140°

Gamers petition to add bot support to MAG

Gamers are petitioning to add bot support to MAG, so far with 2 supporters.

Read Full Story >>
pixelenemy.com
SeanScythe3922d ago (Edited 3922d ago )

This game was a huge let down (for me) and I bought in day 1 thinking it was going to be awesome. Controls sucked, animations sucked, graphics decent, gameplay sucked, constant updates that made thing worse sucked. The game had promise but lacked the resources it needed from the developers. Zipper made awesome SOCOM's on PS2 but this game was horrible.

PS4>Xbone

ricochetmg3922d ago

I doubt you played this game and it's been changed since launch .

Hatsune-Miku3922d ago

I would like an upgraded version of m.a.g on ps4 with better graphics,animations and 60frames per second

SeanScythe3922d ago

You doubt I played this game? I even tried going back to it when they added move support(shutters) that was a waste of time.

Oh and just to put it in ur little face here is my trophy list for M.A.G. http://psnprofiles.com/Sean... So go suck on that.

CanadianTurtle3922d ago

Way to look smart by telling someone that they haven't played the game when you clearly don't know for sure

himdeel3922d ago

While I didn't get to play MAG I still like to play Socom 4 coop and hate that I wont be able to enjoy that game anymore.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3922d ago
MysticStrummer3922d ago

I have to disagree strongly. MAG was my favorite online FPS experience ever. At it's worst it was about like Call of Duty, just mindless run and gun, but at it's best there was nothing else like it.

I do think Zipper handled it badly though. Instead of DLC with new modes, they should have added maps to the existing modes and they should have done it for much cheaper, if not for free.

Sadly this petition has little hope no matter how many signatures it gets. Zipper is no more and Sony isn't likely to put a team together to make bots happen.

Hellsvacancy3922d ago (Edited 3922d ago )

It took me a little while to get into it, and although I do agree with "some" of SeanScythes comment, after spending a decent amount of time with MAG I came to really like it and disregarded the things I didn't like

Once I had found some other players to play with (my buddies weren't interested) the game really opened up

Played it for best part of a year

Crazay3922d ago

I agree with you. It was near impossible to get any real cohesion with so many people to come together as one team.

Caffo013922d ago

MAG was awesome, but the majority of players wasn't ready for such a tactical game.

SeanScythe3922d ago

Yeah maybe you are right, everyone when I played just ran off on their own. No one worked together, people would go all COD. It just needed more Development time, the game felt rushed even in the Beta when the game came out it felt like they didn't upgrade much from the beta to final release.

Ulf3922d ago (Edited 3922d ago )

13% trophies? I wouldn't call that playing it much, personally. I got 30% within a few days.

I think you probably didn't try it much past the first week, when people were still too inexperienced to really put some serious tactics into play.

Also, kinda looks like you like to snipe. I think sniper, as a role, is really only fun in a couple maps in MAG. If that's your gripe with it, then.. I suppose.

The whole game wasn't really about getting kills, though. Actual snipers play much more of a harassment and deterrent role in RL, and hence shouldn't have a large impact in MAG-like settings.

SeanScythe3922d ago

Wow really you are nit-picking my player choice and the amount of trophies I have for the game? 3 of my friends had the game we played the crap out of the game. The same month this game came out so did the GOW collection, followed by Bad Company 2. I dropped the game pretty quick since it didn't keep my interest. Again I did try going back to the game but it still never held me long with the Load times and poor controls.

Ulf3922d ago (Edited 3922d ago )

I didn't pick at your selection of play style, I merely stated that, if you are a dedicated sniper, then yeah, that was probably the sole role that wasn't very fun. And yeah, 13% is weak.. again, sorry, but that's the truth.

CoD is for snipers. Sorry, but its true. As far as I'm concerned, sniper was the one boring role in MAG. The field was littered with cover, and getting headshots in those huge battlefields was fairly hard when you had 32-128 enemy scopes looking in your direction constantly. If you don't get any fun out of any other kind of shooter role, then I think I can understand why you didn't like it.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3922d ago
ForgottenProphecy3922d ago

Thank you, Pixelenemy for supporting my petition!

Fishermenofwar3922d ago

Is this game still alive online? I started it but just never got into it...

I still have the physical disk...Should I log back in and check it out?

ForgottenProphecy3922d ago

It's alive, but it takes a bit to get into a game.

N2NOther3922d ago

It's only alive for another 6 months. Sony is shutting down the servers.

kraideral3922d ago

Sony will shut their servers down so, yeah....

Show all comments (36)
470°

MAG was one of the most ambitious shooters ever and deserves a PS5 sequel

Zipper Interactive were once one of Sony's most important studios and became a household name due to their work on the SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs series during the PlayStation 2's heyday. Their most ambitious title was MAG. Could it make a comeback?

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
yellowgerbil1542d ago

Best game ever. I had put over 1700hrs into that game before it deteriorated too far with cheaters getting out of the map and sadly decided it was time to let it die (Zipper had already been closed down by that time).

_SilverHawk_1542d ago

Amazing game. Hopefully sony makes a sequel

XisThatKid1542d ago

This is the game in modern gaming that even got me into shooters i spent literally days with this game Raven All the way. War against the the mighty D ride oh so edgy S.V.E.R.

NecrumOddBoy1542d ago

Original Battle Royale. No microtransactions. Definitely ahead of time.

XBox4eva691542d ago

It's almost as far from battle royale as you can get. o_O

frostypants1542d ago

It didn't have a BR mode.

Da12RespectA1541d ago

That wasn't a battle royale game at all.

rdgneoz31541d ago

3 teams of 32 fighting it out would be considered Battle Royaleish. If you're gonna saying teams are OK when you start doing teams of 2 or 3 or 4, then 32v32v32 should work. And on besides that, it had 128 v 128 which was insanely fun.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1541d ago
Muzikguy1542d ago (Edited 1542d ago )

I personally hadn't played much of it. I did spend a lot of time in PlanetSide 2 though (somewhat like MAG). Games like these tend to get overrun by cheaters and then ruined too often.

Teflon021542d ago

MAG didn't have that issue as far as I remember. I use to love the 256 matches. That game had an amazing community. Everyone actually communicated and played together. No one B****ed at the team. Everyone understood there was so much going on that if things are going wrong. Everyone had to think of new strategies.
Fav moment was when all 3 other squads 32 took their objectives but we were struggling with ours and had one more to blow up. The other leaders were communicating asking if the 2 nearest squads should send ppl. Our leader was like Naw I got a idea. So he told us all to die and set ourselves at the nearest hills prone without being seen. So we all did and surrounded the areas.
He said everyone on his count throw your grenades. Then snipers go all out and everyone else run in. They won't be able to get everyone and if needed the snipers go in about 10 seconds after.

Everyone did that and I got to the objective and set it off. 9 of us survived and got it. felt amazing to say I got the objective, cover me in that moment. Wish it was PS4 so I could have saved that moment
It was literally the coolest moment I had in a online shooter, closest since was BF4.

Muzikguy1542d ago

@Teflon

That does indeed sound like an awesome moment. One that makes games like these memorable for sure. It does seem like MAG had a lot more cooperation than most any online shooter

Teflon021541d ago

It did because you absolutely can't get no where in it without teamwork. It also didn't have an extremely big base of players. Everyone who played really wanted to play. I really hope they bring it back and do the same thing to only have serious players get into the big matches again

UltraNova1542d ago

Wow, what a run! This game looks better than PUBG!

Muzikguy1542d ago

Watching that video you wouldn't think the game was on PS3.

Spenok1542d ago

I adored this game too. Some of my best FPS online memories on it. So freaking good.

I'd love to see another game like this come out at some point. And NOT like Planetside... M.A.G. was something special.

yellowgerbil1542d ago

Yeah problem is if it existed now adays, it would likely be riddled with xp boosts and dance moves and all that other pay garbage...
MAG and Warhawk are the only 2 online games I ever got into, and both need a PROPER sequel on PS5.
Remember the first time I got 100 kills in a match, was in a turret with a repair kit and just mowed down wave after wave on Valors map.

1541d ago Replies(1)
1540d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1540d ago
PrinceOfAnger1542d ago

I had so much fun with this game

TGGJustin1542d ago

This is a game that was ahead of its time. Had it came out on PS4 it would've done much better. I put hundreds of hours into this despite the problems it had on PS3.

UnholyLight1542d ago

Really interesting as an Xbox owner at the time. This game had captured my interest as a kid but I never got a chance to play it. Being on PS4 and soon possibly PS5, I would love to see this franchise brought back to life. I imagine with the power of next gen it would be really quite fun.

From what I hear and what I remember, this game was FAR ahead of it's time. A real shame it never truly took off from my understanding.

grifter0241542d ago

I'm an xbox boy since mech warrior but got a ps3 slim for mag. If you liked halo or cod you'd have had a blast in mag. Was one of the first games you could actually do something other than shooting and still make a difference in game.

spicelicka1541d ago

PS4 needs something like it. In the multiplayer space it's far behind the Xbox, there are no quality multiplayer games on it that aren't on other consoles.

Dirtnapstor1542d ago

Yes, yes, and yes. Way ahead of it's time. Would love to see a PS5 variant of this game.

Show all comments (100)
120°

Modern Warfare Ground War mode has MAG vibes

Erina Rose, Sausage Roll writes, "Call of Duty: Modern War introduced a new, improved, Ground War game mode this weekend that reminds us of the old PlayStation 3 classic, MAG."

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
ilikestuff1667d ago (Edited 1667d ago )

I never played mag, I did play this beta however, and if mag was like this beta then (fart noises) for mag.

1667d ago
TheGamez1001667d ago

Man do I miss mag and zipper.

TheSinsibleOne1667d ago

Seriously though. Nowadays this and next gen are practically begging for a new MAG.

zodiac9091667d ago

How did we go from having games like resistance 1, 2, warhawk with 30 vs 30 player battles, and M.A.G. with 128 vs 128 players, ON LAST GEN to now having 20 vs 20...such a step back.

JEECE1667d ago

Because Sony hadn't figured out how to market their exclusives yet. Plus at that time COD craze was at its peak. So "generic high school bro #7," who was the primary purchaser of FPSs at that time (or at least represented a crowd necessary to sustain a playerbase), if he even had a PS3, would have just seen a game like MAG as a "copycat of Black Ops, man."

Not to mention MAG was pretty terribly uninviting for new people after awhile, because it was more skill-based. This was great for veterans, but if you weren't willing to put in the time getting destroyed for awhile, you would never appreciate the game. The Battlefield: Bad Company and BF:3 games out during that gen were far more accessible to lower level players.

Vegamyster1667d ago

Battlefield 4 was at the start of the generation and had 64 players, to me it depends more on how the map/gameplay is utilized, i enjoyed the 20vs20 modes more in the MW Beta than the 64 player ground war mode.

1667d ago
moomoo3191667d ago

It feels absolutely nothing like MAG lol. Way more battlefield vibes

xX-oldboy-Xx1666d ago

And even those are very small vibes, it still feels like COD at the end of the day.

390°

MAG: The Greatest Game You Never Played

Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out and most of you probably never heard of it, never got to play it and never will.

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
FiLTHY ESKiMO1786d ago

Who would the next gen version nor that Zippers gone?

_SilverHawk_1786d ago

I remember this game and it was amazing. I would like it if Sony would make another one because this game was ahead of it's time.

RememberThe3571785d ago

It was an amazing concept and it was a cool game, it was just ahead of it's time. I played the sh!t outta MAG, but the game itself played just okay. I'd love to have seen a sequel, even just a spiritual successor, especially with the next gen coming and the way cloud computing has advanced a game like that nowadays would be awesome.

Elwenil1785d ago

It may have been amazing if you played for SVER, but if you played for Raven or Valor, it was an unbalanced mess. I had some fun with it, but the player count was an illusion at best and false advertising at it's worst. The map and faction balance was so ridiculously skewed you knew who was going to win as soon as you saw what team you were against. It definitely had some interesting ideas, but was far from an amazing experience in my opinion. I would have much rather Zipper have made another SOCOM game rather than MAG.

darthv721785d ago

that game would make for a great battle royale release. So many players all at once... it was ahead of its time for a console shooter.

TheGamez1001786d ago

Was such an underrated game. One of my most favorite fps of last gen. So unfortunate zipper was closed down. Imagine if it was a success and thered be a 2nd game by now.....

TekoIie1786d ago (Edited 1786d ago )

I can think of many better games that I've yet to play...

"Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out"

HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better. I'm afraid that MAG is basically your standard FPS but uses scale as it's selling point. The vast majority of shooters that focus on smaller scale matches have gameplay leaps and bounds better than MAG so it is definitely not the greatest FPS.

I know many people are going to try and refute this by telling me to look at the three factions but MAG has literally no character. The game is call 'Massive. Action. Game' for gods sake which is a contender for 'The Worst Title a Game Could Have' award. I've never been a fan of Zipper but I hear great things about them from their PS2 days. However, with MP gaining popularity in the generation that followed I think it says a lot that they couldn't keep up with the competition.

Knushwood Butt1786d ago

'HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better.'.

It was released years later.

Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?

TekoIie1786d ago

"Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?"

Yes, Planetside 1.

Knushwood Butt1786d ago

Fair enough.

Can't say I've played it, but I enjoyed MAG for a while.

FantasticBoss1785d ago

MAG was one of the very few games trying to do scale like it did, but I think it missed the mark. Wish it could have had a sequel though as they may have been able to iterate on it to create something pretty neat.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1785d ago
Profchaos1784d ago

Sony had a awesome approach to online in the PS2 days with SOCOM co op that had games working together to achieve a tactical goal they pioneered voice chat on the PS2 for SOCOM but as they steamrolled ahead it was clear team Deathmatch would take over in popularity which shifted zippers approach so all their experience amounted for not much when designing online in the PS3 era.
It still was a decent game but couldn't stand out compared to cod which had millions of players consistently

yellowgerbil1786d ago

Loved mag had over 1700hrs into it across many accounts, remember my first 100 kill sabotage game, was insane

BLow1785d ago

Yes, so do I and not that game they released on PS3. I'm talking the one Zipper did and not Slant Six. At least Slant Six tried to do the series justice once they fixed the issues.

The one Zipper did didn't feel like Socom to me. It felt more like Ghost Recon to be honest. I absolutely loved the voice commands and I figured they would be even better on next gen hardware. They didn't even bother doing anything.

Maybe, I just wanted it more grounded and not so techy if that makes sense. I just wanted to go into jungles or missions just using my wits and patience and not have to use a bunch of gadgets. I wanted to be able to give orders with my voice to squad members. Yeah, they can at least have earpieces lol.

It's hard to explain but I know the old school Socom players know what I'm saying. Socom just had a certain feeling and the new game didn't feel that way. Slant Six yes. Zipper no...

We can only hope but if they bring it back they have to do it right. If not don't bother and just make something new. I rather have the memories I had with Socom be mostly positive than negative. Unless you pull a God of War, don't bother lol.

I've already said too much but that goes to show how much I loved Socom. Especially 1 and 2.....

Deathdeliverer1785d ago (Edited 1785d ago )

Game was simply ahead of its time. If mag came out now with improved graphics people would be blown away. Back then people whined about the graphics even though it had players literally everywhere. It was several great games in one. Battlefield, Ghost Recon, and Call of duty.

Hungryalpaca1785d ago

What exactly was it ahead of its time in? Player count? Planetside released in 2003 and and played count per match was over 300.

xkvcq1784d ago (Edited 1784d ago )

The BETA for MAG was one of my fondest gaming moments. I was highly anticipating the start of the beta servers but I had school that day. I had started downloading it that morning as soon as it was available and just when it finished downloading I found out school was cancelled, last minute, because of weather. BEST. SNOW DAY. EVER. I played the beta all day, continuing to put off my homework :P

TekoIie1784d ago (Edited 1784d ago )

Well have I got news for you pal! Planetside 2 has been available for nearly 4 years on the PS4 and longer on PC and people still aren't blown away. Maybe the novelty of scale is actually overrated and people don't care as much about it which is why MAG failed when multiplayer shooters were at peak popularity during it's lifetime?

If you were blown away by 256 players in 2010 why would you not have been blown away by 1000 roughly 2-3 years later?

Show all comments (84)