200°

New Project CARS Video Shows Off Next-Gen Water Effects, Rivaling Those Of CryENGINE's Tech Demo

DSOGaming writes: "A while back, Crytek released a tech demo trailer for CRYENGINE, showcasing the features that are being supported in its latest build. There is no denying that the most 'wow-ish' feature that Crytek shown in its tech demo was the procedural GPGPU weather effects. Well, YouTube's member 'Darren White' posted a new video for Slightly Mad Studios' racing game, Project CARS, showcasing similar water effects."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
ATi_Elite3876d ago

See the clouds and environment reflected in the water even as it dries up!

PCars is such a tour de force in ALL facets of Gaming, gameplay graphics, sound, physics, control, etc..

This will be in game SOON (hopefully next build)if not already in game (I'm a build or 2 behind) while Cryteks is a Tech Demo.

Project CARS is pushing Next Gen tech Today not tomorrow.

Orpheus3876d ago

I wonder how this game runs so smooth on current graphics cards, ( as per the videos on internet)

DialgaMarine3875d ago

I've heard that graphics are second to none, but the gameplay is lightyears behind the likes of Gran Turismo.

aliengmr3875d ago

Never heard anything of the sort from the many of gamers playing it right now.

ATi_Elite3875d ago (Edited 3875d ago )

I'm playing Pcars and the Graphics along with Gameplay are ABOVE EVERYTHING.

graphics are hands down the BEST, gives Arma 3 a run for it's money in the detail department and almost has better weather than STALKER.

Physics, Pcars beats everything considered a racer. Your car gets damaged and parts fly off or get dragged along and the physics of your car change depending on damage. SO real!

Gameplay may only be second to iRacing (but iRacing is dam near real and sponsored by Nascar, F1, and Indy

all this while in ALPHA!!!

AJBACK2FRAG3876d ago

Holy cow! It looks totally realistic!

3876d ago Replies(1)
WarThunder3876d ago (Edited 3876d ago )

This is a true next gen racing game!

Im so getting this game on my PC.
GT6 for PS3 and DriveClub for PS4 :D

Show all comments (17)
170°

Why did EA Kill Project CARS?

This video explains why we think Electronic Arts didn't see a future in the sim racing title Project CARS and promptly cancelled the fourth instalment.

Jin_Sakai529d ago

After the last installment I’d say most hardcore fans left. It’s just not that good anymore so I can’t really blame EA this time.

masterfox529d ago

because it was always a project and it never got finished :D

ChubbyBlade527d ago

Every game is a project. Your joke doesn’t make sense

InUrFoxHole527d ago

It makes perfect sense. It's obviously a play on the title. Jesus christ you must be a blast at parties.

ApocalypseShadow528d ago (Edited 528d ago )

Ask Bullfrog or Black Box or Tiburon or Studio 33 or Criterion or any of the previously acquired developers who made racing games as competition, or as developers of EA games, then eventually dissolved into oblivion or reassigned. Just ask them. They'll tell you why.

ApocalypseShadow527d ago

Oh. I forgot. Even Code Masters were absorbed into Criterion. Another racing developer EA took over.

Every racing developer either absorbed by EA or eventually destroyed by them. They either kill competition or have them in the end make Need 4 Speed for them.

MadLad528d ago

EA only cancels projects for one reason.
They didn't see enough money in it.

Kombatologist528d ago (Edited 528d ago )

Not when it's because it didn't meet some crazy margin. It's like if something doesn't make EA a billion dollars on day one (I'm exaggerating that figure of course), they swiftly put it out to pasture.

SurgicalMenace527d ago (Edited 527d ago )

Much like if you're spending money on what's a bad investment for your desired goals, you'd do away with it, if you're wise. We should try to get away from thinking we know more about business than individuals that have been doing it for decades. Perhaps you could benefit from going into business instead of wasting all of your talents in comment sections. It's clear that you're the missing piece that EA's been looking for.

MadLad527d ago

I've made a good amount of money betting on underdog investments over the years.

EA sets unrealistic expectations of their more niche developers, yet continue to fund absolute blunders like DICE and the Battlefield series year after year.

dumahim528d ago

EA butted in and messed with the formula and act shocked when it doesn't work out.

Show all comments (16)
90°

Original Project CARS creator trying to re-hire EA team

Ian Bell, the founder of Slightly Mad Studios, is aiming to hire former Project CARS employees to work on his upcoming GTR Revival project.

Sgt_Slaughter531d ago

If it's just going to be another sim-cade that doesn't do either one correctly then no thanks.

Project CARS 2 was a step in the right direction but the physics still aren't where they should have been, so what did they do for PC3? Go completely arcade. That killed the franchise.

220°

EA dropping Project CARS

From GI.biz: "EA is dropping Project CARS, GamesIndustry.biz can reveal.

The Slightly Mad Studios-developed series was launched in 2015, with EA confirming today that it has made the decision to "stop further development and investment" in the franchise.

The announcement was made internally and it's unclear at this stage to which extent staff could be affected. EA said that employees working on Project CARS will be moved into "suitable" roles "wherever [they] can.""

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Terry_B533d ago

Typical for EA. They buy studios that created nice games..and are sooner or later destroying them and move the people to work on the old same 5+ EA series.

italiangamer533d ago

They will put the developers on the 1000th Need for Speed for the rest of their entire careers, just like Criterion.

SurgicalMenace533d ago

To be fair, it's not EAs fault it falls directly on the consumer. Everytime these companies choose to drop a series they're met with backlash though the gamers didn't support said series enough to justify its continuation. Attempting to paint every company as evil all because they're in it to succeed is ridiculous. They have to make money just like each of us typing in this section. If a job wasn't supporting you well you'd quit and find a new one, this is the same mentality concerning series.

TheColbertinator532d ago

@SurgicalMenace

No it is their fault. They don't listen to fans and burn the franchise to the ground by introducing elements that nobody wanted instead of increasing support for said respected franchises.

I order a steak, they make a steak. 1st sale
I order a steak again, they vomit on my steak and charge me more for it. No sale.

EA in a nutshell.

Tapani532d ago

@TheColbinator Well how do you think they make the billions then?

Their fans ARE buying their games. You are just not their focus group, and I can guarantee their customer insights team is more thorough and detailed in their reaearch than any N4G commentors’ opinion on the matter. Otherwise EA would not exist as a company, and they’d be bankrupt.

deleted533d ago

The one that still hurts the most though was Criterion w the Burnout series. Acquired Criterion's tech for their own existing IP, then shut em down. It's basically parasitic. I sure do miss Burnout's crash mode!

Hofstaderman533d ago

Sounds eerily similar to another large unnamed corporation hey. I believe some EA bigwigs shifted to that company back in the day, would explain the similarities.

rlow1532d ago

Must be talking about Sony

peppeaccardo533d ago

and instead they come out with that piece of shit of Need for Speed which looks like an Anna & Barbera cartoon. C'mon .... PC2 was my go to game for VR racing and the first one i played for tens of hours. i was so lookiing forward to PC4 after that failure of PC3 ... what a shame EA, they are bombing all the good games and stick to the garbage ones. EA when you think you have reached maximum of disappointment they top it off with style .... screw them!

SurgicalMenace533d ago

Need for Speed continues to sell so why would they get rid of what's producing what they need to maintain stability?

EazyC533d ago

What they did to this series was idiotic. The premise was great -- a sim/simcade game that GENUINELY got developed in line with its community. There is a huge gap in the market for this...I mean, PD hasn't listened to fans at all over the last year with regard to simple Gran Turismo 7 tweaks. Sim racing fans are screaming for a title where they actually give a shit about their users.

Project Cars 2 was genuinely on to something, it just needed some refinement. But instead they followed up by selling off to EA with a braindead GRID clone with Project Cars 3. Again...idiotic.

SurgicalMenace533d ago

Well since you're the authority on properly managing a million dollar company, why don't you just call them to let them know of your divine wisdom?

Hardcore sim racers are the ones who are competing acrossed the globe, no company in their right mind would focus on a forever moving casual market. They have to focus on those dedicated to supporting their efforts. Notice how you're speaking from a perspective of self opposed to the collective. Perhaps they sold out because they, like us, needed the money knowing that they could reinvest it into something new. PC was a decent racer but very few people mainlined it over GT or Forza.

EazyC532d ago

I'm not a divine authority but I notice a pattern where these huge corporations turn completely tone deaf of what the "average fan" wants.

vallencer532d ago

Hate to break it to you but project cars 3 was published by Bandai in 2020. EA didn't buy codemasters, which owned slightly mad studios, until 2021. Either way the sales were super poor for the game and it's not surprising EA would just drop the game. BUT it still sucks because it's one less sim racing game on the market. Especially because the first 2 were really good.

Tzuno533d ago

and focuses more on cartoon network games

Show all comments (19)