390°

Call of Duty Ghosts: “We Don’t Want To Go Into The Open-World Idea”

As if previous titles in the series didn’t prove it enough, Infinity Ward’s upcoming Call of Duty: Ghosts will be quite linear in its approach – or at least it is judging by gameplay footage we’ve seen thus far.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
US8F3929d ago

Yup, ofcrouse, they are the fathers of rehash. It takes effort to do something like that and they don't know what that word means. They have amazing marketing compaigns but other than that, it is the same game over and over and over again. AND NO!, making fish move and having a dog is not good enough"

MWong3928d ago

It's soooo sad. I cannot believe they haven't really done anything new for COD. Just upgraded one or two things and call it "NEXT-GEN." COD cannot do "open-world" they would have to add additional substance to the game. Meaning BF has been open world because of all the additional elements it brings (tanks, jets, choppers ... etc) to the table.

BF4 here I come.

SirKilla3923d ago

Cod is like a hotdog... How many ways can you serve it up.
Catsup and mustard one time... Relish the next.
But there is one thing that always comes with it:
Pore hit detection and a client side server.
You want to surprise us! Designate your servers!

SirKilla3922d ago (Edited 3922d ago )

My opinion I don't think people are not looking for game designers to re-invent the wheel but to improve it.

example: take any of the more recent cod games and just simply improve the Hit Detection because as it stands now! Cod has the worst hit detection in the industry! The title they stole from cliffy's gears 1 & 2 but not 3. Designated servers rock!

It would make my heart ha ha happy if they re-did cod mwf 1 or 2 with more maps and content with Designated servers.

Ghost recon made changes to there last title and it sucked. They should of stuck to their original hard core game play!

SuperLupe3929d ago

Not every game has to be open world. You are the very first bunch of people that will be complaining about "open world fatigue" in a couple of years.

I see its the trend now to go open world, most of the best games this gen were linear games. Both can co-exist perfectly. I hope Infinty Ward aren't the only ones not to jump on the open world band wagon.

elhebbo163929d ago

how the hell is open world bad? it gives a game more replay ability and more options on how to tackle a certain objective. that alone makes the game good, add in a great stoy and now you have the best of both worlds.

US8F3929d ago (Edited 3929d ago )

Open world simply presents more options, that's it. There is no such thing as open world Fatigue, lol. You can do all kind of games in open world for example:

First person shooters (ex. far cry 3)

Third person(ex. GTA series)

Rpg (ex. Witcher 3, Skyrim )

Puzzle (ex. the witness)

Simulation (ex. minecraft)

Racing(ex. the crew)

etc etc etc.

More options is better. Honestly, if you want to tackle a game straight on, you do main missions and get on with it but if you want to mess around on the side, then all power to you.

This will not only increase their fan base because it will cater to many different players, but I can see them make more money. However, we know they wont do this because when you look at the content they add year over year, they don't spend much to make, and they get heaps in return. That is what a successful business is, spend as less as possible, while making loads of cash. This franchise would need to take a fall before they stop rehashing but we know that it will be a long while yet.

bjmartynhak3929d ago

Totally agree.

I'm not fond of open world games and also agree that the best games we had were linear (for example: MGS4, Uncharted, Bioshock, Last of US).

JessiePinkmanYo3929d ago

SuperLupe-I know, right?! Pretty soon game developers will have us playing linear games with the same engine and rehashed storyline, add a few different maps and remixed old ones. They will even have the nerve to charge a premium for said named map (COUGH of Duty)
I like CoD AND Battlefield but the formula is getting old. Just imagine a CoD game with an open world, doing vigilante missions complete with destructible environments. This formula WAS done a few years back and the game was a hit (Mercenaries on PS2) the 2nd one was trash, but it's a step in the right direction. Seriously-if I have to play anymore as David Mason in a linear world, I'm gonna get PTSD myself.

sobekflakmonkey3929d ago (Edited 3929d ago )

I know all of you hate CoD and everything but uhhh....I have to agree, at E3 there were quite a few open world games, and when it comes down to it, it's hard to play multiple open world games back to back, I noticed one of you said something a long the lines of "Just play the main storyline" well...as a GAMER that's a little hard to do, you always wanna play as much of the game as possible, also one of you said "there is no such thing as open world fatigue", that's a lie, there is, can you imagine playing 40+ hours in an open world game for EVERY game, its too much, I personally like a linear game, the story is usually better put together in those cases, and a lot more cinematic for that matter, I was actually quite displeased with all the open world games that have been shown, the only ones im really interested in are "The Division" and "Destiny", the new MGS looks good, but I can't imagine playing all these games around the same time, not to mention you don't need an open world game to get more from a game, the perfect example is MGS4, that game was super long but linear, and there was a lot of content there, same goes for The Last of Us, took me 12 hours to beat on my first playthrough, and thats a linear game, I personally would not be happy with pretty much every game being open world because it would indeed cause fatigue.

Heartnet3929d ago

Agreed

In theory and from Adverts open world games seem more fun but then when you get into it its get old real fast...

open world games are big for the sake of being big with nothing interesting between points and even if there is there can only be so much and then it will get the same events over and over and will just be a grind

karl3929d ago

open world is one of the worst things that can happen to storytelling..

it can be done properly like in GTA or Fallout .. and oblivion like others..

but this games are quite particular and wont always be the case...

thehitman3928d ago

I agree @ super. I dont think open world is good for all games infact I prefer linear games for most genres including shooters. It is not easy to tie story in especially shooters when you have an open world game everything needs to be accounted for its harder to transition the story especially if your going from 1 geographical area to the next which most shooters do.

I am not defending COD but I think to demand they should be doing open world is kinda foolish since I think they did a great job for their campaigns. Their multiplayer is what I have grown a problem with.

Leave open world to the studios that excel at it the best and leave the linear gameplay to the companies that are good at it. I like both and I dont want to see either dominate in games where only 1 type is now being made. Couldnt imagine how different UC,GoW or various other games would be. I like sometimes the endless action and the game driving the story sometimes.

SilentNegotiator3928d ago (Edited 3928d ago )

"how the hell is open world bad?"

I've read Superlupe's comment 5 times. No where does it say or suggest that "open world is bad"

People are going to blindly disagree with him because he agreed with an idea presented by the game community's perceived Satan - anyone related to COD - but it's true; Not everything has to be open world.

Blachek3928d ago (Edited 3928d ago )

The issue with the franchise is stagnation, they need to introduce a new game mechanic that makes the game more valuable.

*edit* They don't necessarily need to introduce a full open-world, but they need to at least make an attempt to create a new experience... and this article illustrated how steadfast they are against change.

Playing a game on varying difficulties isn't a reason for many people to play a game again.

They won't change their approach to this open world idea because they know their strength is in linear maps, with cinematic set pieces... they cannot compete or come close to replicating what Dice has done with Battlefield.

An open world Call of Duty would draw a substantial amount of interest from those of us who ignore the yearly installments. Infinity Ward is great with characters, and implementing an open world would allow them to convey them to us while giving them an opportunity to show us how good they are at multi-level story telling.

I don't think they are talented enough to do it, they haven't done anything exciting since the original Modern Warfare.

But hey, here's to Titan Fall =)

joefrost003928d ago

Its funny killzone on 4 and nobody complaining about them rehashing the same thing

webeblazing3928d ago

yeah alot of people is jumping on the bandwagon. its especially funny seeing how a lot of people use to criticize a lot of sony 1st party game because they were linear and not open world.

but we all know Infinity Ward are using this as a escape goat activision pump so much rehash they should be a recycling company. i wonder if want to make a open world game of any other type of game for that matter

SirKilla3922d ago

I don't care about most changes.
Just get the hit detection fixed.
If gears of war can do it then so can you greedy pigs.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 3922d ago
CrossingEden3929d ago

if you don't think that they work hard on these games then you are the person who doesn't know what hard work means -_- game development is hard and takes a ****load of effort, PERIOD

Blankolf3929d ago (Edited 3929d ago )

Don't you dare saying they work hard, I see game developers busting theire ass off, remaking game engines in 1 to 2 years and overhauling and improving games in such way that is beyond recognition.

No sir, you do not have the right to say this campaign marketering champions bust their ass off to make a decent game, they are lazy as fuck, game developing is hard, but I don't see game developers that work the same time and with much much much better results complaining or adding dogs or fish technology that has been around since Mario 64...

HammadTheBeast3929d ago

You're so bad at trolling, give it a rest. Mika hasn't taught you well.

2/10 and that's being generous.

sevilha823929d ago

Do you even play other games besides cod?

Because if you do,you should have noticed by now the abismal diference in quality between other companys that really try to make good games,dev´s like CD Project Red,R*,Naughty Dogs,Dice,Guerrila,Quantic Dream,Bungie,Ubisoft,etc..etc. ..

Dev´s that give all they have,in man power,know how,and most importat love for the trade.

Cod was awesome,Cod was king back when they where led by people that had this kind of sense and love for the game and now that they are gonne all you have is a reash of a greedy corp of a game.open your eyes,play something else and enjoy a lot more games,real games.

I´m only sorry that Bungie also responds to Activision let´s hope Destany prevail in the next years.

CrossingEden3929d ago

Regardless of the quality of other games, (saying that CoD isn't high quality is definitely denial, it may not be innovative or mind blowing but the quality is definitely high), people who say "oh these game developers are so lazy" are idiots, let me enlighten you people from an animation, game design ,and film major
-@blankolf NO game company creates a completely new engine in two years that wasn't already being worked on before, and just because the cod developers don't work AS HARD, as other developers, does not mean that they don't work hard, making games, especially triple A games is not in any way shape or form easy no matter how many shortcuts you take
-@hammadthebeast, oh i'm sorry, I forgot that calling idiots out on being uniformed keyboard warriors who have never met a game developer, been to a game development studio, and haven't even taken a class on the subject matter but make assumptions about the amount of work it takes and have the audacity to call triple A studios who are more talented then they will ever be, makes me a troll
-@sevilha82, I have not bought a CoD game in the past three years, just because I don't like the series doesn't mean that i'm immature enough to say that they don't work hard to deliver them to us, when each person at that studio has done a ****load more work than I or ANY OF YOU have ever done in your life

Blachek3928d ago (Edited 3928d ago )

Game development is difficult... unless,

-You recycle the Game Engine
-Employ the same Plot Structure
-Re-skin maps

They need minimal level designers, developers, programmers, or writers... they re-shade the game and introduce gimmicks.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3928d ago
MizTv3929d ago

it looks like alot of next-gen games are going open world
i think cod just cant pull it off

ape0073929d ago

CoD will never work in open world settings, not everything has to be open world, gta is my fav but open world settiung would ruin some games like if gta turned linear

it doesn't always work

if u want to innovate cod, let there be multuple mission routs, let or right, underwater or above it, airplane, tank, on foot etc...

Heartnet3929d ago

doenst need to... would ruin the franchise by making it open world... game doesnt fit that style of play

quenomamen3929d ago

Well when ur making games for shot talking 14 year old males, you really dont have to do much to impress them.

Donnieboi3929d ago

Open world would require more work. And clearly Activision's studios do not like to work.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney3928d ago

“We Don’t Want To Go Into The Open-World Idea”

yeah to much work for them.

lol

solidt123928d ago

I bet they are just using that excuse because they are being lazy for now and just trying to get those Cross gen sales. I bet once the PS4 and Xbox One sales get in the million and they sell more on those platforms they will change there tune and act like Open World is the next big thing when everybody else have already been doing more open games.

Tales RPG addict3928d ago

the stupidity of COD fans is mindblowing.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3922d ago
Mr_Nuts3929d ago

Because they wouldn't be able to do it even if they tried

Too much hard work for them

ShugaCane3929d ago

So much words to say that they never intended to venture into new horizons and brnig a fresh approach to the series. Too much money is at stake, I guess.

Heartnet3929d ago

This statement is as obvious as saying GTA is never going to go linear world..

People shouldnt have been even asking this question :L and people shouldnt be surprised when they said they wouldnt as it makes absoloutely no sense to change a series for no reason and would possibly ruin it

wishingW3L3929d ago

making an open world it's too much work for them, especially when they sell 20 millions every year with rehashes.

Show all comments (104)
190°

All Call of Duty Games Ranked from Worst to Best

BLG writes: "Call of Duty has to be the most recognizable franchise on the planet. They didn’t get that way by only making a handful of games.

COD has a long and storied career. Launching as a PC WW2 first-person shooter, Call of Duty has gone through numerous makeovers and been on just about every system. The series has gone through some serious highs and tragic lows. I’ll be looking at each Call of Duty game, the good the bad, and the ugly."

Read Full Story >>
bosslevelgamer.com
UnSelf790d ago

Vanguard better be at the fkn bottom. Can’t believe ppl haven’t eviscerated that game with all its lacking

Minimoth790d ago

Yeah, it's close to the bottom. There are a couple of worse ones. Infinite Warfare definitely deserves its place.

KyRo790d ago

There's a number a lot worse than Vangaurd. It's also a lot better than that car crash Treyarch released before it.

XbladeTeddy789d ago

World at War is my favourite. Didn't know the N-Gage had a Call of Duty.

MadLad789d ago

Same for me.
I was never huge into Call of Duty, but I sunk a lot of time into WaW.
Both the campaign and the multiplayer are on point. Wouldn't mind a remaster.

I quit on CoD for a long while. Though I'm the odd man out that actually really enjoyed the campaign for WWII, being I got it through Humble monthly way back when.

TheLigX789d ago

I really enjoyed the Infinite campaign. Multiplayer... not so much.

Yppupdam789d ago

I agree, The Infinite campaign feels more like it's own thing that they slapped the CoD name on. If it stood on it's own, (sans the CoD name) I think it could have been it's own scifi franchise. And a damn good looking game, to boot. I never bothered to play the multiplayer.

victorMaje789d ago

MW 2019 apart from the desastrous file sizes is way better than AW.

MadLad789d ago

That was one I grabbed for Playstation because it pretty much just came out during the Redbox purge of videogames, and I got it for dirt cheap.

It was great coming home to an update every night, and watching one game eat up almost half my console's memory.

Amplitude789d ago (Edited 789d ago )

Will get disagrees but Infinite Warfare campaign was really good. Decent story, set pieces were amazing and if it didn't have the CoD game on it I'm sure people would have been more into it. Advanced Warfare was alright too. Titanfall 2 was just 1000 times better than both but I enjoyed them for their campaigns. I literally barely gaf about the story I'm in it for the set pieces and 5 hours of being stoned watching cool nonsense happen if I'm in the mood to play a CoD campaign. If I'm looking for a deep plot I'm gonna go somewhere else.
Ghosts was the worst story-wise though lol that cliffhanger ending was so bs.

Also MW 2019 was sick and is one of the best CoD games in yeeeears not sure why it's so low on this dude's list. Campaign was great, multiplayer was great and Warzone was fun for a while. Over it now but shrugs.

Beat the Vanguard campaign too but I can't even remember a single thing about it other than that it felt like it was 45 minutes long. Might be the most forgettable thing I've ever played lol just fully erased from my brain

Show all comments (17)
90°

Call of Duty Multiplayer This Decade Ranked (2010-2019)

Call of Duty multiplayer ranked from worst to best! 2019 is coming to a close and MP1st ranks the best COD multiplayer games this decade.

100°

Ray Tracing in Monster Hunter World, Deus Ex Mankind Divided, Watch_Dogs 2, COD: Ghosts & more

DSOGaming writes: "YouTube’s members Benchmark PC Tech, Jose cangrejo, WillTalksTech, Zetman and MissinInAction have published some videos, showing Monster Hunter World, Black Mesa Xen, Watch_Dogs 2, Call of Duty Ghosts, Need For Speed Hot Pursuit, The Sinking City, Remember Me, Deus Ex Mankind Divided and Dishonored 2 with the ray tracing/path tracing effects that Pascal Gilcher’s Reshade mod introduces."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
Pyroxfaglover1751d ago

Wore implementation I've ever seen,.. guess it just does not work all that great on every engine

MarkyMark891751d ago (Edited 1751d ago )

Agree, but this gives me hope that one day Ray Tracing can be a software based feature and not require some type of proprietary hardware to achieve. Software will always outpace Hardware so it could happen, but I feel like its going to take a lot more time to achieve the same level that RTX has already shown glimpses of so far. Really just waiting for Cyberpunk to see if RTX is actually something viable. I think if anybody can truly showcase RTX Features it would be Projekt Red.

zeal0us1751d ago

Too bad it doesn't make Mankind Divided a better game.

starchild1751d ago

It doesn't need to, the game was already fantastic, imo.

zeal0us1750d ago

Human Revolution was a better game and not to mention longer.

isarai1751d ago

Reshade is not raytracing, its a screen space post processing effect. Thats like calling SSAO "global illumination"