100°

The Real Reason I’m Not Getting An Xbox One

Despite its rough start, the Xbox One has done a lot to shore up its image. However, for Blake from Leviathyn, its not enough.

Read Full Story >>
leviathyn.com
xHeavYx3877d ago

"I believe it Sony’s vision for the PS4 more than Microsoft’s vision for the Xbox One….because I’m not sure they have one"
Just like Andrew House said it, the One has no vision. They said it was built around Kinect and DRM, but the first one is no longer required and the second one is gone.
Welcome though, greatness awaits for all the people who removed their blinds and jumped ships

Godmars2903877d ago

MS's vision seems to be, "To make money by providing a money making platform and subscription services" whereas Sony's seems to be, "To make money by providing a product and entertainment". With the slight differences in those statements representing vast chasms.

XboxFun3877d ago

Their vision is to have an all in one complete set top box for the living room as stated by MS many, many times.

The Xbox One plays games, has a great launch line up and will play all those great multi titles currently being promoted by devs and publishers.

As a gamer what other "vision" are you looking for?

Funny how sheep are more concerned about the Xbox One than Xbox's own fans. This tells you that MS is doing everything right.

xHeavYx3877d ago (Edited 3877d ago )

You are so funny it's sad, do you work form MS' reputation dept?
http://17f0418678386b4e6860...

Being an all in one console was only one of the many things they had in mind as part of their vision.
You end your message saying that MS is doing everything right, makes me wonder who is the sheep

joeyisback3877d ago (Edited 3877d ago )

i aint getting one because they dont care about gamer's and im not into power rangers with guns aka halo PlayStation has always had better games also ill be able to play PS4 games on my vita while on the go through wifi check out this picture heres my gamertag on xbox 360 i was an xbox 360 gamer till 4 yrs ago when i saw the light and got a PS3 i hope more xbox 360 gamers jump ship microsoft doesnt care about games at all they just care about tv and other stuff we can get without a gaming system we buy gaming systems for games which PlayStation gives us

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.a...

JuniorCE3877d ago

X1 GPU

768 GCN shader cores with 853MHz
48 TMUs
16 ROPs
1.31 TFLOPS
40.9 GTex/s
13.6 GPix/s
8GB DDR3 with 68GB/s + eSRAM voodoo
2 compute command processors
something between 2 and 16 parallel compute queues
GPU cache bypass: no

PS4 GPU:

1152 GCN shader cores with 800MHz
72 TMUs
32 ROPs
1.84 TFLOPS
57.6 GTex/s
25.6 GPix/s
8GB GDDR5 with 176GB/s
8 compute command processors
64 parallel compute queues
GPU cache bypass: yes

------------

Whether it’s the top notch exclusives or the excellent third party selection, PS4 owners will have a wide selection of titles to choose from at launch with a steady flow thereon after.
Basement Crawl
Driveclub
Infamous: Second Son
Killzone: Shadow Fall
Knack
Resogun
The Order: 1886
Secret Ponchos
Assassin’s Creed IV: Black Flag
Battlefield 4
Blacklight: Retribution
Call of Duty: Ghosts
Carmageddon: Reincarnation
Contrast
The Crew
Cyberpunk 2077
Daylight
DC Universe Online
Deep Down
Destiny
Diablo III
Doki-Doki Universe
Don’t Starve
Dragon Age: Inquisition
Dying Light
The Elder Scrolls Online
The Evil Within
FIFA 14
Final Fantasy 14: A Realm Reborn
Final Fantasy 15
Galak-Z
Hohokum
Just Dance 2014
Kingdom Hearts III
Lords of the Fallen
Mad Max
Madden NFL 25
Marc Ecko’s Getting Up 2
Mercenary Kings
Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain
Mirror’s Edge 2
NBA 2K14
NBA Live 14
Need for Speed: Rivals
Oddworld: Abe’s Oddysee New N’ Tasty!
Outlast
The Pinball Arcade
PlanetSide 2
Primal Carnage: Genesis
Project: Heart and Soul
Ray’s The Dead
Rocketbirds 2: Evolution
Shadow Warrior
Skylanders: Swap Force
Sniper Elite 3
Super Motherload
Thief
Tiny Brains
Tom Clancy’s The Division
Transistor
Trials Fusion
UFC
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade
War Thunder
Warframe
Watch Dogs
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witness
Wolfenstein: The New Order

This VITA TV looks SICK!!!!! :-D
That's why I have chosen the PS4 :-D

Demoa3877d ago

Those are mostly all multiplats

MasterCornholio3877d ago

True but you can still play them on the PS4.

And if the rumors of multi plats being superior on the PS4 are true......

Motorola RAZR i

Godmars2903877d ago

"This VITA TV looks SICK!"

No, it looks very cheap and accessible. Obviously so.

GarrusVakarian3877d ago

I'll get both.

Because i care about games more than companies :)

Ketzicorn3877d ago (Edited 3877d ago )

I don't understand the downvotes for you getting both companies console.Pretty much everyone I know had both systems at some time last generation so I don't get why it's a problem now.

ZHZ903877d ago (Edited 3877d ago )

It's ok to get all consoles but money is the problem. And you may get all consoles but you may favor one while other(s) may leave it to dust. I gave you an agree btw.

jonboi243877d ago

I'll want to get both but I don't have the cash so I like my choice of getting a PS4 first. If down the line MS impresses me with something I really need then yes I'll get. Though I can't easily forgive them for what they tried to do. Only game that truly has my attention on XB1 is Titanfall and I'll pick that up on PC.

Software_Lover3877d ago

I thought we were done with these?

Show all comments (17)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

190°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot13h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke197h ago(Edited 7h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke193h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

-Foxtrot58m ago

"Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs"

He's literally just told you why

We're waiting like 15 years before a sequel comes out, it's insane

Skyrim came out in 2011, the next game is expected to come out in 2027 at the earliest so that's 16 years apart while Fallout 4 came out in 2015 and might not release until 2031, again 16 years.

We're fine with Bethesda trying new things and doing new IPs like Starfield but adding a new game to the cycle now means a bigger wait. Also Starfield didn't meet most peoples expectations, can you imagine waiting 15 years or so for a sequel and it's disappointing? It would feel even worse because you would have to wait another 15 years to see if they manage to come back from it.

They need to give it to another developer, we don't need main numbered titles but a spin off of Fallout and Elder Scrolls should be cycled in between the long gaps of the main releases.

Once again you are making out people want these games as quick as possible when all we want is a standard development time of at least 4 years or so rather than waiting 15.

mandf4h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor6h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave5h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor3h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

-Foxtrot54m ago

@Skuletor

Who's saying to rush the releases? No one is saying that...

People just don't want to be waiting 15 years for a sequel, they aren't working on the game for that long, you do realise that right? The issue isn't coming down to them working on the game and us "rushing them", it's the fact they are working on other games like Starfield now meaning bigger gaps before they even get started on them.

I bet you any more Elder Scrolls VI only entered full development last year when Starfield was finished despite being announced in 2018.

Duke193h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai5h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris4h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (22)