740°

Sony hacking suspect smashes computers to get out of prosecution

A 23-year-old man suspected of helping to hack into Sony's PlayStation Network got out of being penalized for the crime by smashing his computers and making his hard drives disappear.

Read Full Story >>
nakedsecurity.sophos.com
SavageKuma3994d ago

Smart move. Purging the evidence to get away...

WeAreLegion3994d ago

You'd think, but tampering with and/or destroying evidence can land you a LOT more jail time.

SavageKuma3993d ago

he owns the stuff and without a proper search in America they have to go through proper procedures and that gives any smart criminal enough time to destroy evidence that they do not know about.

3993d ago
MysticStrummer3993d ago

He didn't tamper with and/or destroy evidence. Obviously he felt those hard drives would have eventually been used as evidence or he wouldn't have gotten rid of them, but what he did wasn't tampering with evidence in the eyes of the law. It's not evidence until it's found and logged as such during a legal search.

Lior3993d ago

your allowed to do anything you want to with your possessions

raWfodog3993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

@Playbox360, MysticStrummer, and Lior

It is tampering even if it hasn't been officially logged in as evidence. His only defense would have been if he didn't know about the investigation. So that's why he's guilty of tampering with evidence and was sentenced to house arrest. But he probably figured better that than prison.

Bimkoblerutso3993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

I'm not trying to sound like a douche here, but I got a good-humored chuckle out of the fact that a few of you thought that "tampering with/destroying evidence" constituted stealing confiscated evidence from the authorities and destroying it AFTER it had already been logged, like...Ocean's Eleven heist-style or something.

raWfodog3993d ago

@Bimkoblerutso

I got a good-humored chuckle out of the fact that people disagreed with me about what constitutes tampering with evidence. Even after I supplied links to the actual statutes :)

MysticStrummer3993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

@raWfodog - If you read the story you'll see he wasn't charged with tampering with evidence, so... yeah. They can't prove he tampered with anything having to do with the case. Evidence has to do with the case. Hence, he didn't tamper with evidence. He interfered with the investigation. That's not the same as evidence tampering.

EDIT - Just to be clear, they can't prove he did it so they didn't charge him with it.

sikbeta3993d ago

What a genius move, sony and the feds can't do crap to him now lol

Legion3993d ago

@raWfodog

Your links proved nothing. The second was only opinionated advice on the first.

When getting rid of a computer it is common practice to destroy hard drive. The damage to the cases themselves... well haven't we all been pissed off with our PC enough to want to do that?

Him being questioned and then later wanting to dispose of his PC does not constitute evidence tampering. Especially if said practice of destroying HD is common place. (which is)

Had he done it while the police were at the door and or bearing down on him... well then the case might be brought up.

They did not prosecute him for destruction of evidence because of the fact they could not.

He was sentenced for obstruction simply because he basically threw himself on the mercy of the court and his lawyer knew he was looking to get a slap on the wrist.

If he had actually fought the case then it would have cost a lot of money but he still would have been very favored to walk away... but at a much greater cost to him and a drawn out trial that would have possibly lost him his job.

AuToFiRE3993d ago

Not even. Just like with drinking and driving, if you crash, its only a fine for leaving the scene of an accident, instead of losing your license plus jailtime.

Hacking isnt a misdemeanor anymore.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3993d ago
Darrius Cole3993d ago

Committing Crime 101. First Day, First Lesson - Destroy the evidence.

The FBI practically let him go when they interviewed him without a warrant to search his computers. I have no doubt that his hard drives were wiped, scrubbed with magnets, torn apart, cut into pieces at the plates, burnt, and scattered within two hours after the FBI left his house.

You have to be an idiot to keep the evidence after the FBI lets you know that they are watching you. You don't have to be an smart criminal to know better than that.

Minato-Namikaze3993d ago

the FBI has a 99% conviction rate for a reason

Christopher3993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

That's the problem, Darrius, they have to have reasonable suspicion to get the warrant. In this case, they were in a no-win situation on approaching this without giving their hand away at the same time.

TwistedMetal3993d ago

if they were watching him then they already got all the info of all his drives saved to their hardrives. he is already busted. why would someone hack sony anyways just seems dumb to do. japan doesnt do anything wrong. how about they hack some terrorists or companys with crap drm on there games or companies that make you pay for online play.

Legion3993d ago

@Minato-Namikaze

Mainly due to the fact of people doing exactly what this boy did which was throw themselves at the mercy of the court in efforts to not have a lengthy trial. And knowing they will get little but house arrest and slaps on the wrist.

And the 99% rate is highly exaggerated.

"SYRACUSE, N.Y. — Convictions are obtained in just one of four FBI cases submitted for prosecution, according to a new study of Justice Department statistics.

From 1993 through 1997, the FBI referred 222,504 cases for prosecution. Only 27%, the worst mark among major federal law enforcement agencies, resulted in a conviction, said researchers at Syracuse University's Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, or TRAC." http://articles.latimes.com...

This was a long while ago.. but doubting they have improved to the point of 99%. Just because you read garbage on the internet doesn't make it fact. (note: you are reading this on the internet... check for yourself)

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3993d ago
FamilyGuy3993d ago

Maybe he was clean of the crime of hacking but scared of them finding under-aged porn on his hard drives lol

BoNeSaW233993d ago

Under age porn comment followed by a lol? Way to stay classy!

FamilyGuy3993d ago

My sense of humor is very broad, I understand that many wouldn't find it funny though.

Morbid, sick jokes are some of the funniest to me.

Majin-vegeta3994d ago

Wow he doesn't even have a GED?Lol what a loser.

4lc4pon33993d ago

thats a bs comment. I dont have a GED and I have a very high paying job as I have had for the last 17 years.

Ignorant comment

SilentNegotiator3993d ago

No GED and he's the biggest crime boss in Chicago.

Respect.

SilentNegotiator3993d ago

@Utalkin2me

He's in the protection business and distribution.

But seriously, let's see some elaboration. None of these users claiming to have dropped and made $X (some claiming 6 figures) have stated what they actually DO.

nukeitall3993d ago

GED doesn't substitute for being an idiot.

Point being, hard work, detailed oriented and motivation then to outdo education. Now, education with all of the above is a sure winner combo, assuming the education is in something in demand.

PurpHerbison3993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

Why would anybody ever tell someone on N4G what it is they actually do for a living? I am sure we have a decent amount of rich users, handful of poor, as well as a handful right in the middle.

Eyeco3993d ago

It's just an interesting topic on how someone can be successful without a GED or a Degree, I find it inspirational/ motivational that anyone can make a comfortable living if they have the plan and wit's, for years we're told that the only way you'll ever make a living is through education that's it, but that doesn't always work, my sister has a degree in biochemistry something like that and she's been unemployed for 4 years.

3993d ago
Tapioca Cold3993d ago

No its not. He thinks people without geds are losers. Becsuse u dont have a job and a ged but a 'good' job doesnt mean he is wrong. Understand. Msybe you do need a ged.

justrandom3993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

LOL Majin- I agree with you ALCAPONE.I dont have GED either,and I am manager where I work,all the workers I manage have their GED some couple of them have university education ,and they are almos all ignorants.I leave in Canada(im european by the way)Have nothing against canadians cause im also canadian myself,Ive had many years of experience in life and dont need GED.My life experience worths 1000s GEDs.
Well,ive been an immigrant for many years in different countries of Europe and by struggling=experience and finally met my canadian wife(doctor :) .Its not important how much people make but how they manage their money.Lot of people I know go in vaccation by paying with visa and then pay interest minimum monthly payment and they never get out of debts.
I always went in vaccation with my money,working hard money and at the end of the tunnel there was a light which right now I became manager with only working 3 months and the other workers about to get heart attack from jealousy.You have to care for the businees so the business care for you.Work more to get more money and not wanting more money to work more.Dippend of how everyone grew up what famly culture experience etc etc .its getting late .no offence tgo anyone.good night
What Im trying to say is that ...well lets leave vegeta draw a conclusion of wheather he should judge people by a piece of paper.have a nice day.

SilentNegotiator3993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

"Why would anybody ever tell someone on N4G what it is they actually do for a living?"

When you make six-figures (and more importantly, brag about it), you don't shy away from telling people what your occupation is. Unless you're one of the most prolific prostitutes on the planet.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3993d ago
MikeyDucati13993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

I know people with degrees who are losers. So it really doesn't matter.

SolDojo3993d ago

Same story. Got my GED at 17 after having problems in school, had my Associates at 20, make 60k a year and have never once been asked if I had a high school diploma or a college degree for the jobs I've done.

jadenkorri3993d ago

Yes but having only a GED can be really bad, yes great you're successful, but lose your job, and you're screwed. High paying jobs usual requirements will be a college/university degree. They won't even look at you without it. I went to college with this one programmer, he was the best, why noone would hire him had the be the most idiot reason,"only GED" this guy was awesome. He took the cheapest programming course he could find. I know he worked on The Darkness 2 and recently the new Star Trek game. There have been a few xbox kinect games he has worked on too, congrats to him.

MikeyDucati13992d ago

@jadenkorri

Lol stop it man with the get yourself a college education PSA. If these members made it in life without taking the steps you took, so be it. Everyone thinks you gotta have a college education because hey, that's what society led us to believe. But that saying is so true, "its not what you know, its who you know". And the other famous one, "different strokes for different folks"

ACESupERIC3993d ago

How stupid are you? I quit school in the 9th grade when I saw saw a kid get shot in the hallway. O. Perry walker 93-94 if I remember correctly for you fact checkers out there. Now I make almost 100 thousand a year with no h.s. diploma. Thats more than some college grads can say. Who's the loser now moron?

BrunoM3993d ago

Same left high school on grade 11 do to health problems I had to fight cancer for a few years after didn't go back but The last 4 year when doing my taxes my net income is of 123.000 with out a high school. Diploma that's more than mannnyyyy and most people I know finished it and went on to collage and Un

4lc4pon33993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

i know a few people who are in major debt from college and dont even had a good job at all. Most of them are working 2 jobs to make ends meet. I quit school at 16 and never went back and I make roughly 65-75k per year. Its pathetic that you get these comments about how people who dont have a GED or diploma are losers YET I make good money where are most college grads cant find any work and your 75-100k in debt

No wonder most of the world is ignorant. to quick to judge

Ron_Danger3993d ago

This quickly became the perfect comment thread for one of those "my step mom makes $4375 a week from her computer" spam comments!

ACESupERIC3993d ago

I get 7 disagrees for stating facts but no one will elaborate?! F@#$&ng coward losers! This site is soooo full of trolls.

Voozi3993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

What I want to know is, what do you guys even do for a living that nets you $65k-$100K per year without a HS diploma and/or college degree?

torchic3993d ago

you go to school to learn and acquire skills, not for the diploma.

the kids at my college who go to school just so that they have a diploma are usually the ones who have trouble later on figuring out what to do with their lives.

I can't imagine being an engineer without having gone to school, like wow.

ziggurcat3993d ago

@ 4LC4PON3:

"YET I make good money where are most college grads cant find any work and your 75-100k in debt"

*you're

"No wonder most of the world is ignorant. to quick to judge"

*too quick... if you had stayed in high school longer, you'd know the difference between to/too as well as your/you're. in fact, this is something you should have figured out in elementary school.

on topic:

what a coward.

I_am_Batman3993d ago

I have studied mathematics, physics, technology, criminology and several martial arts all over the world and do not earn any money for protecting gotham city at all. But I'm rich anyway so who cares.

Gamerjunki33993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

@ ACESupERIC

https://yourlogicalfallacyi...

Yeah, that's why you have disagrees...

Your point will hold substance if you can provide valid data which demonstrates no correlation between qualifications and salaries.

tommygunzII3993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

Income has a lot to do with where you are located. I'm 4 hours from DC, teachers there for example make 75k a year, but in my city teachers make 37k. Similar sized houses cost twice as much there as well.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3993d ago
kneon3993d ago

Whether or not he finished high school doesn't tell you much about him. You don't know why he didn't finish.

I know phd's that I consider idiots, and I also know plenty of smart people that didn't make it through high school. Don't judge people on their education alone.

ACESupERIC3993d ago

I'm a tankerman. I load and unload barges, ships, and trucks of oil over water. My base pay with no overtime is 87000 a year. Last year I topped 100000 with overtime but not by much. No h.s. diploma or college degree required although you do have to work in the field and get so many supervised transfers before you can go to tankerman school.

kneon3993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

@ACESupERIC

Yup there are plenty of well paying jobs that don't require much formal education. But they usually do require skills of some kind and you need to be willing to do real work.

But in general a higher education leads to higher income provided you get a degree in something useful. I have degrees in computer science and physics and broke through $100,000/year almost 20 years ago.

ACESupERIC3993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

@Gamerjunki3
My original argument was directed towards mejin vejeta because he or she implied that ur a loser without at least a GED. I and plenty of other successful people don't have diplomas or degrees. Does that make us losers? While I do know that higher education can lead to a higher paying job, it isn't a definite outcome. Just like not having a diploma or degree doesn't automatically mean you can't be successful and make a comfortable living. I know plenty of people with degrees who make less than me and plenty that make more. And if you want valid data, just research the average pay for merchant mariners. My job pays 330 a day. The boat captains at my workplace are almost 600 a day. And in the marine industry there is a very high percentage of highschool dropouts.

justrandom3993d ago

I agree with you KNEON.Once i went to pick up my wife(she is a doctor)there was a patient there that had PHD SCIENCE etc you name it,he had studied all life and he wasnt capable of communicating like a normal person he seemed like dumb person ,no offence.So like you saying people shouldnt judge base on education.English is not my mother language before anyone jumps and says; oh you see you should have studied more years to know how to write.I couldnt study more years anyway had to migrate in different countries for a better life.Anyway,I love living in Canada ,it a country of oportunity.Lots of people born here do not appreciate this country.Before i forget,my sister in law which is educated like my wife she always looking for someone educated but never lucky always dissapointed.She has high standards ,well she is alone.I have a happy family kids.no problem moneywise cause im not greedy,i never forget who I was thats why im happy.I earn good money anyway because I worked for it and I earned it.
At my work many workers dont even say good morning or bye.that thing right there tells me they dont have future.when they do not know the basics of socialising.Life its philosofy and it will take thousands of pages for me to write so it would be wasted of time .Ive helped many people in my life but very few appreciated.
I gave up I will be very carefully before I help anyone else again.This world is filled with selfish mother fukers.have a good night everyone ,and please dont disagree cause I wont be able to sleep all night :)

Gamerjunki33993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

@ ACESupERIC

That's great, the fact is your original post was comparing yourself to college students, in which you said you earn more money than some, without possessing the necessary qualifications.

You were essentially suggesting that one may not need qualifications in order to possess a higher salary--that's a fair point, but don't use personal experience as your argument.

I just wanted you realise that the point you've established was anecdotal, and has no ground in order to be a compelling argument. I have no problem with your point, just your argument.

That doesn't mean you are wrong, but how you've conducted your argument was wrong.

To answer your question, no, possessing no qualifications doesn't make anyone a loser. If there was a job which provided 100K, I would not care what the job would entail.

I'm perfectly aware that qualifications don't mean a successful future, anyone in the UK will happily tell you that!

Hell, I have just dropped from college (that would be high school to you yankees I believe).

I was doing English, History, Philosophy and Politics. With no sense with what I wanted to do, compounded with the fact I was burnt out from writing so many essays--I left.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3993d ago
Snookies123993d ago

Not having a GED, degree, etc. doesn't make someone inherently less intelligent or a loser. I've seen plenty of people who have gone through college, yet can't seem to spell simple words correctly. Some people just don't have their GED, sometimes for reasons beyond their control. Does that make them losers? No, it just means that they haven't gotten something that states they've graduated. I believe the entire US school system is fundamentally flawed, but I won't get into that right now lol.

ACESupERIC3993d ago

Being educated doesn't necessarily mean smart and vice versa. Too bad most people refuse to acknowledge this. There probably wouldn't be so many people unemployed in this country.

justrandom3993d ago

On last comment before i go to bed.

I agree also with you Snookies12.I tell you something in many cases and specifically at my work,one of the workers with many years of education had to use the calculator to subtrac 5.00 dollars minus 2.99 I WAS SHOCKED.Einstein once said once the technology with become mainstream is the time stupidity will too.Brain is a muscle if you work it out it will expand,so lot of people doesnt use the brain and then they find themselves in a bad situation.
I was agains population control but now im PRO.And guess which people are going to get rid off firstÉ(my question mark dissapeared).Night and good luck to the dim ones :)

BlaqMagiq243993d ago

Neither does the rapper Nas and he makes more money than you

Qrphe3993d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

Everyone, N4G is not your personal blog, go talk about your life elsewhere.

fourOeightshark3993d ago

I don't have a GED and i own a jewelry store.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3992d ago
PeaSFor3994d ago (Edited 3993d ago )

evidence tampering and destroying evidences is allowed in USA/UK?

what the hell, i know in canada its almost making you automatically guilty and is a charge by itself...

LoveOfTheGame3993d ago

It's not evidence if they can't find it.

Arai3994d ago

The fine of 250k itself is what made me raise an eye-brow.
When the estimated damage is more than $170 million, according to the report below.

The damage is done and they won't get that money back.

http://goo.gl/jYwT7

ApolloTheBoss3994d ago

Shame. The bastard should have got what was coming to him.

Show all comments (105)
90°

New data suggests PlayStation PC trophies are in the works

A recent trophy list published on the PlayStation Network contains hints that Sony is testing PlayStation PC trophies.

Read Full Story >>
truetrophies.com
187d ago
XxSPIDEYxX187d ago

How sweet of Sony to slowly migrate their audience to PC.

300°

Sony Quietly Removed the Ability to Transfer Games from PS3 to Vita - PlayStation LifeStyle

Sony removed the ability to transfer games from PS3 to Vita, which unfortunately locks Vita players out of a lot of PS1 classics.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
ZeekQuattro695d ago

Sony really hates the Vita. Years later and they're still finding ways to snub owners of the device.

695d ago
Tacoboto695d ago (Edited 695d ago )

Sony really hates the players, demonstrated by an onslaught of anti-consumer moves - from PS+ Cloud Save restrictions, enforced DualSense on-console (despite input flexibility on Remote Play), no DLC Support for PS3 PS+ titles, upgrade fees on not just cross-gen titles but also now on their new PS+ service, to things like this.

Only Nintendo out-snubs Sony on treatment of their players.

King_Noctis695d ago

This I have to agree. Nintendo is the worst when it comes to consumer-friendly moves, and now Sony is coming so close.

Auron695d ago (Edited 695d ago )

Well atleast nintendo dont dictate/cherry pick what deserves censorship on 3rd party titles.

695d ago
Goozex694d ago

Ya ms has anti consumer moves like drm

persona4chie694d ago

I fully agree that Nintendo cares less about its fans and stuff, but can we look at each company for what they’re doing not others? Yeah I’m irritated at Nintendo for more or less ignoring drift, limited releases like Mario 3D all stars etc, but guess what when I’m mad at Sony for something I’m not going to keep bringing it up, it’s not going to change the fact that I still can’t transfer my ps1 games.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 694d ago
Wrex369695d ago

Yeah unfortunately they gave it a decent start then just kind of relegated it to the bin. Really great handheld though and in its day was my favorite. Gravity Rush, Persona 4 golden, uncharted, tearaway, freedom unite monster hunter(psn downloaded psp version), and DRAGONS CROWN.. just to name a few.. such a good handheld I'd wish they'd try again man.

shinoff2183694d ago

Only indie devs helped keep it alive sony got some games made for it. Just most aaa devs didnt bother. That was the vitas downfall

darthv72695d ago

It seems like this was included in the most recent PS3 and Vita fw updates. So as long as i dont upgrade my systems... it should still work.

porkChop695d ago

What, why? I don't understand the point of this.

Inverno695d ago

People, jailbreak you Vita.

IanTH695d ago

Yeah, I'm not sure why Sony did this. It's one more thing to push people towards CFW, and then that's basically priming people to pirate. Why would they take away a feature? Why do companies continue to punish the loyal, paying customers? It boggles the mind.

flyinb11694d ago

This definitely pushed me to do it.

GoodGuy09695d ago

Just mod your vita and ps3 lol.

one2thr694d ago

This, Pokémon Inclement Emerald on PSVita🤯

Show all comments (36)
270°

PlayStation Network Currently Generates Over $14 Billion In Sales

PlayStation Network currently generates over a staggering $14 billion in digital sales.

MastaMold699d ago (Edited 699d ago )

Yea with this type of revenue could people start to realize and drop the topic of "Sony needs a Game pass. "

TheGreatGazoo30699d ago

That is what all the smart business people are saying "subscription models are a fad."

Silly gameAr699d ago

@TheGreatGazoo

They also said PS Now was a failure. You think all that money is coming from sub models alone?

Bathyj699d ago

The only industry where people on the losing side think the leaders should follow the losers. Sony's clearly fine doing what they've been doing for 25 years. Selling games like the industry has always done.

Orchard699d ago (Edited 699d ago )

@Bathyj "Sony's clearly fine doing what they've been doing for 25 years. Selling games like the industry has always done."

Gotta future proof. I'm sure Blockbuster folk said the same thing about Netflix when it first came on the scene. Business models and consumer expectations change over time.

SullysCigar699d ago

^ sure Orchard, Blockbuster is one example. Another might be Netflix losing subscribers to the point they're changing their policy and threatening their customers.

Netflix started off as good value, then was amazing as the content was great as well as the price, but now it's expensive compared to it's peers and has lost a load of content to them. Original content is mostly crap now and I'm betting a significant crash in users is coming for them late this year.

My point being? Gamepass and anything Sony may do along those lines may well face the same fate. There's nothing wrong with diversification, but you have to focus on your main money maker and people are lapping up PlayStation traditional model - for good reason.

ABizzel1698d ago

They don't "need GamePass" for financials. They needed the revamp to ensure consumer engagement, loyalty, and market share didn't shift in favor of Xbox due to the potential short-term / long-term success of GamePass.

This is why we have the new PS+. They don't need a direct GamePass competitor, they simply needed an easy to get into and well-marketed subscription service that offers a library of games for the more casual consumer since the core fanbase actually buys games on PS.

Godmars290698d ago

Though, aren't they getting a Game Pass. Just that theirs wont include day one major releases.

MrNinosan698d ago

@Godmars290
They had it for years, way before Gamepass was a thing.

Obscure_Observer698d ago

"Yea with this type of revenue could people start to realize and drop the topic of "Sony needs a Game pass"

Well, whether Sony needs a "Game Pass" I can´t tell but, I´m certain they can´t allow themselves to stay idle and not react to Xbox´s recent advances either. According to Newzoo´s latest report, Microsoft´s year-on-year growth is +9,6% vs Sony -2,3% vs Nintendo +1,9%.

https://venturebeat.com/wp-...

Also once the Activision/Blizzard acquisition is completed, Xbox is expected to become the second biggest company in gaming, right behind Tecent.

https://venturebeat.com/wp-...

https://www.gamesindustry.b...

That´s why Sony´s future investments will be more focused on subscription services, GaaS, Multiplatform, PC and Mobile. There are also rumors of a PS Plus launcher for PC coming soon.

Die hard PS fans might hate the direction that Sony is apparently following under Yoshida (CEO) and Ryan by making PS games and services "less exclusive". But inteligent and reasonable PS fans knows that Sony must do what they have to do if they intent to survive trillion dollar companies like Apple, Google, Amazon and Microsoft while continue and deliver high quality game and services.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 698d ago
RickRoland698d ago (Edited 698d ago )

“Gotta future proof. I'm sure Blockbuster folk said the same thing about Netflix when it first came on the scene. Business models and consumer expectations change over time.”

The difference here is overall convenience. You had to drive to the store and browse then purchase get a game/movie from them and drive home. You have free access from your house to browse and purchase on PS Network. If someone really wants a game and it is of quality and has great reviews they will buy it. Blockbuster lost to internet convenience, not pricing.

Over time subscription services get so large that the fees have to increase, making the value decrease…and as we have seen with sub services quality decreases also. Not everyone wants another monthly bill in their budget for 2-3 games a year they really want to play. A reliance on a sub service weens once you sift through the initial 3-6 months of library access. I know for myself that my gamepass subscription was much more amazing when I first got my series x than it is now 1 year later. At this point I’m just waiting for exclusives…which I wouldn’t mind purchasing without a monthly script because it’s a few games a year.

BehindTheRows698d ago

He knows that, he’s just on the “opposing view” because it’s PlayStation. If Xbox generated this much, and more than PlayStation, it’d be a whole different tune.

Truth is Sony has the winning model and should keep doing exactly what has won them generation(s).

1Victor698d ago

But but but I was told that PS3 was Sony last console and Microsoft was going to buy them.
I want my money back from those damn cheap pact of Gypsies predictions 🤷🏿

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 698d ago
neutralgamer1992699d ago

In fluffy's voice "DAMN"

PlayStation is universal brand. It sells in every country and the brand recognition is just on another level. I think it was like 2018 or 2019 when PlayStation generated more money than Xbox and Nintendo combined

MastaMold

Sony doesn't need GP because they have a huge library of games from their past generations that people can't wait to play again with trophy support. And they have been the best ever since launch of PS5. Game after game while as a Xbox series X owner I am playing the wait game. HFW, GT7, GOW, TOKYO Ghostwire and rumor has it TLOU remake will release this year too. While Ms have all the resources and not much AAA content

Hopefully 2023 is when Xbox can get on a steady schedule for releasing awesome games. Honestly this is the last straw if anything like this happens again than Phil has to and I do mean has to go. He can't be failing this badly with the amount of resources at his disposal

Aloymetal698d ago

''PlayStation is universal brand. It sells in every country and the brand recognition is just on another level. I think it was like 2018 or 2019 when PlayStation generated more money than Xbox and Nintendo combined''

You're absolutely right with both statements.!
https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Eonjay698d ago

I would like to point out that even though is evident that Sony doesn't 'need' GP, they are going to profit very handsomely from their own subscription and they are going to do it without compromising the revenue they get from their first party releases.

Sony Nintendo and Microsoft have worked together to enrich each other. Sony took PSNow, rebranded it to be like GamePass with it's catalog of newer games and then added in Nintendo's retro service. They deserve credit for taking some great aspects of their competitor's programs and making it work for their business.

699d ago Replies(1)
Flawlessmic699d ago

Love to hear it, now keep giving us the usual AAA single player bangers, keep the gaas rubbish to a minimum.

thesoftware730699d ago (Edited 699d ago )

That's good money!

Playstation Network includes all digital purchases, DLC, MT, the monthly/ yearly fee, PSnow and any other paid service on the network.

120mill PS4 and 20 mill PS5, I'm not surprised.

Lol, why mention they don't need a GP service when they are actually doing a similar service come June. I would take that to mean they see more $$ coming from it.

I would surmises the other 2 systems generate in the billions for their digital services as well.

SullysCigar699d ago

"why mention they don't need a GP service"

Because they don't. It's called diversification. They're aiming to offer choices and the best of all worlds. To suggest they 'need' it, though, when they're taking profits like that would be plain wrong.

thesoftware730698d ago

Uh-huh, but who claimed they "needed" it?

Subscriptions services are what all gaming associated brands are doing, Amazon, Google, Nvidia, Ubisoft, EA, MS, Nintendo, Apple, and even Netflix.

Please stop with the "they are diversifying", spin nonsense. They all are, if you can purchase games in a multiple way on

thesoftware730698d ago

Uh-huh, but who claimed they "needed" it?

Subscription services are what all gaming associated brands are doing, Amazon, Google, Nvidia, Ubisoft, EA, MS, Nintendo, Apple, and even Netflix.

Please stop with the "they are diversifying", spin to make them sound different nonsense. They all are diversifying by definition, if you can purchase games and services in multiple ways on a platform then they are all giving diversifying options lol. Sony just like the rest of them sees money to be made.

You can buy, MS games on PC, Xbox, in a store, digitally or sub to GP...see diversifying. You can buy Nintendo games on Mobile, in a store, digitally or you can sub NSO..see diversifying. You can buy games, and 1000 different apps on IOS and android or you can sub and get them...diversifying. Sny is no different, their games selling well means nothing, Subs are industry standard and they are just now bolstering that specific dept. because GP and others popularity can't and shouldn't be ignored.

No need to make them sound like they are doing something special, they are simply moving in a well laid out direction as well.

****Sorry for the double post, had to tend to something***

SullysCigar698d ago

^ "Uh-huh, but who claimed they "needed" it?"

Well, you, when you said, "Lol, why mention they don't need a GP service", but it's no big deal.

By the same token, nowhere did I claim Sony is doing something different, nor did i employ spin. I'm sorry, I might not be the fight you're looking for. I'm just pointing out the situation, not comparing them to any other company.

GamingSinceForever698d ago

What Game Pass does is offer all 1st party and some 3rd party games day one. So no Sony doesn’t need to copy that. That is what was meant when people said that.

thesoftware730698d ago

The 14 billion is not from games alone, it is generated through ALL service sales and usage on the network, even movie streaming, HBO Max, Netflix, Spotify, 3rd party services in general, and yes the gaming division.

I get that it's making money, but the whole "no need for GP-like service", when they are indeed doing a GP-like service is pure worship and a pointless thing to say. Offering the 1st party games on day one has nothing to do with this, technically none of them have to do that, they just chose different directions with that one specific thing.

698d ago Replies(1)
GamingSinceForever698d ago

Sony doesn’t need a GP like service, but that isn’t to say one wouldn’t be nice to have.

Anyone with common sense would love to have the option of playing Playstation games on day one at a monthly cost, however Sony in their current position doesn’t need to go there because they are still making a nice profit selling games at full price.

So no it isn’t worship, it is just stating the facts. They feel that giving away their games would dilute the quality.

MrNinosan698d ago (Edited 698d ago )

They had PSNow for years, they're just rebranding and cleaning it a bit.

John_McClane698d ago

I wonder how much of the money generated comes from their movie company?

Deeeeznuuuts698d ago

Separate division of Sony, so none.

John_McClane697d ago

@DeeeezNuuuts They sell their movies on psn don't they?

P_Bomb697d ago

They stopped selling movies/tv on PSN a while back.

jBlakeeper698d ago (Edited 698d ago )

Because the service they are releasing isn’t meant to compete with GamePass.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 697d ago
Show all comments (50)