80°

What did Nintendo ever do to you?

Shaun from SA Gaming Portal expresses his views on the Wii U as well as lists a comprehensive list of releases for the platform.

Read Full Story >>
sagamingportal.co.za
zeal0us3900d ago (Edited 3900d ago )

"let’s not forget the first gaming console"
Actually Nintendo didn't introduce the first gaming console. The first gaming console would be Magnavox Odyssey. It was release May 1972. Nintendo first console, Color TV Game didn't come until 1977.

Now however my first game console was Nintendo NES. My first game handheld was a Game Boy Color. Pokemon Gold and Silver were my two favorite games and sadly the first and last two pokemon games I actually played.

3900d ago
RedHawkX3900d ago

nintendo made all there games only playable with weird freaky controllers with waggle or big ipads. so now all the gameplay in there games are wack and lame and a chore to play. nintendo also overpirced and underpowered there consoles. they hurt me bad and im here to return the favor with a no purchas of nintendo stuff except for gamefreaks pokemon x/y

AWBrawler3900d ago

wii u gamepad isn't really all that big. roughly the size of a kindle fire, and no nintendo first party game forced waggle on Wii. if it had motion controls it was fully utilized, not just random waggling.

Knushwood Butt3899d ago

@ AWBrawler

Mario Galaxy - random waggle to spin along vines.

golding893900d ago

No 3rd party support hurting the fans. that is what it has done.

At this point..they need a change. people don't want to play Mario every day.

Summons753900d ago

No it's a catch-22. Publishers refuse to support because of the "low" install base but the install base won't grow unless they publish. It has nothing to do with Nintendo, publishers are afraid to take risks, devs under those publishers have claimed multiple times they want to support he wiiu.

The wiiu has a lot of potential for gaming if applied right but people are afrai of change.

KonsoruMasuta3900d ago

That's why Nintendo makes more than Mario games.

3900d ago
gedden73900d ago

Listen and listen well..

NINTENDO HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH 3RD PARTY COMPANIES NOT BRINGING GAMES OVER... Not since the N64 days... 3rd party companies rather have NON game makers like SONY and MS that will allow them to run up budgets and make sub par games with the exception of a few like GTA, Bioshock, etc..

3rd party companies fear Nintendo's first party software and as long as they are in the HARDWARE business they have A LOT of power... This is why you see ALL THESE DOOM AND GLOOM articles about ANY AND EVERY NINTENDO software and hardware product... Nintendo was doomed with the N64 because of the use of the cartage, Nintendo was doomed with the gamecube because of the media form, doomed with the Wii becuase it was gimmicky, doomed with the 3ds because of low sales and now doomed with the Wii U because its not as strong as the xbone and ps4..

It will never end.. WHY?... Because it's all propaganda aimed at firing shots towards Nintendo from the competition: Sony, MS and 3rd party companies.. But even with such adversity Nintendo never breaks and continues to move forward and create good and quality games WHILE thinking outside the box, ie Wii Sports, Wii Fit, Pikmin, Pokemon (at one point), Wii motion controls, Wii U gamepad, SmashBros, Animal Crossing, Brianage and many other titles and innovations...

3rd party devs FEAR THIS and WANT NINTENDO OUT of the game so they can be replaced by another NON Game maker Hardware company..

jcnba283900d ago

3ds doesn't have much 3rd party support and it's the best selling system so far this year. Explain that one for me?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3900d ago
gazgriff2k123900d ago

started to lose focus and go cheap plus they totally wasn't prepared for online or hd graphics. the success of the wii and ds went to there head so they got lazy. they only have themselves to blame. Bring back the old nintendo before they become sega part 2

millzy1023900d ago (Edited 3900d ago )

Third party support is not Nintendo's fault but third parties, before you say yes it is, the Wii u is not selling I would like to point you towards the 3ds, highest selling dedicated gaming device in the world at this point, where's all the western support, oh yeah it's hardly there. Nintendo isn't the problem third party companies are especially EA, it's getting that bad I'm refusing to buy some publishers games on any platform, if they don't respect there consumer base I won't reaspect them.

joeorc3900d ago (Edited 3900d ago )

@millzy102

"where's all the western support, oh yeah it's hardly there. Nintendo isn't the problem third party companies are especially EA, it's getting that bad I'm refusing to buy some publishers games on any platform, if they don't respect there consumer base I won't reaspect them."

they are both to blame but in my opinion its more on Nintendo's side for what hardware they chose for the 3DS not because its not good hardware or anything like that its because, for the simple fact when 99% of all Smartphones are using Arm cortex A9's in pretty much every smart devices from smartphones to Tablets.

Nintendo uses Arm 11's we are talking about a chipset that was developed in early 2002! vs. late 2008 and 2009+ that everyone else is using right now. as a matter of fact Arm 11's use : ARMv6 core instructionset base, while cortex A series are ARMv7 core instruction base.

that is a very big gap in what you can run on v6 vs v7 on the base core of each type.

see for yourself:

http://wanderingcoder.net/2...

a NOTE IF YOU DID NOT KNOW:

The processor core implementation used in the original iPhone was
the ARM11 (it was the ARM1176JZF-S!

The 3DS while a very good system for games, has more limitations on what you can do with the Hardware. esp. in the UNITY 3D game engine. its not that you cannot make fun and exciting games for the 3DS. Its just that compared to pretty much every smartphone the 3DS's hardware just is that much more lacking than it would need to be.

for example: even though the 3DS has (2) Arm 11's only one is used for games and its running @ 268 Mhz

According to official documents, the CPU used is a dual-core ARM11 CPU, clocked at 268MHz. One core is dedicated to system software, while the other is used for application programming, each known as the syscore and appcore, respectively.

VRam:
6 MB within SoC. Independent of system memory (FCRAM).

system ram:

2x64MB Fujitsu MB82M8080-07L = 128 MB total system ram.

GPU = DMP PICA 268MHz
http://www.3dbrew.org/wiki/...

the problem is even smartphones can outperform this hardware, and we are talking about entry level smartphones!

Nintendo puts out quality hardware in the case of the 3DS its just to OLD vs what developer's have for development tool chains and APi's in what they use right now.

Many see Arm 11 as just to OLD because it is just not as capable as the Arm Cortex A series of hardware and since most smartphones made in the past 5 years have all been cortex A series processor's Nintendo really is that far below the standard mobile devices hardware that is used in pretty much every mobile device out there.

millzy1023900d ago

I understand what you are saying but why's are you comparing the 3ds to smartphones, yes entry level smartphones technically have higher specs than the 3ds, but there also required to do a lot more than just play games. if it is the chip set that is the problem, why is no one developing for the vita as well
which has a more modern chip set that devs have the tools and Api's for. the only answer is lack of developer interest which again is not Nintendo's fault, same goes with Sony and the vita, they make a product it up to devs if they want to make games for them or not. Which is fine, I ain't got a problem with that because I own multiple consoles so I won't miss out on a game I want, but what I do have a problem with is all this bs spewing out developers mouths about why this game is not coming to Wii u or why it's missing certain features, like online play in batman, why only half arse the support for Nintendo but not anyone else, either make the full game or leave it, I'm really getting fed up with all this negativity aimed at Nintendo and how they should be like Sony and Microsoft, I don't want to own 3 identical systems I want variety.

gedden73900d ago

"they are both to blame but in my opinion its more on Nintendo's side for what hardware they chose for the 3DS not because its not good hardware or anything like that its because, for the simple fact when 99% of all Smartphones are using Arm cortex A9's in pretty much every smart devices from smartphones to Tablets."

"Nintendo puts out quality hardware in the case of the 3DS its just to OLD vs what developer's have for development tool chains and APi's in what they use right now."

Umm NO thats what articles would lead you to believe... But when there's an avenue to MAKE MONEY COMPANIES WILL TAKE IT!!!! But the case of these 3rd party companies its politics...

If the tech is old, companies would just have to resort back to old devs kits/tool instead of the news one that you are using its as simple as just using the older tools..? What do you think they throw them away??? And if they sold them to another comapany then that company can use them, correct?? It's just software at this point anyways...

It has very little to do with what Nintendo does. BUT HAS ALL TO DO WITH WHAT 3rd PARTIES "CHOOSE" TO DO.. Its all politics..

Oh and you are talking about smart phone devs?? UMMMM the 3ds is not a smart phone buddy...

joeorc3900d ago (Edited 3900d ago )

@millzy102

"I understand what you are saying but why's are you comparing the 3ds to smartphones, yes entry level smartphones technically have higher specs than the 3ds, but there also required to do a lot more than just play games. if it is the chip set that is the problem, why is no one developing for the vita as well"

The reason's are very simple:

you asked :
"why's are you comparing the 3ds to smartphones"

A: Because Nintendo is using in the 3DS ARM powered chipset's, and so do smartphones and Tablets. Developing on those SOC's are alot a like in such that the core instruction set is close to align. 3RD party development studios and publisher's have a single platform to work the development process on. but like i stated when all your 3rd party developer's are using ARMv7 instead of ARMv6 for their instruction set that is a problem for Nintendo's system.

you again asked"

"if it is the chip set that is the problem, why is no one developing for the vita as well "

A: and if you would know that the time required to make a class AAA game for the PSVita is 12 to 18 months that is not including publishing. could that be shorter time frame, sure as a matter of fact playstation Mobile games are added quite fast to market on PSN+
but to make to store shelf, Time to publish is more akin to the livingroom console than it is to publish straight to network software distribution.

Look at the games for the 3DS while very fun and fantastic to play look at the cost's involved to produce such games and the cost's involved to produce something like Tearaway. Killzone.

you cannot expect the games to take the same amount of time.

Again you stated:

"the only answer is lack of developer interest which again is not Nintendo's fault, same goes with Sony and the vita, they make a product it up to devs if they want to make games for them or not."

in the case it all involves man power, resources and of course investment by the developer of time and money, man power and if they can spare it.

these new Mobile chipset's are getting to the point that even john carmack said himself that it requires quite a bit of investment not just in $$$ but also experience with such hardware, no one person can do it all.

Remember the PSVita has 128 MB of dedicated Video Ram just for its GPU! not other handheld in existance has that, you do not put that much dedicated Video ram in a mobile handheld , only to think of the short shelf sales cycle. it would be nice to sell faster, but do you expect to work to advance your tool chains over the long pt. instead of trying to rush everything out the gate?

for pete sake the handhelds chipsets SOC's now can run directX10.1 and in some cases higher!
and these smartphones may be able to do other thing's besides gaming, but for the simple fact most all are running GPU's like the Adreno 205+

The investment in development for the PSVita can be low to really large investment, right now to get larger AAA games development for the PSVita is not a small team size development. that's the point the 3DS and the PSVita's hardware gap is that freaking large! the development time is not going to be the same , if you are trying to make AAA games on both platform.

Korde113899d ago

I have decided, and my children know that this family will no longer support EA. We own every Madden and Fifa ever produced but we will find something else to keep us busy. The Wii U has an install base that is higher than the Ps4 and Xbox1 combined. So Wii U is only selling 10,000 per week. That is alot more than the zero that the others have combined. EA is full of crap!

SirDj3900d ago

Really good article. Oh and dont forget that nintendo also invented the krosspad andthe stick on the controller to move your character in the game ,witch was first intruduced with gamecube. All this that sony,xb gamers are enjoying are nintendo inventions ;)

3900d ago Replies(2)
gedden73900d ago

WOW 5 disagrees for stating facts... WOW..

3900d ago
Show all comments (43)
80°

Behind The Dangerous Stunts Of Nintendo’s Iconic Mario Commercials

Two married costume designers share stories from a decade of traveling the globe with Nintendo.

Read Full Story >>
gameinformer.com
253d ago
110°

Bowser Is Canonically 34 Years Old

In a YouTube video showing Nintendo Switch owners how to create a Nintendo Account, Nintendo of America revealed that Bowser is canonically 34 years old.

jznrpg315d ago

I saw Bowser when I was a kid and now I’m older than him , sigh.

Brazz314d ago

Wow, i'm as old as Bowser!!

Stanjara314d ago (Edited 314d ago )

He looks 55 to me.

Show all comments (7)
100°

Nintendo Is A Bad Company, But We Can't Help Loving Them Anyway

TG: “Most of us also grew up with Nintendo, likely forming a nostalgic connection with games that have long been crowned as our personal favourites. The Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker was an experience that shaped my view on open world fantasy, and Super Mario 64 changed my life like it did for millions of others. These titles have earned their place in history, and remain loved to this day for so many worthwhile reasons. We replay them and beg for remasters all while delving into their worlds time and time again because they mean that much to us. It’s a shame then that the company behind them often kicks its own sweet darlings to the curb.”

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Magog324d ago

I never got the love for Nintendo games personally. The annoying vocalizations and ugly character designs do nothing for me.

Kosic322d ago

Don't forget the constant hand holding with tutorials. Learn this new ability by pressing Y, now prove that you can press Y 8 times before you can move on....

Tapani323d ago (Edited 323d ago )

Another very weird article.

Nintendo is a great company by almost all possible normal measures. The biggest one being: their own staff is happy, and they seem to be very happy, well compensated and retain rate is solid. They are also financially very stable, profitable, and cash rich, so shareholders love them.

Overall it is an extremely creative group of people, and their mission statement is fantastic as well "to put smiles on the faces of everyone we touch. We do so by creating new surprises for people across the world to enjoy together." The social impact is also massive, not to speak culturally. Additionally, they have a really strong core business, high customer retention rate and loyalty. Nintendo's reputation is extremely good, I think in the US alone they are 9th most reputable company, their customer service is better than the average company. Plus, the press gives them a pass, because they are Nintendo. But there's a reason why they do that, it's not "because they are Nintendo", there are more layers to the argument.

Then, then there's the random negative gamers online...and their "reputation" which is inside their heads. And their western ideas of how a Japanese company should behave or what they should do. But they have no right to ask a company to do anything for them, because they can vote with their wallets.

There's a small vocal community online who dislikes Nintendo for what they are, but then again, there's always a small vocal community that dislikes something.

Nintendo also disagrees with the Western world about IP, but most people call Westerners "hidoi!" when they emulate Tears of the Kingdom and do not experience it the way Nintendo wanted them (even if it is not the best visual way), because it is a matter of principle to them (Japanese are very much against anything close to plagiarism, and there are laws that are tight about creative works copying etc.)

The Western Braveheart "freedoom!" shouters need to understand that it is not an American company, nor they need to behave like one. They can have their own fights based on their principles (against emulation). And they very well may lose the battle with that and change, or find a new audience.

In the end, it is so very simple. Don't buy the products if you don't like a company, but there's no need to paint a picture that is unrealistic about Nintendo either.

MadLad323d ago

I hate virtually everything about their business practices, actually. Suing everybody for virtually anything, shooting down fan projects, games they never let devalue, their online infrastructure and how they handle BC.

They're lucky they make great games, because that's the only thing I feel they do right.

gold_drake323d ago

my issue with them, is the complete refusal to have decent tech for us.

and their odd censorship and lawsuits for modders.