160°

Forza 5′s Xbox One tech explained by Turn 10

Forza 5 will be the sexiest racer ever. Dan Greenawalt explains to VG247′s Sam Clay where all of the tech wizardry comes from, and how Xbox One’s clout makes the racer gleam.

3952d ago Replies(2)
F4sterTh4nFTL3952d ago ShowReplies(7)
Popoffboy1877183952d ago

I think 4za fans going be hurt nxt time they see driveclub !!!!

theWB273952d ago (Edited 3952d ago )

Why? They're completely different games. Maybe if they were showing next gen GT...

@Kratos_Kills
I love Forza..probably my fav franchise but I wouldn't go that as far as Faster. Good stuff : )

3952d ago
Felonycarclub83952d ago

They are not completely different games, they are both arcade racing games, LMFAO can't wait for driveclub it's looks to be a fun game

Haules3951d ago

Sorry to burst your bubbles but 4za 5 competes with DriveClub, Just looking at some gameplay footage both games feel the same, easy to drive.

Urusernamesucks3951d ago (Edited 3951d ago )

Ouch , dat dynamic wheather /s

theWB273952d ago

http://forums.xbox.com/xbox...

Already debunked. I don't know why people are still going after that old story. Two of the best looking games at E3 (Ryse and Forza) were confirmed running on X1 hardware too.

Transporter473952d ago (Edited 3952d ago )

I'm sorry Forza looks nice but Ryse really....?

ape0073952d ago (Edited 3952d ago )

^^^^^^^

i think Ryse gfx were so incredible that made u go in total denial

man Ryse gfx are out of this world, i dunno about the game yet, it may turn good or bad but gfx are jaw dropping, FACT

Transporter473951d ago (Edited 3951d ago )

@ape007 um no the game looks ugly, graphic wise...
this game doesn't look impressive at all.
http://www.lightninggamingn...
http://www.lightninggamingn...

this is jaw dropping FACT
http://www.technobuffalo.co...
http://www.technobuffalo.co...

Skips3951d ago (Edited 3951d ago )

^^^
@Transporter47

Pretty much...

When you compare the best looking games from Microsoft to the best looking games from Sony...

Microsoft's look pretty lackluster. lol!

http://www.videogamer.com/x...

http://s.pro-gmedia.com/vid...
http://s.pro-gmedia.com/vid...
http://s.pro-gmedia.com/vid...

vs

http://www.videogamer.com/p...

http://s.pro-gmedia.com/vid...
http://s.pro-gmedia.com/vid...
http://s.pro-gmedia.com/vid...

Hell, Ryse doesn't even look any better than God Of War: Ascension. XD LMFAO!!! XD XD

http://www.videogamer.com/p...

http://s.pro-gmedia.com/vid...
http://s.pro-gmedia.com/vid...
http://s.pro-gmedia.com/vid...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3951d ago
Elit3Nick3952d ago

I'm lost you say that the gpu got downclocked yet you link us to a forum about the X1's ESRAM being more powerful than anticipated...

RandomDude6553952d ago

"102GB/s was the embedded memory peak bandwith up until today.

800mhz*128byte * 1 (read or write operation) =102.4GB/s

800mhz*128byte * 2 (1 read and 1 write operation) =204.8GB/s

DF stating the new peak memory bandwith beeing 192GB/s while maintainig 800mhz clockspeed just doesn't add up...

I personally stop here and leave it at that - the numbers don't add up.

Some people are taking this a step further though:

750mhz*128byte * 2 (1 read and 1 write operation) =192GB/s

this means that a 50mhz downclock would alling with the peak memory performances given in the article."

theWB273952d ago

http://www.nerdroundup.com/...

Theres another one...the whole thing had to do with the eSRam and GPU.

greenpowerz3952d ago (Edited 3952d ago )

I'm not sure why you post that. What you posted shows that the Xb1 is now more capable than PS4 in that area LOL

EDIT Below

Why are you posting BS? Your comments and links are conspiracy theory damage control. Your tinfoil hat is on too tight. MSFT isn't trying to fool anybody, it is vital to their business to keep its specs secret, being the leader in gaming. The *supposed* revision was leaked(just like the first time with 8 gigs of RAM sony had to copy)

RandomDude6553952d ago

http://www.reddit.com/r/Gam...

"So we can basically confirm that cboat was correct. The numbers tell the truth. The esram has been downclocked, and Microsoft's PR department is trying to spin it as an increase in total bandwidth based on some cycle tricks that are probably being exaggerated."

KwietStorm_BLM3952d ago

Being the leader in gaming?...?

DoesUs3951d ago

No, it doesn't show it to be as capable. If you read it correctly and understood it you wouldn't make yourself look rather stupid. ONLY 32meg can run "Theoretically". Good lord, MS must be paying you a fortune.

RandomDude6553952d ago

Lol at "leader in gaming". Maybe if they ever win a generation, they could claim that, but they've been second and third.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3951d ago
SugarSoSweet3952d ago

I have to admit Forza is the only launch game on the Xbox I'm jealous of

Show all comments (65)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

190°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot12h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke196h ago(Edited 6h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke192h ago(Edited 2h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

-Foxtrot0m ago

"Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs"

He's literally just told you why

We're waiting like 15 years before a sequel comes out, it's insane

Skyrim came out in 2011, the next game is expected to come out in 2027 at the earliest so that's 16 years apart while Fallout 4 came out in 2015 and might not release until 2031, again 16 years.

We're fine with Bethesda trying new things and doing new IPs like Starfield but adding a new game to the cycle now means a bigger wait. Also Starfield didn't meet most peoples expectations, can you imagine waiting 15 years or so for a sequel and it's disappointing? It would feel even worse because you would have to wait another 15 years to see if they manage to come back from it.

They need to give it to another developer, we don't need main numbered titles but a spin off of Fallout and Elder Scrolls should be cycled in between the long gaps of the main releases.

Once again you are making out people want these games as quick as possible when all we want is a standard development time of at least 4 years or so rather than waiting 15.

mandf3h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor5h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave4h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor2h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

Duke192h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai4h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris3h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (20)