130°

AMD won the next-gen console war, and PC gamers could reap the reward

Sony and Microsoft will be duking out the next console war for years to come, but there's one company that wins no matter what: chipmaker AMD, which managed to put processors in every new console, including the Nintendo Wii U, the PlayStation 4, and the Xbox One. If you buy any new game console this holiday, you'll be helping to fill AMD's depleted coffers — but AMD's sweep could have far more significance than that. The company's dominance in next-gen consoles could actually make PC gaming more relevant than it's been in ages.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
B-radical3954d ago

Ill reap my reward when maxwell comes out on pc

Orpheus3954d ago (Edited 3954d ago )

The ones who disagreed have sinned.
Ignorance is their sin! :P

blackmagic3954d ago (Edited 3954d ago )

posted in the wrong spot

Transporter473954d ago

Looks like Nvidia is going to have a run for its money now.

Somebody3954d ago

I don't know...MS and Sony chose AMD simply because Nvidia offered a much higher price for their hardware. AMD was more than willing to offer a much lower price because things were not looking too good for it in the PC sector. I mean the article itself has a link talking about how AMD is struggling last year.

Nvidia is running to its banks to make more better hardware for the PC users.

Transporter473954d ago (Edited 3954d ago )

AMD give you more Performance for your Buck. Nvidia pumps the price quite a bit with comparable specs of an Nvidia and ATI card. I build computers i tend to always look at prices and performance

blackmagic3954d ago

To quote cinemablend
Nvidia GTX says 'Hi' (the quote will make sense after clicking the link)
http://www.cinemablend.com/...

I like and own AMD but I openly admit that they are playing a defensive game with intel and nvidia

dcbronco3954d ago

Nvidia is not in that great a position. They could have used that console money regardless of what they claim. Tegra 4 has been a complete failure. AMD is coming into their own and are on the forefront of CPU technology. And it will be the consoles that prove their superior design. Nvidia might have a chance with Tegra 5, but AMD might lock down the market with Jaguar APUs in tablets and phones. If that happens, the roles will reverse and it will be Nvidia wondering if they will survive. I wouldn't buy any Intel or Nvidia stock.

Somebody3954d ago

I'm not doubting AMD gives us more performance for your buck. A lot of people stand by that claim so it's got to be true. I've own a couple of AMD cards and made my own PCs so I should know. And yet, AMD still struggled while Nvidia, who is pumping out much more expensive cards, still dominates.

Now, came along next gen with AMD as the main hardware maker and suddenly everyone shouting Nvidia is dead! Remember the days when everyone shouted the "PC gaming is dead"? Look how that turned out.

It's still very early in the game to say stuff like (that guy is running or that guy is dead) that especially when Nvidia still has a lot of money to hunker down and build their next killer hardware. AMD on the other hand would be very busy getting game developers settle in and pumping the hardware to meet demands. Didn't ATI had a great head start when Nvidia was too busy with the original X Box?

fossilfern3954d ago

Have to disagree both Nvidia and AMD knock back and forth for the performance crown. its not one sided.

Tsar4ever013947d ago

Your right, "Somebody", but I see this a definite WIN for all gamers, PC/Console/Mobile alike because as of starting next-gen,(*except for Wii U) The universal hardware & instruction set code for vgaming has been officially standardized, as PC X86-64 hardware. Porting games across all platforms would be much easier & cheaper, as said in this article.

All the gaming community need to do now is find a way to convince Sony, Microsoft & PC sector to agree to design compatible online servers so all platforms pc/console can all play together & compete off the same type of multiplayer games that come in all platforms as a "cross platform gaming" solution, there's no reason they can't do THIS time being that consoles/PC sharing the same X86 code/hardware.

This article should've read "AMD Command modes the next-gen console war, and pc gamers could reap the rewards." as in Comm Mode in BF4 multiplayer,

Somebody3947d ago

@Tsar4ever

It should be a win for all but in the world of exclusivity, hardware or software wise, it's not that clear cut. There have been quite a number of articles after the PS4 first announcement that seem to give off the vibe that next gen multiplatform games will only give AMD the advantage while Nvidia will be spending a lot of time playing catch up with optimization.

It would be ideal for everyone in the industry to think about the other guys but innovation is based on competition and rivalries.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3947d ago
RiPPn3954d ago

It's going to be great that games will actually start taking advantage of multithreading. Should take full advantage these 8-core at Athlons.

NarooN3954d ago

There's no such thing as an octocore Athlon, lol.

RiPPn3954d ago

Sorry for some reason I thought the FX line had the Athlon name, ie: Athlon FX-8350. Guess I was wrong but the FX line are the ones I was referring to.

cunnilumpkin3954d ago

pc gaming always feels like its rewarding me, and here comes that steam summer sale!!!

woo-hoo

chrispseuphoria3954d ago (Edited 3954d ago )

PC Gaming is great but I play the majority of my games on the PS3. It's where most of my friends go to, it's easy to set up and the exclusives are excellent (The Last of Us especially). I don't think gamers are going to drop consoles this generation for PC due to these factors.

TechnicianTed3954d ago

No one is saying they will, this article isn't about that.

Show all comments (27)
270°

AMD FSR 3.1 Announced at GDC 2024, FSR 3 Available and Upcoming in 40 Games

Last September, we unleashed AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution 3 (FSR 3)1 on the gaming world, delivering massive FPS improvements in supported games.

Read Full Story >>
community.amd.com
Eonjay28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

So to put 2 and 2 together... FSR 3.1 is releasing later this year and the launch game to support it is Rachet and Clank: Rift Apart. In Sony's DevNet documentation it shows Rachet and Clank: Rift Apart as the example for PSSR. PS5 Pro also launches later this year... but there is something else coming too: AMD RDNA 4 Cards (The very same technology thats in the Pro). So, PSSR is either FSR 3.1 or its a direct collaboration with AMD for that builds on FSR 3.1. Somehow they are related. I think PSSR is FSR 3.1 with the bonus of AI... now lets see if RDNA 4 cards also include an AI block.

More details:
FSR 3.1 fixes Frame Generation
If you have a 30 series RTX card you can now use DLSS3 with FSR Frame Generation (No 40 Series required!)
Its Available on all Cards (we assume it will come to console)
Fixes Temporal stability

MrDead27d ago

I've been using a mod that allows dlss frame gen on my 3080 it works on all rtx series. It'll be good not to rely on mods for the future.

darksky27d ago

The mods avaiable are actually using FSR3 frame gen but with DLSS or FSR2 upscaling.

Babadook726d ago (Edited 26d ago )

I think that the leaks about the 5 Pro would debunk the notion that the two (FSR 3.1 and PSSR) are the same technology. PSSR is a Sony technology.

MrDead27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

I wonder how much they fixed the ghosting in dark areas as Nvidia are leaving them in the dust with image quality. Still good that they are improving in big leaps, I'll have to see when the RTX5000 series is released who I go with... at the moment the RTX5000's are sounding like monsters.

just_looken27d ago

Did you see the dell leaks were they are trying to cool cards using over 1k watts of power.

We are going to need 220 lines for next gen pcs lol

MrDead27d ago

That's crazy! Sounds like heating my house won't be a problem next winter.

porkChop27d ago

As much as I hate supporting Nvidia, AMD just doesn't even try to compete. Their whole business model is to beat Nvidia purely on price. But I'd rather pay for better performance and better features. AMD also doesn't even try to innovate. They just follow Nvidia's lead and make their own version of whatever Nvidia is doing. But they're always 1 or 2 generations behind when it comes to those software/driver innovations, so Nvidia is always miles ahead in quality and performance.

MrDead27d ago

I do a lot of work on photoshop so an Intel Nvidia set up has been the got to because of performance edge, more expensive but far more stable too. Intel also have the edge over AMD processors with better load distribution on the cores, less spikes and jitters. When you're working large format you don't want lag or spikes when you're editing or drawing.

I do think AMD has improved massively though and whist I don't think they threaten Nvidia on the tech side they do make very well priced cards and processors for the power. I'm probably going with a 5080 or 5090 but AMD will get a little side look from me, which is a first in a long time... but like you said they are a generation or two behind at the moment.

Goosejuice26d ago

While I can't argue for amd gpu, they aren't bad but they aren't great either. The cpu for amd have great. I would argue the 7800x3d as one of the best cpu for gaming right now. Idk about editing so I take ur word for that but gaming amd cpu is a great option these days.

porkChop26d ago

@Goosejuice

I have a 7800X3D. It certainly is great for gaming. Though for video editing, rendering, etc, I think Intel have the advantage from what I remember. I just mean from a GPU standpoint I can't support them.

70°

AMD storm Nvidia's Super launch party with temporary price cut to RX 7900 XT

Now that the RTX 4070 Super has launched, AMD have chopped the price of the RX 7900 XT to new lows.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
80°

AMD Radeon 700M "RDNA 3" iGPUs Recieve Fluid Motion Frames Support, Brings FPS-Boost To Gamers

AMD has expanded its Fluid Motion Frames (AFMF) tech to Radeon 700M iGPUs which play a major role in laptops, handhelds & desktops.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Tapani99d ago

The ideal FPS would be for Steam Deck 45fps which is boosted to match the 90hz screen. However, today's new games are not on that level even on the OLED version, so the successor to Phoenix Point needs to come out fast. The 2nd Gen Steam Deck needs a VRR screen as well to make this doable. 2025 should be the year for such a device.

XBManiac99d ago

Or you need to play games better suited for Steam Deck. What would be great is a more powerful version of Steam Deck with higher specs for latest games. But... it will take a couple of years, it seems, as Gabe is waiting for a real next gen Zen+RDNA really portable kit.

Tapani98d ago

You are right, it really does come down to understanding what your Steam Deck can play and how. And that to me, is a bit of a pain to deal with. For a portable, I have zero interest in tuning anything, and just want to pick up and play. To do so in the PC space, you are correct, there needs to be a real next gen APU available.

That being said, I really appreciate there are these devices and can see how people like using them. To me the Steam Deck or any PC handheld should be a device which can continue the AAA games I play on my 4090 when I'm on the go.

Personally, I'm waiting for Strix Point, RDNA 3.5 at 16CU and an OLED VRR 90-120hz screen and better memory bandwidth. This should play AAA games at low settings at locked 40 or 45 fps which would be great already for a handheld. When Strix Point is out, most of the non-Valve PC handheld manufacturers have already sorted out the kinks in their software as well, so there should be a good maturity in 2024 or 2025 in these devices.

I do think, though, that Fluid Motion Frames will be a technique that these handhelds will benefit a lot from in the coming years as it spreads.