310°

How Sony Could Beat Microsoft At Its Own Game And Win The Living Room War

The PS4 has social apps, video streaming, and all the other bells and whistles the competition has, but first and foremost it’s a machine designed to play games. Or at least that’s the message.

NatureOfLogic3874d ago

MS is too busy doing damage control to actually explain how Xbox One plans to take over the living room. I personally don't see Kinect being reason enough to spend $100 more on a console that places you behind a pay wall for key features and apps. MS need causals to take over the living room, and I don't see that happening with their premium price.

GarrusVakarian3874d ago (Edited 3874d ago )

Exactly, the casual gamer is going to see the PS4 and Xbox One next to each other in the store and be more inclined to buy the PS4 purely based on price. Casuals don't care about specs, they see the cheaper console and choose that one.

black0o3874d ago

and not a confusing name like ''Wii U'' where most of the casuals are like it's just a new controller for the wii

i can see some confusing about the xboxone

XB1_PS43874d ago

I disagree, I think the way that MS is portraying the XB1 to the mainstream audience is going to sway the casuals to it. The PS4 is built for hardcore gamers, with casuals in mind. The XB1 was always meant to be an entertainment box for the family.

Also, most people in the world have no idea about all the bullsh*t MS has put gamers through. They will be inclined to buy what they see in advertising. Recently MS had been advertising all the casual aspect during NFL games. That's an enormous market.

GarrusVakarian3874d ago

@XB1 PS4

"The PS4 is built for hardcore gamers, with casuals in mind. The XB1 was always meant to be an entertainment box for the family. "

I agree, but $100 difference would be very tempting to a casual with no interest in specs or the industry goings on.

XB1_PS43874d ago (Edited 3874d ago )

Double post. Whoops.

XB1_PS43874d ago

This is the casual market, they don't think of it the same way we do. It's not PS4 vs XB1. It's "that thing I saw on TV that I can video call from my television and have my fantasy scores on screen, all with voice commands." Most probably won't even know there is an alternative to compare prices with.

They will see PS4, marketing for games, and only games. Not even knowing the rest of the package. That's appealing to us, but not for a parent that doesn't play games.

Basically the casual market is won with advertising, and Microsoft is an advertising machine.

XB1_PS43874d ago

For the people disagreeing, I don't mind. Yet I still would like a few replies telling me why you disagree. I'm curious.

infamousinfolite3874d ago

@XB1_PS4

That is true but there could be some who just want a pure gaming console and not all that Microsoft offers with its console.

XB1_PS43874d ago

@infamousinfolite Yes, you're right, the hardcore gaming community does want that. I'm talking about the casual/non-gaming community. The parents buying a console for their kids are going find it very attractive that they can use this box without picking up a controller.

No matter which way anyone spins it, MS made the right choices regarding the mainstream market. I know if I set an XB1 and a PS4 up at my parents house, and explained all the features. They would want the XB1 over PS4. Mostly because they see controllers like this:
http://wallchips.com/wp-con...

Brix903874d ago

Why would casuals spend more money on a console when they play every now and then an wont be required to pay subscription for all it's features. The X1 is appealing to the 360 crowd and the gamers that enjoy to have both consoles. Last gen the Xbox had more hardcore gamers and the fact that there flocking over to Ps4 not all but a good sum makes it seem that Next gen PS4 will cater hardcore gamers. So with some of the hardcore community more split all that's left is casual gamers which PS4 having the lower price tag, more exclusive and free features it's the obvious choice.

NateCole3873d ago

XB1. The problem is casuals don't really care much about the features you mentioned.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3873d ago
ZHZ903874d ago

There're more reasons about PS4 than just cheaper and more powerful.

Like this past history of Sony with their PS games and MS with their Xbox games during era of PS3 Vs X360
http://www.gamepur.com/news...

Drasill3874d ago

That graphic is extremely biased. Notice how they include only exclusives for the Xbox 360 side, but on the PS3 side they include games that are also on PC/PS Vita.

ZHZ903874d ago (Edited 3874d ago )

So? Even if they included Vita games, problem?

Lets then add games that are on PS3 that are also n PC and PS4 like Yakuza:Ishin and DC Universe Online, and for X360 side lets add its games that are also on PC and Xbone like Titanfall and Alan Wake.

PS3 still wins.

I am not biased, you and anyone who agrees with you are the biased.

Ps4Console3873d ago

How do you know ? Because you read it on the net give me a break you don't , you won't now until launch & we see the hardware running .
I think Ps4 will win because it is vastly cheaper than the Xbox One & that is vital & it has great launch titles to running on the Ps4 console , I have pre-ordered mine .

gaelic_laoch3874d ago

There will will be a majority of living rooms, bedrooms, kitchens, basements....... With PS4's in them as it is! PS4 ownership is going to go off like a mushROOM cloud!

MASTER_RAIDEN3874d ago

The only thing i would recommend sony do, if anything is to make sure they keep the firmware updates coming to keep the console up to date. media capabilities are already there. Great price. lots of gaming options. not much more you could ask for out of a console.

skydragoonity3874d ago

Sony has won everything this next gen... Living room wars included.

My_Outer_Heaven3874d ago (Edited 3874d ago )

Unequivocally and absolutely yes. Microsoft's push for cable box support through HDMI-IN is going to be the downfall of Xbox One. Sure it might seem like a great thing on paper but with today's harsh times a lot of people will prefer to cut the cord and avoid overpriced cable subscriptions completely and stream things instead with online services such as Hulu, Netflix,iPlayer,YouTube etc... Internet is the only thing I feel worth while to pay for and now house phones are becoming a thing of the past because these days mobile phones are ever so popular.

We don't need cable when we have smart TV with intergrated Freeview or Freesat in HD.

My parents back home have already cut the cord. Freeview is all they need. If people really need to watch, record and rewind live TV there are a lot of TVs, PCs and other devices have DVR capabilities.

MysticStrummer3874d ago

Exactly. Traditional TV is on the way out. It's odd that people who talk about the "all digital future" of the XB1 don't see that.

NoLongerHereCBA3874d ago

That is probably much more the case in America than in the EU. Which is why I hope the TV stuff actually also works in EU countries.

At least for me TV isn't on the way out as you say it. Netflix was just released here in The Netherlands and TV is mostly included when you pay for an Internet subscription.

mhunterjr3874d ago

Traditional tv is going nowhere. Not as long as sports and the news is televised. Sure digital is growing, and will continue to do so. But TV should not be ignored. Microsoft is actually blurring the experience between live TV and on-demand, which is an approach plenty of people will gravitate to.

MysticStrummer3874d ago

@mhunter - You can watch sports and news through the internet also.

beerzombie3873d ago

There 3 hundred million people in America and most if not high percentage have cable TV of some type. Even though I cut my cable and so have most of my friends, most people have not. cutting cable is not consumer friendly yet.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3873d ago
infamousinfolite3874d ago

And can the Xbox record TV shows and movies via the console?

Groo3874d ago

I couldn't agree with you more. Also having to pay a XBL sub just to use Hulu, Netflix, YouTube etc.. doesn't help either

Show all comments (61)
90°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot6h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo31m ago(Edited 30m ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

Duke1913m ago(Edited 12m ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

60°

Athenian Rhapsody Throws WarioWare into a JRPG

Athenian Rhapsody is a JRPG with a difference: alongside turn-based combat & exploration, you'll need to complete WarioWare-style microgames.

70°

El Shaddai: Ascension of the Metatron - Coming Back for a New Generation

Originally launched in 2011, El Shaddai: Ascension of the Metatron is coming to Nintendo Switch, so It's time to look back at the original.

jznrpg1h ago

Still have my ps3 copies. Bought it at launch and another one when I found it cheap and in perfect condition about 10 years ago. I wouldn’t buy it on Switch but if they made a PS5 version I would. I still have one of my PS3 Fats hooked up so good to go either way.

darthv721h ago

Id play it again on the switch. I wished my 360 version was bc but this is still a good way to play.