410°

PS4 and Xbox One – Your Choice?

Which console are you going to buy? 6aming's Jamie would like to know in his newest article.

darthv723889d ago

While i will have both eventually as well....if i must chose one then i will take whichever one comes out first.

shoddy3889d ago

It's only logical to pick the cheaper yet more powerful console.

True_Samurai3889d ago

Xbox One hell yes.... Ps4? Naawwwlll

FATAL1TY3889d ago

PS4 + Killzone Shadow Fall + inFAMOUS Second Son

http://www.gifti.me/i/JytNW...

ShinMaster3888d ago

I'm going for the one that offers powerful hardware at a good value.

The console with the largest community of gamers worldwide.

But most importantly, the one that has great first party studios that will provide continued support with awesome games all through the console's life cycle.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3888d ago
3889d ago Replies(4)
Cueil3889d ago

I choose.... BOTH... haha mother fackers

Pixel_Enemy3889d ago

You have more money than sense.. I have about $20,000 put away in my bank account and I am not going to waste any of it by buying both consoles at launch. There's not enough time in the day to learn both OS's and play games on both at the same time for me. I will buy the PS4 at launch and the Xbox One down the road when I see more reason to get one.

sincitysir13889d ago

Thanks for sharing how much wealth u have!

VforVideogames3889d ago

Theres no reason to buy a ps4 now , the XBOX-1 has one of the best launch line up ever on any console so XB-1 for me on day ONE and ps4 maybe in 2-3 years.

FlameHawk3889d ago

@VforVideogames, a majority of people are going to do the opposite, PS4 first, then XBO.

Cueil3888d ago

I've accumulated a ton of Xbox 360 titles that I also got for pennies on the dollar on Steam and GoG So I traded them in for nearly my whole PS4 purchase at GS

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3888d ago
donman13889d ago

I second that. PS4 is the smart choice.

IRON883 3889d ago

PS4 day one and maybe just maybe down the road Xbox one

Jazz41083888d ago

I choose xboxone for my ps3 was slow ane update city constantly so I will go with the smmothest experiece and ms has already shown theyknow software.

3889d ago Replies(1)
mafiahajeri3889d ago

Playstation 4... I choose you!!!

ovnipc3889d ago

X1 Day 1! Mid next year PS4. Wii U I had one and sold it i didnt like it. Xbox one has a best line of game for now. If Titanfall was CONFIRMED for PS4 I would had gone PS4. DR3, KI, DLC first for CoD and BF4 Xbox all the way! Ufff drones are going to down vote me.

Xsilver3889d ago

PS4 because i fell in love with the franchises and it feels good to be back.

ovnipc3889d ago

Omg!!! Ps4 the best console everrrr! More specs lots of indies f2p lots of them that's my console. Y1.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3888d ago
Majin-vegeta3889d ago

PS4 Sony has been hitting every sweetspot from the price to the games.

MariaHelFutura3889d ago (Edited 3889d ago )

Completely agree. The choice isn't that hard, my reasons......

Preorders: Sony
http://n4g.com/news/1342347...
Specs: Sony (link is not needed)
Launch Games: Sony 33>23 (link is not needed)
Countries: Sony 32>13 (link is not needed)
Restrictions: Sony 1>81
http://n4g.com/news/1338295...
Price: Sony 399>499 (link is not needed)
Backflips: Sony 0>5 (link is not needed)
Polls: Sony (link is not needed)
Recording time: 15>5 (link is not needed)
The Last 3 Years: Sony 64>12
http://forums.digitalwarfar...

pedrof933889d ago

Ps4 recording time is actually before you press the button, so you won't miss a fail or a win moment.

The recording time may actually be virtually unlimited.

Benchm4rk3889d ago

Troll harder next time. A simple I choose PS4 would of been suffice but you always have to try and stir the pot

slimeybrainboy3889d ago

PS4 - ND are the best developer in the world IMO. Theres more reasons than that, but there is no way I would miss out on TLoU 2 or new IP or U4.

XboxFun3889d ago

Xbox One, the best launch line up I have seen since the SNES. Love the features packed in and just the overall look of the UI.

Not to mention I am really excited to see what their franchises will look like down the line.

Yes, i'll be getting the Xbox One for sure.

sincitysir13889d ago

What happens after launch? Like the next 5 years?

TheFutureIsBlue3889d ago

People waited on the 360 and guess what they saw? Halo and Gears. Laf. PS4 ftw

WarThunder3889d ago (Edited 3889d ago )

"best launch line up I have seen since the SNES"
HAHAH!

X1 has 4 launch games Ryse,Ki,FM5, DR3 and WOTanks.

PS4 has 9 launch games,

- KillZone SF
- Knack
- DriveClub
- Blacklight: Retribution,
- PlanetSide 2
- War Thunder
- Warframe
- Resogun

You most be one of the people who thought every game was shown at MS E3 conference was X1 exclusive lol....

On topic:
PS4/PC is the best gaming combination, PS4 exclusives and PC multiplatform.

Jazz41083888d ago (Edited 3888d ago )

That would be sony with destiny and watchdogs, kingdom hearts etc. All mp all made to believe exclusive to sony when its not.

BlueBlood173888d ago

What? Ryse, Dead Rising 3 and Forza?

Nah, sorry. Killzone, Driveclub and Knack is easily on par with that.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3888d ago
IamTheStorm813889d ago (Edited 3889d ago )

Both 4 me on day One.

Both will offer excellent gaming and entertainment experiences that I won't want to miss out on.

After all, the best way to be sure that one doesn't miss out on any gaming experiences is to own all of the consoles, so that's what I do.

11/15 and an undisclosed date in November cannot come soon enough for me.

JackStraw3889d ago

yeah right. i love people who say "both for me on day one" like they have tons of money to blow on consoles + games. yet they're here posting on n4g. just stop.

IamTheStorm813889d ago

Uh, so because I post on n4g that means I can't afford to buy 2 gaming consoles?

You're making no sense at all, JackStraw.

creatchee3889d ago

I won't buy both on Day One because I want to enjoy each on their own merits. It's like you have to marry one woman, but you get your mistress later after the sex isn't as exciting anymore.

Show all comments (168)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

200°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot14h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack12h ago(Edited 12h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke198h ago(Edited 8h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--6h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke194h ago(Edited 4h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

-Foxtrot1h ago

"Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs"

He's literally just told you why

We're waiting like 15 years before a sequel comes out, it's insane

Skyrim came out in 2011, the next game is expected to come out in 2027 at the earliest so that's 16 years apart while Fallout 4 came out in 2015 and might not release until 2031, again 16 years.

We're fine with Bethesda trying new things and doing new IPs like Starfield but adding a new game to the cycle now means a bigger wait. Also Starfield didn't meet most peoples expectations, can you imagine waiting 15 years or so for a sequel and it's disappointing? It would feel even worse because you would have to wait another 15 years to see if they manage to come back from it.

They need to give it to another developer, we don't need main numbered titles but a spin off of Fallout and Elder Scrolls should be cycled in between the long gaps of the main releases.

Once again you are making out people want these games as quick as possible when all we want is a standard development time of at least 4 years or so rather than waiting 15.

mandf5h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor7h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave6h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor4h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

-Foxtrot1h ago

@Skuletor

Who's saying to rush the releases? No one is saying that...

People just don't want to be waiting 15 years for a sequel, they aren't working on the game for that long, you do realise that right? The issue isn't coming down to them working on the game and us "rushing them", it's the fact they are working on other games like Starfield now meaning bigger gaps before they even get started on them.

I bet you any more Elder Scrolls VI only entered full development last year when Starfield was finished despite being announced in 2018.

Duke194h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai6h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris5h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (22)