130°

Xbox 720: 10 Reasons It’ll Win Console War Over PS4

Whatculture: With the news that Microsoft is going to unveil the Xbox 720 on May 21st, discussion over which company – Microsoft, Sony or even Nintendo – is going to win the console war has started to run rampant. We’ve already suggested why we think it’s possible that the PS4 could win the fight for next-gen supremacy, but given that we’ve yet to see anything from Microsoft yet, it seems a tad unfair to call the fight before the behemoths have all squared off. In just a few short weeks, we’ll have all the answers, when Microsoft lifts the curtain on their latest games console.

Still, it’s fun to play Devil’s Advocate and speculate on just why they’re going to blow Sony out of the water. Here are 10 reasons why Micoroft are destined to win the console war…

Read Full Story >>
whatculture.com
MonkeyNinja4012d ago (Edited 4012d ago )

"10. Their Main Competitor Has Failed (WiiU)"

Really? Nintendo is their main competitor? I coulda swore it was Sony...

Godmars2904012d ago

Two generations Sony was clearly leading, so yeah, this gen has had no clear "winner" just console makers struggling to make a profit.

AngelicIceDiamond4012d ago (Edited 4012d ago )

I recently haven't been seeing eye to eye with @Mars but he is right.

I also believe Sony and MS will struggle to make a profit going on next gen.

Its clear signs that Sony and MS will be pretty even in specs and quality in first party games. With Sony releasing "right away" rather than later it should really even things up for Sony going on next gen.

Both of MS and Sony's first party and third party stables are locked in ready.

And the fanboys will be too...
Get ready for a new generation of trolling amongst gamers.

As far as the article goes, it fails in many ways.

jerethdagryphon4011d ago

easier to develop for.... there the same damn chips and unified ram pool is just as easy to use as split so... yea thats a fanboy comment

GuruStarr784012d ago

And, The number #1 reason the article states is Kinect 2.0?!

Fail....

Muerte24944012d ago

10 reasons:

10:Wii U floudering (It just means the number one spot is up for grabs

9:Microsoft's track record (Microsoft though this gen and the previous has been outsold by Sony)

8: Cheaper (now prices have been anounced)

7: Superior Online (This is debatable I have a LIVE sub and I can honestly say there is no difference. There aren't even dedicated servers in most of their exlcusives)

6: Good things come to those who wait (same thing can be said about any system)

5: Blu-ray (Ps4 will offer this too or you can just purchase a ps3?)

4: Exclusive content (You're joking right? Sony losing exclusive to Microsoft? Doubtful)

3: More comfortable controller (this is only for shooters. Fighting game player actually prefer DualShock because of the D-pad/ personal preference)

2:Easy to develop (Both system are using APUs)

1: Kinect (it had it's moment but ultimately because a "dust collecting" peripheral)

Jaqen_Hghar4012d ago

A man doesn't have to say anything but look at that ^ comment

Godmars2904012d ago

Would think that #9 applied towards hardware reliability. That if that they cheap out with the BR or have another certain "issues", especially early and widespread one, they aren't going to be coming back from it. Not when they're putting themselves out under "convenience".

Gimmemorebubblez4012d ago

For those of you who don't like slides.
10- WiiU floundering
9-Microsofts Track record
8-Cheaper(Probably)
7-Superior Online
6-Good things come to those who wait
5-Blu-ray
4-Exclusive content (Timed exclusivity etc.)
3- More comfortable controller
2-Ease to develop
1-Kinect

JoGam4012d ago (Edited 4012d ago )

Ummmm the main thing that should be on the freaking list and considered for why the Xbox 720 will win the console war over the PS4, is GAMES. WHY IS THAT NOT ON THE LIST? Never mind, PS4 is getting my money anyway.

For the record, whoever wrote this opinion piece please know, "GAMES" is to be considered if we are talking about a "GAMING CONSOLE". Everything else is just secondary.

spongeboob4012d ago

Apparently games don't matter to the guy or guys who came up with this hugely debatable list.

This list looks like it was written by Micheal Pachter and Nolan Bushnell or 2 over the hill guys who have no business talking about the games industry.

patterson4012d ago

This looks more like a list of why the PS4 will be better than the 720. Especially the Kinect part lol.

Max-Zorin4012d ago

The neutrals and the gamers that don't berate you(like 50% of this site) for having a different preference already won the war.

Hicken4011d ago

How is a competition between two sides won by someone who takes neither side?

In any case, this list is complete and utter crap. None of the reasons make any sense; half of them aren't even confirmed.

I'm amazed the usual suspects aren't in here supporting it.

Jaqen_Hghar4012d ago

A man couldn't read after 360 "left PS3 in the dust" ages ago apparently. An author goes on to say how it managed to catch 360 last year in the next sentence. Need a man say more?

Show all comments (28)
60°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

60°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

170°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot10h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

Duke194h ago(Edited 4h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke1946m ago(Edited 42m ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

mandf2h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor3h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave2h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor40m ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

Duke1945m ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai2h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris2h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (17)