300°

PlayStation Vita TV: Solving Problems We Didn't Know We Had

TSA writes: "When Sony teased the news we had “been waiting for” yesterday, I wasn’t sure whether to believe them or not, and whether it would be worth getting up at 6:30am to report the news on TSA if there wasn’t going to be anything exciting aside from a Japanese PS4 release date."

Read Full Story >>
thesixthaxis.com
3879d ago Replies(6)
ricochetmg3879d ago

I love the idea and hopes it comes to the us

ziggurcat3879d ago

it will, it's just going to be out in japan first. that's why andrew house made the announcement, and why they broadcast the event with english translation.

FamilyGuy3879d ago

With the internet blowing up over this as huge positive news it will most certainly be coming to the U.S.

On top of that Sony gave us the heads up that they would be announcing something big and that there would be a translated stream. All so that we could see this things reveal.

100% chance this thing is coming to the U.S., no doubt whatsoever.

iceman063879d ago

House mentioned something about it being in Japan ahead of a "worldwide release". A product like this is pretty much a lock to come to the US.

Ginesis3879d ago

This...is a dumb idea. For a company in financial trouble this is a huge risk that won't pay off. Quit digging a hole that you've been trying to fill Sony!

dredgewalker3879d ago

Actually it's Sony's gaming division that's been keeping Sony afloat. It's the other divisions that were making lots of losses for Sony.

Ginesis3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

And now they're risking their profitable division by doing this. What they should do is focus on innovation in the mobile market because the next company with the next big idea in that market will reap the rewards.

Death3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

Sony's gaming division has not been keeping Sony afloat. Sony's lost about 4-5 billion this gen on the gaming side. They've made a small profit in the tens of millions the last couple years. Before that it was huge losses. Sony Financial is their biggest profit leader that helps them the most. http://www.sony.net/SonyInf... (pg.28)

With color charts and graphs. http://www.sony.net/SonyInf...

Sony made about 1.5 million last year on the Playstation brand and close to 30 million the year before. Losses in the billions prior dating back to 2006.

@Ginisys

Mobile is their market with the biggest losses. About a billion in 2012. They made about 7 million the year before that.

For the disagree, check the links. They are from Sony.

dredgewalker3879d ago

@Death
From what I understand most of the recent losses from Sony's gaming division is because of the investment in the cost of developing the PS4 and probably the newer vita models.

@Ginesis
It's a calculated risk, if they manage to make the Vita Tv successful they'll increase the Vita's install base and garner more dev support.

Death3879d ago

Actually, the last couple of years they posted a small profit. The bulk of their losses before that had various reasons. Hurricane, drop of the yen, low sales, etc.

PS4 development is the least expensive of any console they have produced. It was subscontracted for the most part using off the shelf componants with very little modification relatively speaking. They claimed it is a result of listening to developers. Realistically it was about costs associated with R&D. It was a very good decision on their part either way.

dredgewalker3879d ago

Ahh I forgot about that whole tsunami incident.

WeAreLegion3879d ago

Innovation in the mobile market?

Have you not seen Sony's phones? They're incredible!

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3879d ago
Protagonist3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

@Ginesis

You should apply for a job at the Sony Corporation, it seems you know what you are talking about... the analysis about the financial trouble/huge risk was spot on.

/s

Software_Lover3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

That could apply to 80% of this website. /s

Ginesis3879d ago

Actually smart ass I have a Business degree in Finance so I know a little bit about economics and products and who's the market for said products. All I was saying is its hard to see their direct market for this device plus the vita name doesn't have enough market penetration to put out new devicse under the same umbrella and expect it to do any better. Sony needs to be a bit more conservative with their ideas right now

Protagonist3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

@Ginesis

"I support systems that will be supported"

So now you can see in the future? you are "Genius"

Death3879d ago

They aren't risking their profitable market with the VitaTV. They make their money on the financial side more than anything. Without their financial division, Sony lost money last year. Charging for online is a step in the right direction if they want to be profitable. They also need to increase software sales. As a gamer I love the fact we can use certain games at no additional charge as Plus subscribers, but as a business owner I believe they are taking sales from themselves with the service.

Ace_Pheonix3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

*gasp* Oh wow, a business degree! Well everyone step aside, we got a guy here that has a degree in the same over saturated field as every other college student! I bet he was even able to not get a job with it! Haha, all sarcasm aside, I think it's a brilliant idea that will move more Vitas in the long run. But it really should be compatible with the DS4 for touch support.

Kujii3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

@Ginesis

The PS4 has over 1 million pre-orders. how many of those people do you think would have 2+ TV's in their house? And for $99usd they can play their PS4 on another TV in the house.

Money in the bank if you ask me.

Thats not including people that will buy it just because its a cheap way to enjoy PS1, PSP & PSV games or stream movies.

Being a parent this is an amazing solution for my daughter. I dont have to buy her a Vita that will most likely break or be left somewhere. And I can play the same PS1 classics with her that I played as a kid.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3879d ago
sincitysir13879d ago

Someone's upset they're not getting a vita tv.

Ginesis3879d ago

No I won't be getting one I support systems that will be supported.

AznGaara3879d ago

Because a $100 box that streams tv shows, movies and plays video games have always failed. No wonder people don't buy the AppleTv... oh wait.

Ginesis3879d ago

Sony attempt to enter that market will be an uphill battle especially cause chromecast and good luck moving apples people to something else they have them on lockdown. Simply put...that market is spoken for right now.

Navick3879d ago

@Ginesis

So much for your degree... You still don't get it. This is the first time something like this has been done. There is no other market to take notes, charts or. Past sells from. It's not an Apple TV or Roku, though it has some of those features. It has access to over 1300 games, psone, psp, and vita games. It also always u to purchase one ps4 and reap the benefits of having a second in your bedroom. On a big screen. Remote play at its finest. I think it's genius and will sell like hot cakes.

wishingW3L3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

@Ginesis, don't even try to make sense out of anything because fanboys are just gonna fanboy. My console of choice is always Sony's but I'm nowhere near as delusional as them and I do admit Sony has made lots of mistakes and what they are doing now is indeed risky. But to the fanboys Sony's in a pedestal and they can do no wrong even though they really messed up with the PS3 and again with the Vita.

SirBradders3879d ago

Not a good idea to you maybe but to cash struck homes this is the nuts a vita on your tv for £80 and enables you to stream your ps4 throughout the house while watching tv through it so it has a place in cash struck homes and the better off with multiple tvs.

This is a good move from sony how can you think it is a bad move?

FamilyGuy3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

You're crazy, they just introduce a $100 way to play Vita games as well as it being able to stream Gaikai content eventually. This thing is gonna sell through the roof.

You're over here talking about innovation in mobile market? lmao, did you not notice they also have revised PS Vita models that are cheaper to make (No OLED screen) as well? A slimmer, lighter, less expensive handheld vita as well as Vita Tv, the install base will probably quadruple within the first couple months of this things release.

$100 and less = impulse buy, when it comes to consoles. Vita tv = Vita console

If by mobile you're referring to cell phones well Sony has innovative cell phones already and the market is just over-saturated with competition. If some other company comes up with something great they'll all just copy each other anyway. Sony has a phone that can be submerged under water, they're already doing great stuff.

I'm really caught off guard by the people that see this as a negative thing. Realize that you are in the minority. Just because you're too narrow-minded to see the benefits of such a device and who is market will be you think it's a bad investment yet you can look at any news report story on the Vita Tv and see 100 positive comments to every 7 negative ones. 100 to 7... it's a really good sign that people are interested.

ginsunuva3879d ago

How is it a huge risk when it's just Vita parts w/o screen?

iceman063879d ago

While it might be considered "risky", financially it's not a huge risk. The R&D has already been done, games are being made and have been for some time since it supports various previous console iterations. All that they really have to do is market, produce, and sell. The ability for it to remote play brings this device into play big time. Assuming that it works as advertised, this allows you to play PS4 games on another TV or in another room for about $100. That alone will move units.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3879d ago
miyamoto3879d ago

PS Vita games seen @720p or 1080i is not a bad thing...its actually very good!

i dont have to carry my ps4 to a friends house or at work to play ps4 games

this will encourage gamers to buy less expensive ps vita versions of ps3/ps4/ps vita cross platform games

very nice

loving it

and then there is Gaikai over the horizon

thrust3879d ago

I wanna see the ps4 games steaming over the net in uk!

3879d ago Replies(3)
Show all comments (64)
140°

PlayStation Doesn't Need a Dedicated PC Store Launcher

With all the PlayStation games that are now coming to PC, is it time for Sony to release a dedicated PC launcher?

thorstein3d ago

No, and they already solved any need with the overlay that's coming.

Vits3d ago

Unless they are trying to kill their recently created PC business, I would advise against opening a dedicated PC store. It's an extremely hard endeavor, and people, in general, are very comfortable with Steam. Even Epic, with their billions of dollars invested, is still struggling to find a foothold, and they have Fortnite.

just_looken2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Money is one thing security is another but again millions have 0 knowledge past 2020.

Epic store for years struggled with a shopping cart/account theft/credit card theft

Rockstar launcher/store to this day over 5 years later still has horrific user interface security flaws lost account's and stolen CC

Then you got that activision need phone number oh we lost it launcher

The crown jewel is the ea launcher/store ea app 3 yrs old still has hundreds of threads were people lost games/accounts/game access or just straight up crashes.

Edit" Oh ubi launcher were you buy a game that may or may not be there again or work and the launcher 5yrs old still has no 4K support if you launch it on a 4k screen there is a high chance it will just crash.

ocelot072d ago

Can tell who ever put this together is not all that clued up on pc gaming.

It's just a known fact. The PC gaming community prefer Steam and Steam alone. They don't like different launchers. I personally don't mind them. But majority just stick with steam. Hence why EA and Ubisoft went back to on releasing on steam and why Microsoft release games on steam as people hated buying from the windows store.

The only other launchers that I imagine are doing ok is GOG due to being drm free and epic games due to the free games every week. Sony shouldn't release any sort of pc launcher n

Nitrowolf22d ago (Edited 2d ago )

It literally says in the OP that PC gamers don't like multiple launchers lol. It even mentions Steam being the go to for gamers

Tacoboto2d ago

Title: "PlayStation Doesn't Need a Dedicated PC Store Launcher"

N4G: "Can tell who ever put this together is not all that clued up on pc gaming"

When you don't even read the headline...

ocelot072d ago

I read it and had a brain fart. As read the title then this "With all the PlayStation games that are now coming to PC, is it time for Sony to release a dedicated PC launcher?"

So I hold my hands up on that mistake. Rest of my comment still stands.

Giblet_Head2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Steam and GOG are highly preferred because of the rich feature set. Ubisoft, Rockstar, EA, Epic etc have all set a precedent over the years for customers to instinctively expect individual publisher launchers to be so extremely half-assed that the majority simply don't want to bother dealing with what is almost an inevitable disappointment by comparison to Steam or GOG. Those publishers and their inaction or general disinterest to improve have effectively ruined any future adoption to be taken seriously.

Einhander19722d ago (Edited 2d ago )

This is just another ridiculous double standard article.

It's like how Microsoft can spend 20 years of making nothing but gaas and live service style games to sell microtransactions, dlc and subscriptions and get praise for doing it, but if Sony wants to make a single game like that every website under the sun is writing articles saying how Sony is anti-consumer or whatever.

derek2d ago

Yep, huge double standard look at the tortured reaction to the ps5pro, websites hyperventilating like Sony is forcing people to buy it.

just_looken2d ago

Wait my xbox from 2004 has avengers gaas on it? wow your so smart

m$ Gaas started with the other companies like sony

Gamepass yes they are deep into that but its still a huge money saver sense you do not own your games then get a service like that.

Now there pc xbox launcher that is trash for years now

Show all comments (15)
240°

Is Driver (PS1) Still Worth Playing in 2024?

"Driver was a technical achievement for PS1, a pioneer in cinematic gaming, and an often brutal challenge - TechStomper asks if its brand of 70s car chase antics still holds up."

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
PrimeVinister10d ago

The driving holds up, most of everything else does not.

PrimeVinister10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

@Shane Kim

Well, I mean the driving physics hold up. The draw distance, police AI, visuals in general etc do not

Cacabunga10d ago

One of my all time favorites on PS1. I spent a summer vacation playing this was so good

isarai10d ago

Sadly youd be hard pressed to find any driving game with better physics these days. But the draw distance really kills it for me

PrimeVinister10d ago

The physics hold up ridiculously well. And the draw distance is a real hurdle at first.

__y2jb10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Nonsense. The physics in any modern game or any 360 game is light years beyond Driver.

Dandizzle10d ago

This game is hard, you will fail and quit

PrimeVinister10d ago

But you will get there eventually... maybe

MatrixxGT10d ago

All in the first two minutes.

jznrpg10d ago

Stop with is it worth it articles. If you want to play a game play the damn game!

anast10d ago

I loved this game awhile back.

Barlos9d ago

Yeah but is it worth reading pointless articles?

__y2jb10d ago

It wasn’t worth playing in the 90’s.

Espangerish10d ago

My thoughts exactly. I bought it at release for full price and got frustrated and bored with it very quickly.

Show all comments (41)
240°

Is Gran Turismo (PS1) Still Worth Playing in 2024?

Gran Turismo for PlayStation launched a sub-genre and revolutionised console racing - TechStomper asks is it still worth playing in 2024.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
Terry_B12d ago

Well..you can play it completely offline at least ^^

PrimeVinister12d ago

Something we really miss, just turning on the console and having the game start without signing into stuff

Terry_B12d ago

Fully agreed. That and Splitscreen Modes for Racing games.

PrimeVinister12d ago

@Terry_B I miss having people to splitscreen with, but I can't blame anyone for that :-(

Cacabunga12d ago

Not too late.. we can still change that.

PrimeVinister12d ago

@Cacabunga I will let you in, see ya soon compadre :-P

MrBaskerville11d ago

@Terry_B
GT7 actually has 4 player splitscreen. Which is wild in this day and age.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
TiredGamer12d ago

Good news is that Sony released a final update to Gran Turismo Sport to allow it to function offline. Expecting the same for GT7 at some point in the future.

PrimeVinister12d ago

That is great news, I really liked Sport even if many others did not :-/

Chocoburger12d ago

I'm not big into sim racing, but I got sucked into the hype for this one from magazines back then. I just played arcade mode and that was enough for me to feel like I got my money's worth.

Yeah, it's definitely worth playing today. GT 2 has a few interesting fan made graphical mods when played on an emulator as well.

PrimeVinister12d ago

The arcade mode is underrated, it's a great alternative mode and you can even unlock GT HiFi with it.

Fonsecap12d ago

Cars back then had much more personality then those we see today. Modern cars all about the led lights and the tablet size screens and they all seem alike, back then they could be simpler in design but had tons more personality.

PrimeVinister12d ago

That is something a few people have pointed out - that cars all look the same now. I have to agree that a lot of new vehicles lack personality.

fsfsxii12d ago

You guys are so anti-fun its depressing, like who tf cares about personality of objects like wtf? Just learn to enjoy stuff as is.

PrimeVinister12d ago

It's hardly anti-fun to remark that some objects look nicer than others.

And everyone has their favourite era of cars, I sincerely doubt many will pick the 2020s a few decades from now.

Fonsecap12d ago

Dude, like wft cares about personality of objects? What about art? Paintings are objects and they're considered good or bad if they show or lack personality so I ask, wtf are you talking about? Cars are also considered pieces of art, vintage cars, classic cars, classic bikes and so on. Artists are appreciated by the objects they craft, blacksmiths, painters, engineers, designers, so wtf cares about personality of objects indeed... ( Sorry for my English, it's not my native language)

MrBaskerville11d ago

Talking about cars is fun if you are a car enthusiast. Just saying.

ApocalypseShadow12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

That Corvette Stingray to this day is one of the most ferocious whips ever driven. Overpowered against other cars yes. But to drive it and be that close to losing control, but being in command around those curves, just can't be duplicated.

HiFi mode is also something I miss. There should be a mode in today's GT where it's Mano o Mano and the detail and resolution jump full throttle. In today's games, Max Ray Tracing and lighting and textures to make it look even more real..

PrimeVinister12d ago

A modern HiFi mode would be really cool! It would be really interesting to see how real they could go by stripping it all way back.

And Stingray is a solid choice 👌

TiredGamer12d ago

HiFi mode in GT1 was only a stripped down 60 fps mode for one track. Should have been called "Performance Mode" or "High Frame Rate" mode.

PrimeVinister12d ago

@TiredGamer it was only three tracks, but it was still cool

Petebloodyonion12d ago

Not according to Former Playstation president Jim Ryan for he told Time that he doesn't see why anyone would play old games given the advancements in fidelity achieved today.

https://time.com/4804768/pl...

PrimeVinister12d ago

I don't agree with him, but he had a few good points.

Show all comments (33)