560°

The Xbox One Has One Major Problem

Fortune Tech: ''Microsoft's Xbox One is being touted as the only peripheral your TV needs—except for your cable box, the only thing it apparently can't work without.''

Read Full Story >>
tech.fortune.cnn.com
Godmars2903989d ago

Definitely looks like they have one major issue: lost of gamer trust.

Sure they've got the Halo Madden and COD crowd, but past that?

Objective3989d ago

Haha that's a very very big crowd you just mentioned there... Is there a bigger crowd you have in mind?

guitarded773989d ago

I am put off by the XBOX One as much as anybody, but I don't think anyone should be too surprised. MS is following the same plan they've had with the 360. Just carrying it over to next gen.

At least they have 15 exclusive games to show with 8 new IP's. But if they continue to follow the course, over half will be Kinect 2 games... and that wouldn't surprise me.

NewZealander3989d ago

you say they have the halo croud like thats a small bunch lol

anyway going on what ive seen so far its day one for me, xbox one looks amazing, only thing im not sold on is no backwards compatibility, but hey my 360 will still be hooked up anyway!

dont like kinect being always on? unplug it when the consoles not in use, problem solved!

G20WLY3989d ago

^Objective, I have a far bigger crowd in mind; it's called 'Everyone Else'!!! :P

EVILDEAD3603989d ago

Lol @ the article. It's not a problem at all.

Xbox one can't replace your Cable box. It will simply supplement it into ONE (lol) input.

It's a simple HDMI-In situation that's optional. If it does what MS says it will do then it'll be huge + for any cable owner with a standard box.

I loved the voice stuff as I use Kinect now to pause and play movies.

Evil

Nes_Daze3989d ago

@ Objective, try the rest of the world crowd...

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3989d ago
4Sh0w3989d ago (Edited 3989d ago )

Godsmar you guys are overeacting or just trolling. I like the legit criticism, nothings perfect. I cant speak for everybody but neither can you but personally I have full confidence in micro delivering a great gaming platform. Gamers may have bad feelings about some choices but I doubt it will seriously have a huge impact as long as there are games people want to play. Its funny I never hear you guys frown endlessly on online passes when sony does it and I bet if they introduce some similiar used game fee you guys are'nt going to give up on sony. I predict this all in one strategy is going to be very appealing, I'll bookmark this post and we'll see if I'm wrong, but I wonder what will be you guys excuse will be when its selling out?

As for this news I dont think its micro fault if you dont have cable, plus you still can do everything else except cable tv stuff, also even by his own analysis theres you are talking about a very small group.

JackBNimble3989d ago

Sony has nothing to do with online passes, that would be publishers like EA & Activision who implement that. And online passes are completely different from what MS is planning on doing with XB1.There will be no borrowing or renting games on XB1 platform, only buying.

Gr813989d ago

That isn't even the biggest problem! Though it is pretty high on this list. The whole damn thing is lame. I can't think of a positive atm regarding this Box.

aviator1893989d ago

dedicated servers for all games on X1?

that isn't a positive thing?

Gr813989d ago

But no backwards compatibility? Used Games Fee?

mmccarthy43989d ago

@Arius Dion The have a fee because after you install your game the disc is no longer required i would not be suprised if used games from gamestop or other retailers came with some form of redeem code or a lower price. If not used game sales would definately plummit.

HammadTheBeast3989d ago

^ WHy is this BS system even in place?

DonFreezer3988d ago

Yeah just like me.I can't even think something positive about the ps4.

3989d ago Replies(7)
urwifeminder3989d ago

Can do no wrong for me I am as devout as you fellow sony gamers enjoy your games.

isyourhouseonfire3989d ago (Edited 3989d ago )

As a Microsoft fan, I have to admit I was worried about the nextgen due to the lack of information coming from MS. After yesterday, a huge weight has been lifted off my shoulders. MS brought the heat and the world's most powerful gaming publisher brought the most powerful game - COD Ghosts - as if begging to be on Microsoft's team. I realized at that moment that Activision knows something that we only sort of know: The XBOX One is the king of nextgen. I'm relieved and excited!

Ron_Danger3989d ago

You do know CoD is multi platform, right?

punisher993989d ago

"The XBOX One is the king of nextgen. I'm relieved and excited! "

More like completely and utterly delusional. What does COD ghost have to do with microsoft anyway when this game will also be on the PC and the PS4??

Gimmemorebubblez3989d ago

"I realized at that moment that Activision knows something that we only sort of know: The XBOX One is the king of nextgen. I'm relieved and excited!"

MS was having a three-some with two whores, EA and Activision. EA and Activision only hopped in to bed with MS because MS paid them well.

Show all comments (71)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

180°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot11h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack18m ago(Edited 17m ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke195h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke191h ago(Edited 1h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

mandf3h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor4h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave3h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor1h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

Duke191h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai3h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris3h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (19)