210°

Is Xbox the 'One'? What Microsoft isn't telling us

OXCGN:

"The dust has barely settled from Microsoft’s Xbox One reveal and fanboy outrage is still thick in the air.

Here are five essential aspects to Microsoft’s new angular apparatus that really should have been revealed on the big stage."

BadCircuit3985d ago

I'm really not sure I'm excited about this one or the PS4. I'll definitely need more details. They should have left them for E3 or done a full reveal early, not this half baked rubbish.

NatureOfLogic3985d ago

Is Xbox the one? yeah the one no one wants. Already sick using one, I mean the word not the actually console.

Before anyone gets all serious, It's all fun and games, unless it's Xbox one. ;)

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney3985d ago

"What Microsoft isn't telling us"

that its sh!t!!

buddymagoo3985d ago

Do they really need to tell you that? Isn't it already obvious?

dedicatedtogamers3985d ago

As a gamer, ask yourself: are the features of Xbox One how I want gaming to look in the future? Ignore the brand. Ignore that it's Xbox. If this was a box with no brand at all, does this scream "future of gaming" or "future of TV" to you? Now ask yourself this: if I buy this console, am I sending companies like EA and Microsoft a message that this is what I want the future of gaming to look like?

I want details on BOTH consoles (and I'll be just as upset if Sony decides to implement a used-game fee for their own games), but ultimately, PS4 and Xbox One are going in two divergent directions, that much should be crystal clear.

It's really quite simple. If you like gaming, support a game console. I'm not even going to buy a PS4 until about a year from now (that's my personal policy), but the Xbox One isn't remotely on my radar.

gaminoz3985d ago

This is exactly right and I'm the same.

gaminoz3985d ago

What's with the 'cloud' on both consoles? Will that mean that online will be essential as game devs use the power of the cloud more to get better results?

They are saying the consoles are 'future proofed', but that means the games will rely on the cloud to run more and more doesn't it? Is that a good thing for countries with bad internet?

yesmynameissumo3985d ago (Edited 3985d ago )

I don't think games (outside of saves) should have any kind of reliance on the cloud. For the exact reason you mentioned. It's all about how the cloud is leveraged and MS's approach sounds nice, but unrealistic with the US and International Internet infrastructures.

EDIT: From what we know of the PS4 so far, yes, that is a PS4 :)

EDIT2: The Steam Box will play x86 based PC games. I'm unsure if they'll have a Linux version, but it is possible. I think a PC/PS4 is all I need for the next gen. My kids will just have to play the Wii U.

gaminoz3985d ago

And yet I read an interview where Xbox says that it is 'future proof' because they can use the power of the cloud.

That's great news for amazing games, but what if they don't run well like some PC games that rely on the net?

I agree with you. I don't want a PC console, I want a console that plugs and plays and you can choose to be net reliant or not. Is that the PS4?

BadCircuit3985d ago

If we are going to be really tethered to the net and now it is running, I'd rather see what Valve's Steambox will do.

I hope they come up with a HUGE showing at E3, but I've barely heard anything...except it might only run Linux games? Is that right?

MariaHelFutura3985d ago

Requiring the internet to boost "power" would be the worst idea of all the bad ideas they already have. Its a recipe for disaster, more than it already is. Think about it.

psychof0x3985d ago

It sure would be great if developers saw some of that reinstall money.

Noami3985d ago

they arent telling us that it might fail same as the first "one" did ...
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Proeliator3985d ago

I feel that they are really holding a lot of info back. Should be interesting to see how it plays out.

BadCircuit3985d ago

But is that a good idea? They might as well have waited until E3 and done a big proper show?

Instead of having happy clappers cheer everything they showed that was 'meh'.

Show all comments (27)
200°

Marvel: Ultimate Alliance Has Appeared On The Xbox Store

Activision and Raven Software's 2006 action role-playing game, Marvel: Ultimate Alliance, has found its way to the Xbox Store.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
LG_Fox_Brazil9h ago

Used to love this one, but X-Men Legends 1 and 2 will always be my favorites, especially Rise of Apocalypse. Would pay some good money to play it today with online multiplayer, back then I had no way to get a modem

RavenWolfx1h ago

Yeah, I loved the Legends games so much.

ZeekQuattro8h ago

I remember buying them dirt cheap on the PS4 and then a few days later I read they were delisted. I was wondering why the bundle was price so low and got my answer when that happened.

Knightofelemia7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Sad to say this is one game franchise next to the Xmen that needs a sequel. I use to play the hell out of Xmen Legends and Marvel Ultimate Alliance. Was great when my cousin had the OG Xbox play with four other people and then playing online. Great games glad to see it reappear even though I own the discs love the mechanics of this game.

Terry_B6h ago

It got a sequel..but for dumbass #reasons as a switch exclusive.

shinoff21836h ago

It looked so horrible to. They should've kept it similar to the first two.

Asplundh6h ago

Because Nintendo funded it, they did the same for Bayonetta.

Knightofelemia6h ago

I totally forgot about the Switch sequel.

jukins6h ago

Misleading. This page is whats available for people who owned the game prior to delisting.

Abnor_Mal5h ago

The first game was the best imo.

170°

Hades 2 Is Already Fixing The First Game's Biggest Problems

Ben Sledge from TheGamer Writes "I’m already impressed with Supergiant’s commitment to improving body diversity in the Hades 2 technical test."

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Nacho_Z10h ago

There's a reason they're called 'gods' and not 'regular people'. It's nice they've diversified even more but gods looking godly wasn't exactly a glaring issue with the first game.

Juancho5110h ago

Hey! Gods suffer from obesity and diabetes too!

Blastoise9h ago

This is the dumbest article I've read in a long time.

Michiel19899h ago

No one had an issue with that besides a very select group of people that try to push their own agenda.

Crows908h ago

Exactly. Not even sure they're necessarily committing to body diversity either.

The designs look fine not stupid.

gerbintosh45m ago

Who haven't even played the game either

Inverno8h ago

The writer of the this article clearly doesn't know what a real god looks like and has never seen them /s

Tody_ZA7h ago

Thanks for bringing up a bunch of garbage thoughts that never crossed my mind when playing the first game because I was too busy playing the game to worry about the portrayal of the physical bodies of gods.

Foolish me, when I read the title I thought we were talking about game mechanics.

Piss off, honestly, with this asinine bottom of the barrel try-hard-to-be-relevant trash.

Show all comments (12)
80°

Fallout 76 needs Ghoulification to make Appalachia more interesting

Players are taking to Reddit to let Bethesda know they want ghoulification added to Fallout 76 in a future update.

Read Full Story >>
gamesandwich.com