100°

Nintendo missing Wii U price cut opportunity with Pikmin 3's release

Gimme Gimme Games writes that cutting the Wii U's price along side a major first party release like Pikmin 3 would have been a good idea but it doesn't appear to be happening. They suggest other first party games that could be coupled with a price cut to increase Wii U sales.

Read Full Story >>
gimmegimmegames.com
iamnsuperman3916d ago

That would have been a bold but good move. Nintendo really need to cut the price now before the launch of two new systems over shadows the price cut (launching any system gets attention. A price cut a month before a new console release is a bad move. They need that big unit increase that comes with price cuts

XboxFun3916d ago

They will probably slash the price when the new systems actually release to the public.

guitarded773916d ago

If they can price drop and release SM3D, WWHD, MK8 and/or SSBU a week before the next gen consoles come out, that would be a good bold move.

PopRocks3593916d ago

It will be in vain if they don't get the mass market to go for it though. I believe a $50 price drop coupled with a barrage of TV commercials for each new game that comes out can give the Wii U a necessary push.

Right now the Wii U needs some uniqueness, a marketing push so that it catches peoples' attention. Without that attention, no games or price measure will help it.

darthv723916d ago

cutting the price by at least $50 is a good start. they really need to up the marketing with not only adverts for new wii-u games but also advertise that it plays all the previous wii games as well.

It may not be much but having the bc of the wii library for games like NSMB and LOZ skyward sword and more is a selling point to those who may not have a wii yet and are looking at the wii and wii-u.

byeGollum3916d ago (Edited 3916d ago )

Why would nintendo cut their price, when it's the cheapest of the the three next gen consoles?

V0LT3916d ago

Might be the cheapest but for $50 you get a heck of a lot more.

byeGollum3916d ago

Depends on what you consider more, tech specs or games.

Th4Freak3916d ago (Edited 3916d ago )

@Gollum The problem is that it has inferior tech specs and it doesn't have games...

PopRocks3593916d ago

What are you guys talking about?

That's like arguing you get more if you pay $100 for the Xbox One, which only comes with Kinect and supposedly lower specs. It's not about the specs, it's about if the games and features appeal to you.

andrewer3916d ago (Edited 3916d ago )

Gamers nowadays don't care about stuff rather than power and tech (the disagrees prove it). For example, the Wii U could be even more expensive that I would still buy it, because no Playstation or Xbox will deliver the games I want to play and only Nintendo offers. But kids now don't get what it is to love a game the way gamers used to. Real shame.

N4g_null3915d ago

and it gets worst and worst.

Axonometri3916d ago (Edited 3916d ago )

I would like to get a Wii U for kids and family. I just come to the conclusion each time I think about it, that it comes too close in price to the PS4. It also is right around the same price as a new tablet, and there sure are a lot of inexpensive apps for the kids on tablets. Too many options clouding the purchase intent right now.

Khordchange3916d ago

who says they wont? They do have a earnings conference tommorow

TripC503916d ago

No need for the price cut, not yet. Keep selling at this price as long as possible Nintendo, then at the last second drop the discount bomb.

Show all comments (23)
40°

2023 Game Anniversaries To Keep Note Of

Major 2023 game anniversaries include The World Ends With You, Mario Kart Wii, and The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker, among many others

Read Full Story >>
nintendolink.com
170°

Is Shigeru Miyamoto's 'A delayed game is eventually good' rule true for Nintendo?

Delays have become more common lately and several games have not been improved by it. Does delaying games work out better for Nintendo?

Read Full Story >>
nintendoenthusiast.com
masterfox1182d ago (Edited 1182d ago )

it depends, if you have a strong leadership, vision and focus for the project or game, delays can help alot because the person in charge knows what it needs to realize the task, but if you don't have that, delays could completely destroy your game, take for example Cyberpunk terrible management and end result, it wouldn't matter if they delayed the game even more cause the issue here is not time is the horrid management.

1181d ago
fr0sty1181d ago

Duke Nukem Forever says hello...

RaidenBlack1182d ago

"but a rushed game is forever bad"
~ not in these days of day1 patches, subsequent hotfixes and continued updates.
And the over-reliance on these conveniences has given rise to sub-par deliveries.

Rebel_Scum1181d ago

Give me these day1 patches, subsequent hotfixes and continued updates over my old cartridges that have the bugs they were shipped with.

1181d ago
Unknown_Gamer57941181d ago

Yeah, when games shipped with bugs in the past, those bugs stayed in the game for the rest of time. So, I'm glad that patches and updates can fix problems spotted in games after release.

What I'm less thrilled about is that it's a double-edged sword, as so many devs are now using that as an excuse to reduce the amount of time spent on bug testing so they can rush their product out ASAP. They're turning what is an excellent tool, into a crutch.

Sure, in the days when games were just on a disc or cart and couldn't be "patched" post-release, barring releasing an entirely new edition of the game, we were stuck with whatever product was released at launch. The difference is, devs made extra sure to test their games so they wouldn't be buggy messes. Once in a while a game would release with a bug that slipped under the radar, but I for one recall that most games I played in those days seemed to be just fine, and I can't say I've had much trouble since with retro games ported to modern systems.

I just think modern devs and publishers need to be held to a higher standard. There's no reason why a game needs to be a mess at launch. Patches and updates are an excellent tool, but they should not be treated as an excuse to cut corners. As it stands, that just gives me one more reason to wait before buying most games as I sure as heck am not paying full price for the "pleasure" of testing a game for a company whose job it was to do so.

gold_drake1181d ago

what if u dont have internet? over a substantial period of time? u happy with a bugged out game for 60 quid?
i wouldnt be. im not a fan of those day 1 patches.

JackBNimble1181d ago

Curtain_swoosh
Don't you need a day 1 patch just to use your console?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1181d ago
Knightofelemia1182d ago

“A delayed game is eventually good, but a rushed game is forever bad.” To bad they didn't listen with Cyberpunk now look at it. Honestly I like a game that is pushed back work out all the kinks maybe add new things to the game. I don't liked rushed games pushed out the door call it done for the holiday sales. I also don't like remakes that have half the content cut and sold at full price like RE3 remake. I will gladly wait for a game that is not rushed and had the extra time worked on it it shows they actually cared for the game when making it. I can understand minor bugs and a few updates to correct the bugs but unlike Cyberpunk you patch as you go I hate.

Firebird3601181d ago

Red tried. Gamers are also to blame, they bitch so bad about delays.
They wanted the game now and thats what they got.

Knightofelemia1181d ago

Only way I will bitch is if the game is delayed and turns out to be a piece of shit

Sashamaz1181d ago

Rather naive of you to think gamers forced a company to release a broken, and buggy game that's been in development for many years.

It is more likely the higher-ups/investors began asking questions on why the game was taking so long to develop especially as they have to keep pumping money into the project.

If what is available on the internet is correct then the investors did not even push for the game to be released early, instead, they were lied to and told the game was ready.

Either way, I would not blame a few vocal gamers, what company would let some random on the internet determine when they release their product.

Knightofelemia1181d ago

@Firebird360

Gamers aren't to blame they didn't bitch when Cyberpunk was pushed back for the December release. If anything gamers were mislead by the marketing of the game as a must have game. They even had Keanu Reeves marketing the game he was good in the game. Fact is someone knew the game was buggered up on last gen but they pushed the game out for the holiday season sales. Developers mentioned the game was not ready and should have been pushed back. Cyberpunk falls flat the gamers were bitching because the game is broken and voiced up because we were mislead by CD Projekt. And with a broken product you want you money back whether it's a cordless drill, cellphone, DVD player. I believe Sony got annoyed from the constant refunds they were issuing because Cyberpunk is broken I don't blame Sony for pulling the broken game. I think the reason why Microsoft never pulled the game digitally is because they sunk money and helped market the game as well. Now if Cyberpunk was pushed back to say fall of 2021 they would have had a good game on their hands. The bugs would have been worked out more features added to the game it would not have ended up as going down as the game with the shittiest launch in history.

1181d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (26)
60°

Pikmin 3 Wii U version is back on the Nintendo eShop

The Pikmin 3 Wii U version has reappeared on the NIntendo eShop following its removal from the store after the announcement of Pikmin 3 Deluxe for the Nintendo Switch.

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com