1000°

Cliffy B: Numbers Don’t Work to Allow Used Games, “Disc Based Day one $60 Model is Crumbling”

The announcement that the PS4 would allow used games (at least to the extent the PS3 does) brought roars from the audience, and ‘won’ the conference online. But serial contrarian and Gears of War guy Cliff Bleszinski has come out in defense of blocking used games, something the Xbox One does. - PSLS

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
doctorstrange3962d ago

It's like he wants people to hate him

DxTrixterz3962d ago

Gears of War - Microsoft. There is your answer.

Relientk773962d ago

It's like somehow Cliff B, Gears of War and Microsoft are all connected or something

conspiracies. they're here.

blackbeld3962d ago Show
THE-COMMANDER3962d ago

Agree.

Sony said more than once, that they are following the PS3 model in terms of used games and DRM.

darthv723962d ago

the music industry all over again.

you have consumers saying they should be able to download music or convert their music to digital form. then you have the artists and studios saying you can't do that.

There has to be a happy medium here. Before Itunes, there were the various music sharing apps and people using any type of mp3 player to get their digital fix.

then the music industry flexes their muscle and napster takes the fall for the consumers. So then here comes apple to say, we can make things right for both sides. Selling licensed music for cheap gives the consumer the legal right to own the digital copy of a song while at the same time it gives some of that back to the artist that created it.

so maybe MS is the napster....it has to take the fall in this age of DRM for sony to come along and say, we can do things the right way. So it doesnt piss off the gamers but actually gets them to have compassion for the devs and publishers and in turn helps out the publishers in the long run.

There is a right way and a wrong way of doing something. Both Ms and Sony are publishers but one is doing things the wrong way with pushing (MS) and the other is doing things the right way with persuading (Sony).

Mucless3962d ago Show
Godmars2903962d ago

@darthv72:

So you're basically saying we only have Justin Beaver or J-pop level gaming to look forward to. That at some point production costs are going to have to level out if not drop.

webeblazing3962d ago

@darthv72
what???

and dont musicians make most of they money on tour
and if both systems used bluray why dont they put some much content on the disc so it would be too much of a pain to download

poopsack3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

@Darth

Except everything Napster did wrong was for the user's benefit and corporation's loss (of course for their own benefit as well as this was their business model), which pissed off the corporations. Microsoft is the corporation, they wont "take the fall", they'll just pay their way out of it because its whats brought their success so far. Exclusivity (timed or true) and brand spamming (as before) is what they'll hope will make everyone forget all the negatives.

YNWA963962d ago

Whats wrong with buying a console and never having to pay for a game or multiplayer.... This is not fair :( boo hooo hooooo

morganfell3962d ago

Hey Cliff...relevant much?

Here is the undeniable rule. As soon as you beginb restricting the freedom of consumers, they drop you like a bad habit and find an alternative.

The more you tighten your grip, the more worlds will slip through your fingers.

These idiots calling for DRM worry about the industry when restricting consumers is the very thing that will insure the death of their current structure.

ThatsGaming3962d ago

Interesting because he no longer works for Microsoft.

Garbanjo0013962d ago Show
ltachiUchiha3962d ago

darthv72

The difference with that is xbl wont be selling them cheaper compared to steam or psn. Go look now on xbl vs psn & you will see that the price differentials are a big difference. If any of these 2 were to do such a thing, sony will fit it perfect because they actually hook consumers up with deals all the time & if u have ps plus its not even close. ps plus blows xbl out the water with free games, cheaper games & is just better overall for consumers.

NewMonday3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

if a one time game "license" cost just $20 for a core game then you wouldn't see all this uproar

but asking us to pay the full $60 JUST FOR STARTERS THEN CHARGE ANOTHER $20-$30 is ridiculous.

EA:".. looking at the customer more from an ARPU perspective rather than a packaged goods perspective, we think there's a great opportunity to get $70, $80, $90 from that consumer. But upfront from the clients, it's a $60 price point"

http://www.gamesindustry.bi...

Perjoss3962d ago

@morganfell

star systems

RumbleFish3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

I have never understood the discussion. Used games bring money to the publishers too, because many gamers use the money they got from used games sales to buy new games. I would have bought less than half of my games if the games haven't had a resale value.
I say No! All we can see in these strategies is greed. If they weren't greedy they would have discounted downloadable versions with a rediculous cost for them compared to physical copies.
But look at the greedy pigs at EA: their games are even more expensive when you buy them in Origin instead of a physical copy. Are the people drunk to buy there?
Please excuse any wrong spelling/grammar, I am not a native speaker.

papashango3962d ago

I don't blame him.

The dude feels like he's owed all his dues. Doesn't mean I support him. I just got no beef with a man trying to get his.

SilentNegotiator3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

No, it's the fact that he's been rubbing on EA for the last 6 months. EA is supporting Microsoft with a temp exclusive (believe what you want; EA told Eurogamer 'we can't discuss Titanfall going to other systems' instead of 'maybe'...and we're talking about EA regardless). Thus, Cliffy is supporting Xbox One to make EA happy and hopefully land a job at EA, as he has been trying to do for months.

His Microsoft-heavy history probably helps his anti-consumer bias, though.

Kleptic3962d ago

Cliff is a game designer...not a publisher/producer...I'll wait for Mark Rein's comments on Epic's stance with this...as it was Cliffy B claiming UE3 could 'only be done on an xbox 360'...when the head of Epic, a year later said...'completely untrue'...

the weirdest part with all of this is MS keeps saying they made all these DRM decisions with direct feedback from 'all the big 3rd party publishers', which one would assume would be EA and Activision...

but then both of those publishers clearly stated 'the current online pass policy works acceptably, we don't see any need for that to change' at their own conferences...which is exactly what Sony allows on the Ps4...they won't put passes on their own titles, but will allow 3rd parties to continue doing what the do now...

its not a debate...MS has really pushed themselves into a hole with this DRM stuff, and it doesn't seem like any non-affiliated people are backing them up. Cliff may be, but he's not exactly a go to business executive that has any important feedback...he just makes gears of war games...and more often than not, the company he actually works for (Epic), contradicts his own statements...

morganfell3962d ago

@perjoss - yes in Star Wars but this is something different ;)

abzdine3962d ago

what a jerk this guy is!!
a console that doesn't even work all over the world how can he say this type of nonsense?! if only it worked alright everywhere ok maybe he has a point because he is paid by MS but come on!

Greatness awaits
4>1

Mutant-Spud3962d ago

The answer to music piracy was Spotify, so we can expect to see something like that with games, Greenlight is another response, so you could see a scenario where only the people who invest a certain amount of money in the game get the full featured product on day one. The other solution would just be to move to completely digital distribution and make the games cheaper, EB is advertising PS4 games at about $120 Australian, if they were $30 I would probably buy one a fortnight.
Don't forget we're yet to see the "Steambox" too, that could trump both consoles.

+ Show (19) more repliesLast reply 3962d ago
Why o why3962d ago

Maybe Microsoft listened a little too much to the wrong devs. I won't have to deal with anything of the sort cliffy boy. Thanks for ut series btw....great games

HammadTheBeast3962d ago

When money talks, M$ listens.

solidjun53962d ago

He's the ultimate shill.

Knushwood Butt3962d ago

Cliffy looks like he just stepped out of his meth lab.

Jazz41083962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

As long as third party pubs do t limit trading games at gamestop then its business as usual for trade ins on xboxone. Its been stated several times this is the case with both sony and ms so as far as trade ins it sounds oike nothing is changing. Please provide me a link if anyone knows something that says ms will not let you trade your games in for credit or cas to retailers please.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3962d ago
Thirty3Three3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

Who the hell is this guy and why should I care about him or what he says...?

RankFTW3962d ago

You really don't know who he is?

Thirty3Three3962d ago

@rank;Uh.. no.

Unlike many, I don't spend my life on the internet.

MRMagoo1233962d ago Show
Thirty3Three3962d ago

I agree, completely, MRMagoo123!

Thanks for the explanation :D

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3962d ago
tuglu_pati3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

Every time I hear some one say this developer is greedy or this company is greedy, i wonder what the hell you guys have in your head.

This companies are in for the money not to have loses. The truth is I'm not happy with all this DRM and used games talk. But the reality is this developer need to make money or you think they do all this for the fun of it.

V0LT3962d ago

LOL! If every corporation did this I can't wonder but how you would feel then.

BlackTar1873962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

Hey Tuglu,

Please explain to me why the consumer is on the knife for this problem? They want money on used games get a reasonable case built and take it to the supreme court to rule on. The consumer should not bear the brunt of the change because the game industry and its retail markets build a bad business model. Fix the model fix the problem. Don't fix the consumer side when its not the consumer side with the problem.

I thin alot of developers do make games for the fun and love of it.

I hope whoever disagreed with me has a great thought out point and shares otherwise you are a sad sad little man

webeblazing3962d ago

yeah completely right but as customers we have to let them know whats not gonna fly then we can meet on middle ground

blind-reaper3962d ago

You have to respect the consumer if your consumer's respect back, with Microsoft's policies you are only hurting legit consumers (people who buy original games).

tuglu_pati3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

@BlackTar187

"I thin alot of developers do make games for the fun and love of it."

I love what i do for living that does not mean i'll do it for free and believe me i will go with whoever pay me more for my work. Its important to love what you do, but you do it also because you need the money to provide your family (if you have one) with the best resources. If you think this developer will go through all the work just for fun, you need a little dosis of reality.

@ BlackTar187 Bellow

If you read my first post, you'll notice that i say im not happy with it, nor do I approve. I'm just saying that every time i hear someone say a company is greedy i wonder, if this someone know this companies are in for money not for the fun of it.

I guess you need to learn how to read and comprehend before replay.

BlackTar1873962d ago

Hey tuglu,

Why not respond to the meat of my post? Why respond to the 5% at the bottom. Fact is your full of it and your punish the consumer thought process for bad industry business model is laughable.

nypifisel3962d ago

If developers want to make more money they have to present us with a product we're willing to pay full price for. There's already been studies that comes to the conclusion that restricting used games lessen profits from game sales - unless the prices of the games drops with over 30%. And we all know that's not going to happen, they just want to have the cake and eat it too.

Why should we (the consumers) pay for that? Sony went with a more consumer friendly approach and god damn will they cash in on that. They'll see that a happy consumer is a spending one, Sony will with this line earn tonnes of money - and they will do this cause they delivered what we wanted, not restricting what we deserve.

badz1493962d ago

consumers are not in the wrong in this! not at all! it's about consumer's rights on physical media that they paid money for that M$ is about to take away!

it's just common sense that if you buy anything physical, you have the rights to keep, lend, trade in or resell them as you wish! XBone is not allowing that or at least not making it easy to do it like the old days!

if they really think that used market really is THAT threatening to the industry, why don't they go full digital like Steam? no one will complain like with Steam because you never have a physical copy to begin with.

they are afraid the world is not ready yet for full DD and still stick to disc based games but at the same time trying to pull a BS!

Tyre3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

@Tugly pati BS We all make money. If you want to make a quick buck...go be a prostitute. Most of the developers do it out of a passion. In the entertainment business, creative people with passion are essential. That's why you get new IPs and Good games. Cliffy is just as wrong. They are all misguided by the end of the console cycle/economic crisis & their religious misguided believe in mobile business models & DRM (especially Cliffy cause he worked so close with Microsoft). Mobile is a fad. Text Necks & Neck Hernia epidemics are on the rise. No one will ever defeat the big screen. The myth that Used games threaten AAA sales has been debunked by Gamestop's real figures & facts dozens of times. Used games stimulate the buying of new AAA titles cause they leave you with more money in your pocket. We have seen this talk since the 80ies and consoles are bigger than ever! The new AAAs will sell even more nextgen. I know my friends & I are all pre-ordering PS4s (thx to Sony we will buy) & we will buy ALL AAA titles. Everybody is excited, Next-Gen will kick off BIG and even Indie Games/Hardware Architecture/ease of development are better than they were ever.....all this BS about the games industry will seem like yesterday's irrelevant nonsense by greedy bastards, as the NextGen drops.

tuglu_pati3962d ago

@Tyre

how old are u? Nevermind :/

juggulator3962d ago

@tuglu_pati
Activision made a billion dollars on Black Ops 2. It's up to them as to how much of a cut Treyarch gets.

YNWA963961d ago

@ black tar, its obvious as this industry matured, this would happen. We are going digital eventually, and there will be no used games ever again.... So either you will pirate or buy legal.... MS simply making first move, very unpopular, but progressive.... This might eventually lead to much bigger sales of games, but cheaper....

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3961d ago
avengers19783962d ago

And let's hear it for gaming a biggest DBAG, ladies and gentlemen, cliffy b

Blachek3962d ago

He said it like it is.

nypifisel3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

@Blachek

Cliff is clueless. He's not saying it like it is, he's saying it like they want it to be. If AAA games can't make profits from 5 millions in sales, then perhaps that game shouldn't had cost that much to make. It's how everything works, why would there be an exception for games? It's a product like everything else.

Seriously if they can't reign in the budgets and create games that are profitable then that's their fault. If AAA games of today can't live in the climate that exists, they don't deserve to.

Why o why3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

That gif (jif) doesn't surprise me one bit even though sony also advertises in that section. I've always thought that edge were bias on multiple fronts. Ar well, I guess I'm wearing a tin foil hat again right because sonys there too right....lol

NextGen24Gamer3962d ago

It's funny because its all common sense to me. People/consumers want want want but some are too cheap to pay for what they want. When you buy a game, you don't own the content. You can't make copies of it. As consumers we have been spoiled. PCs have had this tech for years and now consoles have the tech and I'm glad they are finally implementing it. It should drive cost of new games down and developer can get paid for their work instead of GameStop reselling it like they own it over and over again. One copy of a game gets sold to one consumer and then that consumer sells it to GameStop for pennies on the dollar and then GameStop sells it close to full price to a new consumer and the dev receives none of it. God loving people got to see the wrong in that. Common sense stuff.

People complain about everything. I just believe in right and wrong.

BlackTar1873962d ago

please explain why its our job as consumers to fix a poor business model?

NextGen24Gamer3962d ago

It's not the consumers job. It's e developers and publishers and console makers job. And guess what? They are finally doing it. Thank goodness. Finally got it right for consoles. Gamers will benefit with games that coat less.

ShwankyShpanky3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

I'd love to see how these ridiculous arguments would have played out sixty years ago.

Hasbro statement: "When you buy the game Clue, you are buying a license to use the product. The paper/cardboard in the box is only a delivery medium for the IP that is printed on the medium, to which Hasbro retains all rights of resale. By selling/purchasing a used copy of Clue, you are taking money that rightly belongs to Hasbro developers and placing it in the hands of used toy resellers."

3962d ago
MRMagoo1233962d ago Show
clonerz3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

Whoa Is Me Mr Elite I'm so sorry forgive me should I kiss your Boot now yeah hmm... Not gonna happen bottom line is if I buy something I should be allowed to do with it as I please example lend it to a friend use it on more than one console in my house sell it to whomever I want to (Mgoo said it all)

NextGen24Gamer3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

Mrmagoo and anyone else who doesn't understand.

If what u say is true and is the law. Why can't you do all that with computer games? Lol

You sound like a spoiled baby who is having your binky snatched away and you believe you have a right to it. Guess what? You have grown up...I think...and you have managed without it. Lol...or maybe you still need it with all the whining you are doing.

Fact is...the system is broken as is...we the consumer have been taking advantage of the broken system and now consoles are catching up to what pcs have been doing for ever.

Ms has tweaked and perfected the pc game model by allowing you to install your game on 10 different game systems.

By allowing you to trade game in

By allowing you to let someone borrow it once

By allowing you to play it on any system you want as your games follow you

On the pc there are games you can't play without an Internet connection. It's the way of the future. You can't play a console without electricity.

You can tether Internet from your cell phone once a day and it only takes kilobytes to check in.

Sony clearly went he way of the caveman by keeping the same model for the next gen. It def makes last gen gamers happy. Keeps the binky in your mouth just a little longer. But it is coming out sooner or later. Grow up

MysticStrummer3962d ago

I don't know about other people's towns, but GameStop has closed 2/3 of the stores near me. Their business practices and price gouging was already starting to hurt them. There are simply better and cheaper ways to get used games, and GameStop was going to have to change their ways if they wanted to stay in business. You believe in right and wrong? Punishing consumers for GameStop's business practices is wrong.

Common sense stuff indeed.

If you think game prices will come down because of this, you're fooling yourself.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3962d ago
shutUpAndTakeMyMoney3962d ago

He Must be working on a new xbox exclusive.

**rolles eyes**

Relientk773962d ago

Oh I wouldn't be surprised at all

Rhaigun3962d ago

Arguments like this from Cliffy B piss me off. Hollywood would be over the moon if they could get away with $60 movie tickets. And their budgets are still millions of dollars higher.

If I go to the theater and pay $10 to see a movie, then also buy said movie for $20 on bluray, its still $30 cheaper.

Gamer19823962d ago

Exactly they spend a LOT more developing films too. Gamer developing done well makes millions for developers. They lose money not because of used games but because of being badly managed. Movies you could argue are bought by more than games but they are 1/4 of the price so that easily makes up for the difference. Te reason games don't sell like movies is the price and they talk about increasing them every generation. They are going in the wrong direction and eventually consumers will stop buying..

Blachek3962d ago

I agree with Cliffy B in relationship to the construction of price points for console games. Reading this site, it is ridiculous how people flock to Sony because they aren't trying to right the ship... where as Microsoft is. How else do people think they can correct this pricing structure?

MS has shown they are looking to the future, while Sony is playing Loss-Leader hoping that this fundamental ideology they both have leads to MS losing sales. If Sony doesn't implement a new structure this gen, you had better believe they will next.

Like Cliffy B said in this article, and I have in the past... Sony is riding this MS Hate Train knowing full well they will follow suit at some point. They are just waiting until people are tired of complaining about the direction the industry is headed.

THamm3962d ago

Lower the price of the COMPLETE games, not only would you sell more, also we wouldn't care about used games

3962d ago
LAZL0-Panaflex3962d ago

He's an Xbox fan boy scrub. If $60 games were crumbling he wouldn't have a Lamborghini and that wife being the treasure troll/teletubby he is.

PS gears 3 campaign was dogshit.

Mithan3962d ago

Or maybe he is smarter than most of you dumb fucks who post on the internet and knows the realities of a business case.

StuffofLegend3962d ago

Agreed. The game economy was built on non drm terms, I couldn't possibly believe that because one company tanks on the opposing terms that its the end of gaming. Worst case scenario, video games get a revolution and a huge indie surge.

Christopher3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

If you can't have this model, then why are publishers walking away with hundreds of millions and even billions in profits each year?

Also, if this model is broken, then why are PC games coming out cheaper and have a much higher piracy rate... but are still going strong?

tiffac0083962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

Exactly, I think creating the right expectations will lead to better development cost.

Its the industry that is over budgeting the game production due to unreasonable expectations and only heaven knows where they are actually investing and losing their money at.

I mean look at Square Enix, they made millions on Tomb Raider, Hitman and Sleeping Dogs and yet they come out and say they didn't make money?

Something is wrong here and the consumer is being used as a scapegoat.

rainslacker3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

I wish I could bubble you up cg.

Edit:BTW the answer to your question is because they are already finding ways to monetize games more. DLC, MT, etc. Cliffy says something to that effect, and he's not wrong, but it seems like the solution is there. It's not ideal for the gamer, and some companies abuse it, but it's a fair compromise in many cases, as it's completely optional on the user side of things.

I'd personally be very interested to see these numbers he speaks of. After all this talk, he finally mentions that he has numbers, so I say transparency is key if he wants us to bite.

Rubberlegs3962d ago

PC games are cheaper because its all digital now. You can get a new released game on the PC day one going digital for just about half off the price. Boxed versions your always going to be paying the retail price for a new release.

lilbrat233962d ago

He supports it because developers are getting greedy. Now if you are going to charge me to trade my game in you better drop those games to $30

Christopher3962d ago

Not developers. The people who lead the development companies and get money back from the games. Majority of developers make a salary and that's it.

Muffins12233962d ago

GOD DAMN IT HE HAS BEEN GINGERFIED

rainslacker3962d ago

Agreed. It's one thing to say what he does, but I've said many times before...Show us those numbers. Show us how the used game market affects bottom lines. Show us and maybe we'd be willing to compromise.

t0mmyb0y3962d ago

I work with a guy like him :)

wellard3962d ago

Yup, he is desperate for hate. I couldnt read the article properly though, all i got from it was, "Im a tool, greed greed greed, gamers are tossers, F&^£ them, im a tool, tool tool tool. Give me more money, im a tool"

TheTwelve3962d ago

I love this! Because I want everyone to see how wrong Microsoft is this gen. So that this crap never happens again in this industry.

12

Cueil3962d ago

he's just trolling for lolz

Fairchild Channel F3962d ago

Of course he agrees and supports DRM. He and his wife need gas money for their Lamborghini's.

KRUSSIDULL3962d ago

Lame excuse to use DRM to make more money. Publishers need more money all the time to create higher quality games so they ask for more money so they can compete with other high quality games.
But they don't seem to wanna make game development cheaper because the competition is to high.
In the end consumers may not be able buy new games because they weren't able to sell the used games.
Not to mention DRM may hurt other games than are not most have games because consumer only have afford to buy the most have titles.

otherZinc3962d ago

There will be a backlash waiting for SONY. SONY started this some time ago then pulled the string at the end. Great for consumers, not good for devs where their games sell less than 1mil 1st 8 weeks.

nosferatuzodd3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

People don't really get it this is a nazi move by Microsoft
Look I'm a Sony fan but I'm not that blind if Sony did this crap I would stay away from them has well.

Forget about ps4 buy a PC instead or wii u just don't sopport this crap from Microsoft
remember this is bigger than ps4 vs Xbox this is about freedom if Microsoft succeeds then
Kiss you're asss goodbye with owning you're own game

Tyre3962d ago

@nosferatuzodd Well said. bubble for you!

FamilyGuy3962d ago

This guy is an idiot, not all games have to be AAA, they can be made at high-decent quality with lower budgets and still be very profitable. Heavy Rain is a good example of this and a few indie games have raked in cash this gen: Super Stardust guys, Journey devs, Minecraft makers, Castle Crashers creators, and more.

Renting and used games are NOT the problem here. Games sell based on their perceived quality and worth. No matter how big the budget spent, a game has to look like it's worth the cost. Visual quality, replay value, content, etc.

Consoldtobots3962d ago

MS and their minions are COMPLETELY talking out of their behinds on this one. the biggest problem with the used game market was the publishers bearing the brunt of second and third dips of their multiplayer service from people who paid money for a used game to a third party like gamestop. EA fixed that problem with their $10 online fee for previously used titles. What this amounts to is GREEEEEEEED from MS and those in the industry who think like they do. In other words they feel the cost of entry to any one of their games is $60 for EVERYONE. I say good luck to them with that attitude let us know how it works out for ya.

jcnba283958d ago

For telling the truth? It's like you don't want to face reality.

+ Show (27) more repliesLast reply 3958d ago
Mr_Nuts3962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

God it's Carrot Top's younger brother

PirateThom3962d ago

Maybe if games weren't $60, more people would buy new. That's why it's crumbling.

ShwankyShpanky3962d ago

"You cannot have game and MARKETING BUDGETS this high..."

Hmmmmmm..... then don't?

Qrphe3962d ago

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

$10 million dollar budget

http://www.gamespot.com/new...

Metro The Last Light made with 10% of the typical AAA budget

Simple answer for Cliffy, cut game budgets (marketing specially). Publishers are the true cancer here, hopefully self-publishing brings everything into balance.

Viper73962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

Exactly, the blockbuster business model is broken to begin with and should be abandoned as soon as possible.

There are plenty of indies, doing AAA-quality stuff with budgets fraction of what AAA-developers.

Sure their games might be missing 30 minute cut-scenes, hollywood voice acting and they focus heavily on gameplay.. wait a minute, why do I even play AAA-games anymore?

ShaunCameron3961d ago

Eh. The $60 price is nothing. The real problem is the high costs just to make the game itself. Some of the most successful games this generation were made with relatively low budgets. The Call Of Duty franchise, any Wii game, etcetera.

@ Viper7

Exactly.

jc485733962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

wait, something doesn't quite makes sense. He is saying that MS is the savior? preventing industry from loosing money because of used games? Then what was all that BS about games getting cheaper to develop now?

Edit: Even Ubisoft believes the importance of used games, so I don't know why Cliff is bringing up Assassin's Creed as an example of how much games cost to make when you have thousands of dev working on it.

Relientk773962d ago (Edited 3962d ago )

That's nice. PS4 and Wii U, No restrictions ftw. Microsoft go home, your drunk.

Show all comments (315)
100°

New Shark Tank Inspired Wolves’ Den Game Contest With Spatial, Youtube, and Gaming Legends

Rapper/Actor Ice-T, and YouTube, Gaming Legends, Cliff Bleszinski, Welyn, And Barji To Judge First ‘Wolves Den’ Game Jam Series On Spatial Platform

Read Full Story >>
terminalgamer.com
N4GTG39d ago

This could be great for some indie developers

280°

Gears of War Creator CliffyB Offers His Thoughts on Xbox Exclusives Going Multiplatform

During a recent Game Rant interview, Gears of War creator CliffyB comments on Xbox-exclusive games possibly adopting multiplatform models.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
S2Killinit40d ago

Im sure he would love it. More money for him.

OtterX40d ago

Yea, I remember seeing him and his Lamborghini at one point in history. Lol, I think that kind of gives it away.

rippermcrip40d ago

Doubtful he gets any residuals from anything Gears related.

rippermcrip39d ago

Bunch of clowns down voting without any explanation of how exactly he is getting money off Gears. You think Notch still gets Minecraft money too?

jznrpg39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

Depends on the contract. Some contracts have residuals some don’t

Whitey2k40d ago

Sometimes I don't get what he says half the times. He could of put gears on the playstation from the start but he's fanboyness for xbox got in the way

Notellin40d ago

I imagine this is exactly how fanboys feel how this went down. Microsoft paid for all the development and took all the risk off Epic games for a new IP.

It has nothing to do with anyone being a fanboy. Well other than yourself who oversimplified this entire franchises history.

LoveSpuds40d ago

I agree Notellin, however, once he was in bed with MS he did become pretty 'anti Sony' ans was such a shill for MS.

Hofstaderman40d ago

This. And Sony also does this with titles these days.

shinoff218339d ago

I thought it was said cliffs shopped it around hence rumors of a ps3 demo being out there. If ms took on all the cost, why is there a ps3 demo?

Rude-ro39d ago

Not true at all.
Microsoft had to buy the ip because the contract ran out on keeping it exclusive.
Microsoft took no risk, they just marketed the game and payed for a contract.
Not hard to find out.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 39d ago
Ironmike40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Your the the fanboy

Sciurus_vulgaris40d ago

No, Epic signed a development and publishing contract with Xbox for Gears of War. After Judgement Microsoft still had the Gears of War publishing rights. Epic then sold the Gears of War IP to Microsoft in 2014. Cliffy B never owned Gears of War, he was just a lead designer of the series.

rippermcrip39d ago

Ya I don't know what people are saying about CliffyB making money of Gears sales nowadays. He was never the owner and Epic no longer owns it either.

ChasterMies40d ago

“He could of put gears on the playstation from the start but he's fanboyness for xbox got in the way”

It has nothing to do with fondness for the Xbox platform. Microsoft paid for exclusivity.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 39d ago
Travesty40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Well when you look at the sales perspective of ps5. It has a big audience selling over a 2 to 1 ratio. It makes money sense.
Fanboy era was at its prime during the ps3-360 generation. It’s not as toxic as it once was, thankfully. People grow out of it eventually. I have my preference just as the next person. That being said it’s coming to be more about expanding availability instead of standing behind a brand. Much more Microsoft than Sony. But Sony will probably move up its time of PC release for increase revenue.
We will see, it’s just speculation.

Psychonaut8540d ago

CliffyB is like David Jaffe at this point, always quick with the opinions but haven’t made a successful game in over a decade at this point. Do any of us really care what they think about anything? I certainly don’t.

shinoff218339d ago

I never liked the guy tbh but he's got more relevance in gaming then we do.

Skuletor39d ago

CliffyB, I haven't heard that name since Lawbreakers flopped.

Show all comments (21)
390°

Sorry, CliffyB, But "Gears of War" Doesn’t Need A "God of War"- Style Reboot

Shaz from GL writes: “In an interview, Cliff Bleszinski says that he’d be interested in helping develop a Gears of War reboot akin to God of War. Unnecessary? I think so.”

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
Jin_Sakai165d ago

Regardless, Gears of War gameplay feels outdated this day and age.

spicelicka163d ago

I completely disagree. Outdated in what way? There is literally no other cover based TPS multiplayer game like it and the core gameplay is so good that people still play Gears 1 today. I can't think of any games that has shotgun battles like Gears. The real issue is that there is simply no new audience for it, because the learning curve is so steep. It just needs to market itself better and the work needs to be done on the campaign side. Better to just split up the single player and multiplayer as two different projects and releases.

Also, this who "reboot" discussion isn't considering the fact that God of war doesn't have multiplayer as a significant portion of the game. Single player only games have a lot more freedom to change. With Gears you have to consider that there's an entire community still playing every day, so you can't just change the core gameplay balance. On top of that they can't dedicate as many resources to single player as God of war, because the budget has to be split with multiplayer.

163d ago
Gamingsince1981163d ago

There is no other one like it because there is no demand for that style of game, kinda obvious really. If there was an interest in gears style games the market would be flooded with them.

lucian229163d ago

Gears of War 1 and 2 were bad combat wise.... Story wise too. I beat both of them because of the hype and gave up after that.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 163d ago
GamerRN163d ago

I agree. It needs done kind of overhaul, but I don't think a God of War style would suit this game.

I gotta be honest I don't know what it needs, but it needs something ... And 5 wasn't it

terrorofdeath163d ago

Maybe it's a reboot more in the sense of a more emotional storyline or something like God of War, and some small tweaks in terms of gameplay.

anast164d ago

They don't have the talent to do a GoW style reboot.

DOMination-163d ago

Do you have a genuine reason to come to that conclusion, other than it not being a PlayStation studio?

The Coalition probably have the best and most knowledge team on Unreal Engine 5 outside of Epic. I'd have thought if anyone "had the talent", it would be them.

Rude-ro163d ago

Because they did not do a fantastic job when they took over the ip.

In fact, the majority of ips under Microsoft shows complete signs of cheap development with bigger marketing budgets.

More make up on dated engines can work… but can not be mistaken for innovative.
No innovation equals no ability to push a franchise into anything new.
Take the “open world” introduction in the last gears…
Empty vast traveling areas to get to pre determined “random” encounter areas is a cheap developing approach.. not innovation to build any trust into.

kneon163d ago

Even if they were the best in the world at UE5 that would only mean that they might make a great looking game. It takes a lot more than that to make a great game.

anast163d ago

"Do you have a genuine reason to come to that conclusion, other than it not being a PlayStation studio?"

History and current output.

jznrpg98d ago

Look at the last 10 years and you have plenty of evidence

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 98d ago
rgraf77163d ago

God of War is overrated. Those boring boat rides talking and backtracking.

GamingManiac163d ago

Bruh, that made me laugh lol

anast163d ago

I'm not big on the game, but it isn't overrated.

Inverno164d ago

A reimagining that continues the lore, and story of established characters is absolutely a great way to continue a series that needs a refresh. I agree that any long standing franchise that has run it's course definitely needs a "God of War" style reboot, because GOW did it right. I might have my issues with the last two games but they did right by the series regardless.

Ra3030164d ago

There's no helping Gears of Woke. Microsoft killed this franchise when they forced the woke culture into the story.

itBourne163d ago

God of War did the same, just in a more subtle sly way.... They could of probably made a few cuts and bam, PG rated movie right there. God of Rainbows and Daisies.

itBourne163d ago

Dang, so many dislikes lol, willing to elaborate, just didnt want to throw out a bunch of spoilers. If anyone wants to discuss as to why, im always open to discussions. Just shoot me a DM.

343_Guilty_Spark163d ago (Edited 163d ago )

How is it woke? Because the lead is a female?

Is Horizon woke also?

CantThinkOfAUsername163d ago

It is, but not due to the gender of its protagonist.

zeuanimals163d ago

There's no helping you. Anti-woke culture killed your brain when they force fed you the idea that diversity is the worst thing ever.

Ra3030163d ago

Lol....good to see that you agree as do I with the fact Microsoft went woke as Disney with the Gear franchise. Microsoft tried to save the franchise by taking the formula that was working with the strong Bro leads and going to the woke weakass female formula that no one cared about.

Binarycode163d ago

Diversity isn't a strength. Look at the world. That's the reason it's in the state it is.

Gamingsince1981163d ago

Forced diversity is the reason people don't like diversity, you should just hire who is best for what, not have to tick boxes first then worry about talent next.

zeuanimals163d ago (Edited 163d ago )

@ra3030

Every company has gone woke, even successful ones. Those don't fit your narrative though. Yeah no, the only two things Microsoft and Disney have in common is that they're woke /s

Totally not that they're risk averse companies that don't wanna innovate in fear of it being a waste of time. They've got bottomless pockets and limited time. So they spend their time trying to crack codes, find patterns, create money making templates out of whatever property they're working on. It needs to be as mass produceable as possible. Disney and Microsoft, bringing sweat shop factory made quality to gaming storefronts and theaters near you.

zeuanimals163d ago

@binary

Right because the world was so much better segregated... and there's a million other reasons I'd put ahead of diversity as to why the world is the way it is, but way to show how much diversity is on your brain by how dangerous you think it is. It's literally the cause of everything to you.

@gaming

Actually forced diversity is the only reason people like diversity. If you don't force people to do it, they won't do it. The only people who end up liking it due to having met new people with different perspectives only ever got to because they were kind of forced to. That's literally part of the reason diversity is being advocated for, because it promotes innovation. Having dozens of people with too similar of viewpoints can lead them to being too likeminded and unable to think of different solutions, or even different problems that weren't even recognized. There's more than one way to be a useful hire, and having a genuinely unique perspective is one of them.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 163d ago
+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 163d ago
Crows90164d ago

I thought they were doing a soft reboot with gears4 but then it turned out to be the exact same as all the others.

A more horror oriented and tight corridor renewal would work for that franchise....also...why they got guns? They're alien like...they should have other types of weapons entirely.

OMNlPOTENT163d ago

dang why do most of the different species in god of war use swords, axes, and bows? They should have other types of weapons entirely.

Crows90163d ago (Edited 163d ago )

They don't... Okay you obviously haven't played god of war. What a way of owning yourself man! Lol

The draugr are pretty much the only ones...and besides we're comparing established mythology with made up bug aliens

Show all comments (75)