340°

PlayStation 4 — Voice Messaging Confirmed

Last month, during Sony’s presentation at Gamescon, Worldwide Studios President Shuhei Yoshida had unveiled the User Interface of the PlayStation 4. While the demo was impressive, there was something that people may have missed that should catch your attention.

Read Full Story >>
stfuandplay.com
M-M3879d ago

In before someone says the 360 had this first. Great feature to have though, wish the PS3 had it.

Ezz20133879d ago

both copy from each other
like every company do

monkeyDzoro3879d ago

When does voice messaging features implementation is "copying" ? Why people (Sony or Xbox fans) like to use that word ? Phones have been doing that decades ago...

HammadTheBeast3879d ago

It's a useless feature overall. BARELY anyone used messaging on consoles, even less will use voice messaging.

shoddy3879d ago

At least on ps4 you don't have to pay for this feater

Irishguy953879d ago

Its a useless feature on Xbox because you have X game chat.

ShinMaster3879d ago

From previous experience on 360, people mostly use it for verbal abuse.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3879d ago
STANK083879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

And still to this day people have the audacity to say that PSN is better than Live. LOL. How did you guys send voice messages on PSN? Two cans and a string?

Edit: @ABeastNamedTariq Since you're civil, I'll bite. Yea I own both systems. I've played both religiously. IMO Live is better hands down, also the connections are smoother. Also I praise MS for their forward thinking. MS bought Netflix, ESPN, TV apps to systems first. MS is Pioneers to this online sh*t. The fact that It took Sony a entire generation proves it.

ABeastNamedTariq3879d ago

What do you mean better? Connection times? Lag?

Have you ever played an online game on PS3? It's virtually the same as Live, except quieter.

What are you getting at?

TKCMuzzer3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

I think this is due to the limitations of the PS3 not the PSN otherwise the PS4 would not be able to do it.
In other words, if your going to be a wise guy at least think before you comment.

A disagree? I wonder who that was. If it is a PSN issue it would not be possible on the PS4, it's a simple as that.

@STANK08 , Microsoft are pioneers, they bought you apps like Netflix and then charged you to use them. Do you work for Microsoft?

Thisisjuju3879d ago

Both Live and PSN have their own advantages.

I really like the easy of use of the Xbox interface and party chat. Its so much easier to organize games with friends on a 360.

I chose to use a PlayStation however for the metric f**kton of games and content I get for a pretty low price of their Plus service.

christrules00413879d ago

It had nothing to do with PSN. The bandwidth from the RAM was allocated on the PS3. It has 25GB/s of bandwidth. 12.5GB goes to the GPU, 6.25GB for the OS and 6.25GB for the CPU. Since it's allocated they couldn't change how much memory goes where so they had no room in there OS to add new features. That is why party chat never came to the PS3 as well or being able to listen to music in the background while playing a game.

Things that does have to do with PSN is stuff like the lag on the PS3 compared to the Xbox 360. The download times where extremely slow and when you sign in it etermines how fast you can load the friends list(which can be quiet slow).

That is all stuff that happens on the "cloud" for the entire past generation.

twinspectre3879d ago

and still to this day people have the audacity to say that XBOX is better than PS.
LOL. How did you guys pay the live for P2P servers Hosted by third parties company like Activision (cod) EA (BF), PSN is Dedicated Server and it WAS free

christrules00413879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

Edit: Sorry I thought the first one was cancelled LOL

kneon3879d ago

I've never had the urge to send a voice message on PSN, and I doubt I ever will even when it is available. I have a full size bluetooth keyboard for my PS3, on the rare occasions when I want to send someone a message I just use that.

stuna13879d ago

And how did you send voice messaging!? Ohh I know this one! By paying $60 a year.
The fact that Sony has heard what gamers wanted and included it into the PS4 DNA is a good thing regardless if it wasn't included in the PS3, it will be included in the PS4? From the look of things the Xbox1 won't be catching a break anytime soon, because every time they announce anything even close to good news, there is Sony and the PS4 to 1-up it at every turn.

Thomaticus3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

Hands down live is better.. pick your hands back up. Resistance Fall of Man had 32 player online matches, DAY ONE for PS3. I don't think a 360 game has done that to this day. If you prefer Xbox live, that's fine, but don't try and pretend that there was something wrong with PSN. We've been playing and enjoy games for almost SEVEN years now. After SEVEN years I can say that PSN great. The PS Plus goodies made it a lot better than live. Oh yeah, please Thank Sony for their PS Plus service which will help you get better bonuses from your xbox live service.

HammadTheBeast3879d ago

lol.

It took MS a whole gen to implement Blu-ray, a feature they mocked at Sony as "useless".

Therefore we have double, even triple-disked games on Xb360.

Online quality is the same pretty much, as someone who played CoD 4/MW2, Halo 3/Reach,and MAG/Metal Gear Online/Killzone 2 (pro) and tons of others I can safely say that both offer the same quality of online play.

A few less disconnects and maintenance issues on XBL, but not enough to warrant $60.

I'll give them credit for the apps, however, the apps on PS3 (mainly Netflix) are updated more frequently and are more user-friendly.

AceBlazer133879d ago

didn't dreamcast or some one of those old timers have online capabilities long before xbox? you ppl that bring up copying claims should really check your facts.

bsquwhere3879d ago

The only stank around here comes out your cake hole.

CGI-Quality3879d ago

If you weren't so biased about it, you'd have a point that I can understand. I agree that LIVE had better comm features, but the only reason they were ahead of Sony is because of the generation prior. Then again, it's like saying Sony "pioneered this HD movie shit, since MS is an entire generation behind and FINALLY decided to adapt to a winning format".

Yes, sounds silly, much like your comment, but your point was made.

FamilyGuy3879d ago

Why would you need to voice mail people anyways?
Sending a PM is just the same as text messaging and everyone in the world send texts all the time without complain.
I understand it's convenient but I never considered the inability to send a voice mail a problem. If I had something long to say I just plugged in my usb keyboard or invited them to a voice chat when we were both online so we could talk. On top of that someone said it was limited to 15 seconds or so? If that's true I really don't see what the big deal was about.

Party chat is one thing, very convenient and makes sense but who really cares about leaving voice messages?

DatRealBoy3879d ago

@Stank

um reason why xbox online may look smoother is the dashboard not the online itself 360 use P2P servers but did you know ps3 exclusives used dedicated servers hmm the more you know :/

nunley333879d ago

stanko,you couldn't think of a better troll name than that lol? its feature that's useless that i won't use but it'll make all 360 converts comfortable so i'm good with it along with cross game chat.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 3879d ago
Thisisjuju3879d ago

Looking forward to this.

One of the features I missed moving from 360 to PS3 was the voice message hate you could get. Was always a good laugh.

Sitdown3879d ago

Contradiction/ironic..... you didn't beat yourself to the punch.

FACTUAL evidence3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

Omg thank you sony, thank you!!! Now all i need is a feature to magically skip to Nov 15 2013, and a psn id change feature!

JunioRS1013879d ago

So... anybody else gettin the PS4?

UnholyLight3878d ago

Welcome to 2005, Sony...Only 8 years late to the game. For something so simple it just is kinda funny it took this long.

PS4 day 1 for me!

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3878d ago
Rikuson13879d ago

I wouldn't be surprised if they do something with the speaker on the dualshock 4 since it comes with that ear-bud mic now. Obviously this is yet another feature in from of the Ps+ pay wall which is great. I know some people out there that really wanted to voice message on PSN because text chatting is inconvenient and slow. Great news if you were wondering if PSN on Ps4 was going to have it or not. I wonder if the Ps Vita will have some sort of software update it's possible for that handheld since it'll have cross platform party chat with the Ps4 (Ps3 though obviously not)

deviouslight3879d ago

Its already confirmed that vita would have cross platform chat

Rikuson13879d ago

what has already been confirmed? the dualshock 4 using the speaker to play of the voice messages?

joeyisback3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

found this video other day figure they would of posted this closer up than but good now everyone else can see it closer who wasnt able to

PositiveEmotions3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

Cool new feature now i can send voice message to my psn friends.

I dont think the voice message is behind the ps+ paywall i think is a free feature.

Kayant3879d ago

It wouldn't be seeing as party chat isn't.

AngelicIceDiamond3879d ago

@Positive it is a free feature.
Trust me, if its free on Xbox it'll be free on PSN.

bornsinner3879d ago

it required a next generation console for sony to do this but well done on their copy & paste mission :thumbs up

Majin-vegeta3879d ago

Just M$ required a next gen console for Blu ray *thumbs up*.Sit your @$$ in the corner kid.

fattyuk3879d ago

LMAO Well said majin

:D

bubbled up.

joeyisback3879d ago

PS2 eye toy saids hello my younger brother Kinect

KwietStorm_BLM3879d ago

Take some time to learn how the consumer industry operates, then report back.

BluEx6103879d ago

MS still using AA batteries, and a power brick.... Maybe they should copy and paste Sony and get with the times already.... lol

AceBlazer133879d ago

required microsoft a next gen console for upgradeable hard drives. oh wait they still don't have it

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3879d ago
Show all comments (89)
140°

PlayStation Doesn't Need a Dedicated PC Store Launcher

With all the PlayStation games that are now coming to PC, is it time for Sony to release a dedicated PC launcher?

thorstein2d ago

No, and they already solved any need with the overlay that's coming.

Vits2d ago

Unless they are trying to kill their recently created PC business, I would advise against opening a dedicated PC store. It's an extremely hard endeavor, and people, in general, are very comfortable with Steam. Even Epic, with their billions of dollars invested, is still struggling to find a foothold, and they have Fortnite.

just_looken1d ago (Edited 1d ago )

Money is one thing security is another but again millions have 0 knowledge past 2020.

Epic store for years struggled with a shopping cart/account theft/credit card theft

Rockstar launcher/store to this day over 5 years later still has horrific user interface security flaws lost account's and stolen CC

Then you got that activision need phone number oh we lost it launcher

The crown jewel is the ea launcher/store ea app 3 yrs old still has hundreds of threads were people lost games/accounts/game access or just straight up crashes.

Edit" Oh ubi launcher were you buy a game that may or may not be there again or work and the launcher 5yrs old still has no 4K support if you launch it on a 4k screen there is a high chance it will just crash.

ocelot071d 16h ago

Can tell who ever put this together is not all that clued up on pc gaming.

It's just a known fact. The PC gaming community prefer Steam and Steam alone. They don't like different launchers. I personally don't mind them. But majority just stick with steam. Hence why EA and Ubisoft went back to on releasing on steam and why Microsoft release games on steam as people hated buying from the windows store.

The only other launchers that I imagine are doing ok is GOG due to being drm free and epic games due to the free games every week. Sony shouldn't release any sort of pc launcher n

Nitrowolf21d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

It literally says in the OP that PC gamers don't like multiple launchers lol. It even mentions Steam being the go to for gamers

Tacoboto1d 11h ago

Title: "PlayStation Doesn't Need a Dedicated PC Store Launcher"

N4G: "Can tell who ever put this together is not all that clued up on pc gaming"

When you don't even read the headline...

ocelot071d 8h ago

I read it and had a brain fart. As read the title then this "With all the PlayStation games that are now coming to PC, is it time for Sony to release a dedicated PC launcher?"

So I hold my hands up on that mistake. Rest of my comment still stands.

Giblet_Head1d ago (Edited 1d ago )

Steam and GOG are highly preferred because of the rich feature set. Ubisoft, Rockstar, EA, Epic etc have all set a precedent over the years for customers to instinctively expect individual publisher launchers to be so extremely half-assed that the majority simply don't want to bother dealing with what is almost an inevitable disappointment by comparison to Steam or GOG. Those publishers and their inaction or general disinterest to improve have effectively ruined any future adoption to be taken seriously.

Einhander19721d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

This is just another ridiculous double standard article.

It's like how Microsoft can spend 20 years of making nothing but gaas and live service style games to sell microtransactions, dlc and subscriptions and get praise for doing it, but if Sony wants to make a single game like that every website under the sun is writing articles saying how Sony is anti-consumer or whatever.

derek1d 7h ago

Yep, huge double standard look at the tortured reaction to the ps5pro, websites hyperventilating like Sony is forcing people to buy it.

just_looken1d ago

Wait my xbox from 2004 has avengers gaas on it? wow your so smart

m$ Gaas started with the other companies like sony

Gamepass yes they are deep into that but its still a huge money saver sense you do not own your games then get a service like that.

Now there pc xbox launcher that is trash for years now

Show all comments (15)
240°

Is Driver (PS1) Still Worth Playing in 2024?

"Driver was a technical achievement for PS1, a pioneer in cinematic gaming, and an often brutal challenge - TechStomper asks if its brand of 70s car chase antics still holds up."

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
PrimeVinister9d ago

The driving holds up, most of everything else does not.

PrimeVinister9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

@Shane Kim

Well, I mean the driving physics hold up. The draw distance, police AI, visuals in general etc do not

Cacabunga9d ago

One of my all time favorites on PS1. I spent a summer vacation playing this was so good

isarai9d ago

Sadly youd be hard pressed to find any driving game with better physics these days. But the draw distance really kills it for me

PrimeVinister9d ago

The physics hold up ridiculously well. And the draw distance is a real hurdle at first.

__y2jb9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

Nonsense. The physics in any modern game or any 360 game is light years beyond Driver.

Dandizzle9d ago

This game is hard, you will fail and quit

PrimeVinister9d ago

But you will get there eventually... maybe

jznrpg9d ago

Stop with is it worth it articles. If you want to play a game play the damn game!

anast9d ago

I loved this game awhile back.

Barlos8d ago

Yeah but is it worth reading pointless articles?

__y2jb9d ago

It wasn’t worth playing in the 90’s.

Espangerish9d ago

My thoughts exactly. I bought it at release for full price and got frustrated and bored with it very quickly.

Show all comments (41)
240°

Is Gran Turismo (PS1) Still Worth Playing in 2024?

Gran Turismo for PlayStation launched a sub-genre and revolutionised console racing - TechStomper asks is it still worth playing in 2024.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
Terry_B11d ago

Well..you can play it completely offline at least ^^

PrimeVinister11d ago

Something we really miss, just turning on the console and having the game start without signing into stuff

Terry_B11d ago

Fully agreed. That and Splitscreen Modes for Racing games.

PrimeVinister11d ago

@Terry_B I miss having people to splitscreen with, but I can't blame anyone for that :-(

Cacabunga11d ago

Not too late.. we can still change that.

PrimeVinister11d ago

@Cacabunga I will let you in, see ya soon compadre :-P

MrBaskerville10d ago

@Terry_B
GT7 actually has 4 player splitscreen. Which is wild in this day and age.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
TiredGamer11d ago

Good news is that Sony released a final update to Gran Turismo Sport to allow it to function offline. Expecting the same for GT7 at some point in the future.

PrimeVinister11d ago

That is great news, I really liked Sport even if many others did not :-/

Chocoburger11d ago

I'm not big into sim racing, but I got sucked into the hype for this one from magazines back then. I just played arcade mode and that was enough for me to feel like I got my money's worth.

Yeah, it's definitely worth playing today. GT 2 has a few interesting fan made graphical mods when played on an emulator as well.

PrimeVinister11d ago

The arcade mode is underrated, it's a great alternative mode and you can even unlock GT HiFi with it.

Fonsecap11d ago

Cars back then had much more personality then those we see today. Modern cars all about the led lights and the tablet size screens and they all seem alike, back then they could be simpler in design but had tons more personality.

PrimeVinister11d ago

That is something a few people have pointed out - that cars all look the same now. I have to agree that a lot of new vehicles lack personality.

fsfsxii11d ago

You guys are so anti-fun its depressing, like who tf cares about personality of objects like wtf? Just learn to enjoy stuff as is.

PrimeVinister11d ago

It's hardly anti-fun to remark that some objects look nicer than others.

And everyone has their favourite era of cars, I sincerely doubt many will pick the 2020s a few decades from now.

Fonsecap11d ago

Dude, like wft cares about personality of objects? What about art? Paintings are objects and they're considered good or bad if they show or lack personality so I ask, wtf are you talking about? Cars are also considered pieces of art, vintage cars, classic cars, classic bikes and so on. Artists are appreciated by the objects they craft, blacksmiths, painters, engineers, designers, so wtf cares about personality of objects indeed... ( Sorry for my English, it's not my native language)

MrBaskerville10d ago

Talking about cars is fun if you are a car enthusiast. Just saying.

ApocalypseShadow11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

That Corvette Stingray to this day is one of the most ferocious whips ever driven. Overpowered against other cars yes. But to drive it and be that close to losing control, but being in command around those curves, just can't be duplicated.

HiFi mode is also something I miss. There should be a mode in today's GT where it's Mano o Mano and the detail and resolution jump full throttle. In today's games, Max Ray Tracing and lighting and textures to make it look even more real..

PrimeVinister11d ago

A modern HiFi mode would be really cool! It would be really interesting to see how real they could go by stripping it all way back.

And Stingray is a solid choice 👌

TiredGamer11d ago

HiFi mode in GT1 was only a stripped down 60 fps mode for one track. Should have been called "Performance Mode" or "High Frame Rate" mode.

PrimeVinister11d ago

@TiredGamer it was only three tracks, but it was still cool

Petebloodyonion11d ago

Not according to Former Playstation president Jim Ryan for he told Time that he doesn't see why anyone would play old games given the advancements in fidelity achieved today.

https://time.com/4804768/pl...

PrimeVinister11d ago

I don't agree with him, but he had a few good points.

Show all comments (33)