MestreRothN4G3923d ago

More like "open world minigame gameplay".

Abriael3923d ago

Eh, doesn't look that minigame-ish to me to be honest.

MestreRothN4G3923d ago

Maybe because the naval minigame is becoming the full game. hehe

pedrof933923d ago (Edited 3923d ago )

That must be the Ps4 version.

nveenio3923d ago

Yeah, I'm surprised how many devs are favoring the PS4 version for demos.

Sevir3922d ago

Its the ps4, confirmed by Eurogamer, details that give us clues is the fact that the foliage has its own physics that moves as you hide in it, which is discussed in great length in the Digital foundary write up.

I don't think too much that its because Revs favor the PS4, I think its more to do with Sony AGGRESSIVELY marketing the ps4 and securing partnerships with key publishers for certain titles...UniSoft has always shown off PS footage of their games due to the partnership in-place. Much like the new partnership for bungie with Activision and the rumored partnership Sony has with Epic as well as Edios square and Warner Bros interactive.

nveenio3922d ago

@Sevir

I don't need Eurogamer to tell me it's the PS4 version. The button prompts give it away.

brodychet3922d ago

Wow this looks so much better than I thought it would. This video has sold me.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3922d ago
Campy da Camper3923d ago

That looks head and shoulders better than the last 2 installments. Waypoints as fast travel points, seamless boat to land, WHALES!!!

I'm excited to play this game!

BluEx6103923d ago

Same here. After AC III I was a little put off by AC IV. But now that I see, it's gameplay more and more, it looks really fun. I'm mostly excited about the pirate theme to it. Ship battles, crew recruiting and treasure hunting etc...

Going to have to add this to my PS4 collection.

blennerville3922d ago

looks good, im interested in this game. i love the pirate gameplay - just a shame they are bringing back the creed.

jimmywolf3923d ago

i hope the game does well but am going wait for a $20 price point

MestreRothN4G3923d ago (Edited 3923d ago )

I hope it sinks for becoming more casual, unpolished and uninspired every entry, but at a 20 price point, AC 3.0.0.1 may be worth a try.

Abriael3923d ago

Why exactly does it look unpolished to you?

CrossingEden3923d ago

sitting behind a computer at a desk hoping that a game that is the culmination of over two and a half years of hard work from seven talented studios as in at least 100 developers with families of their own is really sad and immature of you, gamers wanna be respected yet they say comments like "i hope this game sinks" each person that worked on this game has done more work in their life then YOU, but i guess in your mind making three huge cities, creating several minutes of new animations (an animation usually last 3-10 seconds), creating 50 unique locations isn't considered hard work to you -_-

DARK WITNESS3923d ago

@ CrossingEden

If the amount of resources was the only factor determining the quality of the game then it would be a fair point.

How many dev's worked on AC3? They have families, wonderful, but this is not a charity. If they can't make a quality game then they should leave it to the people who can.

If a game does not match up to the quality they portray when they show off videos like this then it deserves to tank.

MestreRothN4G3923d ago

@CrossingEden

Well, first, what do you know about me to say that "each person that worked on this game has done more work in their life then (sic)" me? What do you know about them? Do you realize how stupid is your rage and prejudice? How would you compare art making and "real world" needs to say what is "doing more"? Okay, too hard for you.

Second, Dark Witness answered it. If a game is getting worse and worse, if they are treating it like CoD, calling AC3.0.0.1 as AC4 (and people like you fall on and support this), I really think these schemes shouldn't get along and I hope for this business to fail, leaving room to DECENT business, innovation and quality.

Gamers want to be respected and that's WHY they hope this milking stops. FFS, they probably spent more on marketing than development.

Third, I'm not a grammar nazi. I don't even have english as native language... But google "then" and "than".

MattyG3923d ago

How is it becoming more casual? Since when is adding more features making things casual?

snipes1013922d ago

Given how many features have been added to the games over the years, I really don't see how you get off calling the games casual.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3922d ago
MiasmaDodo3923d ago

Looks absolutely gorgeous.

I may be buying this and FIFA day 1 for PS4

GusHasGas3923d ago (Edited 3923d ago )

the synchronization points doubling as fast travel points is really damn helpful.

Abriael3923d ago

Yep, considering how big the world is :D

Tdmd3923d ago (Edited 3923d ago )

Agree. But considering how view points just got so much more important than ever before, I wish they would be harder to reach and much more well guarded as well. Give me a challange!

Show all comments (58)
120°

Leaked Early Prototype Footage Reveals Development Stages Of Several Assassin's Creed Games

Prototype footage from several of Ubisoft's Assassin's Creed titles has leaked, revealing early stages of their development.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
90°

The Best Pirate-Themed Video Games (Not Skull and Bones)

BY JASON MONROE: The very best pirate-themed video games that you should play instead of the disappointment that is Skull and Bones.

Read Full Story >>
growngaming.com
thorstein48d ago

PoE: Deadfire, Unless you have a or PS5 or an SSD don't bother, loading times are insane. A minute and a half to go into a room to investigate a desk in an inn and then an additional 1 1/2 minutes to leave the room and then load to leave the inn???

And they never fixed it.

220°

Assassin’s Creed: Black Flag vs Skull and Bones Video Comparison Is an Eye-Opener

Ubisoft has just released Skull and Bones on PC and consoles. And, from the looks of it, the game wasn’t received well by some gamers. Not only that but it appears that Skull and Bones can be worse than Assassin’s Creed: Black Flag, a game that came out a decade ago.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
OtterX62d ago (Edited 62d ago )

I wanted a Black Flag sequel so bad. It's still my favorite AC entry. The fact that they ignored everything that we loved about that game in this "spiritual successor" is making me enjoy watching this game crash and burn quite a bit. Either do it right or don't do it at all. (I understand the legal binding they got themselves into with the Singapore government to release this game at all costs)

/grabs popcorn

isarai62d ago

My thing is, if the Singapore govt was forcing you to do it at all cost, why not make what people wanted? How did ubi delay it for 5yrs, then again for 1yr and not just make a similar experience to black flag? How do you spend so much time and make so little?

Chocoburger60d ago

Ubisoft did make a sequel, Assassin's Creed: Rogue. It has a short campaign, and its packed with filler side quests for upgrades, but it's still a decent time.

It released on the same day as Assassin's Creed: Unity, so it was mostly forgotten.

porkChop61d ago

11 years of development. Multiple restarts. All the while people have been saying they don't want some pirate game where you can't even get off your ship. 11 years of people telling Ubisoft all they want is a pirate game that's basically Black Flag without any of the assassin or animus stuff. Yet they still served up this trash that no one wanted, charged $70 for it, and had the balls to call it AAAA.

The Guillemot family honestly needs to be forced out of Ubisoft. They've doubled down on everything players don't like about their games, they want AI to create "rough drafts" of their stories rather than letting their writers do their jobs, and they literally do not give a shit what their playerbase actually wants. 5-6 years ago their stock was worth more than 4x what it's currently worth. The company is dying.

Jin_Sakai61d ago (Edited 61d ago )

What has happened to developers? How can you possible make a worse looking game 11 years later? It’s honestly mind boggling.

darksky61d ago

It's because the older developers were better at it. The new generation pass most of their exams by copying code from around the web so are not nearly as good at understanding what they are developing.

LucasRuinedChildhood61d ago (Edited 61d ago )

No, here's the truth:
https://www.channelnewsasia...
This was made in Singapore and it's the first game of this scale to be made there. Ubisoft would probably cancel it normally since it clearly wasn't shaping up well but they were getting government grants to try build up the industry there.

Do you really think game developers are radically different than just 10 years ago? And this game has been development since Black Flag released.

Using one crap game to trash a whole industry of developers is stupid. It's like saying "Alien Colonial Marines proves that game developers suck now."

yeahokwhatever60d ago

i know this to be at least part of the puzzle from experience.

senorfartcushion60d ago

It's the multiplayer aspect of the world. MP games look worse than single player games, period. Every comparison we keep seeing are for games like Gotham Knights, Suicide Squad and Skull and Bones. They all have multiplayer focusses.

SyntheticForm61d ago

God, I'd love a remake of Black Flag.

Yi-Long61d ago

Enough has been said about this game already. The gaming world shrugged when it was announced so many years ago, and instead of listening to all the criticisms from the community back then, Ubi just sailed on and kept making a game nobody really wanted. What a waste of money and effort.

Show all comments (16)