70°

Will the Xbox One and PS4 bring in more gamers?

Both Sony and Microsoft are throwing around specs regarding teraflops and polygons and lens flares and megahertz and blah blah blah, but where does the next generation of hardcore gamers come from when kids are getting used to smartphone and tablet games that are basically good enough?

Read Full Story >>
usatoday.com
aceitman3988d ago

I think that sony will get some more gamers that wanted a high end pc but cant afford to buy one , and it will get back the sony gamers they lost to ms, and get a good amount of ms gamers .

Gr813988d ago (Edited 3988d ago )

The answer is no. Just getting dissatisfied customers from another camp doesn't mean you're getting more gamers.

I don't think Either Console will bring in more gamers. Neither will Wii U btw.

abzdine3988d ago

just give me those PS4 games announced so far and i'll be busy for months!

NateCole3988d ago (Edited 3988d ago )

There are new gamers born and growing up everyday.

Anthotis3988d ago

I can see a lot of mindless hipsters buying the Xbox One simply because they like multimedia devices, whereas they wouldn't be fussed if it was a games console like the PS4.

The only other people buying it will be those who have a religious devotion to Xbox. People who refuse to accept that their beloved console is a piece of shit, and will buy it for the reason alone, regardless of whether they have a decent internet connection or not.

NextGen24Gamer3988d ago

If the consoles came out today. Yes Ps4 would sell better to Gamers! But it doesn't. 6 months to go and alot more games to show from both companies. Way to early to judge.

Let's revist this discussion after E3! I have a feeling xbox gamers will be happier as Games will be shown & played!

Don't be so short sighted people! I believe that this next generation will be a lot like the last one. Both consoles will sell very good and gamers will play the games they want to play!

Sony doesn't have the bluray advantage anymore and to the every day consumer the numbers on the box look the same. 8 gigs of ram, 8 processors, blah blah blah...It will come down to Games & Extra Features!

Get your popcorn out!

Why o why3988d ago (Edited 3988d ago )

No 1 year head start either. It is all about games, price, marketing and word of mouth. One will probably have more games to show than the other....ill make you right on its best to wait for e3 though, but some of the loyalist 360 gamers are heading towards the sony camp... tell them to care about not knowing about 8 vs 8 bla blah and all of the aforementioned factors

NextGen24Gamer3988d ago

no one is headed over to sony camp from the xbox camp. That's just silly. First of all launch is 6 months away. If a one hour hardware reveal turns people to another camp, then E3 and game announcements will bring those same people back! If you own an xbox you probably love

Call of Duty
Mass Effect
Halo
Gears of War
Forza

That's a lot of gamers that will most likely want to continue to play those blockbuster franchises and with their friends on XBOX LIVE! Call of Duty will either look the same on both or look better on the xbox one. But even more important than that, the die hards will want the new stuff FIRST!!!!

The fans who love those games, and want more from those franchises, will stay with the xbox. All the added features is icing on the cake! When you go to your friends house and you see all the cool things the xbox one can do that the ps4 can't...We will see how that turns out! LOL...

I just don't get peoples logic. It's really not that complicated.

All xbox gamers want is the games they want to play and a better gaming experience than they had with the xbox 360...Easy!

Anon19743988d ago (Edited 3988d ago )

Depends on the price points. The Wii taught that lesson quickly enough.

On a side note, I find it funny that so many predict PC gaming is going to pick up. It's like they haven't been paying attention the past decade. PC piracy is hitting roughly 90% and developers simply aren't making games for PC like they used to. That's not going to change. I'm not saying there isn't anything to play on the PC, don't get me wrong, but for your average consumer/gamer, there's no way they're suddenly going to start wandering down the isles of their local computer store to build their own gaming PC's en masse.

Console gaming has the visibility, the price, the convenience, the developer support and the games. While PC game spending is rising, a lot of that has to do with the rise of social games, and it's still little more than a quarter of the industry overall.

I'm not dismissing PC gaming, I'm simply looking at the facts. I'm really surprised that so many seem to be concluding that PC gaming is the future somehow. It was the future 20 years ago when the experience was substantially better than console games and it had multiplayer all to itself. That's not the case today and while console gaming has evolved, PC gaming's hangups have remained consistent this entire time.

Supermax3988d ago

I think everyone that owns a ps3 and a 360 will in the next 3 years will buy the next gen variant,I'm gettin both,and I don't count Nintendo out of the equation.

B1663r3988d ago

The XBox One has real potential to kill off the console market here in North America...

I'm starting to wonder if that was the plan all along...

My_Name_BTW_Is_Dante3988d ago

Sony may see a rise in the amount of gamers playing on their console but the overall numbers for consoles will fall due to people either going to PC gaming or even going to mobile gaming (if they're casuals).

ApolloTheBoss3988d ago

When it comes to Xbox One, if you're talking about the typical jock who only plays Call of Duty and Madden then yeah.

Show all comments (17)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

190°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot13h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke197h ago(Edited 7h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke193h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

-Foxtrot1h ago

"Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs"

He's literally just told you why

We're waiting like 15 years before a sequel comes out, it's insane

Skyrim came out in 2011, the next game is expected to come out in 2027 at the earliest so that's 16 years apart while Fallout 4 came out in 2015 and might not release until 2031, again 16 years.

We're fine with Bethesda trying new things and doing new IPs like Starfield but adding a new game to the cycle now means a bigger wait. Also Starfield didn't meet most peoples expectations, can you imagine waiting 15 years or so for a sequel and it's disappointing? It would feel even worse because you would have to wait another 15 years to see if they manage to come back from it.

They need to give it to another developer, we don't need main numbered titles but a spin off of Fallout and Elder Scrolls should be cycled in between the long gaps of the main releases.

Once again you are making out people want these games as quick as possible when all we want is a standard development time of at least 4 years or so rather than waiting 15.

mandf5h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor6h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave5h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor3h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

-Foxtrot1h ago

@Skuletor

Who's saying to rush the releases? No one is saying that...

People just don't want to be waiting 15 years for a sequel, they aren't working on the game for that long, you do realise that right? The issue isn't coming down to them working on the game and us "rushing them", it's the fact they are working on other games like Starfield now meaning bigger gaps before they even get started on them.

I bet you any more Elder Scrolls VI only entered full development last year when Starfield was finished despite being announced in 2018.

Duke193h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai5h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris4h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (22)