300°
7.7

IGN - Soul Sacrifice Review

Soul Sacrifice has finally arrived on the PS Vita. But is this the be-all, end-all handheld RPG many were hoping it would be?

dedicatedtogamers4006d ago

Let's keep this simple:

For those who played the demo, is this 7.7/10 material?

Yes (agree) or no (disagree)?

I've already sunk 10+ hours into the demo. Yeah...that doesn't sound like 7.7 material.

PirateThom4006d ago

7.7 isn't a bad score, but it's a safe score.

The review reads a lot better than the final score and I think the score is more a "hey, if you don't like it don't blame us".

I think the fact the demo was so comprehensive and lengthy means reviews are a little irrelevent, you either liked the game or you didn't

bicfitness4006d ago (Edited 4006d ago )

Game rocks. And for the record out of all the reviews, Jim Sterling is the only one who completed the main campaign - so props to him for DOING HIS JOB. Mainstream reviewers like IGN are the worst sort of bottom-feeding, click hungry, Mountain Dew whoring trash. Not to mention the Avalon Quests and MP aren't even online. Really, its embarrassing that these people play MP centric games without ever dipping into the content. 75% of the quests aren't available for single player. I'd like to see them do that with the next CoD, but they won't.

P.S. You can check what reviewers completed the game by their PSN profile. So far, only Jim. I bet the average reviewer clocks in at 12 hours for this game. I squeezed 80 out of the demo, make of that what you will. And the Polygon review that claims the game is "button mashing" is the biggest turd on the pile. Try doing a 3 star of higher quest "button mashing" and see how fast you die.

Kanzes4006d ago

The demo is great, I thought it's gonna get at least 8 or maybe 9

Protagonist4006d ago

My experience with the demo makes me feel it is better than a 7.7... more like a 9.0

dedicatedtogamers4006d ago

@ bicfitness

The difficulty (or lack thereof) is one thing I was fearful about. I didn't want it to be a cakewalk. I'm accustomed to MH's higher difficulty for all but the most basic monsters, and SS follows the same route.

Tei7774006d ago (Edited 4006d ago )

The demo is great! The game is easy to pick up and play and its exciting to find new magic, but I can't see the game getting any deeper then that. The story is random dribble, the voice acting is pretty bad, the world isn't cohesive, the battle arena's are bland and recycled. It survives off its combat which is great fun and the magic is brilliant. 7.7 seems about right to me, seeing as its only $40 mayb they could bumped it up to a mid 8.

If you're the sort of person who treats you handheld like a console, I think you'll probably find this game cool, but utimately shallow. If you only play an hour here and there you'd struggle to find a better distraction then this.

-Its probably my favourite 1st party game for the Vita thus far. I'll be picking it up later in the summer.

I_LOVE_MYSELF4006d ago

I wish I could try the demo. This game was potentially going to push me to buy a Vita, but it looks like I should just get MH on my 3DS instead.

GameCents4006d ago

If a playstation exclusive is averaging 7-7.9 in reviews then the ps-only crowd will insist that the game is at least an 8-8.9 in their opinion. Take a look at reviews for Starhawk, Sly Cooper, Twisted Metal, PASBR and many others to see this in action.
Same apllies for ps games at the 6-6.9 range, the ps fan will always insist that the game is 1 - 2 points better than average reviews.

This is doubly true when a Vita game is being reviewed. Some ps fans feel the need to be protective over the struggling console for obvious reasons and will ecen go as far as saying a horrid short game like Declassification is getting unjust hate.Again, one needs only check past reviews to collaborate my words.

What's my point? There's no point asking a mostly ps fan driven site if they believe a Vita exclusive game if it is 7.7 material, they'l always tell you it's at least an 8.7.

Closing remark, one chapter of a game does not fully represent the entirety of said game. So those of you lambasting IGN for not completing the game and then turning around and saying according to the demo it is worth at least a 9 are being hypocrites.

Kingthrash3604006d ago

demos should be more like SS. to be honest that was the deepest I've ever played. people sinking in 20 + hours in this demo. reviews are irrelevent after demos like that. it was smart and gives reviewers less power. devs need to take notes, this game will sell from demo players. if any doubt play the free demo, simple.

Bimkoblerutso4006d ago

Reviews are not irrelevent. People just continue (and will always continue) to staunchly insist that review scores are an objective ranking for games.

Reviews are completely...I repeat, COMPLETELY subjective articles. The only real attributes that can be objectively stated in a review are those that are quantifiable, such as number of polygons, sound quality, blah blah blah. There is no way to objectively prove that Mario controls wonderfully, or that Snake's ass looks great in tights.

Reviews simply exist to present perspective. It may be a perspective that you vehemently disagree with, but what people don't seem to realize is that they are bringing their own biases into the mix SIMPLY BY DISAGREEING.

Bias is not necessarily an ugly word. It is the culmination of all that we have seen and experienced that has brought us to the opinions that we form, and WE ALL DO IT.

Stop looking to reviews for some misplaced reinforcement of your own opinions, and start accepting them for what they really are: perspective.

kupomogli4006d ago (Edited 4005d ago )

@GameCents

It's the same as when Nintendo fans and Microsoft fans will bash reviews for giving games like New Super Mario Bros 2 and Gears of War Judgment lower reviews.

As for Twisted Metal, the game is amazing and it deserves a high single player and offline multiplayer review. But online was broken until six months later when they finally fixed it. However, IGN didn't fail to show how bad of a gaming website they are when they still gave it a 9/10. It's clear they didn't put any time into the online multiplayer or they would have docked it another point I'm sure. Although, I guess we can't very well fault them for playing only a couple hours online, because after you actually get into a room, the game runs silky smooth, and doing everything single player they already have enough to review the game.

Although, time and time again, sites like Kotaku and IGN prove there's a lot wrong with video game journalism.

Dir_en_grey4006d ago

LOL, IGN called this game a RPG...

(It's a pure action game ya f' tards)

nuff said

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 4006d ago
Kingthrash3604006d ago

crazy how the review contradicts the score...
wow ign...just wow. 7.7 lol....but the review reflects a 8.7 score...sad...
what really sad is he didnt even beat the game.....lol wow

Shikoro4006d ago (Edited 4006d ago )

I really don't understand it. Since when are reviewers allowed to publish a review without finishing the game? That's completely bizarre and hurts their reputation even more, but when you're at the rock bottom, I guess you can't go any lower. -_-

Judging by how much some of the reviewers had been playing the game, I would be more credible to write a review based on my 35+ hours of playtime...

Sad is the entitlement "gaming journalists" are given...

HammadTheBeast4006d ago (Edited 4006d ago )

Sadly, they only reserve that for CoD, making sure to prestige at least once to get the "full experience"

HarryMasonHerpderp4006d ago (Edited 4006d ago )

Hmmm
6/10 from polygon
6/10 from Edge
7/10 from Eurogamer
7/10 from IGN
8/10 from Destructoid

Very predictable.
The demo played like an 8/10 at least for me.
Was still going to pick this up whatever the "main" websites scored it.
I seem to be disagreeing with a lot of review scores these days, they all seem to be marked on the reviewers bias, attention span and how much hype and marketing goes into the game. I've also read a lot of the reviewers have neither finished the game or played the online portion which is arguably the biggest part of the game. Polygon's review is laughably short and claims it to be a "button masher" which anyone who has played the demo knows is clearly not the case.

SilentNegotiator4006d ago (Edited 4006d ago )

Go back in time and tell them that it's on 3DS. Instant 9/10s.
Can't wait to see Modojo's review...Chris Buffa will probably review it himself and give it a 3/10.

SonyPS44005d ago

Just because it is on a PS doesn't necessarily mean reviewers will intentionally keep the score lower. There are many games on PS that received high scores, Uncharted 2 and 3 came to mind. Demon's Souls is another, so is LBP Vita, etc. Uncharted Vita also received some good scores, but because of the game's many flaws it wasn't favored with boatloads of 9+ scores, but the game was still well received nonetheless for a spinoff. Zelda Skyward Sword had some controversy from GameSpot. Xbox360 exclusive franchises have declined a bit as well in the scoring department. Oh and Call of Duty Black Ops II, the list goes on.

You just have a thing with Nintendo, and when people argue your points you respond with some "you're just playing the victim" comment while doing damage control for Sony when the company and its products get criticized.

Sandmano4006d ago

This game deserves at least an 8.

hulk_bash19874006d ago (Edited 4006d ago )

Been playing the demo for a while and just got in some time with the game(about 2hrs in) and I'm enjoying it. So far it's a solid 8.5 for me, can't wait to log in some more time.

Show all comments (60)
110°

PS Vita Exclusives Freedom Wars, Soul Sacrifice to Have Servers Shuttered

Sammy: "Two high-profile PS Vita exclusives, Freedom Wars and Soul Sacrifice, will have their servers deactivated on 24th December, 2021. Both titles, published by Sony in response to its loss of Monster Hunter exclusivity, were built around co-operative play, and maintained relatively dedicated communities to this day."

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
Rangerman1208872d ago (Edited 872d ago )

Oreshika is also getting it servers shut down too. Big shame for these games. Honestly some of Vita's gems.

Snookies12872d ago

I'm surprised these were even still up! Loved the Vita though, had some great times with that handheld.

XxSPIDEYxX872d ago

These games deserve sequels or remakes. It was Soul Sacrifice that even got me into Monster Hunter.

Rangerman1208872d ago (Edited 872d ago )

Honestly surprised they never got ported to the ps4 or even PC. Since Sony won't give the vita another shot, wht not make a Vita collection? Could have Soul Sacrifice, Freedom Wars, KZ Mercs, Uncharted Golden Abyss, Murasaki Baby, etc. As a way to conmemorate the Vita.

CDbiggen872d ago

Freedom wars servers are still up? Holy shit.

jimbo6597872d ago

This why you never should have achievements/trophies locked to online only features.

Show all comments (12)
160°

It's a lonely but fun place - Top 10 PlayStation Games Stranded on Vita Island

"When PlayStation Vita released in 2012, expectations were high as Sony's previous handheld (PSP) was quite successful even if it could never quite match with Nintendo's handheld juggernauts." - Tyler Hall from Video Chums

Read Full Story >>
videochums.com
ZaWarudo2012d ago

Soul Sacrifice seriously needs another entry.

2012d ago
Fist4achin2012d ago

I would have added Killzone Mercenaries to the list. Overall, good list.

Lexreborn22012d ago

It’s not stranded until 2019, if people really wanted to get some great experiences out the way then they’d buy it. But there are so many stubborn people that made their mind up that won’t happen.

You can go on eBay, OfferUp it any social market place and get one from 70-120 WITH memory card and the games are dirt cheap. But I bet people feel like buying their 5th 3DS for 200 plus because of its color is better then checking out great games.

I guess it’s not always about the games

execution172012d ago

I could just never find one after I got a stable income, could find games all over the place though

rainslacker2011d ago (Edited 2011d ago )

Quite a few of the games aren't dirt cheap. Guess it depends on what you like though. The Japanese anime games tend to hold their value quite well.

One can get digital games pretty cheap a lot of the time, and if they were smart, they'd have added all those vita games on PS+ over the years, and have quite an impressive backlog when they get their system.

2012d ago Replies(1)
130°

How Sony & Third Parties Attempted to Capitalize on Monster Hunter's Absence on PSV

VGChartz: “While the PSP definitely got off to a flying start in terms of sales thanks to the promise of console quality gaming on the go, things took a downturn in the following years due to a variety of factors including increasing competition from the DS & phones, and a lack of quality exclusives. In Japan, one franchise injected new life into the little handheld turning it from a decent seller into the must-have machine in the country - this was, of course, Monster Hunter.

Capcom's co-operative action-adventure series was born on the PS2 but found a much better audience on the PSP, where local ad-hoc play became somewhat of a phenomenon in the country. Each successive release sold better than the previous entry, culminating in Monster Hunter Portable 3rd clearing nearly 5 million copies. The stage was all set for the franchise to make the jump to Sony's new handheld in 2011, but in a surprise piece of news it was announced the series would instead be transitioning to Nintendo's new 3DS handheld.

With the audience still very much interested in buying a true next-gen successor on the Vita despite the hardware shift, other companies stepped in to attempt to plug the gap in the market, leading to a large variety of imitator franchises on the Vita. It's these series I'm intending to examine in this article - what they are (including many that actually pre-dated Monster Hunter or appeared alongside it on PSP), how many entries Vita saw, how well they sold, and how well they succeeded at providing a co-operative hunting experience.”

Read Full Story >>
vgchartz.com
Movefasta19932151d ago

Lol i remember soul sacrifice, i remember when people hyped it up to be the next monster esque game, it was fun for a while but it didn't do it for me.

Jaypi032151d ago

Honestly, story wise, I enjoyed it more than Monster Hunter, but it's comparing apples to oranges really.

Movefasta19932150d ago (Edited 2150d ago )

I don't play monster hunter for story, honestly the monster games have terrible stories but I still love them. I couldn't stand the bland environments in soul sacrifice and having to regenerate the abilities.

TheGamez1002151d ago

Freedom wars, God eater, Toukiden, and soul sacrifice I loved. Well the single player stories that is which is the one thing the mh games lacked to me. Very underrated games.

2151d ago
InKnight7s2151d ago

wow wow stop there lack of quality exclusives? Crisis Core FFVII, Dissidia, Dissidia 012, The 3rd Birthday, KH BBS, Type 0, other SE games, 2 GOW games, DW games, MGS Peace Walker, Dragon Ball Tag Tenkaichi (best DB on the go ever), tons of best anime games including Yu Gi Oh GX, Gundam, HxH, Naruto and so more, Megan Man X, Gran Turismo, 2 GTA games, without mentioning other PS exclusives and MH. PSP main issue was the HACK, without hacking I assume psp games would had sold much better. best portable device ever. with ton of PS1 classics.

Chaos_Order2150d ago

I actually thought Freedom Wars was excellent. Loved the setting, loved the combat, in some aspects I think it beats even Monster Hunter World. (Although MH's scale, scope and depth makes it better overall) I'd love to see a sequel or spiritual successor.