360°

Xbox One: Hands-On Impressions | IGN

IGN - "After months of checking out the Xbox One from behind a pane of glass, we finally got to cradle one in our hands. Get our thoughts, here."

kennyg37393879d ago ShowReplies(2)
Sitdown3879d ago

Which is completely opposite from what was said in this video

HurtfulTimez3879d ago

really? because not once did i hear him say its small in anyway or even its smaller when u actually hold it. he said its 'not massive' which is different from 'not big'

IMO its pretty big compared to ps4 but I suppose thats me comparing it to the size of current gen consoles that have had thier redesign. so as he says in the vid, guess it looks 'normal' lol

mewhy323879d ago

This can be summed up easily. It's big, it's bulky, it's black, and it comes with a spy camera. There ya go. Move on.

ohiostatesman3879d ago

Incredible sleek and gorgeous console.

P0werVR3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

@hurtfultimez

1:30

Yeah, hurtful times indeed!

As some reviews of it so far as claimed that it seems big, but until you actually see up close and handle it, it's not as big and quite normal and sleek.

darthv723879d ago

The look is very solid and well designed to fit in with the majority of other home A/V equipment.

just dont block the vents...lol

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3879d ago
My_Outer_Heaven3879d ago

Big and ugly... looks like a VCR player from the 80's

Count3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

Nobody had a problem with the size of the Ps3.

HurtfulTimez3879d ago

@count

because the ps3 actually looked different to a set top box. xbox made there design to look like a set top to blend in with other devices under th tv. so when xbone (sorry Major Nelson im too used to calling it that now) is compared to a set top box it looks huge compared to other set-top boxes. my only gripe is that its horizonal standing only

YNWA963879d ago

Your just a hater, I was too young to own a VCR in the 80's. Now I can feel redemption when I get my X1.... will be the same width as my other components, finally some consistency. Sick of everything being and different size and shape under my TV!! Wish they all came the same way....

No_Limit3879d ago

It is big with big vent and a power brick because it needs to extract heat from 2 GPUs. :D

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3879d ago
Wikkid6663879d ago

Said it's about the same size as the GS4

Christopher3879d ago

Doesn't look _that_ big to me. I say this as far as initial products that have not seen miniaturization over time.

BallsEye3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

The guy is tiny.

here's size comparison.

http://cdn2.ubergizmo.com/w...
It's smaller than original ps3

mxrider21993879d ago

its taller than the original ps3 not thicker but almost as thick and you cant have the ONE vertical has to lay horizontal plus the original ps3 had hardware for BC with all ps2 games the xbox one does not

nukeitall3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

I thought people didn't care about the box just 4-5 months ago?

All of a sudden, they now do!

Good thing Xbox One has plenty of quality AAA games then!!!

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3879d ago
redcar1213879d ago

Looks good to me can't wait to get my one maybe ps4 next year

Brix903879d ago ShowReplies(1)
JuniorCE3879d ago

Too big for next gen console...

NobleRed3879d ago Show
Show all comments (58)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

190°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot13h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke197h ago(Edited 7h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke193h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

-Foxtrot1h ago

"Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs"

He's literally just told you why

We're waiting like 15 years before a sequel comes out, it's insane

Skyrim came out in 2011, the next game is expected to come out in 2027 at the earliest so that's 16 years apart while Fallout 4 came out in 2015 and might not release until 2031, again 16 years.

We're fine with Bethesda trying new things and doing new IPs like Starfield but adding a new game to the cycle now means a bigger wait. Also Starfield didn't meet most peoples expectations, can you imagine waiting 15 years or so for a sequel and it's disappointing? It would feel even worse because you would have to wait another 15 years to see if they manage to come back from it.

They need to give it to another developer, we don't need main numbered titles but a spin off of Fallout and Elder Scrolls should be cycled in between the long gaps of the main releases.

Once again you are making out people want these games as quick as possible when all we want is a standard development time of at least 4 years or so rather than waiting 15.

mandf5h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor6h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave5h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor3h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

-Foxtrot58m ago

@Skuletor

Who's saying to rush the releases? No one is saying that...

People just don't want to be waiting 15 years for a sequel, they aren't working on the game for that long, you do realise that right? The issue isn't coming down to them working on the game and us "rushing them", it's the fact they are working on other games like Starfield now meaning bigger gaps before they even get started on them.

I bet you any more Elder Scrolls VI only entered full development last year when Starfield was finished despite being announced in 2018.

Duke193h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai5h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris4h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (22)