1120°

This is what Uncharted 3 - and racing games - could look like in CryEngine 3

DSOGaming writes: "Ah, the power of CryEngine 3. You know though, it’s really funny. This bloody engine can push some of the most spectacular visuals we’ve seen, yet developers are not taking advantage of it. Guess Crytek is overcharging CE3′s license, otherwise we can’t find any reason at all for not using it. But anyway, modder ‘PianoPolish’ was utterly impressed by Naughty Dogs’ Uncharted and decided to create a map that was inspired by the game’s ‘Desert’ level."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
iamnsuperman3918d ago

Crytek has a habit on making things look pretty but not delivering on any other aspect on the game. I really do not rate them as a developer. This engine looks good but what about the other stuff. They are important too

dark-hollow3918d ago

That's why it's a good thing that other developers besides crytek can pay to use this already outstanding engine.

john23918d ago

I seriously don't know why they are not taking advantage of it. Is Crytek overcharging for it?

GameNameFame3918d ago

Ive seen very few games demo that were using Crytech engine.

It looks nothing like Crysis 3. IDK why... maybe its difficult to use...

Speaking of Uncharted... When is Uncharted 4 coming out????

They are now 2 team and been making a sequel since 2011.... Should be about time...

Why is there no news on theses devs? ND is 2 team. GG is 2-3 teams. Santa Monica is 2 teams... and there is MM.

SONY TELL ME WHAT GAMES THE MAKING!!

dedicatedtogamers3918d ago

@ john2

It may not be an issue of overcharging for the engine (though that might be it, too).

The reason why - for instance - Unreal Engine is so widely used is because EPIC does such a fantastic job with creation tools and middleware. Plus, plenty of devs are already familiar with it.

In this day and age of "churn the game out, get it to stores, and sell it with marketing hype" what value is there in making a game with CryEngine when you can make a game with UE for less cost, less time, and you can simply bullshot the visuals prior to actual releaase?

abzdine3918d ago (Edited 3918d ago )

sorry but sand in U3 looks more realistic than this
http://gamer.portail.free.f...
http://ps4vita.fr/wp-conten...
http://scr3.golem.de/screen...
http://jstationx.com/wp-con...

man these pictures make me wanna give this amazing game another go!

Godmars2903918d ago

Missing iamnsuperman's point.

If Crytek can't do more than make pretty looking games with their own engine, how is anyone else do better with it?

andrewsqual3918d ago

@abzdine And that's not all. To keep the relevance to the article I have to say that snow in the CryEngine looks NOTHING like the snow physics in Uncharted 2 and The Last of Us. Even Resistance 2's water effects are more incredible than the Cryengine with water that actually reacts and turns into small waves when you move in it.
The Cryengine is one of the most overrated and underused engines of all time. The first Far Cry is the only good game Crytek ever made.
(I didn't looks at the video the article is talking bout because I got sick of these videos 5 years ago)

Autodidactdystopia3918d ago (Edited 3918d ago )

ERmagherd.

this is literally the only place on the internet that cant see that crytek is definitely talented..

I mean seriously guys why cant the godlike developers trump them.

they must suck because they are doing physics simulation on a level uncanny to the average dev?

I honestly don't get it guys, what in the hell is the deal with bashing crytek on this site?

They make things that are fantastically impossible to other devs... they make graphics that toast ea.

yet story, something that every fkn body can do and compete about you see as lacking..

What is my problem that I don't agree with you?

crytek
1 leader in gfx industry
2 no title released has failed to be a blockbuster
3 n4g takes things and skews the heck out of them saying things like "THEY MAKE GUUD GRAPX BUT GAMEPLY DURR DURR"

4 are you guys kidding?

seriously I have never seen such a sacramental ode to twisting what is actually in front of you to suit your sony aspirations EVER.

and I dislike consoles and love exclusives, I bought a ps3 for killzone 2-3 and gt 5 and and xbox for gow 2-3 and forza.

what the hell is wrong with you children. crytek is doing things that people simply CANNOT do as well as include supplementary story to rival shit like cod and ghost recon whats the problem?

does crytek have to rename themselves naughtydog to get some recognition.. or are all of you too young to see the advances in realtime graphics provided by them?

ND might have an edge in story but great stories have existed since times begone, great graphics on a "magic box" we call monitors have only been around for about 5 years and believe it or not crytek have taken the forefront of that battle, creating the most insane effects ever seen on a piece of silicon that you can own in your own damn house.

what is your deal? I ask again...

I mean .. every body loves a good story but I don't go to universal studios , or Disneyland or , knots berryfarm, to read a fckn novel I go there for the mind blowing effects and sound.
If I want a great story I funkin read one of the best books ever written or (lol play halflife) haha jk
or are you just not paying attention?

nveenio3918d ago

We always get lots of screenshots from CryEngine, but rarely any decent video. I'd like to see a character running through this environment, leaving sand cascading away from his footprints. I'd like to see a character climbing around on the rocks, jumping from this one to that one. I want to see some great animations.

Scenery just doesn't do it for me. There's more to a game than scenery. The place needs to come alive.

Sarick3917d ago (Edited 3917d ago )

Graphics aren't everything that make a great game. Games are like books. You can put pretty pictures in them or have awesome covers for them but in reality it's the story and how entertaining they are that wins in the end. Everything else is just EYE CANDY.

I've seen some AWESOME looking game animations movies and soundtracks in games. These games look or awesome visually but play like horrible Battlefield Earth movies.

Just remember games that look or sound great don't always play great.

Muffins12233917d ago

@GameNameFame

Its not that hard to use compared to unreal engine and it is more expensive,i heard they charge you a million dollars to publish with the engine while unreal charges you $500,000.

bangshi3917d ago

This is a pointless article.

Who cares how it looks made in CryEngine 3, it wouldn't run on the PS3 like that so it is a moot point.

It isn't like ND would be incapable of making a game that looks as good as, if not better than these screenshots.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3917d ago
Spurg3918d ago

''I really do not rate them as a developer. This engine looks good but what about the other stuff. They are important too.''

I thought Crysis games had pretty interesting gameplay. Choose the way you want to play in an FPS isn't very common nowadays...so I think they delivered but it wasn't appealing to you. And their setting are interesting too...a whole island for you to explore...again not a lot of fps games let you do that. So when it come to delivering...I think they do but not to your taste.

Crytek is going places games rarely go. Ryse is a nice example of that. Ryse may have gotten a lot a criticism from viewers but people who played it actually liked it saying how the combat is similar to the arkham series.

iamnsuperman3918d ago (Edited 3918d ago )

Everyone is different as I know some people like Crytek. I find their gameplay very boring and the locations (all be it look pretty) are equally as dull (I am talking about pre Ryse because information about that game is all over the place so I am waiting for it to be released to make a judgement on it). There hasn't been a game I can say i really liked by them

Truehellfire3918d ago

I liked the first Crysis and Warhead quite a bit. Gameplay was fun, graphics were good, and story wasn't half bad. Crysis 2 wasn't very fun, and 3 was just slightly better.

tubers3918d ago

Really loved Crysis 1.

You have no idea how many hours I enjoyed just dicking with the North Koreans on the 1st level.

I just loved grabbing them and staring at their constipated facial reactions. I also found it hilarious when they try to sniff me out and then I de-cloak, go maximum strength, punch their faces and watch them fly a few meters!

Pretty fucking novel when I played it several years ago.

I didn't feel as good when I played C2 and C3 :(

turgore3918d ago

Except that these are made by modders, and not Crytek. However, we have to give Crytek credit for creating an incredible engine.

levian3917d ago

I really like the looks of the shots of the desert. Its so bright and crisp! It looks similar to the setting of the new Metal Gear actually

Hellsvacancy3918d ago

Sorry for sounding stupid (it's only because I don't know) but could Crytek not loan or license out the CryEngine 3 so other (more creative) developers can make use it to make a game?

GuyThatPlaysGames3918d ago

Could would should. Nobody is ever happy

showtimefolks3918d ago

i recently bought crysis 3 and while the game looked great everything elser is a huge fail for me personally

guns felt weak
mediocre story and only 5 hours long

so crytek can deliver on graphics and nothing else

NBT913917d ago (Edited 3917d ago )

They made Far Cry and that was great, I enjoy the series (aware that Ubisoft developed 2 & 3).
But yeah Crysis, for all its visual flair is a boring game I think, it has some interesting ideas though.

I think it would be good to see what other things they can do. They are making Homefront 2 and (although the rest of the game was pretty average)I loved the online play modes in the first one, it was good how it focused on objectives, as you unlocked rewards / perks in game via points which you could get by either killing and / OR focusing on the objectives so that was neat. Looking forward to Homefront 2.

EDIT - I should mention I played Crysis on PS3, not PC. While the graphics are probably not as good, I still found it pretty average as games go.

starchild3918d ago

Oh please. I hate this trendy Crytek-hating bandwagon that sprouted up.

The Crysis games are all good games. I enjoy them a lot more than most military shooters and the like. They have great dynamic gameplay that I find to be a lot of fun.

The fact that Crytek creates industry-leading visuals and pushes graphics technology further than just about anybody should also earn them a little respect.

Just sad the way some of you act.

CBaoth3918d ago

+1 well said amigo. Even their worst game, C2, looked fantastic with Maldo's and Blackfire's mods running.

People have unrealistic expectations. They complained the gameplay was no longer open world. To that end I say no shit Sherlock, it's New York City, not an island in the South Pacific. What did ya want to do - enter ANY skyscraper with 10 thousand plus rendered office rooms and stare at old PCs on every floor? It's a videogame, not a Holodeck from Star Trek. The only valid criticism I ever entertained was the anemic AI and even found that, on the highest difficulty settings, was much improved in C3.

Crytek is a good developer. If their games were simply a function of a great engine, then I ask why does City Interactive's IP Sniper 2 look and play like shit?

jollygoodchap83917d ago

People like to hate on them that's for sure.

Unless Crytek is making an exclusive for their precious console then all of a sudden its "I can't wait! This game looks sick!!"

Flip flop

starchild3918d ago

@iamnsuperman

I'd like to know what games you think are good...

3918d ago
Funantic13918d ago

State of decay is a great game using the cryengine 3.

Wingsfan243917d ago

Very buggy though. Just like Sniper Ghost Warrior 2. I think the Cryengine will really shine in the next-gen though.

Funantic13917d ago

They justed updated it. It's fine now.

KazHiraiFTW3918d ago (Edited 3918d ago )

@iamnsuperman

Obviously you haven't played Crysis or Crysis Warhead, two of the best FPS's of all time designed for the PC exclusive Cryengine 2.

kevnb3918d ago

they made great games until they went multiplatform. Farcry and Crysis 1 were awesome.

Rhinoceros3917d ago

A voice of reason at a moment when everyone is screaming about spec superiority. Gameplay matters the most.

3917d ago
fontell153917d ago

as Jacob implied I didnt even know that a student can make $6748 in four weeks on the computer. have you seen this web site http://www.wep6.com

princejb1343917d ago

i think gameplay is more important than graphics
i have played many ugly looking games but because they were fun to play it never stopped me from playing for hours

Dagobert3917d ago

Crytek games are just tech demo's really.

keyz15793917d ago

I do like what Crytek brings to the table graphically but hopefully in the next gen cycle they will concentrate on gameplay as well and other aspects that make a game successful

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 3917d ago
iCaruth3918d ago

It looks good but leave the car engines to the racing devs.

Pancit_Canton3918d ago

Looks horrible. It looks blocky,bland and dull looking. Naughty Dog 3.0 would blow Crytek's CryEngine 3 out of Uncharted territory.

isa_scout3917d ago

I agree, most people that talk smack about Uncharted's graphics fail to understand that Naughty Dog intentionally makes games that don't look photorealitsic. They make stylized graphics, and it adds to their charm. Nathan Drake would look weird if they were to try to make him look real. Naughty Dog makes the best graphics on consoles, and Crytek makes the best graphics on PC...
As far as gameplay,story,length, and support goes Crytek hasn't made anything amazing since Crysis 1. There is a hell of a lot more to games than just pretty graphics. My fav game this generation was Dragon Age Origins and the graphics for that game was horrible. Since when did graphics beat gameplay??? These young kids would have never made it on my Atari...Sad.

KazHiraiFTW3917d ago

uh I dunno dude I just finished playing The Last of Us, great game, but the graphics were atrocious. Ugly low res textures, blocky shadows, abysmal aliasing, flickering textures, and very rarely did the FPS get as high as 30, most of the time it was a 20-25 fps slideshow. I completely disagree with Naughty Dog making the best console graphics, Crytek does a much better job with Cryengine3 on weaker hardware (360)

jimbobwahey3918d ago

Uncharted 3 looks nicer than those CryEngine 3 screenshots, so I'm glad that Naughty Dog stick to their own engine :)

starchild3918d ago

No, it really doesn't.

I would love to see the world through the rose-tinted lenses of the Sony fanboy glasses.

_QQ_3918d ago

Just like The Last of Us is the "best looking game ever made".....

KUV19773918d ago

Cry-Engine is really nice but thse screens really look very weak and not at all like they could be in the engine. As far as those special screens go, the actual game looks way better. In most-cases it is artwork over pure tech.

ChickenOfTheCaveMan3918d ago (Edited 3918d ago )

I agree, I really really liked the visual on PS3 for Crysis 3 and Dead Space 3, but Uncharted still looks better than those and the simulation of Uncharted 3 in CryEngine3, sorry...

Beastradamus3918d ago

Naughty Dog use the HAVOK engine which is the same engine used in GTA 4 and many other games. Learn what you're talking about man.

Wintersun6163918d ago

HAVOK is just the physics engine, and yes while it is used in Uncharted 3, it's not the actual engine used to build the game because it's just a physics engine. Naughty Dog has their own engine for their games.

The irony.

Anonagrog3918d ago (Edited 3918d ago )

"Learn what you're talking about man".

It really doesn't take more than a minute on the net for any layperson to learn that Havok is a physics middleware, as Wintersun616 said, and that Naughty Dog use their own in-house proprietary engine.

Don't slam others when you, yourself, clearly have no understanding of software development and game development.

isa_scout3917d ago

Naughty Dog owns their own engine, not sure where you get your info from but the Havok engine is a physics engine not a graphics engine dude.

EdoubleD3918d ago

It's all about the art direction

AznGaara3918d ago

Yup. Believe it or not, the Uncharted series isn't as uber realistic as people make it out to be. There's a hint of stylization to their games. Same with TLOU, which is why I love the way their games look. Not so hyper realistic that it loses a sense of character.

Show all comments (113)
160°

Analyzing 'Uncharted: Drake’s Deception' – Wait, What is The Game About?

Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception has a lot to live up to as Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is an incredible and near-perfect game.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
Profchaos898d ago

It's about retirement...oh wait

UNCHARTED2FANATIC898d ago (Edited 898d ago )

I cant even say what the point was its easily the worst story in the series. The online was a whole lot of fun though but overall doesn't come even close to 2

porkChop898d ago (Edited 898d ago )

It was a step back for sure. Personally, I thought even the MP was way better in U2. Solid game, glad I played it. I just think they didn't push as hard as they did with U2.

UNCHARTED2FANATIC893d ago

Yes both the online and story was better in 2 no doubt

Flewid638897d ago

The "young Drake" portion was pretty top notch, story-wise. But yeah, everything outside of that I felt was inferior.

DanielEndurance898d ago

Villains were all over the place in this… one second they wanted Drake dead, the next they needed him, then they want him dead again, then they coulda killed him, but poisoned his friend instead, then coulda shot him again, but had brunch with him, then needed him alive, then coulda mowed him down, but decided to kill him by fire and let him escape… Uncharted 2 was way better. 😅😅

slowgamer898d ago

=D Sounds crazy. I don't remember any of that. Played it on ps3 and I remember thinking that why was this game so bashed compared to second one. I liked it.

Chocoburger897d ago (Edited 897d ago )

Another thing that annoyed me about UC3 events was the agent Talbot teleporting around Turkey. It just felt off to me, and made no sense.

Also, for about one third of the game, you go on a wild goose chase to rescue Sully, who wasn't even there to be rescued, and you end up back where you started again. There was simply no pay off for all the events you go through, so it fell flat in that regard as if they couldn't figure out how to make the game longer, so they decided to side-track you to do something with no pay off, hoping you wouldn't notice due to all the incredible action set pieces they made.

Overall though, even with its flaws, I still enjoy the game.

TheEnigma313897d ago

This was actually my least favorite in the series. Didn't have that same impact that part 2 set.

Flewid638897d ago

Uncharted 2 is the pinnacle of the series (to me).

Granted, 4 had the best story in my opinion, but 2 was the overall best game.

Show all comments (12)
210°

Uncharted 3 Anniversary Retrospective: Shackled By Its Precursor's Legacy

A decade after its release, how does Uncharted 3 fare today? Does its story still work? Was its precursor’s legacy a bedrock or quicksand for its own aspirations?

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
899d ago Replies(2)
SullysCigar898d ago

When arguably the weakest game in the series is still awesome and more fun than most games today, you know you're onto a winner!

coolbeans898d ago

I'd extend "arguably" before awesome too. Many technically demanding scenes were jaw-dropping for the time, but it's tough to ignore the sub-par context propelling the action forward.

SullysCigar898d ago

Tough for you, perhaps, and that's fine. I enjoyed it very much. Perhaps a little less than the others in the series, but then the bar is extremely high.

I remember being blown away by the water and sand tech in U3 for the time too. It certainly was a visual treat!

LucasRuinedChildhood898d ago (Edited 898d ago )

It is very good, but when I originally played Uncharted 3 it was the most disappointed I'd ever been in a video-game because Uncharted 2 was just that good. I enjoyed 3 much more when I replayed it in the Nathan Drake Collection though. I could just enjoy it for what it is and accept that it's not Uncharted 2 - it's not a roller coaster, and it doesn't balance and rotate between action, puzzles, platforming and set-pieces in the same way.

Uncharted 3's gameplay is a bit more compartmentalized and focused on one thing at a time. I'm not surprised the scrapped version of Uncharted 4 was going to have no gunplay for the first half. It's also paced much differently - it takes a long time to get to the notable set-pieces. Uncharted 2 is insane from Nepal onwards which is about an hour into the game. haha.

I did like the introduction of chase sequences, and I love first hour (bar fight, young Drake) and from the airplane sequence onwards but I just think the rest of it just sort of meanders along without as much purpose as 2.

When it comes to the script, you can feel the absence of Neil Druckmann and Josh Scherr (writer on every other console Uncharted game). Drake gets hit in the face, and the game goes on a random side plot for an hour to give you some boat set-pieces. He then washes up on a beach close to where Elena is staying to get you back to the real plot. Drake just says "How convenient" to try make you laugh off how sloppy the plot got.

In retrospect, I'm not sure if Naughty Dog were ready to work on 2 different games at once. 3 clearly had production issues that 1 and 2 didn't have, and Hennig's version of 4 didn't work out. They had to crunch so hard to get the rebooted version done on time that Bruce Straley gave up making video-games.

coolbeans898d ago

I'll give you some props for the extra analysis. I remember Druckmann climbing his way to a writer spot in UC2, but wasn't aware of Josh Scherr. I didn't know that was the reason for Straley's departure either. That's pretty damn rough.

GhostofHorizon898d ago

They had to make some weird choices as far as story went because the actor for Cutter had to bail which left a few holes in the story.

Uncharted is one of my favourite series and while the leap from 2 to 3 was not nearly as big as the leap from 1 to 2, I think it was an amazing experience none the less.

coolbeans898d ago

Graham McTavish's departure wasn't easy, but I don't think that would fix many holes tbh. Because the main issue to consider is the precarious mindset Naughty Dog was operating on: an increased emphasis in set pieces that HAD to go in and worrying about the context later.

Petebloodyonion898d ago

I really liked part 3 ( Among Thieves is still the best in my opinion) My only complaint was the interactions with the villains and how they were a missed opportunity, Linda MacMahon (Marlowe) was an interesting antagonist due to the history with Sully and Nate but it fails basically flat especially with her ending. And I couldn't care about Navaro 2.0.

What I did love and made me care was Cutter, in the short time he was in the game you could feel that the guy was a good treasure hunter for example when he pulled his own notebook with the clues he founds so the team can escape a room.
It was a small touch that add a lot to the character.

Good-Smurf898d ago

Marlowe was played by Rosalind Ayres.

MadLad898d ago (Edited 898d ago )

I have mixed feelings on the series. I still own all of them on the PS3, and the collection for PS4, but I didn't truly "love" any of the games until 4.

They're good games, but they always stumble on some element.
The first is good, but the climbing mechanics weren't exactly fine tuned with the first showing. Not to mention the spongey enemies if you played on anything past normal; but you're then faced with a fairly unchallenging game experience.
The second mostly fixed the climbing, but added in a pretty clumsy stealth mechanic.
Three was just two with a new story.

Four got it right though.
I don't remember once getting annoyed by any mechanic had in the game.

I know that everyone has a soft spot for 2, and 3 is sort of the black sheep of the series; but they did, overall, get progressively better. Which doesn't always happen.

Show all comments (28)
190°

Ranking the Uncharted Games From Worst to Best

KeenGamer: "Which Uncharted game is the best? Uncharted is widely recognized as one of the most groundbreaking and consistently great franchises in gaming. For both long-time fans and newcomers to this action-adventure classic, here’s a ranking of the franchise’s four main games."

Read Full Story >>
keengamer.com
Kyizen997d ago

UC 2, 4, 3 and 1. Great read and article

ABizzel1996d ago

No Golden Abyss -_-, otherwise I agree with the order.

UC2: Best overall
UC4: Best graphics, best gameplay, best locations, best environements
UC3: Best set pieces IMO (the boat and desert fights will always be amazing)
UC1: A rough Draft of what was to come
UCGA: Basically UC1 on Vita

Levii_92997d ago (Edited 997d ago )

Great list and great article nicely writen and explained. Although for me personaly i would put Drakes Fortune above Drake’s Deception and Uncharted 4 is absolutely my favourite of the franchise and number 1 for me.

Inverno997d ago

U2 is the only game playable on crushing without causing a great amount of frustration. Not to mention just how much influence it had that they redid some of U2s set pieces like the caravan twice, and armored truck chase in U4.

DFresh997d ago (Edited 997d ago )

I'd rate it as the following.

1.) Uncharted 2
(Close to perfection of any game I've played in years. Single Player/Multiplayer/Co Op all amazing.)

2.) Uncharted 3
(On par with UC2 multiplayer/co op wise minus the kickbacks [aka killstreaks]. I really liked the Lawrence of Arabia story.)

3.) Uncharted 4
(Single player is amazing. Multiplayer was meh. Co Op had potential. Absolutely hated the health revive system it slowed down the game way too much. Always preferred the fast pace action of UC2/UC3. Made it way more fun that way. Recoil was too ridiculous that most people in lobbies would only do hip firing, using power weapons and using that OP grappling hook to melee people after dropping them. Nobody wanted to revive anyone.)

4.) Uncharted
(It's the first in the series so it's hard to judge. Though I loved the story.)

NecrumOddBoy996d ago

I agree here but it’s also a series you can play from front to back and truly enjoy. Story-wise, they are all great and flow so well. I wish they threw both Golden Abyss and Lost Legacy on this list. Lost Legacy is the best mechanically in my opinion. You can see it’s stepping stone framework for TLOUS2.

Michiel1989996d ago

uncharted 2 is one of the few games that actually surpassed its pre-release hype.

medman996d ago (Edited 996d ago )

I am a single player gamer...I barely ever touch a multiplayer component. The only exceptions over the years have been the Mass Effect 3 multiplayer, TLOU factions, and the Uncharted 2 multiplayer. The Uncharted 2 multiplayer saw me spend more time playing it than all my other multiplayer experiences over the years combined. That game really was a masterpiece all around.

brando008996d ago

I agree completely, those are all stellar MP experiences, coming from another SP gamer who only occasionally gives MP some time.

Gardenia997d ago

Come to think of it, the step between Uncharted 1 and Uncharted 2 is huge. It goes from the weakest in the series to one of the best games ever made.
I think I'm going to play all of them again soon.

Ninver996d ago

Yeah all of a sudden I've got that Uncharted itch.

Michiel1989996d ago

is multiplayer still up for the remastered trilogy? or did it never have UC2 mp?

Show all comments (26)