and I just missed that news , is it??

tordavis3864d ago

No one ever said that it runs 1080p native, they said it runs at 1080p. When you load up the game on your 1080p tv, it will be running in 1080p. who cares what the native resolution is when the final is 1080p? Oo

Kleptic3864d ago

I've always enjoyed this logic...

The modern HDTV standard is 1920 x 1080 resolution, with a refresh rate of 60hz, or multiples of that...

this means...if an image is taking up the full screen...guess what...its displayed at 1920 x 1080 resolution...

on most TV's, you can change the settings to display sources at their native resolution...with those settings, if its not full 1920 x 1080 resolution, the image will NOT take up the entire screen...

but its cool, you're absolutely right...upscaling is every bit as good as something being natively processed at 1920 x 1080...this is why there is absolutely no visible difference between a Blu Ray movie and a tired ass DVD...upscaling abilities are able to make up pixels out of thin air to the point that no one can tell the difference................righ t?

sourav933864d ago

Wrong. Aaron Greenberg said 3 days ago that Ryse ran natively at 1080p : http://www.unscripted360.co...

SilentNegotiator3864d ago

"who cares what the native resolution is when the final is 1080p?"

People with working eyeballs that can tell the massive difference between upscaled 900p and native 1080p. The difference being several 100,000 less pixels worth of detail.

2cents3864d ago

Launch titles on a console that hasn’t been released. Everything is an unknown. Unfinished drivers, devs guesstimating available resources, minimal optimization based on SDK's not being robust enough to offer unique tools to maximize overall quality.

There are so many factors that make judging the current cycle of games that are going to be released in the launch window difficult, but it doesn’t seem to stop many from deciding the final outcome based on nothing more than rumour and speculation.

All I know is, the games from Xbox and Sony I’ve seen look good, not a massive leap from the current gen when you consider how stunning 'The last of us' is, but still an improvement in some cases.

The real proof will be when we see something like the next God of War or Halo, as the devs will be doing everything in their power to maximise every last ounce of the respective consoles unique powers. But that is a long time to wait. Till then hopefully we will see some gems that are exclusive to each console that can demonstrate to us, the gamers, why the next gen is indeed 'Next Gen!'

Jazz41083864d ago

Didnt sony state the ps3 would run its games at 120fps and 1080p? If you disagree im sure I can find the article. Really if greenburg would not have blasted 1080p on this game 900p is good as I know alot of next gen games on both systems are not hitting native 1080p so all in all its a launch game so I know we will see much better soon but I dont like the misleading info coming from ms the same as all the misleading infor from sony on the ps3 and emotion engine.

2cents3864d ago

I agree with you Jazz,

It's a case of too many cooks ruining the broth. But us gamers are partly to blame! Since the internet has become such a strong form of communication and news is instantaneous we have become addicted to feeding our insatiable appitite for knowledge about everything gaming. I check N4G whenever I have a break at work and most evenings just so I can stay up to date with all things Sony/Xbox.

I remember having to waits for monthly mags to get my gaming fix, now it's anywhere and everywhere! The issue stems from many lowbrow sites allowing children with no literary training or journalistic integrity to post so much crap about whatever they want that it's almost impossible to know what headline on this site is worthy of our attention. But we click, we read, we bitch. All the wile mr website owner is laughing at all the hits that are being generated.

I mean look how angry everyone is! It's constant, it's daily, it never seems to let up. These snippets of news are constantly repackaged and sold to us as something new when all it is, is just a polished turd.

The Internet keeps our cages rattled, fanboys make happiness hard to find and we are left to fight it out with eachother on message boards around the WWW. It's a case o too much information with hardly any substance. So when something finally comes along we all jump on it like wild dogs. But he said, she said, I said.

I just can't wait till late Nov so we can all have our shiny new toys and stop fighting and start playing!

dantesparda3863d ago

Stop having a conversation with yourself

3864d ago Replies(1)
THEDON82z13864d ago

Something tells me this is why EA has been so elusive about the final resolution of Battlefield 4!!!Oh well NOVEMBER 15 is right around the corner and I cant wait!!!!

xKugo3863d ago

This is pretty shocking, for a variety of reasons. Most notably because it was stated as being 1080p not even 48 hours ago. Though 900p isn't 'that' bad, it's still shocking to know that a next-gen console isn't going to at least make native 1080p a standard. If we can't have 60fps, at least give us native 1080p. All console gamers, whether XB1 or PS4 deserve at least that for the amount of money we're paying.

Another tidbit, is just coincidence that 1600x900(900p) is exactly the same resolution put forth by devs in a scenario situation where games running at 1080p/30fps on PS4 would run at 900p/mid 20sfps. Were I buying a XB1, disappointed would not begin to describe it. Can you imagine if this turns out to be true with both multiplats AND exclusives(excluding Forza). The amount of backtracking would be unreal. Also, some people like Elite who said XB1 would be doing 2k and later on 4k gaming would be eating crow for weeks.

Just my 2¢

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3863d ago
jhoward5853864d ago

Notice Aaron Greenberg didn't mentioned anything about RYSE frame rate speed. He did for Foza though.

B-radical3864d ago

Cause we know whats its aiming for? And they prob just wanna say we have a game running 60fps

M-M3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

Next generation gaming right there. So, where are all of the people stating that the Xbox One has some super secret sauce? If the Xbox One had better specs, it should be able to do 1080p without a problem. This also confirms why most Xbox One games can do 60FPS.

Muerte24943864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

much like the EdRAM inside the Wii U, developers have yet to make any kind of techniques for get the extra bandwidth out of them. These were put in there to help rectify that narrow DDR3 pipeline. But if developers don't properly use it then this is what we can expect.

If you get a disagree, it wasn't from me. I'm buying ps4 day one. Xbox One down the line if they ever remove Kinect and drop the price.

AznGaara3864d ago

If this gen is anything to go by then don't be surprised when Devs don't take extra time to fully optimize one console after coding for another. I mean it took FOREVER for PS3 ports to be on par with their 360 counterparts.

So I expect that mentality will carry through next gen except with the Ps4 being the "superior" version since its "so easy to develop for."

windblowsagain3864d ago

It's not just an edram problem.

16 rops. 68g/s bandwidth. 1.31tf.

That is the rez most likely 99% xboxone games will have because it does not have the power.

Ju3864d ago

Even if they will it will be hard to match the PS4. Only with optimization at it's fullest it might come close - it will never go beyond. There are just too much hard facts - no optimization in the world can overcome physical boundaries.

AceBlazer133864d ago

isnt it just forza and ki locking 60 fps? a racer and a fighter.

Megaton3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

Those are definitely the two easiest genres to max frames with. Even on my janky mid-range graphics card I can hit a locked 60 in fighters and racers easy.

u got owned3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

@Megaton

"Those are definitely the two easiest genres to max frames with."

I agree, but then why isn't Drive Club running at 60 fps? hummm!! but its ok because its on a PS4 with 50% more powah... ;)

riceking3864d ago

@ u got owned

well forza 5 have no real-time lighting, no weather effects and basically a static skybox.

so... try harder next time

u got owned3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

@ riceking

So that is the excuse now, i thought racing genre were the easiest to max frames with.

Megaton3864d ago

They are easy to max. Even easier if you have nothing going on in the background.

u got owned3864d ago

@ Megaton

So Forza 5 doesn't have weather and day cycle. Ok i give that. But Forza has a much more robust simulation physics engine, not only that completely customization on all cars, more cars than DC just to name a few things, i mean Forza is huge compared to DC and still they manage to run it at 60 fps.

Megaton3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

You're making the mistake of assuming that I care about either of those games. I play arcade racers. Not sims or sim wannabes. All I said was that generally those are the two easiest genres to max. I don't know or care why DC doesn't run at 60 FPS (assuming it doesn't, I haven't got a clue if you're even right about that), but I would assume it has a lot more going on than Forza does if it has a significantly lower framerate.

black0o3864d ago

KI actually runs at 720p!! and froza has static environment ;) unlike Driveclub fully dynamic

badkolo3864d ago

and yet forza 5 looks better then anything ps4 has shown so far go figure

Ju3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

Yes, and so is Ridge Racer 7. /s

Sevir3864d ago

So remember that Edge article, and MS's Response to said article!!!!? I'll just leave this here :)

http://m.edge-online.com/ne...

Microsoft's own guy just confirmed What devs have been saying, anonymous or others...

PS4 > XBOX One!

The devil is in the details as they say!!!

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3864d ago
robotgargoyle3864d ago

It's a launch game. Who really cares whether it's in 720p, 1080p, or 1080i? People act like 720p is standard def or something, when in reality, the difference is only noticeable on larger TVs (50 inches and above) when comparing 720 to 1080.

black0o3864d ago

we care since M$ said that X1 can run games at 4K I mean 4x1080p O.o

1OddWorld3864d ago

55inch I see the Difference. Plain as day.

Walker3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

lol, I'm disappointed . the difference between ps4 and xbone games will be about 720p, 900p, 20fps, 30fps for xbone games against 1080p, 30fps, 60fps for ps4 games .

ps4 is the most powerful and popular console in the world right now ! DEAL WITH IT !

Magicite3864d ago

no need to deal with that, but need to buy it :)

DistroyerOfFanbums3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

I agree with the PS4 part, moreover they will not release a game on the X1 that's at 20FPS.. It would indeed be at 720p at 30fps, that's the lowest it would go.(Direct X will help in this)
.
Props up for the guy being honest, but the question is, will the consumer notice a difference. (Lower resolution)Example, Killer instinct at 720p upscaled to 1080p, ryse 900p upscaled to 1080p, ect.

Irishguy953864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

Most likely due to poor drivers over power.

The 50% difference GPU will not be that huge with regards to res and FPS, it will be big and noticeable but not that massive in the end. The power difference does not add up with the final performance

B-radical3864d ago

Lol alot of us know what the more powerful console is and are dealing with it......didn't stop me from canceling my x1 :D

Flutterby3864d ago

You cancelled your xbone preorder ?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3864d ago
5h4h4b3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

Oh man. Oh man . Look at this now . Please come out of your delusions xboys. Look at this now. Hmm question comes to the mind " what about forza"

tuglu_pati3864d ago

Read the article Forza is 1080p native, 60 FPS.

5h4h4b3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

Bro I read the same about ryse. Now look what happened.

Damn, that edge article was spot on.

ErcsYou3864d ago

So..., Ryse was 1080p naitve two days ago. You feel where im coming from now?

tuglu_pati3864d ago (Edited 3864d ago )

I now where you're coming from, but at least they were honest and came out and updated with the real numbers.

ziggurcat3864d ago

he also said in the same sentence that xbone "upscales all titles to 1080p..."

you can't say something is native 1080p, and in the same breath say all games are upscaled to 1080p... because that means that forza isn't actually native 1080p.

black0o3864d ago

to put it simply MS is full Of lies ... behold BF4 on the x1 lol

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3864d ago
GinkgoID3864d ago

Is it worth pointing out the GT5 ran at native 1080p on the PS3 back int 2010. Easier for a car game.

BOLO3863d ago

Wrong. GT5 ran at 1280x1080 resolution.

Jazz41083864d ago

So if forza added real time lighting it would match drive club? Thats a load of bs as we all know forza will be a huge game and driveclub was made to be a free to play at first.

T23864d ago

maybe true but then you have to ask is forza worth 60 bucks MORE than DC? for me as a casual racer the answer is still no.

Show all comments (334)
110°

15 Best Ancient Rome Games of All Time

From underrated Xbox One launch titles to absolute emperors of the strategy genre, history heads will love these games based around Ancient Rome.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Leeroyw360d ago (Edited 360d ago )

There's fifteen ancient Rome games?

LG_Fox_Brazil360d ago

Shadow of Rome was so freaking good

Sashamaz360d ago

I'm still waiting for the sequel.

HyperMoused359d ago

Ryse was awesome, i have no idea why it wasnt recieved well and why we havnt seen another, Rome conquered so much, you could take the action anywhere, and it looked great when xbox one came out, now would be even better.

200°

Ryse: Son of Rome Deserves a Second Shot

Ryse: Son of Rome was an Xbox One launch title that has been left to collect dust, but Crytek should set aside Crysis and give Ryse another shot.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
AngainorG7X615d ago

It was a great game, it had issues but it can only go up from here.

crazyCoconuts615d ago

It was just ok. Looked really good for an Xbox game though

Snookies12614d ago

"for an Xbox game"

Way to subtly throw shade there. It looked amazing compared to any game at the time it was released.

Never played it myself though, wasn't really interested in it personally. Plus it came at a time when I didn't own an Xbox console. But it was at least different than the usual copy/paste games we get. So I hope it gets another chance sometime soon.

Crows90614d ago

It was a crytek game though

1nsomniac614d ago (Edited 614d ago )

It was a stunning game on all basis. One of the standout games for Xbox as a whole. I ended up buying on pc as well… and yes nothing looked better than it in PC at the time either. Nothing just ok about it, definitely needs a sequel.

fr0sty614d ago

@snookies12, don't pretend like the Xbox One didn't struggle with being gimpled by its tiny pool of ESRAM as a frame buffer. It was significantly weaker than the PS4.

crazyCoconuts614d ago

Metacritic 60, user score 6.4. I'm not alone in putting it into the "ok" category...

VenomCarnage89614d ago

@snookies
Haven't played it but at least you know enough to defend Xbox over it. The game did look good, for an Xbox game. That's not some "subtle shade," it's full on reality.
I remember it being nearly the only graphically decent game on the Xbone for like the first two years after launch, and graphics were that games strength

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 614d ago
CrimsonWing69614d ago

I really enjoyed it. Bought it at launch even.

ManMarmalade614d ago (Edited 614d ago )

The qte's were disappointing though. God of war was doing it back in the ps2 days. As gorgeous as the game was, the gameplay needed to be updated.

annoyedgamer615d ago

I really liked the original Ryse but Crytek doesn't have the funds. The mismanaged their properties and let EA raid them with Crysis for the duration of their relationship. Right now they are working on Crysis 4, I doubt they can spare resources to work on a Ryse sequel.

gamer7804614d ago

It would have to be funded by MS, I really liked Ryse sure it got repetitive but the setting visuals and story were good

moriarty1889614d ago

MS should have funded a sequel to Ryse and Sunset OD. Two good franchises they definitely needed last gen.

annoyedgamer614d ago

MS is too busy trying to become the next EA, Ryse wont be on their list of titles to finance unless it gets a hipster makeover with lootboxes.

darthv72615d ago (Edited 615d ago )

I recently bought it for the steamdeck and have to say... 60fps is a game changer. I really wished MS had gotten a one x patch or series boost mode option but sadly, nope. Other games that definitely deserve a second chance (esp on steamdeck/pc) are quantum break and sunset overdrive. Both deserved 60fps support on one x / series but you have to go to PC for that.

Rumor has it Crytek had plans for a Ryse 2 but due to the low turnout for XB (at the time) it was shelved. They really should give this another shot. i dont care if its multiplat on PS and XB and PC and Switch... just so long as part 2 gets made.

babadivad614d ago

The game is automatically boosted on Series X

darthv72614d ago

sorry... but it's not. It still runs at the same fps the XBO did.

lelo2play614d ago

Game was good enough, not great.
Graphically it was top notch. Still holds well till this day.

Crows90614d ago

It only needed more enemy variety and few more movesets or weapons to use. That would have made the experience tons better.

MadLad614d ago

It was a good game.
Only time I saw quick time events actually make me feel engaged.

Show all comments (39)
50°

Here are the new Xbox Game Pass Quests for August 2022

Xbox Game Pass Quests recently reset for the month of August. So if you try to collect as many Microsoft Rewards points as possible, there's a new set available now.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
anast621d ago (Edited 621d ago )

This is not what I would call value for money spent. They give you quests in liveservice games to get you "re-engaged" with the monetization schemes or to get you hooked or so you at least spend some extra on skins and loot boxes. Then they dole out paltry points after you have already paid extra for whichever liveservice within a liveservice that you are already paying for. My worry is people can't actually be that stupid to fall for this, can they?

littletad620d ago

Absolutely nothing in this comment makes sense. At all.

anast620d ago (Edited 620d ago )

How does it not make sense? O thy god of reason, shine some evidence upon us. Ryse of Rome, ESO,and AC: Origins are all live service games, between them you can get 275 points. Liveservice games are made to keep people spending. Therefore, Gamepass is a live service and the points are for playing live service games.

It is not my problem that this does not make sense to you, it is absolutely your problem. I mean it is all your problem.

Julion0715620d ago (Edited 620d ago )

Hate Xbox but comments in every Xbox article 😂 without making sense smh

anast620d ago

Bring the evidence and then your emoji might make sense.