1030°

Official Sony PS4 site update confirms PS Vita remote play of all PS4 games

Ever since the PlayStation meeting back in February where Mark Cerny showcased how the PS4 game Knack was played remotely on PS Vita skeptics have voiced their concern about the feature. Have this time now come and will this feature now be available when the PS4 launches this holiday? Today Sony updated the official PS4 site with a section supposedly confirming the fact that you WILL be able to play all your PS4 games on go.

JoGam3990d ago

This is great news. Got a PS3, a Vita 3G and waiting on the PS4. My Playstation family will be complete.

3990d ago Replies(9)
himdeel3990d ago

And my Vitas battery screams in terror and says somberly, "I'll never be free of that damn extension cord ever again."

Que the music: dun dun daaaaaah

(fade to black)
scene ends

jon12343989d ago

gamestop is selling the official battery charger at a much lower price, its 29.99 rather than 50 bucks, you should jump on that :)

Knight_Crawler3990d ago (Edited 3990d ago )

I am a little confused...does this mean that all developers have to implement the Vita remote play feature like it is with trophies or is it just Sony 1st party studios?

Thanks Snookie...this is good news because it means that developers can focus 100% percent on their game not not worry about other things that will take away time from the single or multiplayer experience.

Snookies123990d ago (Edited 3990d ago )

The remote play is actually integrated with the system this time around. I don't believe it requires anything from developers to include it now because of that.

BISHOP-BRASIL3990d ago

It's hardware enabled. The only question that was hanging out was if developers/publishers could turn the feature off.

I even assumed in another post some days ago we would see most games remotely playable but that publsihers would probably disable it for multiplatforms sold on both systems, but it seens now I was wrong and they just can't control it, which is great news.

extermin8or3989d ago

The only requirement is that they include alternate control mapping for the vita-in the same way they have to provide trophy's :p but it can't take long to sort that out ..

Cam9773990d ago

Where is your PS1, PSX, PS2 and PSP, bro?

DragoonsScaleLegends3990d ago (Edited 3990d ago )

I have had 3 PS1's, 3 PS2's, 3 PSP 1000's, 1 PSP Go, and 2 PS3's. I want a vita but the memory prices keeps me from being able to afford one and im not getting anything less than 32GB.

insomnium23990d ago (Edited 3990d ago )

@drpepper

So you let yourself be left out because of something like that. I have an 8gig card. It cost me 20€ and I manage everything through content manager. Easy as pie.

Ontopic: This news just brought THAT much more value to my Vita. Thanks Sony. Nothing else to say really. Thank you Sony.

Codey473990d ago

@insomnium2

I definitely recommend 32gb to anybody, as bare minimum.. as already stated by drpepperdude.

I already have a 32gigger and find myself struggling for precious memory card space. Even with content manager, transferring files From Vita to PS3(and vice versa) can be a laborious task.

Seraphim3989d ago

32GB min isn't nearly enough. They need bigger cards!! Seriously though, yeah, definitely go with the 32GB. Especially if you're a PS+ Subscriber. I went w/ 16GB thinking I should be fine but after my free dl of PSASBR, Uncharted (PS+), Disgaea 3 (PS+), FFVII, Castlevania SoTN, Gravity Rush (PS+) and a couple other randoms I'm already full. Got rid of some junk I probably wouldn't play just to free up a couple gigs... If you're not a Plus subscriber and plan to buy your games on cart 8-16 should be suffice. But the games definitely fill up the card FAST!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3989d ago
whoyouwit043990d ago

I have a question, with remote play will you be able to play ps4 games any where, or is it limited to the range of your house.

MoonConquistador3990d ago

@whoyouwit04 - Depends on the model, if you have the 3G version and a decent data plan then anywhere you can get a signal.

I have the Wi Fi only version so I need to be in range of a Wi Fi connection, so no, your not restricted to just your own home.

FamilyGuy3990d ago

Anywhere, remote play works through an internet connection. As long as your PS4 is hooked up to the internet and your Vita is getting a strong enough internet signal you can play any game that's on your PS4 from any where in the world.

extermin8or3989d ago

As long as both are connected to the internet-although remember that even with gaikai tech the further away you are the more likely it is to lagg/have bad latency issues.

shadow27973989d ago

It's not going to work through 3G. Sony won't even let you play online games over 3G, why would Remote Play work.

I also question it being able to work very well away from the house. There's going to be latency issues.

FamilyGuy3989d ago

Remote play is like a PCs Remote Access, it's just with games. It's through the internet, there is no need to be anywhere near your home/PS4.

If your PS4 is connected to the internet and your Vita is as well (through wifi only, most likely) then you can play and access the PS4 from anywhere in the world.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3989d ago
solidt123990d ago

Thank You SONY! im a happy man.

madara0sama3990d ago

Me too! But Vita Wifi only. Playing games on the go. This has something to do with Gaikai.

_QQ_3990d ago (Edited 3990d ago )

So it takes 2 systems to outdo one?

morganfell3990d ago

Take your jealous based trolling soemwhere else.

BeZdaBest3990d ago

lol...sorry...

psv + ps4= controller with no l2 or r2 or l3 or r3... small thumbsticks(my hands are big so this is a problem for me)..battery dying every 3-5 hours..

psv using the ps4 as a crutch
thats sounds great..

ShinMaster3990d ago (Edited 3990d ago )

He meant:
PS4+Vita Bundle > Wii U's GamePad
____

@BeZdaBest
The PS Vita has rear multi-touchpad which are used as L2/R2 and a multi-touchscreen. Don't be ignorant.
This IS actually great news.

P.S. I have big hands too, but I never complained when playing an NES, SNES, GB, GBA, DS or 3DS. So quit b*tching.

Go rag on the PS Vita somewhere else. You're in the wrong article.

BeZdaBest3990d ago (Edited 3990d ago )

@shin master.
nah im pretty sure he meant the whole console....

.rear touchpad..its not the same as buttons..
just like with mobile games..it will never be a replacement for real buttons...

its like a 250$ downgraded dualshock 4...

beside the buttons.. no motion capabilities..no rumble..share button..that light at the top.(dont remember whats it for...) basically its missing things that will make it 100% compatible (without doing some awkward runaround)

p.s.s
really how old are you...cus if you had big hand for the snes..you most be a monster of some sort..
bitching..N>>>a plz..i dont have time to be dissing console..thats for kids/fanboys..

ShinMaster3986d ago (Edited 3986d ago )

Wrong again. The PS Vita DOES have motion capabilities.

And it's not a $250 DualShock. It's an entire gaming system on its own with gaming and media capabilities beyond that of any controller.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3986d ago
LAZL0-Panaflex3990d ago

If this is true. This is big. This is big for ps4 and this is big for vita. Game over Xbox.

baodeus3990d ago

so what happen if you can play every xbox games on ipad, mobile phone, etc...that millions already have on the go? What happen if you can also play all pc games on the next xbox or with any xlive/window activated mobile devices?

skyrimer3989d ago

@baodeus do you really expect xbox games to be playable on a phone? I mean, four front buttons and four shoulder buttons plus twin sticks mapped in your screen sounds playable?

baodeus3989d ago (Edited 3989d ago )

@skyrimer

check some of these out:
http://www.rakuten.com/prod...
http://www.outletpc.com/yc1...
http://www.outletpc.com/yc1...

You didn't know that there are attachment/wireless controller for mobile devices? If you really want to play game with complicated control scheme on your mobile, you can. They are quite cheap too, not anywhere near $200 a piece.

1. Do you look at the economy or tech trend lately?
2. Do you know that the mobile entertainment (including games) aren't just on 3DS or vita?

man, we live in a world where information are abundant and pretty much free. How come you don't use it to your advantage, you know expand your horizon or at least help you formulate better argument/question next times.

-SIXAXIS-3989d ago

@baodeus: The whole point of streaming to phones was to appeal to the mass market. Does the vast majority of phone/tablet owners have these extensions? NO. So your point makes no sense.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3989d ago
starchild3990d ago (Edited 3990d ago )

Well, this doesn't seem to confirm what they claim it does. It says play your "favorite" PS4 games, not 'all PS4 games'. But I will say this: IF all PS4 games can be played remotely on the PS Vita and IF all of those games can be played from any wi-fi hotspot remotely then the PS4 and Vita will absolutely rule my gaming world.

If it only allows you to play PS4 games in another part of your house then it really is a pretty worthless feature for me. I don't ever see myself playing on a small Vita screen when I can play on my big screen HDTV.

I am a PC gamer and console gamer, but mostly game on the PC right now. But if Sony makes it possible to play big budget console games on the go, then it's a slam dunk. This would be huge. They will have achieved my dream and I will likely leave behind other platforms and game mostly on the PS4.

extermin8or3989d ago

I imagine it will be possible via WiFi in fact yoshida has said a)all games that use normal controls so move only games won't be playable but all others will-he did suggest that it might not be possible over WiFi at launch till they had all the gaikai stuff up as latency would be to big withouit but that within a year or so he expected it to work over WiFi too etc.

kayoss3990d ago

I cried uncontrollablly when i read this news.

4lc4pon33990d ago (Edited 3990d ago )

i have a PS2, PS3 60gb phat, A 160gb Slim and a 250gb super slim, a Vita 3G and im def waiting for my PS4. God sony has spoiled me with some of the best gaming experiences ive ever had

BeZdaBest3990d ago

good.. and know we need games..

DOMination-3990d ago

Now if only Vita had a front touchpad, L2, R2, L3 and R3 and a share button..

Blaze9293990d ago

wonder if this will be another one of those features developers must "choose" to implement...

FlyingFoxy3990d ago

Nobody needs to implement the feature, it's not part of the game but the system, so it will work with everything.

FlyingFoxy3990d ago (Edited 3990d ago )

This is very good news, but..would 3G streaming be good enough? or will we still need wifi access to get the speeds & line quality over 3G?

OccludedGamer3989d ago (Edited 3989d ago )

That really depends. See PS4 games will be streaming many Gigabytes of data in a go, much much more than can be streamed directly to Vita.

This data will first need to be compressed very heavily from the PS4 and uncompressed partially on the Vita's end.

Basically It's gonna be hard to say without testing it, But as a guess, I'd expect it to require slightly better speeds than what you need to stream HD video efficiently as it seems like a good target to aim for considering the state of internet speed wordwide

TesMgsFan3989d ago

Mate where is your ps1, ps2 ?

3989d ago
+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 3986d ago
doctorstrange3990d ago

Ok, as much as I'd like this to be true - favorite does not equal all. Sony lists cross save on your "favorite title" here - http://uk.playstation.com/p...

This is simple marketing hyperbole.

We don't even have KZ3 remote play, and that got a full video.

TL;DR - Nothing to see here.

KrisButtar3990d ago (Edited 3990d ago )

That site is for cross play between PS3 and Vita, not the PS4 and Vita.

"PS4 Remote Play: Screens are mirrored on PS4/Vita (Both on at same time). Hardware does it/not on devs. Start at any time; no special mode."

Link
http://gamingeverything.com...

@doctorstrange
With the PS3/Vita crossplay it seems like they have to do extra coding and work, but with the PS4 it seems it was built to use this feature, so doing cross play between PS4/Vita doesn't seem like Dev's have to do anything extra to get it to work.

doctorstrange3990d ago

Exactly, Sony say favorite titles have cross play between PS3 and Vita. Most don't.

OccludedGamer3989d ago

That's a load of crap DoctorStrange. I just read over the link and there's absolutely no mention of the line you quoted. The actual line is as follows.

"Remotely access your PS3 from your PS Vita and enjoy particular games and services when you're away from your TV."

That sounds pretty clear to me that it's NOT all of them, rather than marketing hyperbole

despair3990d ago (Edited 3990d ago )

you're mixing up cross save and remote play. Remote play means its streaming from your PS4 onto your Vita at full PS4 quality and graphics. Cross save is just the same game available to both ps3 and vita and you can share the saves between them.

This article is about remote play not cross save.

doctorstrange3990d ago

My point is that Sony used favorite for cross play, when they didn't mean all. For this story, on streaming, they are using favorite again, so it's illogical to assume this time they mean all.

SoapShoes3990d ago

Cross play /=/ remote play... Cross play means you can play with PS3/PS Vita users on the same server. I see what you're saying but yewles1's post below clarifies it.

despair3990d ago

ah you're right, a little more sceptical now :(

yewles13990d ago

"We ask developers when they finish the PlayStation 4 product and submit a master to make sure that they have the appropriate controller mapping to work on PS Vita. All games will work – unless it is a dance game [laughs]."

http://www.gameinformer.com...

insertnamehurr3990d ago

Sony means "your" favourite games like the games youd like to play on ps vita, your comment sounds like we will only play sonys favourite games, we will play any in general but mostly your favourites.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3989d ago
Makasu3990d ago

Killzone: Shadow Fall on PS Vita CONFIRMED!

DA_SHREDDER3990d ago

And without L3 R3 buttons! Joy!!

Gridloc3990d ago

Maybe you've havent heard, but the the Vita has a rear touch pad and a front touch screen so I don't think the R3, L3 will be much of an issue.

himdeel3990d ago

Front touch on screen is way easier IMO than fiddling with the back touch.

majiebeast3990d ago

Didnt they say that it would be real easy for developers to implement this feature? I read that somewhere few motnhs back.

GribbleGrunger3990d ago (Edited 3990d ago )

Developers don't have to implement anything. This is dealt with by the PS4 hardware and Gaikai integration. The only consideration would be control scheme, but giving people an option to map buttons how they like would be very simple.

mamotte3990d ago

How dare you to post a fact here? You'll receive disagrees even if it's a good thing related to the article. Try rumours.

DEEBO3990d ago

I thought sony said they would handle remote-play on their end.that way they wouldn't have to depend on developers to do it for them.i can't wait,i use the wii u gamepad more then my T.V and i have some nice screens plus a projector screen.but being able to play my games and watch t.v at the same time is really cool.

Show all comments (170)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies14d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken14d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga14d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken13d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6413d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long13d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197213d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic13d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 13d ago
DivineHand12513d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91313d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer13d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91313d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit13d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 13d ago
Christopher14d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6913d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit13d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher14d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken13d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197213d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic13d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2313d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218313d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder13d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts13d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

blackblades20d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken20d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades19d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii19d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p

280°

Judge rules in PlayStation's favour in $500m patent infringement lawsuit

Genuine Enabling Technology was seeking damages, claiming the tech allowing PlayStation consoles and controllers to communicate infringes its rights.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
S2Killinit21d ago

Big victory for Sony. And a long time coming.

DarXyde21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Crazy to think the savings from this lawsuit allows them to develop one AAA game.

Make it Bloodborne 2, please and thank you.

21d ago
Profchaos21d ago

Sounds like patent trolling they tried the same thing against Nintendo with the same pattern.

Motion and control input traversing over higher and lower frequencies seperate from each other allowing the controller to do both

Pyrofire9521d ago

Patents suck. Most of them are complete garbage.

Knightofelemia21d ago

So to recoup the money Genuine is going to take on Nintendo or Microsoft next. I hate patent lawyers they are some of the worst bottom feeders out there.

Show all comments (13)