210°

Dear Mr. Iwata, Please fix this Nintendo of America problem...

"There are some people in the video game industry that like to place all the blame for Nintendo's current financial and Wii U situation on Mr. Iwata, the current CEO of Nintendo Company and now CEO of Nintendo of America as well. Some of those people deny that employees and management in other regions for Nintendo, like at Nintendo of America for example, might actually be part of Nintendo's overall problem as well though.

There is currently one Nintendo problem though, directly related to Nintendo of America's region, that I don't think Mr. Iwata made and might not even be aware that the problem exists. At least, I don't think he would have made this decision, based on one of his own more recent comments. It is a problem that Mr. Iwata now as CEO of Nintendo of America can hopefully address and get fixed though, for consumers and Nintendo investors.", writes CoffeeWithGames.

Read Full Story >>
coffeewithgames.com
jjdoyle3881d ago

hows this an issue still!? mores than two years since amazon sold a nintendo console and people still have jobs that made this decision?

N4g_null3879d ago

I think ill take a break from the bs. The best thing to do is enjoy your games and see what happens when wii fit, dktf, mario multi, and the party game drops. Of course people want Nintendo dead. Why bother discussing it.

mii-gamer3880d ago

fix nintendo of australia while you are at it

hollabox3880d ago (Edited 3880d ago )

Fix Nintendo of Japan by getting rid of their hardware R&D and start recruiting Sony's talent.

lilbroRx3880d ago

Why? So they can reach a 30 year low in stock prices and loses billions year after year?

hollabox3880d ago (Edited 3880d ago )

Or maybe so the Wii U2 in 2015 can be competitive! If I'm not mistaken but didn't Nintendo have $7 billion in the bank when the Wii U launched? Latest reports claim Nintendo is down to $5 Billion. $2 billion in less than a year, if this continues Nintendo will be done in 3 years. Last time I checked Sony had $22 billion in the bank with potential revenue from more than just video games and the Seattle Mariners!

Based on the latest sales with the Wii U selling 27,000 plus units globally last month I think gamers have spoken. Not enough software at this point in time, not enough hardware potential, and lackluster marketing. Decisions mostly made by Japanese men, so yeah they need to fix NOJ first and the rest will fall in order.

jjdoyle3880d ago

hollabox
dont knows what ignorant fanboys site you read, but evens with english as second language i found the info in 30 seconds.
you could find outs that info out instead of spreading ignorance around:
http://www.forbes.com/compa...

11.6 billion cash on hand as of march this year

3 years and done. rofl! the ignorance in 2013 amazes me. not sure if ignorance or just laziness

hollabox3880d ago (Edited 3880d ago )

@ jjdolye

I got my information from IGN, as of July 31st this year from what they claim its $5billion in actually cash not including assets! So no my information gathering was not being lazy at all. I do agree Forbes information holds more weight, but I found multiple sources that has Nintendo's net worth all over the place.

In 2011 Nintendo had $10-11 billion in the bank with just under $2 billion in loans. Giving Nintendo an net worth in actual cash value of $8.5 billion in 2011. Ign is claiming that figure is down to a little over $ 5 billion as of July 31st 2013. So I'm mistaken Nintendo is not losing $2 billion a year, its about $1.75 billion.

http://www.ign.com/articles...

http://blog.pricecharting.c...

jjdoyle3880d ago

hollabox
ign? cant spell ignorant without it. no surprise there.

"That’s $5,038,214,927.30. More than 5 billion dollars. In cash. And almost that much in “short-term investment securities”, which are essentially bonds."

unless somebodys cooking books at nintendo noway done in 3 years. that is ignorant to even suggest

maybes if noa would get their house straight and sell their units on this site it could help some

AbortMission3879d ago

Are you slow? Sony has been on the rise for quite a while now Lol. Someone's desperate (or bitter)

TheVideoGamHer3879d ago

@hollabox LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TheVideoGamHer3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

@AbortMission Actually Sony has not been on the rise. What you're referring to is the fact that they are FINALLY starting to make a profit on the PS3. While this is good, their overall financial situation is not as good as it could be. With the PS3 JUST turning a profit, I kind of wished they would have held back just a tad with the PS4. Hopefully Sony will continue to profit from the PS3 while also being in good standing with the PS4.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3879d ago
ChickeyCantor3880d ago

Their R&D looks at new innovations/ideas/viable stuff. It's the higher ups ( Iwata ) that says what will actually be developed.

hollabox3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

@ jjdolye

"That’s $5,038,214,927.30" That's about right, in the grand scheme of things $5 billion is not a whole lot if net cash value is being reduced by $1.7 plus a year. In 3 years if this continues as stated in my earlier post Nintendo will exceed their actual cash value in the bank right now.

Now I'm not saying Nintendo can't take loans, nor do I wish financial hardship or downfall on Nintendo. I'm simply saying you have to start at the head (NOJ) before the body will follow (NOA, etc). So this article about fixing NOA I call bull crap since its NOJ hardware/software, and marketing decisions that has Nintendo in this situation. Starting with the hardware team designing a system maybe a third more powerful than current gen with the largest controller since the Jaguar.

Now with Satoru Iwata running the show in both territories, and if the Wii U continues to struggle it all falls back on who? NOJ! Same thing can be said if Nintendo is successful, NOJ will get the credit and Satoru Iwata a vote of confidence with a pay raise.

kwandar3879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

Okay, so let me help you out here. Their functional currency is likely the Yen, so the drop in value of the bank accounts (when restated to US) is likely due in large part to currency swings. Ohh .. and a decreasing Yen helps sales.

No accountant I know (and I know MANY), would impute that business is going south based solely on the change in cash balances. No offense, but that just shows a complete lack of understanding. If you want a real answer, read their cash flow statement.

3880d ago Replies(1)
josephayal3880d ago

Nintendo should stop making consoles. They could make a fortune selling Mario,Zelda games on the X1 and PS4

SpiralTear3880d ago

No, they shouldn't, because they would not make a fortune doing that.

People buy a console because of the things they can't get on other systems, in this case, a Nintendo system for their exclusive franchises. That's basically replacing a console sale and a game sale with just a single game sale.

DragonKnight3879d ago

Actually they would. For the Big 3, software always makes more money than hardware. For Nintendo this is especially so because their games have long shelf life due to continuous demand. New Super Mario Bros. Wii is still a full priced game despite being out for YEARS. Why? Because Nintendo can legitimately get away with not having to lower the price.

If Nintendo stopped making consoles and only made games, they'd actually make MORE money because the R&D costs for consoles would be gone and all they'd have to worry about is keeping the quality of their titles high.

ChickeyCantor3879d ago

@Dragonknight,

Their income also comes from selling hardware( not always at the start but eventually). They would be loosing far too much.

DragonKnight3879d ago

@ChickeyCantor: Barely. The money they make from hardware sales is dwarfed by the money they make from software sales. They have to cover R&D and distribution costs with hardware and they are only selling the one home console for the most part. Say the Wii U sells 30 million in its lifetime, but Nintendo releases hundreds of first party games throughout that lifetime. You can even begin to make the claim that the amount of money made on hardware comes close to the amount made for software.

The only one of the Big 3 that would take a hit from not selling hardware is Microsoft because they don't have the first party offerings that Nintendo and Sony do, but Nintendo could be far more profitable as a software only company than a software/hardware company.

PopRocks3593879d ago (Edited 3879d ago )

@DragonKnight

I have to disagree there. You have to consider what Nintendo accumulates with both hardware and software. Their consoles are typically sold at a profit with few exceptions and of course they make money on software as well.

If you insist they will make more money by going software only, you are leaving out the fact that 1) they are now no longer making money off of hardware and 2) are now paying licensing fees to their competition, therefor making less money than they would have on software than if it was on their own hardware.

Considering there's no sight of Nintendo leaving the handheld market, I don't see much reason for them to leave the console market as well. If the GCN was not enough to end their run, I doubt anything would be. Well, except for any of the awful decisions that led to Sega going software only.

PopRocks3593879d ago

@DragonKnight

I have to disagree there. You have to consider what Nintendo accumulates with both hardware and software. Their consoles are typically sold at a profit with few exceptions and of course they make money on software as well.

If you insist they will make more money by going software only, you are leaving out the fact that 1) they are now no longer making money off of hardware and 2) are now paying licensing fees to their competition, therefor making less money than they would have on software than if it was on their own hardware.

Considering there's no sight of Nintendo leaving the handheld market, I don't see much reason for them to leave the console market as well. If the GCN was not enough to end their run, I doubt anything would be. Well, except for any of the awful decisions that led to Sony going software only.

PopRocks3593879d ago

Ah crap. Sorry for the double post, guys.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3879d ago
Show all comments (30)
80°

Nintendo's Massacre Of The 3DS And Wii U Is Finally Complete, Regrettably

Hanzala from eXputer: "The cruel hammer of Nintendo has fallen. Farewell, 3DS and Wii U, you surely brightened my life and many others; you won't be forgotten."

280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10110d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref9d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde9d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander19729d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville9d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff21838d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos8d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 8d ago
isarai10d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref9d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan9d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis0078d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander19729d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

9d ago Replies(3)
Einhander19729d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

9d ago
9d ago
Zeref9d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde9d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander19729d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander19729d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier9d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto9d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff21838d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto8d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 8d ago
Hofstaderman9d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts9d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts8d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic8d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)
90°

Nintendo's War Against Player-Made Content Will Hurt The Company In The End

Danish from eXputer: "Nintendo has historically gone against player-made content and emulation of its games. This has done much to harm the company's image."

XiNatsuDragnel16d ago

I agree nintendo hire some these folks to help in your games it'll help imo.

banger8815d ago

They need to stop announcing these mods and fan remakes until they're finished. Finish it, upload it, and then if Nintendo dmca's it tough shit. Once it's online, people can share it around, even if the original download gets taken down.

Jingsing15d ago

True, but most modders need constant admiration during the process to motivate them.

PRIMORDUS15d ago

Yup, once it's a torrent nothing can be done Nintendo is helpless at that point. But it would be wise if they just had a site on the dark web, it's also easy to use with Tor and no one will bother you.

mastershredder14d ago

This is all coming from the mouth of short-sighted fandom and grifting madness.
No.... it wont. There is a clear defined reason why they don't. This is nothing new. Make your own shi7 from your own original ideas especially if you are trying to capitalize of it it. Duh.

Yeah, hire people that have zero respect or understanding for an established process. Wow. Yep. Totally makes sense.

shinoff218314d ago

Those guys that made that sonic game got a gig from sega or something along those lines and that game was dope as hell. One of the best sonics as of late.