190°

John Carmack talks about Wolfenstein, cannot comment on Doom 4's development, prefers Intel+Nvidia

DSOGaming writes: "During his QuakeCon 2013 keynote, John Carmack revealed some interesting information about the ID Tech 5 version that will be powering the new Wolfenstein title. According to Carmack, id Software is currently trying to un-optimize and clean up the core code of the engine as Wolfenstein is a cross-platform title."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
NYC_Gamer3919d ago

That's my combo[Intel&Nvidia]better performance

kevnb3919d ago

amd video cards still have poor support for many games, and intel processors are just better. You can go amd, but you will have more messing around to do with drivers and/or cpu cooling.

LAWSON723919d ago (Edited 3919d ago )

I dont understand this messing around with drivers idea, because I have had zero issues that I needed to fix myself over almost a year and a half (hd 7950 and 6850). AMD makes great GPUs that usually offer alot more for the money. I do agree though Intel is just better than AMD when it comes to CPUs

fossilfern3919d ago

What messing around? I have been using AMD for years even before AMD bought ATi. Don't start spreading some fanboy flame bait

Bobbo443919d ago (Edited 3919d ago )

Driver issues aside, AMD really isn't a cheaper alternative anymore. Look at benchmarks. The 7970 performs similar to a 670, and they're very similar price ranges ( http://www.videocardbenchma... ), with the Nvidia card actually being a little bit cheaper and a little better performance. You may say that game performance is better on a 7970 than a 670, but it clearly depends on the game with some games performing better on different cards. Point is, in raw performance they're similar, and similar in price. Not to mention AMD is falling pretty far behind in performance. They have nothing that comes close to the performance of a Titan or 780. The 7990 is a joke to compare to the Titan or 780. You can't compare dual GPU cards to a single one. I've had my fair share of experiences with multi GPU setups, and will never go there again.

fossilfern3919d ago

Bobbo

Are you seriously using some sort of synthetic benchmark comparison? I wouldn't trust them for any GPU. And considering that the 7 series from AMD is about 2 years old now and still maintains a high position isn't something to sniff at.

This driver rubbish in relation to AMDs drivers not being good is something I havnt experienced so Maybe I'm lucky. And nvidia haunt had perfect drivers either so it goes both ways.

Bobbo443919d ago (Edited 3919d ago )

Fossilferm

Yes, I'm obviously using a synthetic benchmark comparison, like I said, it gives a comparison of raw power. Why wouldn't you trust a benchmark? How can you make the argument that the 7000 series is an older card? I compared the 7970 to a 670, they released within a few months of each other. And my comment about Nvidia having better performance with a 780/Titan than AMD is no less valid because AMD won't release a new line of cards. If you would like a comparison of game performance, well here is one of Battlefield 3 etc. performance ( http://www.hardocp.com/arti... The 670 is very similar in performance to the 7970, with each of them pulling slightly ahead in different scenarios, like I said. I used to be a huge AMD fan until my last build when I realized you really weren't saving anything anymore (I'm just talking the GPU department, comparison of AMD to Intel is a joke).

And you see what I did there, I gave at least some form of proof of my claims.

Oh, and I imagine people's complaints about AMD drivers are probably more about higher end configurations that demand more from drivers, like Crossfire, Eyefinity, etc. I've tried both Crossfire and SLI setups, and SLI works drastically better in comparison. Although AMD is working on it, I think they just released a frame latency tool of some sort.

fossilfern3919d ago (Edited 3919d ago )

I'm No fanboy if that's what your thinking. I was actually contemplating going nvidia and getting a 760 but will be waiting for the new series of GPU from AMD since I had some bad run ins with nvidia gpus.

It goes back and forth between the GPU crown and it depends on the game too some things AMD do well and nvidia do well in others.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3919d ago
3919d ago Replies(8)
Megaton3919d ago

I run Intel + AMD, but I've got not delusions about which is better between Nvidia and AMD. They just cost a lot more, and suck up a lot more power. I'd definitely go with Nvidia for my GPU if I had the money to burn.

sinjonezp3919d ago (Edited 3919d ago )

I can't agree more. Nvidia support is great. Intel cards, while usually priced more, gives you significantly better performance. I understand that AMD gfx cards are priced lower, their driver support is bad. Nvidia gives consumers new drivers at least once a month or when a triple A title comes out. Additionally providing sli profile upgrades. Every CPU I build for costumers I always tell them Intel and nvidia.

ATi_Elite3918d ago

I have:

Intel + AMD and Intel + Nvidia. I really see NO difference as they both perform GREAT! Each GPU has it's up n downs but AMD GPU's are cheaper so it wins.

I don't want to here any CRAP about AMD Drivers cause they have been good for years and AMD Drivers have NEVER EVER burned up a GPU or set your house on fire like Nvidia Driver 196.75 and 320.18 have done!

Funny how Nvidia Fanboys NEVER seem to remember 196.75 burning up GPU's, PC's, and burning down houses while they BRAG about Nvidia Drivers.

Nvidia Driver 320.18 has also FRIED a lot of GPU's too but luckily no burned houses.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3918d ago
john23919d ago

Man, those QuakeCon keynotes are simply a joy. Say what you want about Carmack (and the fact that he f'ed up PC gamers) but it's a joy listening to him, his opinions and his ideas

opinska3919d ago

How did he f'ed up PC games? Rage was a sweet game, with a great engine. Wolfestain was alright too.. Doom 3 was a master piece.

john23919d ago (Edited 3919d ago )

RAGE had a lot of issues when it was launched on the PC. Also the fact that this version was held back by the console versions was something that pissed off a lot of PC gamers

Vladplaya3919d ago

Doom 3 was NOT a master piece, not even by long shot. It failed by TRYING to be a scary game, instead of been actual Doom game. It failed miserably at been scary, then at everything else. Boring ass narrow corridor shooter in the dark.

aliengmr3918d ago

Rage was a glorified tech demo that showcased tech that was pretty meh.

Coach_McGuirk3919d ago

Intel & Nvidia for quality, AMD for price/performance. Both are excellent and we should consider ourselves lucky to have the option.

Plagasx3919d ago (Edited 3919d ago )

Sighs...no Doom 4...again.

palaeomerus3919d ago

Yeah, I admit that I am starting to worry. And it seems like such a no-brainer too. Just make a really fast, twitchy game where you kill lots and lots of 'dumb as hell demons' and dead people, that pop out of monster closets, with crazy weapons with lots of smoke, fire, blood, and bones in it. Maybe have some destructible scenery and vehicles here and there to spice things up. Have some key cards and levels you can wander around in.

Sometimes looking backwards is the way forward.

JBernardo3919d ago

AMD's cpus are the best in terms of price/performance. Just look at the FX8320's price... It went for about £105 yesterday on Amazon.co.uk... Can't beat that.

Show all comments (32)
80°

The Best Video Game Reboots of All Time

Like the film or television industry, the world of gaming has seen its fair share of reboots over the years. While some of these video game reboots have had

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
250°

John Carmack, the consulting CTO for Meta's virtual-reality efforts, is leaving.

businessinsider writes: "His exit came on Friday, the people said. Carmack, who has been openly critical of Meta's advancements in AR and VR, core to its metaverse ambitions, posted to the company's internal Workplace forum about his decision to leave."

Read Full Story >>
businessinsider.com
BlackIceJoe494d ago

I hope he starts up another new company and can get another new game engine on the market too.

Number1TailzFan494d ago

He's apparently focusing on AGI, Artificial General Intelligence, AKA trying to get AI to be sentient. Which according to Ray Kurzweil could happen by 2029.

Rainbowcookie494d ago

SKYNET approves

SKYNET becomes a follower

SKYNET left the forum

Yui_Suzumiya493d ago

Then I need to look more into this because it sounds like the backbone tech I need to make Projekt Monika a reality.

camel_toad493d ago (Edited 493d ago )

AI advances are really starting to open my eyes to us not even having scratched the surface. But with the field itself growing exponentially and stuff I'd never considered before like putting AI to work finding cures for major diseases - it's exciting but also kinda scary tbh.

More on topic - sentient AI. Creating a digital soul so to speak. Spooky in a what have we done and is it good or bad kind of way.

masterfox494d ago

He is like: "Im done with F#@#$%NG nonsense, pff Metaverse da funk I was thinking!!, Im out!! :D"

Yeah he put a smile in his face too in the end.

Orchard494d ago

I hope he goes back to traditional games.

VR gaming is a flop and the Metaverse has (fortunately) completely failed to take off.

Babadook7494d ago

VR has much more potential than flat screen games. Just need to tap the right market and fund AAA development. Meta is a rotten company though so good to see him leave.

Orchard494d ago (Edited 494d ago )

That's where it becomes a catch-22 problem though. Very few companies (if any) are going to spend AAA amounts of dollars on VR if the market isn't there - and the market isn't there.

If it was the future of gaming we'd see the big publishers getting involved - and basically none of them are.

Agree on Meta 100% - horrible company and I really do hope FB (and social media) dies some day soon.

JackBNimble494d ago

There will never be AAA games until VR sells at the rate of mainstream consoles. Understand that even if Sony do sell 3.5 million VR in the next 2 or 3 years like they hope, that isn't ever going to get any commitments for AAA budget. No investor would ever sign off on that.

Orchard494d ago (Edited 494d ago )

The adoption has been terrible and the market basically non-existent as a result of that.

We're now 10 years into PC VR gaming, 6 years into console VR gaming and it just hasn't taken off - the reality is, most consumers don't care for it.

Even with a huge install base like the PS4, only a few million adopted it, about 3-4%.

ApocalypseShadow494d ago

He only thinks it in his mind. Because Microsoft isn't offering "high fidelity VR." Only Sony is offering "high fidelity VR" because they actually deliver.

I just read today that Honda is moving forward in using VR and has vehicles that were built in VR without an actual real vehicle.

Orchard just doesn't know any better. He claims he's a PlayStation fan but doesn't want Sony to succeed in growing the VR market. But he's okay with Microsoft buying up the industry and game pass. Tell you where his mind is actually at. Or he has investment in it.

But Carmack leaving is only that he was frustrated with higher ups. But he's very interested in AI. And that's a good field of investment too.

JackBNimble494d ago

If any of the big 3 had sales were like VR for their console, they would fold like the Saturn. Right now VR is nothing more then a high priced peripheral and no one should expect AAA for it.

By the way , I am one who would like to see VR succeed, but it has a long way to go before that ever happens.

Orchard494d ago (Edited 494d ago )

@Apocalypse

"Only Sony is offering "high fidelity VR" because they actually deliver."

And the reality is, from what we've seen thus far, the vast majority, about 97% of Sony customers don't care about it in the slightest. They can't even sell out of PSVR2 devices, which are supposedly in short supply. Better to just invest in traditional experiences instead.

"I just read today that Honda is moving forward in using VR and has vehicles that were built in VR without an actual real vehicle."

Yes. And that helps gaming how? I've said time and time again that AR/VR is great for enterprise. Just not great for gaming.

The lack of customers, lack of customer interest, and lack of AAA game companies investing & AAA game experiences being crafted says everything we need to know about the state and future of gaming VR.

tagzskie494d ago

When uncle philly announced true vr experience and demoed fallout 4 in one x, some xboys sings different tune..

Orchard494d ago

@tagzskie Well, those people were wrong.

Knushwood Butt494d ago

'Just not great for gaming.'.

That's your heavily biased opinion. You are in every VR thread trying to project your doom and gloom. Why?

There are many genres where VR is at least equal to or better than flat. VR in a driving game destroys the flat experience.

FPS, horror games, even Tetris is better in VR.

You speak about AAA as if it's the only consideration, moving goalposts.

Capcom.

Are they not a AAA publisher?

Is RE4 not a AAA game? RE7? RE8?

Hofstaderman494d ago (Edited 494d ago )

The Metaverse is one big flop but VR gaming on its own still has steam and growth potential. Remember Mark and his Meta wants you to associate gaming with the meta verse the gaming industry and its large number of users has the capacity to sway the opinion of the mass market.
Incidentally, Meta is haemorrhaging money and expertise that’s what this article is highlighting.

ApocalypseShadow494d ago

See, the problem orchard is that you see what you want to see. Sony sold PSVR at profit. They made money on software. They made money on a 10 year old peripheral. Yeah. It didn't sell 100 million. How many games sell bucket loads when they cost almost 10 times less than PSVR was at launch? That's why the new headset is coming. Before, there was no console VR. There is now. To grow the market, you must keep pushing and not be afraid like Microsoft. Facebook, HTC, ByteDance, Varjo, Valve, Sony, etc are growing the gaming market. Did flat gaming sell millions overnight? No. It took time. Just like any other product. Fads fade. VR is not a fad because it has potential in many areas. Sony doesn't want PS VR 2 to be a Kinect. A fad. Millions on advertising but no substance. It's why PS Move still exists and works on PS5. And Kinect is dead. Move had substance. PSVR had substance. Which is why PS VR 2 exists.

Honda is an example of VR entering other sectors. It's fairly obvious that it "ain't no 3D TV." Bugatti also uses VR as well as other car manufacturers. VR is here to stay. I know it hurts you that it's growing bedsides flat gaming being successful too. Just like mobile.

You just like to lie to yourself and others. VR is in education, in construction, in the automotive industry, medicine, real estate, music.... AND GAMING. The market wasn't there. Now it's here and it's growing in every sector besides gaming. But you want it to jump out there immediately like some viral video or fad. That's not how it works.

Chances are, you developed something, because you call yourself a developer. And no one wanted your product. So you're projecting.But there are other companies and developers who are successful in making VR work. You just sucked at it.

You claim Sony isn't selling out on pre-orders. But you don't even know what numbers they have allocated. Or how many they are producing to meet demand. You just pull it out from you know where and lie to everyone that Sony is failing. Sony has said they will have headsets for launch and not have to worry about production. What do you have that goes against Sony's statements on the matter? Absolutely nothing. Put up your facts against Sony's production lines?

But tell us. What software you made for VR that failed so that we all can know where your mindset is?

Orchard493d ago

@Knush You just highlighted the problem perfectly - the only AAA taking part in console VR is Capcom. Where is COD VR? Battlefield VR, GTA VR? All the big pubs are skipping on it because they don’t believe in its future - if they did they’d be investing in it now.

@Apocalyspe At the time I thought MS were insane for not getting into VR, but looking back on it, given where we are now, that seems like a very smart decision.

Honda making VR for car showrooms or whatever means nothing for gaming. The vast majority of gamers - PS gamers included - don’t care in the slightest about VR. The numbers show that.

I’ve never worked on a VR game nor do I want to. The market being non-existent means salaries are substantially lower when compared to AAA salaries. I wouldn’t take the pay cut - I’ve been in AAA since graduating college, and I intend to keep it that way.

But that’s also the good point of being a developer, ultimately it doesn’t really matter to me if the game sells well or poorly - I still get paid the same at the end of the day.

It’s funny that you mention Kinect because I consider the Kinect a failure too - but it still had 4x the sales of PSVR and a way higher attach rate.

We are supposedly still in the tail end of a chip shortage, so clearly we would expect a new device like PSVR to sell out - Sony themselves were too or they wouldn’t have done invites to get one initially - they thought it was going to be difficult for people to get one (so did many on here) but when it turned out it wasn’t they opened it up to everyone.

Clearly it isn’t moving as many units as they’d anticipated.

Come talk to me when we’re all sitting in our living rooms with VR headsets on and the attach rate is so high they ship it in the box as the default controller method - so I guess I won’t ever be hearing from you again :p

Knushwood Butt493d ago

@Orchard

'the only AAA taking part in console VR is Capcom'.

No, EA and Ubisoft have VR games on console.

https://www.ea.com/games/f1...

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 493d ago
Stanjara494d ago

Problem with VR is that it hasn't have legs. Everything from mevement, enemies, pacing, puzzles has to take that into equation.

494d ago Replies(2)
Hofstaderman494d ago

I agree with you. I remember when Second Life was as the dogs bollocks and big business had store fronts or ambassador land parcels but soon discovered that it was pie in the sky. Second Life is still operational but only frequented by a stagnant population of people who were with it since it’s launch. New people sign up to try it out but tend to not stay. People want to browse the internet or use it to play games not live in it.

generic-user-name493d ago

"And yet, you can provide me no evidence to the contrary."

Compare sales of gen 1 VR headsets with sales of gen 1 home consoles.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 493d ago
XxINFERNUSxX494d ago

One of if not, the best game engine developer in the world. I hope he gets back into developing game engines.

Orchard494d ago

I could see him in some kind of director role at Epic games working on Unreal Engine. That would be pretty cool.

MadLad494d ago

I would hope he stays away from modern day Epic.

Orchard494d ago

@Mad Depends. Their engine & online services are highly impressive and very advanced.

The games on the other hand... Fortnite... no thanks.

Wrex369494d ago

They need to stick VR back in RnD departments everywhere that or let the porn industry lead the way like everything else that's been introduced then brought to mass market after porn made it a thing lmfao

Number1TailzFan494d ago

Yea VR has that virt-a-mate thing which seems to be quite popular with adult Quest 2 owners, but i mean there is Half Life Alyx, few other things.. nothing huge after those so far.

Show all comments (39)
40°

Here are the new Xbox Game Pass Quests for September 2022

Xbox Game Pass Quests recently reset for the month of September. So if you try to collect as many Microsoft Rewards points as possible, there's a new set available now.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com