310°

Dev: "PS4 and Xbox One are better than PC's in many ways"

How many years PS4 and Xbox One stay up to date? What are the opportunities in cloud gaming? What graphics can we expect from next-gen games? In an interview with PCG the developer Umbra Software talked about PS4 and Xbox One.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
Wizziokid3969d ago

It goes both ways

PC's have advantages
Consoles have advantages

Blackdeath_6633969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

i agree but quality on pc is better without a doubt. i am still very fond of my console because of the convenience and accessibility it brings and i'm glad that sony hasn't taken away that convenience with drm,always-on blocked used games and the rest of it because when you impose that much restrictions in my eyes the benefits of owning a console quickly deteriorates

Haules3969d ago

PC-PS4 for me, best combination!

PC for multiplatforms
PS4 for exclusives!

TheBlackSmoke3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

"quality on pc is better without a doubt"

Sorry but PC is not a standardised platform. The Graphics whore PC community is a tiny minority of PC gamers. Which is why that market does not sell and pc developers like crytek jump to console.

Just because YOUR PC can run games at a certain level doesn't mean the next 100 people's pc can.

Minecraft, WoW and LoL are the biggest thing on PC and they all have low system requirements.

Back to the article, its easy for people to simply look at specs side by side and say PC is better than console, but they don't factor in the talent of the developer and also the fact that consoles have full dedicated resources to the game.

Look at the last of us, there's no PC that can run anything near that quality on 512mb ram. Imagine the possibilities in PS4 future with devs like naughty dog.

edit: @decrypt

"95% games released are multiplats PC gets the best version there no question asked. Hell many multiplats on PC are like exclusives check BF3 or may be Skyrim running with a few hundered mods"

Of course and they sell like shit in comparison to console games. The only games on pc that can boast sales are low spec, ftp and mmo games.

Its funny you mention skyrim which only looks like a new game if HEAVILY modded with texture packs, enb's body replacer's, tonnes of ini file tweaking etc and BF3 which is desgined for high spec PCs in mind first, when the majority of multiplats are made for console and then ported to PC with minimal uprezzing and AA options.

The notion that a multiplat PC game with 90% the same assets as the console version somehow looks like a "new game" or a "generation ahead" is delusional.

decrypt3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

"PS4 and Xbox One are better than PC's in many ways"

How so?

1. Both consoles need to pay to go online now.

2. They have no BC so must create a new games library from 0 games. Mean while PC has 25 years of BC on its side and can emulate literally any console in history asides the PS3 and Xbox 360.

3. Their games cost more 10-20 usd more than PC versions.

4. Still no mods, Console makers rather console gamers bought DLCs.

5. For the price 400-500usd for console you could easily make a rig around 500usd that would beat both of them and would hold the option to be upgradable in the future.

@blacksmoke

95% games released are multiplats PC gets the best version there no question asked. Hell many multiplats on PC are like exclusives check BF3 or may be Skyrim running with a few hundered mods.

Then PC has exclusives too, its a known fact Xbox hardly had any exclusives. Nintendo games can be emulated on PC. So that just leaves the Playstation and its exclusives really. PC easily has more. Check out games like Dota 2, Shogun 2, Dayz, Arma 3. The difference is those games provide hundreds of hours of game play. Mean while the typical sony exclusive lasts 8 hours no replayability.

As for the 512mb arguement. PCs are designed for more than just games. They are designed for multitasking being able to handle several applications at once. Why do you think options like Cross game chat or a good browser never made it to the PS3? yea the 512 mb RAM.

reynod3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

@Theblackstone

Pretty much any low to mid range PC these days can play games in 1080p. If anyone is interested in gaming on PC they will atleast get a half decent GPU. You dont really need a monster PC to max games out. People going for the highest end of hardware are only going for bragging rights or may be interested in multiscreen gaming.

@panthers

Anyone half interested in PC gaming would have a 200usd GPU atleast, which would be more than faster than any console and will max out games at 1080p.

Panthers3969d ago

Im the opposite. I do PC for exclusives and PS4 for everything else.

SC2, SWTOR, and more are only on PC. If not I would be a console only gamer. So much nicer playing from my couch.

Panthers3969d ago

The whole "PC gets the best version" only applies to a small percent of PCs though. At least at the start of a console gen.

Most PC owners would get the better version on console since their PC isnt up to par.

Blackdeath_6633969d ago

wow it seems people REALLY don't like talking about PC's on this site.

TheBlackSmoke3969d ago

"As for the 512mb arguement. PCs are designed for more than just games. They are designed for multitasking being able to handle several applications at once. Why do you think options like Cross game chat or a good browser never made it to the PS3? yea the 512 mb RAM"

What is the point of this point? I already know that' s the reason. My point is you cant judge ram on a console the same as ram on a PC because consoles aren't running hundreds of background tasks.

People who are declaring 8gram on ps4 is "lolz weak compared to mah peecee" aren't realising that a console operates differently and so much more can be achieved with that than on a pc with the same specs.

My point stand's, you cant run the last of us on PC with 512 ram.

reynod3969d ago

"aren't realising that a console operates differently and so much more can be achieved with that than on a pc with the same specs."

The keyword here being SAME SPEC, you need to realise, 8GB RAM on PC has been pretty standard for the last few years. Today PCs are pushing above 16GB of RAM since its so cheap. GPU are coming equipped with super fast 3-6GB of GDDR 5 RAM. Hence making an arguement of same spec is not valid. You'd have to make a last gen PC to make the same specs as you would get on console.

TheBlackSmoke3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

@reynod, you are talking so much bollocks.

There is NO WAY a LOW to mid spec PC can run a current gen PC game at 1080p "easily". Do you even understand what low to mid spec is? out of the box not intended for high end gaming, laptops, netbooks, still running on xp, vista etc.

Even a mac book pro you buy today cant handle 1080p games without frame loss.

And again, acting like its standard that every pc gamer has 16 gb of ram is retarded. How can PC dominate anything if only a few thousand enthusiasts have a PC with capability anywhere near that.

All you have done is prove my point that PC gamers need higher specs to achieve the same thing as a console. the only thing you are boasting about is that you have the privilege to spend money to upgrade it every 2 years. lol

kevnb3969d ago

PC for multiplats and exclusives, ps4 for the other exclusives I care about.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3969d ago
Somebody3968d ago (Edited 3968d ago )

@TheBlackSmoke

"Just because YOUR PC can run games at a certain level doesn't mean the next 100 people's pc can.

"True...if you're still looking at the past. It's changing. Let's stop with the graphic whore argument and look at what the potential effect next gen console hardware will have on PC gaming in the near future:

If a game is optimized for an X86-based console using PC-like development process (the very selling point Sony said in the first announcement) then why do we assume X86-based PCs in a year's time would be unable to do the same? PS4 and X1 are primarily AMD machines who also make PC hardware and has planned to evolved the things it had learned in building next gen beyond that. I won't be surprised seeing a motherboard with GDDR5 Ram slots coming out by next year.

PC evolve over time while consoles stay the same...add a single architecture between them then we might be seeing medium PCs or even laptops playing multiplatform games at the same fidelity as next gen consoles. It was hard in the last/current generation since developers have to code three platforms with different hardware and architecture each. Now, there's one architecture for ALL 3 platforms using hardware that came from one shared source-the PC.

Sonyslave33969d ago

LOL what advantages does consoles have over pc none really.

DJMarty3969d ago

Easy of use, all consoles have standard hardware(closed system), price of hardware, console exclusive games.

decrypt3969d ago

The same closed hardware has you at the mercy of the console maker. They want to implement DRM, nothing you can do about it.

They want pay for online, nothing you can do about it.

PC is pretty easy to use now a days too. Its all about click Install on Steam, click Play.

Infact i would argue PC is much more convinient, Console has an update. You are stuck cant play without the firmware update, On PC well you decide when you want to update.

windblowsagain3969d ago

Once you've bought a game on steam it's worthless.

Making backups is easy enough though.

PS4 pay to play is disappointing.

Shame Destiny isn't coming to PC, would have been good.

Although i'm a big fan of BF3, BF4 just looks 3.5 and the same gameplay. Want something new.

reynod3969d ago

@windblowsagain

Games bought on Steam discounts are bought at extreme discounts, no point reselling them.

Infact they can be seen as a collection. I have over 200 of them on my Steam library, most of them bought on discounts. I am happy i can play them for decades to come. No concern not being able to play them the next time i upgrade.

Unlike console where there is no BC.

badz1493969d ago

high end pcs have more power and perform higher too and I'll stop THERE because there is no current PC setup that cost $399 and perform even close to to the PS4 and that's a FACT!

but when it come to a general question why console is better...I'll just say this...PS+! there is nothing else ON EARTH that gives you THAT many contents for a measly $50 a year, PERIOD!

3969d ago
hellvaguy3969d ago

"PS+! there is nothing else ON EARTH that gives you THAT many contents for a measly $50 a year, PERIOD!"

Not trying to start up a flame war, but just days ago and for several years strong, sony fans were so proud of free online. Funny how the tides have turned and they don't critize sony now over it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3969d ago
Hellsvacancy3969d ago

Games would be one thing, so many good console games you cant get on PC, Red Dead, MGS4, The Last Of Us for example

Other than that, none

JsonHenry3969d ago

The one and only advantage is a closed hardware architecture making it easier to optimized for. But that one advantage is kinda huge.

But then PC comes along and takes winning position in all else.

Haules3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

PC will always be on top! but i Like the PS4!

warewolfSS3969d ago

Are you a real person?

You do know your console dosent care about you right?

Blackdeath_6633969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

accessibility,affordability and convenience.
affordability:
pc's are expensive even if you try to build one with the same specs as ps4 you will never ever be able to bring it down to $399 without skimping out on some parts and making a not very well made machine.
accessibility:
consoles work out of the box no need to install os,drivers no need to build it etc.. for mainstream people/layman they will not want to deal with that and much rather buy something that works as it is.
convenience:
both the above points contribute to this one in that you have to go through a lot less hassle to just enjoy your games and if you're not bothered about quality (one of the advantages of a pc)then there is no reason to do so.
conclusion, if you just want to play games consoles are very suitable way to do so. PC has many advantages and i can argue for that too but it really boils down to what you're looking for.

malokevi3969d ago

Did you even bother to read the article?

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3969d ago
givemeshelter3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

PC gamers like myself should be damn happy about the XboxOne and PS4. Why? Because they both use PC architecture as the PC and games will be so easy to port back and forth. So in the end, PC gamers will get most if not all 3rd party games hitting these systems because it will be a snap to port games back and forth. Win Win in my books.
I am getting disagrees for stating this? LOL. Only on N4G.COM

iamgoatman3969d ago

Now paying for online is required for the X1 and PS4 I don't see how this can be debated at all anymore.

kB03969d ago

Prefering console over pc is one thing, but PC can't be compared...not only is it a lot more multifunctional but it also has room to expand, upgrade and customize...

The two cannot be compared!

Not only that, but pc has been playing 1080p for years...even at 60+ fps and 3D.....

So really I dont get what ppl try to prove with these comments other than stirring the pot?

givemeshelter3969d ago

What I did find with this E3 was these next gen systems were showing off physics, graphics and gameplay that I have enjoyed for YEARS on my PC and in most cases those games on these systems did not look any better and actually some looked worse then PC games.
Obviously as time passes these next gen games will get better but I found this interesting that the games looked like PC games years ago.

iistuii3969d ago

I agree. I watched them race with NFS Rivals & all I could think was my PC Most Wanted maxed out already looks wayyy better than that. But as you said earlier, it'll be even better now as some of the crap ports we've had to put up with Dead Island cough cough, should be a thing of the past.

Show all comments (51)
60°

How to recruit Lam in Eiyuden Chronicle: Hundred Heroes

Lam is among the 120 characters available for recruitment in Eiyuden Chronicle: Hundred Heroes. While she is one of the many straightforward recruits, a known bug may prevent players from recruiting her if certain conditions are met. Despite developers’ assurances of fixing the bug, some early access players still encounter issues with recruiting Lam despite attempting the standard method.

Read Full Story >>
infinitestart.com
320°

Tomb Raider Remastered just quietly censored one in-game detail

Tomb Raider 1-3 Remastered players are ticked off by the game’s most recent patch, which censors in-game pin-up posters of Lara Croft.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbible.com
rlow111h ago

This is why gaming is screwed. When people change things to fit someone’s agenda, it’s a slippery slope downhill.

Christopher10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Even if that agenda is of the developer? Way to remove developer rights.

***One player called it a “huge problem with modern games,” saying they can now be “ruined AFTER people buy them”.***

The level of drama. Yes, I recall sitting there for more hours than I did anything else in the game. These two pinups are the core of the game, after all!

coolbeans9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

rlow1's cringe catastrophizing aside, I do think developers *ought* to strive to maintain an original work to the best of their ability. The language of a "remaster" tacitly implies that - for good or ill - what's being resold is what fans remember but better.

Profchaos9h ago

Games can be ruined after purchasing them yeah we know this not from this but from GTA IV which had half it's radio content patched out due to licensing expirations and to me that was a huge deal.

This pin up poster is a bit of nonsense but the whole argument of modern games can be ruined post launch is Absol true.

DedicatedDark8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

It's not their work to censor. They are incharge of restoration & remastering the work, not overwriting it.

Barlos6h ago

It's not the agenda of the developer though, they're pandering and trying to increase their ESG score.

Way to support censorship...

victorMaje6h ago

It’s not the end of the world for sure, but I understand the hate towards this kind of change. I believe it’s also a matter of principle.

Imagine a Picasso painting being restored & the restorer deciding there aren’t enough strokes, or some lines aren’t straight enough or curved enough…not sure it would/should sit well with people.

Have all original devs signed off on this change? Even if it’s the case, are we saying older gamers are better mentally equipped to process what was there than current gamers, hence the change?

Enough time ago the case was made that games are an art form. We’re supposed to have won that case.
So which is it? Are games art or not?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6h ago
Eidolon7h ago

Hasn't this been happened for over a decade since remasters? I can't see that it's any worse now. Maybe if Sweet Baby starts getting their hands on remasters we will definitely have a problem.

Rebel_Scum9h ago

tbh I dont see something like this as censorship. Does anyone else not find it strange for someone to stick pin ups of themsleves in a locker room?

Now of it was a pin up of some half naked firefighters it might make sense as Lara might like that, and if they removed that I would cry censorship. But removing pin ups of the main character, yeah I get it.

Barlos6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

It's a game, and they were placed there for the audience. It's not real life. If it was, she wouldn't have fought a T-Rex now would she?

Yes, it's censorship but it's a bit less in your face. If they were in the original game, then they should have been in the remasters. It's bad enough that they have that ridiculous unnecessary warning at the start, but then they start removing things post launch. I don't care how small the change, they shouldn't be doing it. It's nothing but ESG pandering but in a subtle way.

Rebel_Scum5h ago

Look bro, if you have pictures of yourself naked on a bear skin rug up in your house let me tell you, its not normal.

jambola4h ago

I wasn't aware censorship was based on what made sense to you

Rebel_Scum4h ago

Likewise, what a stupid comment.

jambola4h ago

I agree
Your comment was pretty stupid

Rebel_Scum3h ago

I never said censorship is based on what I say dumbass. Just because I dont see this as censorship doesnt mean I’m saying others cant.

How about you come at me with your opinion rather than snarky comments with no thought on the matter.

SimpleDad6h ago

By the year 2030, this remaster collection will totally be changed and censored. Probably will remove Lara as a playable character. It's ridiculous. Glad that my family didn't buy this.
I still have Tomb Raider 2 PS1 as a memory.

jambola4h ago

Those shorts are a little revealing
Should probably make them snow pants

Barlos4h ago

They'll probably make her trans

CobraKai6h ago

It’s mentioned in the article, and it’s a point i 100% agree with, it’s the fact that they can censor a game after you buy it. That’s total bullshit.

Killer2020UK5h ago

Whilst it's an overreaction to say this has "ruined" the game, it's still problematic that this has happened post launch and for many, post-purchase.

I don't want someone to change a product for the worse after I've bought it. The same goes for implementing micro transactions after reviews.

I wonder why they did this? Nobody was kicking up a fuss as far as I'm aware.

maykhausonninh5h ago

Nobody was kicking up a fuss as far as I'm aware.

Show all comments (26)
100°

Final Fantasy III Pixel Remaster Review – You Are Your Job, Apparently

Gary Green said: In a time where an enhanced, 3D remake of Final Fantasy III already exists, it’s hard to argue that Final Fantasy III Pixel Remaster is the definitive version we were expecting. With Final Fantasy III already being the last in the series to be translated and make its way west, this is something of a slap in the face for the fans. Still, let’s not be disheartened. There may be many shortfalls in this edition of Final Fantasy III, however there’s no denying that this classic JRPG still holds some nostalgic value, even if it struggles to break away from its original hardware limitations.

Read Full Story >>
pslegends.com
FACTUAL evidence11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

It’s funny I’m seeing these articles about pixel remaster, and I just platinumed 1-4 within 8 days lol. I’ve been on FF5 for about a week now. Let’s just say 5 was the start of FF having content like crazy. I should have the plat within 2-3 days.

MrBaskerville2h ago

The game being an accurate represantation of the original was not a slap in the face to the fans. The 3D remasters looked like ass (visually) tbh.