140°

Has Assassin's Creed Gone Wrong?

When the first Assassin’s creed released for consoles in 2007 the game didn’t fail to disappoint. The inherent repetitiveness of the mission structure and gameplay left many gamers wanting more. A game that clearly had so much potential didn’t live up to the expectations that the hype had brought it. Enter Assassin’s Creed II: a game that arguably should have been what the first Assassin’s Creed wasn’t, it made so many radical changes to the series that everyone wanted. It ditched the bad, built on the good, and made a world that felt so real.

Read Full Story >>
jumptogamer.com
Kanzes3921d ago

It should be "Pirate's Creed" than Assassin's Creed

iamnsuperman3921d ago (Edited 3921d ago )

I feel Assasin's creed has gone too far left field. AC1 was dodgy at best but vastly improved into AC2 and AC:B since then it has a bit of a weird identity crises for AC series. AC Revelation (I did like by the way) had some weird additions like tower defence and AC3 was just pure wrong for the series. The series just didn't fit in that world and adding to that the awful voice acting just made the game feel wooden and empty. It wasn't an AC game (I was generous in my review giving it an 8). The only thing I really can praise AC3 for is making the Templars more appealing (should have done that from the beginning) but again this wasn't fully played out

Now we have Black flag which is (like Kanzes said above) more Pirate's Creed than Assassin's Creed. The AC series had so much potential by weaving a conspiracy story in real life events but they have failed to capitalise on this and have created a B rated movie style story with random adventures between the big releases.

They need to reboot it, sit down, plan the story from the beginning and not add story related stuff later on just to pad things out because at the moment it is poorly done.

KwietStorm_BLM3921d ago

I agree with everything you said verbatim. It's actually almost weird how exact I've said the same thing to my friends. It's not like it's a 'bad' series, but they lost focus when it turned into a yearly thing, and it's just all over the place now.

theWB273921d ago (Edited 3921d ago )

I too agree...but not with the reboot part. The stories didn't fall off too much either. I was actually very into the modern aspect of AC3, but that ending killed it. It was worse than the Mass Effect ending.

BTW..the yearly release isn't like a Madden yearly release. These teams are getting 2 and 3 years to work on the next game.

http://www.pcgamer.com/2013...

I am admittedly a little biased...it's my favorite franchise by far : )

Brasi19893921d ago

Huh, while Assassins Creed 3 was my game in the series I thoroughly enjoyed it (WiiU version). I did feel that Connor felt a generally generic character and feel they wasted a ton of potential due to the time period and his heritage. He just seemed to simple to have much appeal. So I agree that Connor was dull and his father more appeal i cannot comment on the other aspects of the nonrecurring games being better, but I can attest to the amount of joy I had while playing AC3.

P.S. I also agree the Desmond section was atrocious.

starchild3920d ago

I completely disagree. In my opinion each entry in the series has surpassed the previous. Assassin's Creed 3 was the best game in the series, not only in terms of game mechanics, but also in spectacle and narrative.

Einhert3921d ago

the story probably would have been better for the series if they had just actually had it take place in those time periods. The desmond sections are pretty bad.

AC3 went wrong with its story but mainly the main character was a chore to play as.

I have never felt so disconnected and disenchanted with a character before. Connor was a total and utter bore while his dad was by far the more interesting character and should have been the playable character the whole way through.

MajorLazer3921d ago

Agreed. Haytham was so amazing to play as and then the focus shifted to Connor

starchild3920d ago

I don't understand that at all. Connor was a very cool character to me. It seems like some of you have a problem playing as a native american character.

Einhert3920d ago (Edited 3920d ago )

way to assume it is a race issue

First of all, I am Irish so why would I ever have a problem with native Americans? I'm not some american yokel.

And he was flatline, boring and he completely lacked any emotion even in his supposed tragic scenes.

He just was not interesting and every piece if dialogue he had was just focused on one thing and he didn't display much of any intelligence so there was nothing there to make him likeable.

But don't listen to reason or me, just assume I have a problem with playing as other ethnic groups.

GameCents3921d ago

It all went downhill after Brotherhood, which was a slight downgrade from II in my opinion.

Sidewinder-3921d ago

Only cattle will willingly buy this game.

3921d ago Replies(1)
Heisenburger3920d ago

Or fans of Moby Dick.

I want to hunt, chase, defeat, and be defeated by some whales.

Plus I am terrified of open water. That screenshot of that shark attacking the boat got me excited.

My phobias incarnate.

Very exciting

Show all comments (31)
120°

Leaked Early Prototype Footage Reveals Development Stages Of Several Assassin's Creed Games

Prototype footage from several of Ubisoft's Assassin's Creed titles has leaked, revealing early stages of their development.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
90°

The Best Pirate-Themed Video Games (Not Skull and Bones)

BY JASON MONROE: The very best pirate-themed video games that you should play instead of the disappointment that is Skull and Bones.

Read Full Story >>
growngaming.com
thorstein45d ago

PoE: Deadfire, Unless you have a or PS5 or an SSD don't bother, loading times are insane. A minute and a half to go into a room to investigate a desk in an inn and then an additional 1 1/2 minutes to leave the room and then load to leave the inn???

And they never fixed it.

220°

Assassin’s Creed: Black Flag vs Skull and Bones Video Comparison Is an Eye-Opener

Ubisoft has just released Skull and Bones on PC and consoles. And, from the looks of it, the game wasn’t received well by some gamers. Not only that but it appears that Skull and Bones can be worse than Assassin’s Creed: Black Flag, a game that came out a decade ago.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
OtterX59d ago (Edited 59d ago )

I wanted a Black Flag sequel so bad. It's still my favorite AC entry. The fact that they ignored everything that we loved about that game in this "spiritual successor" is making me enjoy watching this game crash and burn quite a bit. Either do it right or don't do it at all. (I understand the legal binding they got themselves into with the Singapore government to release this game at all costs)

/grabs popcorn

isarai59d ago

My thing is, if the Singapore govt was forcing you to do it at all cost, why not make what people wanted? How did ubi delay it for 5yrs, then again for 1yr and not just make a similar experience to black flag? How do you spend so much time and make so little?

Chocoburger57d ago

Ubisoft did make a sequel, Assassin's Creed: Rogue. It has a short campaign, and its packed with filler side quests for upgrades, but it's still a decent time.

It released on the same day as Assassin's Creed: Unity, so it was mostly forgotten.

porkChop58d ago

11 years of development. Multiple restarts. All the while people have been saying they don't want some pirate game where you can't even get off your ship. 11 years of people telling Ubisoft all they want is a pirate game that's basically Black Flag without any of the assassin or animus stuff. Yet they still served up this trash that no one wanted, charged $70 for it, and had the balls to call it AAAA.

The Guillemot family honestly needs to be forced out of Ubisoft. They've doubled down on everything players don't like about their games, they want AI to create "rough drafts" of their stories rather than letting their writers do their jobs, and they literally do not give a shit what their playerbase actually wants. 5-6 years ago their stock was worth more than 4x what it's currently worth. The company is dying.

Jin_Sakai58d ago (Edited 58d ago )

What has happened to developers? How can you possible make a worse looking game 11 years later? It’s honestly mind boggling.

darksky57d ago

It's because the older developers were better at it. The new generation pass most of their exams by copying code from around the web so are not nearly as good at understanding what they are developing.

LucasRuinedChildhood57d ago (Edited 57d ago )

No, here's the truth:
https://www.channelnewsasia...
This was made in Singapore and it's the first game of this scale to be made there. Ubisoft would probably cancel it normally since it clearly wasn't shaping up well but they were getting government grants to try build up the industry there.

Do you really think game developers are radically different than just 10 years ago? And this game has been development since Black Flag released.

Using one crap game to trash a whole industry of developers is stupid. It's like saying "Alien Colonial Marines proves that game developers suck now."

yeahokwhatever57d ago

i know this to be at least part of the puzzle from experience.

senorfartcushion57d ago

It's the multiplayer aspect of the world. MP games look worse than single player games, period. Every comparison we keep seeing are for games like Gotham Knights, Suicide Squad and Skull and Bones. They all have multiplayer focusses.

SyntheticForm58d ago

God, I'd love a remake of Black Flag.

Yi-Long58d ago

Enough has been said about this game already. The gaming world shrugged when it was announced so many years ago, and instead of listening to all the criticisms from the community back then, Ubi just sailed on and kept making a game nobody really wanted. What a waste of money and effort.

Show all comments (16)