140°

Xbox One Cloud: A Renaissance for Online Gaming

So, when I bring up the term “Cloud-based gaming”, a lot of you will pretend to understand what I am talking about, but a lot of you are still very confused on what the Xbox One’s touted cloud is, and just how important a step it is for gaming.

Read Full Story >>
leetgamers.asia
Automatic793951d ago (Edited 3951d ago )

Many people on this site are writing off Xbox One cloud based technology but with an incredible service like Xbox live they should not underestimate the One. I guess until they see it for themselves and start to appreciate it that is when most gamers will come around.

3950d ago
Pope_Kaz_Hirai_II3950d ago

Whatever Michaellito79 ... POWAH of DA CLOWD

AngelicIceDiamond3950d ago

If you don't like it fine, but there's no need for unnecessary trolling.

I guess its a bad thing that MS is doing something to enhance games. Or doing something GAME related.

Which is ridiculous because we as are gamers should be looking forward this kind of thing, instead of hating it.

Dacapn3950d ago (Edited 3950d ago )

Ok here's how it is for me:

I have a PS3, 360, and a Wii. I play the 360 & PS3 primarily and the Wii has collected dust for the past 5 years.

PS4: I'm already sold on and have my preorder set.

Wii U: I'll get for Smash...maybe.

Xbox One: The DRM thing would have sucked for a lot of people, but realistically I have internet so it wouldn't have mattered for me. Now until the spybar is somehow not required, I will not be buying an Xbox One...ever. That simple. But even if they somehow made it optional by launch, I'm still not getting one right away, mainly because of this cloud thing. Until I see it, I will not put $500 down on something that may or may not have a significant impact on my games. Right off the bat the PS4 will be more powerful. I don't have to base my purchase on hopes and dreams. People can keep spewing Azure and 8 bazilion servers blah blah blah. Show me and I'll believe.

That's my reality as a gamer.

theWB273950d ago

Since you aren't basing off hopes and dreams and you say the PS4 is more powerful. Show me one game that looked better than any X1 game shown. You can't, which means you're buying a machine on the hopes that future games will look better.

There isn't a single PS4 game that shows that power impact so many people talk about. People keep spewing 1.8 teraflops..8gigs GDDDDDDDR5 RAAAM...the GPU and this and that. But not one game shows it.

Isn't that kind of the same thing as the cloud? Until it's proven, why buy a PS4?

CrossingEden3950d ago

if you have a facebook then you're reality is deluded, because social networking sites are much more likely to give our info out and ALSO have more of it -_-

Dacapn3950d ago (Edited 3950d ago )

@theWb27

Killzone looks better than any Xbox One game shown. Done.

Now I'll humor you. If all the games look the same, you're doing an asstastic job of convincing me to buy the system that costs $100 more. I guess that wasn't really humoring you was it?

@Crossing Eden

Facebook is the weirdo opening your mail before it gets to your house. Xbox One is the peeping Tom taking pictures of you when you get out of the shower.

Apples and Oranges son.

MRMagoo1233950d ago

@thewb27

If anyone was to point out a game to you that looks better than anything the xbone has and probably will ever have it will be infamous second son, it looks miles better than any of that sh!t MS showed at E3 and it isnt even finished yet, you are either blind or just plain ignorant.

theWB273950d ago (Edited 3950d ago )

@Dacapn
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. 100 dollars more...I think most people understand the Kinect is bumping that price up...not the actual system. Killzone...whodathunkit.

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cn...

Ryse is on par with that but Im sure youll disagree. It's ok we can both see.

@MrMagoo
Infamous looks really good. Here ya go...with that many zombies onscreen at once...the draw distance. But Im sure youll disagree too, but it's ok we can both see.

http://www.newsarama.com/18...

To the both of you those games have already been proven to be running on the X1 hardware. I'll leave you with this

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Im not bashing the PS4...but they need to show a game that boasts how much more powerful it is. Cant believe Magoo said Second Son was miles better. Wow that name is fitting.

Blankolf3950d ago

@theWB27 You think Quick Timus Eventius is better graphically than Killzone, even Microsoft doesn't agree with you good sir, they decided to advertise for killzone instead of Ryze in some shops :P

I do agree it has been a even fight in graphism power, but I wouldn't expect to see that just now, if you remember PS3 early games weren't all that great in graphism compared to the ending cycle games.

But the problem here is that the difference is so great that we see some glimpses of difference right off the bat, as shown by Killzone, in a few months old how it would be?

They say they have a lot of servers, but US servers probably? Do you honestly think that every american will be able to have its own server? And the whole world? The clouds are an early concept, we have internet connection but we haven't tapped to such technology at least to load full games on the other end without lag, the limit on this is Xbox1 will put minor stuff like load some car, load some stats, nothing too great.

But in the long and short run PS4 is a much more appealing system.

Automatic793950d ago

Half of your reality does not make sense.

Kinect spying on you? really

Cloud alone should be one of the reasons for enjoying Xbox one.

Especially, since online is not a problem for you.

Seems like you made your decision already. LOL

Dacapn3950d ago (Edited 3950d ago )

@thewb27

You're right. I will disagree. That screenshot looks like you could have taken it from God of War: Ascension. Yes, a PS3 game. You should have shown the gameplay trailer which is a much better representation. You know...the one where you get to press a button every two minutes. Seriously, the game looks like a tech demo. And quit bringing up kinect. I. Don't. Want. It. I literally have zero interest for it on my 360 and at least there, I have option to leave it on the shelf at best buy.

@michaellito79

Do you watch the news? I'd post the link, but apparently it looks like spam. Do yourself a favor and google the recent NSA & FBI privacy invasion discovery. Yes the one with an American citizen fleeing the country. Microsoft, along with other companies, has given the government full access to their servers. Skype and everthing you've done on your computer NOT private. They were the first company to sign off on spying on you back in December in 2007. So no, I don't believe microsoft when they say no we won't be monitoring you. Welcome to the desert...of the real. Seriously, do you live under a rock?

Thomper3949d ago

Does your reality as a gamer not make you want to play Killer Instinct, Titanfall and Forza 5? I couldn't not preorder and XB1.

As for the "spybar".... Put a bag over it if your gonna be kissing your dad or something equally weird.. ;0)

Belking3949d ago (Edited 3949d ago )

When you show me Gaikai streaming all of past PS titles worldwide then I'll believe that. I continue to see games still running at 1080P and only 30FPS on PS4. That isn't a power edge. There is no advantage in power. Final specs haven't been released yet for xbox-one. There will be minimal differences in each console. power and performance are two different things.

That's my reality as a gamer.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3949d ago
MRMagoo1233950d ago

why is there no down bubble for "doesnt have a clue", MS cant do what they are saying they can do with "the infinite power of the cloud" it cant be used to make game look better its cant be used to make live game play better it can only be used for static assets and that is all get a clue ffs.

3950d ago
MRMagoo1233950d ago (Edited 3950d ago )

I dont think it wont work i know for a fuc@en fact it wont work i work with pcs for a living jack ass. And what are you talking about that it is working on those games all but one was running on a pc about 4 times the power of the xbone and none where using cloud, if you really believe this cloud pr bs you are gonna be in for a shock come release my sad lil friend. Titanfall running on xbone looks nothing like the demo they showed and i cant wait to rub it in when you guys get it.

headblackman3950d ago

its clear that you really don't know what yours talking about and its obvious that you'll vomit any kind of bull sh*t out of your neck just to big up the ps4 when your argument is based off of total fanbot b.s. speak with facts and not blind fanbot emotions. study the azure cloud technology and its full functions and how it will work with the Xbox one. then compare it with all of the statements that you've clearly read from multiple game developers about the cloud, its benefits, and its power. if you can believe the developers about the ps4 specs and how easy it is to develop for and how strong it is, than why can't you believe it when a developer says that the cloud is the future of gaming,the cloud is like having the power of 4 Xbox ones,the clouds processing possibilities are limitless? why can't you believe that? oh let me guess? because Microsoft paid them to say that huh (but the same sh*t can be said about the ps4)? lol. you fanbots kill me with some of sh*t you say with no thought what so ever. if you can't read,if you have no technical knowledge on how computers, servers,software, and games consoles as well as software goes, then either learn or stfu and let the grown folks talk who do understand this kind of stuff.

3949d ago
Belking3949d ago

Get a grip dude, MS never made the claim of the cloud making games look better. It gives devs more resources so they can squeeze more out of the console with putting a load on it.

Belking3949d ago (Edited 3949d ago )

double post.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3949d ago
RedHawkX3950d ago

The cloud crap is bs

ps4 is the new xbox live

headset check
better versions of games check
cheaper psn price check
cheaper console= more people owning it check
more powerful console= more people owning it check
more people will own the ps4

xbox one is myspace and ps4 is facebook. in this transition pase a few fools will try and stay with myspace but in the end facebook is just better and is where everyone will be going to. ps4 has already won.

dont be that last xbox one warrior wasting 600 dollars on that xbox console.

Blankolf3950d ago

My good sir, you just won the internet.

DeadlyFire3950d ago

Using the cloud for dedicated servers is smart. Sony also has a cloud setup. Could do the same thing. Many games this generation will be hosting a larger player count. So its not unlikely that Sony isn't in line with a similar proposition. Data centers are not hard to find.

Using the cloud for AI learning is trivial at best. It might be able to study, but it won't be able to fully replicate human interactions for another decade at the minimum. It can simulate it, but not replicate it without error for awhile.

Project spark is just built off of Sony's Littlebigplanet. Which Sony has done last gen with the PS3. Same idea. I like Spark. Looks good. I don't see how the Cloud does anything different for it than what is already represented on the PS3 with LittleBigPlanet.

PS4 has every feature of XBL built into its system this time around. The Cloud is also in the background. If you can tell me one thing that is different. I would love to hear it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3949d ago
3950d ago Replies(1)
3950d ago
Whitey2k3950d ago

y invest cloud when ps4 has gaikai to have lobbies and that online comeee oon i mean xbones bragging about 256 players on titan fall and funny enough ps3 already had that with M.A.G and ps4 is getting planetside 2 which is like 2000 players so xbox cloud means nothing

koolaid2513950d ago

Who plays Mag that game is irrelevent I don't see it at mlg events or anything like that and PlanetSide has been out for pc it's free 2 play but pay 2 win!!!

3950d ago Replies(1)
Whitey2k3950d ago

i recking they are copying sony again buying servers and doing what sony is doing

http://n4g.com/news/1289608...

buying servers not cos there doing for consumers like us but bringing in xbox and pc games on apple and android phones

Thomper3949d ago

LoL... Seriously...?

Microsoft, the multinational software corporation are copying Sony buy buying servers??

Step away from the meds kid. The Azure platform has existed for over three years, Sony bought Gaikai 12 months ago.

Today's episodes was bought to you by the letters F, A, I, & L

:0)

Show all comments (57)
320°

10 Years Later, Sunset Overdrive Still Remains A Beloved Xbox Exclusive

Does it still hold up in 2024?

We've still got a few months to go, but October marks the 10-year anniversary of this Insomniac Games title, with the developer having since moved on to work on the Marvel's Spider-Man games for PlayStation. It was assumed that Sunset Overdrive might make its way to other platforms eventually, but that hasn't happened as of yet.

Read Full Story >>
purexbox.com
Christopher14d ago

So beloved that it sold so well that there's a sequel and Insomniac never had the opportunity to go back to Sony to develop games exclusively for Sony.

RaidenBlack14d ago

ngl, I was low-key expecting Sunset Overdrive to migrate to PS as well along with Hi-Fi Rush and SoT

Christopher14d ago

I think that would require Insomniac going back to work on it to port it over, probably why that's not happening.

RaidenBlack14d ago

Didn't Sony help with SoT port?

Christopher14d ago

I think only in so far as they support every piece of software heading their way? They have that team who specializes in helping people port games, not just SoT, and then the one team that takes PS5 games and ports them to PC (that's their full time job essentially). But that team, the former mentioned one, doesn't do all the work, just help out with how to best do things. So, that team wouldn't port a whole game like Sunset Overdrive.

RaidenBlack14d ago

Ok I thought you meant Insomniac reluctant/Sony not permitting them to go back and work on Overdrive. Hence I added the participation from Sony's side.
But yea, In actuality its Insomniac not having spare dev time to get involved in the port work, atm.

Christopher14d ago

*** But yea, In actuality its Insomniac not having spare dev time to get involved in the port work, atm. ***

Definitely this. They're working on two major IPs as it is and Sony forced them to layoff some people at the end of last year as well. So, likely not capable of sparing the time because resources are being fully utilized.

badz14914d ago (Edited 14d ago )

There was an article awhile back talking about the situation with SSoD. Insomniac does own the IP and Sony now owns it after they bought Insomniac but the publishing right for SSoD is owned by MS - at least the 1st game still is. MS has to sell the publishing rights like they did with the first Mass Effect game to EA after EA bought Bioware before Sony can do anything with the IP.

Einhander197213d ago

Nobody cares about Sunset Overdrive, except all the xbox fanboys who didn't buy it but like to come into articles about the game and try to act like it's somehow Sony's fault for whatever reason.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 13d ago
darthv7214d ago

there was supposed to be a sequel. IG had it all planned but MS said no. And Sony wont greenlight a sequel if they cant get the first one away from MS. Plus... IG has other projects they moved on to anyways so...... yeah.

fr0sty13d ago

Well, with the recent change in policy towards exclusivity, I imagine Sony could get MS to port it over.

Zeref14d ago

Because a game needs to sell 10 million copies for it to be considered beloved 😂

Christopher14d ago

I mean, it's also not a highly rated game, not even in Insomniac's top ten or even top ten on Xbox that year. With this logic, any game can be beloved and so throwing around the word beloved means absolutely nothing. Doesn't have to sell or have great critical reception, just a handful of people need to love it.

Hofstaderman14d ago

You guys are so starved for games you reminiscing about a decade old game made by a now Sony studio. Of course it never sold 10 million, the vast majority of people bought a PS4.

LucasRuinedChildhood14d ago

A game not played by many can still be beloved by those who played it, yeah.

Only making a profit of $567 after 10 years shows that it was not as beloved as it should have been though. That's really bad.

As much as people complain about AAA games not being unique or having fun ideas or bringing in new IP, a lot of gamers don't show up for them. Even less people seem to have played Hi-Fi Rush.

romulus2313d ago

What's it considered if it just sells 1.8 million copies like it did?.

FinalFantasyFanatic13d ago

It was okay when I played it on PC, idk if I'd consider it one of the more beloved games of that generation.

Zeref13d ago

@Christopher

8s and 9s is not highly rated, okay buddy 😂

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 13d ago
MontyeKristo14d ago

I mean, it sounds like you're just hating on the game - but, I loved it. It was one of my favorite games of it's time and that generation. Replayability could have been better, but I still managed to play it several times. I would have greatly appreciated a sequel and definitely would have been in line to pick it up..

Things happen.

Christopher13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

***I mean, it sounds like you're just hating on the game***

No, that's all the people who refused to accept that this game was beloved and never even bought it. I, on the other hand, bought, played it, thought it was 'okay' and moved on.

Now, what hate did you see in my post other than listing the fact that it's not as beloved as the few who liked it? This and Days Gone get way more love in online discussions than they do in sales and support, I find. Both are okay games, not much more. But for some **unknown** reason, people prop them up often as more than they are.

Profchaos13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

It's in noabs land unfortunately as Microsoft own the publishing rights to sunset overdrives original game while insomniac own the IP.

So Microsoft would have to be onboard with publishing this game on PlayStation systems with the understanding the would not profit from any subsequent games in the franchise unlike the games they are currently releasing on ps5 to get players into their franchises this would be a small cash injection build a fanbase around a game they no longer own then nothing.

ChasterMies13d ago

I really don’t get the love for Sunset Overdrive. It’s one of the few games I bought, played a few hours, gave up, and never returned.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 13d ago
isarai14d ago

Not beloved enough for Xbox owners to buy it apparently, Xbox was the worst possible audience for that game.

Obscure_Observer14d ago

Sony couldn´t give a f* about Insomniac´s freedom of creativity, that´s why you don´t have a port for that game and will not be getting a sequel either!

That franchise wil probably never make a comback thanks to Sony´s greed for money, which have turned Insomniacs into a Marvel´s slave factory until 2030.

It´s sad, but it is what it is.

ApocalypseShadow14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

I didn't know that Ratchet and Clank were part of the Avengers of Marvel? Hidden in the ending credits of Guardians of the Galaxy or something? Captain Marvel?

Beyond the "cry me a river" of your comment that these Marvel games aren't on Xbox, it was Insomniac that was approached by Sony to work with Marvel to make a game. And let them decide what character they wanted to develop. They chose Spider-Man. Must be highly profitable for them. Wolverine is a profitable, recognizable character. And the X-Men definitely are a hot property that gamers would love as a story based videogame. Being that X-Men 97 brings back a popular Saturday morning cartoon and the introduction of the X-Men into the MCU movies coming up.

It was Microsoft's continued incompetence in cancelling the Marvel MMO game and turning down Marvel in making a super hero game as they were asked first.

Keep the tears flowing. It's not greed. It was smart business to say yes. And maybe Insomniac wants to make these games. And not a game that didn't sell well to an audience that doesn't buy games.

Christopher14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Neither does Microsoft either, based on your own argument here. Microsoft denied the sequel, not Insomniac/Sony. There's also no sign that Microsoft is allowing a port. They control the next two games in the IP and any DLC or the like for the first. But, nothing.

What's sad is people trying to use this game to blame businesses for doing business things that they are both doing as some way to make them look worse. Microsoft wants to use Insomniac to make a good IP that sells their platform and Sony wants to use Insomniac to make a good IP that sells their platform. But, no, Sony bad!

Don't know why the truth that these companies are very much alike is so hard for people to accept.

romulus2313d ago

Your comment literally contradicts itself but troll statements typically do. If Sony is so greedy for money as you proclaim than wouldn't it behoove them to not only release the first game on their console but a sequel as well, as that would be a way for them to make profit and that's apparently their focus according to you? Speaking of profit and greed, I suppose Microsoft bought all those Developers and Publishers in hopes that they wouldn't make any money from it, right? Your ability to troll on this site with impunity is whats sad, but it is what it is.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 13d ago
PhillyDonJawn14d ago

I bought it, along with at least 1-2 million others.

PrinceOfAnger14d ago

Very fun game that need a sequel.

-Foxtrot14d ago

Insomniac: “We went with Microsoft because we want to own the IP so it’s ours”

Microsoft: *owns publishing rights preventing the studio to re-release the original game, make a remaster, remake, any DLC, massive expansions and multiple sequels on other platforms*

The logic is just…I never got it

Owning the IP was Insomniacs main defence when they announced they were making a game exclusively for MS and yet they’ve ended up “owning” an IP they can’t do anything with.

If they went with Sony like normal you might have seen a sequel by now.

Tacoboto14d ago

The winner of the Logic Cake has to be Bungie, though.

Wanted to be free from Halo and MS, so they buy themselves out, only to partner up with Activision, in the same timeframe as Activision ousting the heads of Infinity Ward, for a full decade with Destiny.

... And then things start falling apart in that relationship almost immediately, whodathought!

Christopher14d ago

Hey, when Sony offers to overpay you for your services and signs a contract that says they won't force you to do anything you don't want, who would say no? Such an overpriced purchase from Sony. Poor business, IMHO. But, honestly, I'm not a business person. But, still, I don't understand it.

darthv7214d ago

...and it seems this conundrum is also why the game cannot receive any sort of FPS boost patch for Series consoles. IG wont make it, and Ms can't get another team to do it without consent from IG. I liked it on XBO, but now I also have this on PC and I can tell ya... it definitely benefits from a 60fps frame rate.

badz14913d ago

been playing it at 1080p144fps on my modest pc. not the hardest game to max out and yeah this game definitely needs to be played at high fps considering all the actions

darthv7214d ago

Sadly this may never get the proper fps update it deserves on XB (or even PS) but I now play it on steam and it definitely feels better at 60fps than it did at 30. Its a fast paced game... you need that 60fps in this one.

babadivad14d ago

This game was so fun. Me and my brother put many hours into this one.

Show all comments (52)
120°

15 Top Notch Single-Player Games You Can Complete in 10 Hours

For those who don't have time for massive open worlds or role-playing games with epic tales, these 15 games are worth checking out.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
anast41d ago

Good games for the $9.99 bin, you can get all of the Metro's for $10 in a bundle.

490°

Insomniac Games Has Made Just $567 off Sunset Overdrive

Gamingbolt writes: "Insomniac Games has enjoyed commercial success on a level it had never seen before with its Marvel’s Spider-Man games, but not all of its titles in the last decade or so have seen eye-watering sales. In fact, specifically where Sunset Overdrive is concerned, the money the studio has made off it is quite negligible, to say the least."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
darthv72122d ago

Not gonna lie... looking at the IG roadmap I was fully hoping to see SSOD2 and Resistance reboot on there. The first SSOD was fun. It definitely needed the benefits of a 60fps mode and I was expecting there to be some sort of patch or FPS boost support when played on SX. Sadly... that ship sailed, but Sony gave me hope they would do the game justice. It really is a fun game that deserves to be played.

Gazondaily122d ago

At least it made some money. Ratchet and Clank lost Sony about $8m.

Eonjay122d ago (Edited 122d ago )

And yet they were happy to join PlayStation and since then they have made that back many, many times over. And clearly, it wasn't enough to keep them from releasing another Rachet per leaks.

Einhander1972122d ago

Wanna talk about the profitability of Forza or Redfall?

8m is a number that will easily be made back when iR&C has been on the market as long as SO has, R&C will make more profit that SO ever will.

mkis007122d ago

Nah that was later updated to say it made sony money but maybe not insomniac

maniacmayhem122d ago (Edited 122d ago )

It's probably why Insomniac is going the Marvel route for a while and then later bring out their next R&C game.

It's not a bad way to do business honestly. They develope something for a while that will guarantee some money and then in between being out something of their own.

Unfortunately, with the way the industry is, this is how things are going to be mostly.

@Eonjay

Of course they were happy, I remember when they were happy they were independent, but they saw how tough it was being that and without first party support and came running back to Sony.

Einhander1972121d ago

I just want to add that $8m is only 265,000 copies at $30. The game will easily cross that.

outsider1624121d ago (Edited 121d ago )

That money can be spent buying a PS5 with Ratchet and Clank.

IRetrouk121d ago

No it didn't septic, you read projections and thought you read actual money made, calm down 🤣

Outside_ofthe_Box121d ago

"No it didn't septic, you read projections and thought you read actual money made, calm down"

So you saying he got excited and jumped the gun like a typical overzealous fanatic?

itsmebryan121d ago

@Gazo
R&C lost $8 million. So after all the pride PS5 owners took in the game they didn't buy it? That's crazy. Some said before Sony 1st party games don't sell well. I guess it's true

CobraKai121d ago

@Maniac
Marvel came to Sony with the pitch to do a Marvel game after MS turned them down. Sony gave the job to Insomniac who got to choose any Marvel character to do a game for, and the rest is history

DivineHand125121d ago

If there is one game they should have made money on it's Ratchet and Clank. That game was fun from start to finish. I hope this doesn't discourage them from making more games in the future.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 121d ago
notachance121d ago

Lol look at everyone here jumping to reply based only on other comment here

The claim that R&C made $73m while costing $81m was based on leaked 2020 presentation slide, and on the same leak you can also find Insomniac’s own claim that it already made $145m on R&C Rift Apart..

outsider1624121d ago

As you can see they dont read much.

Zhipp121d ago

I didn't know Insomniac earned money from games. As a first party studio I figured all profits/losses were absorbed my the parent company.

Vits121d ago

Unless Sony coughs up the cash to buy the publishing rights from Microsoft, or the wild scenario of Microsoft snagging the IP from Sony happens, talking about sequels, ports, or even DLC is pretty much wishful thinking.

Source: https://gamevro.com/microso...

Jin_Sakai122d ago

If it were on PlayStation it would’ve sold better. Being a Microsoft exclusive was a mistake.

CrashMania122d ago

Zeref running around calling everything a flop, bet he won't call this a flop, can't begin to imagine why.

darthv72122d ago

well..... it did make IG some kind of $ unlike R&C which lost $8m in the process.

Does that count?

TheKingKratos121d ago

Well darth ... You went full fanboy and pretty much acting stupid or possibly can't read

As a user above said

They claim that R&C made $73m while costing $81m was based on leaked 2020 presentation slide, and on the same leak you can also find Insomniac’s own claim that it already made $145m on R&C Rift Apart..

Kribwalker122d ago

Yeah 😂😂😂 That’s why the newest ratchet game lost $8 million

purple101122d ago

Had a bigger budget
+ console shortage
+ is was ps5 only.

God if war and gt7 were made crossgen and made money in the same time period

Jin_Sakai121d ago

“Yeah 😂😂😂 That’s why the newest ratchet game lost $8 million“

Sunset Overdrive budget $42.6 million
Ratchet & Clank budget $81 million

You do the math. 😉

Eonjay122d ago

Rachet and Clank sold more than Sunset Overdrive so yes.

CrashMania121d ago

You'd have a point if the numbers weren't from 2022, and before the PC port, and before the thread, mkis. Might not have made a huge profit, but it didn't lose money.

notachance121d ago

Before 2022 and before PC Port, yes

Be honest, you jumped to reply this only by looking at some other comment mentioning that while completely skipping the following replies aren’t you?

Jin_Sakai121d ago (Edited 121d ago )

Sunset Overdrive budget $42.6 million
Ratchet & Clank budget $81 million

And R&C was profitable. Even with nearly twice the budget.

“Update to the previous Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart sales thread: It was profitable. Sold 2,7m(as of roughly February 2022)”

https://www.resetera.com/th...

Outside_ofthe_Box121d ago

Jin, now why did you have to go ahead and ruin thesoftware730's day like that by posting facts? Smh

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 121d ago
Christopher122d ago

I mean, maybe because of market reach. But it wouldn't sell better than R&C or SM games. It was a fun game, but not as enjoyable as the others, IMHO.

ChasterMies121d ago

Dead Rising 3, Rise Son or Rome, the Titanfall franchise, and the Tomb Raider franchise were all hurt by Xbox exclusivity.

cammers1995121d ago

Exactly. Fuze and sunset overdrive. Both came to Xbox. Both failed. Hmm.

Knightofelemia121d ago (Edited 121d ago )

It was an exclusive because during that time Insomniac was not owned by Sony. Sony has to honor that contract or they will be forced to pay it out or go to court. No different then a Microsoft title being an Sony exclusive they have to honor the contract.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 121d ago
mastershredder122d ago

"where Sunset Overdrive is concerned, the money the studio has made off it is quite negligible, to say the least."

I'm sure that big platform jump had nothing to do with it right? Pull a Rare, win Rare Prizes.

P_Bomb122d ago (Edited 122d ago )

Re. R&C and the 8 million, I wonder if hitting PS+ Extra hurt its legs? Good get for the service, but did it eat some sales?

FIELDMARSHALL_P121d ago

More than likely, but it could also make new fans that wouldn't have normally played the game buy the new one.

Hofstaderman121d ago

Same excuse XBOX fans use and look at whats happening to them and their preferred console...

Hofstaderman121d ago

I think it did. This highlights the pitfall of day one releases on sub services. I know R and C was not day one but it would have benefited from having more time to garner sales on its own steam.

Crows90121d ago

Learn to read. It didn't lose money. Read again.

P_Bomb120d ago

“Learn to read.”

I can read just fine professor. See yourself out 😤

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 120d ago
preciousdeath122d ago ShowReplies(1)
Show all comments (64)