100°

Bonus Round:Is "Always On" A Turn Off?

Next-Gen Nightmare? Will gamers shy away from the next generation of consoles when they always need to be online?

Read Full Story >>
gametrailers.com
US8F4009d ago (Edited 4009d ago )

Yes for single player games, no for multiplayer only games.

Good episode.

JoGam4009d ago

Jaffe is funny. We was taking bet that he couldn't make a point with cursing. LOL Whats funny was the dude in the middle started cursing too. LOL

Maddens Raiders4008d ago

to play single player games (if true)? ...yes, just as much as rhetorical questions.

StrongMan4009d ago

I thinks it's a turn off for everyone. Haven't you seen all of the bad publicity about it.

Roper3164008d ago

are you a PS+ member? Do you allow auto game updates & save backups? If your answer is yes your console is already always connected! How do you think Sony's network accesses your PS3 to do this? So are you turned off by your PS3 & Sony now?

Now if it stops you from being able to play your single player or any games while not connected that is a complete different story.

badz1494008d ago

it's the HUGE difference between "optional" and "mandatory" and don't you dare trying to spin that one up!

it's like how "mandatory" install for the PS3 is a bad thing and "optional" install on the 360 is nothing but good but that's another story!

JoGam4008d ago

I agree, the ps3 is always on. Im not sure is its everyone or just when u become a plus members however, it doesn't require you to be always on to play games. I believe that's the issue everyone is having. Always online required for playing single play or story mode games.

Roper3164008d ago

@ Badz

Did you read my comment? Do you understand what you read if you did?

" Do you allow auto game updates & save backups? If your answer is yes your console is already always connected!"

do you see where I asked he if he allowed auto updates & game saves?

If I asked if he allowed it that means I know it's optional.

Hicken4008d ago

And yet despite you, according to you, acknowledging that it's something he allows, you STILL try to equate it to a console that REQUIRES an always online connection.

The subject is a console that requires an online connection to play ALL your games; that should be evident by now. His comment is in reference to the fact that MOST(because some people are idiots) don't like the idea that a console would have to be online at all times to play its games.

Why, then, would you respond by questioning a conditional, OPTIONAL online connection?

Simply put, it was a stupid comparison.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4008d ago
joab7774008d ago

It is period. I am almost always online but there are times when I don't want to appear online. For example, I take a day off to play a great game. Now everyone knows why I did it...lol. Also there are still many places that don't have high speed internet. Now u can play offline. What do u do when its always on?

otherZinc4008d ago (Edited 4008d ago )

@StrongMan,
I think its a "turn off" that a console starts off with backwards compatibility...then releases a slim model and takes backwards compatibility away.

Themba764008d ago

yes plain and simple if it's always on I want nothing to do with it.

Rebo004008d ago

I wouldn't be bothered about Always-On if I hadn't played SimCity...

fOrlOnhOpe574008d ago

It would be straining credibity for MS to go to the extent of an Always Online requirement for single player games - and no one could be that stupid or arrogant.
If I were an xbox player I wouldn't be worried. And yes, Im only into SP.

Show all comments (29)
70°

Bonus Round:Episode 501 - 2011 Industry Preview

GT:Will Nintendo win the console war in 2011?

Read Full Story >>
gametrailers.com
NYC_Gamer4828d ago

where can Nintendo go from here?the next console will need some type of gimmick to have the same success as the wii

ABizzel14827d ago

For once I actually agree with Pachter on something. I don't think the 3DS will be as big of a success as the DS was. I think it'll do 80 - 100 million easy, but the price, having DS in the name, and competition are going to hurt it this time around. Apple's cutting into their casual market with the iPhone, iPad, and iTouch, and the NGP is hitting all the right notes with the hardcore.

I also think it's time for a new Nintendo console, and I expect to hear about it or see it this year, and launch in 2012. I expect their new console to be slightly more powerful than the 360 and PS3, and launch at $300, and like every said it'll have some kind of gimmick to make it the new must have.

DFresh4828d ago

I'm not expecting a console from Nintendo for at least a couple more years.
3DS seems to be Nintendo's big focus in 2011.
Though I know Nintendo will keep announcing some dope exclusives for their platforms.
Much like the new Kirby game.
Not Kirby: Epic Yarn from 2010 but Kirby: No Strings Attached in 2011.
:)
New Pikmin or Star Fox game wouldn't hurt either.
F-Zero could be another plus.
Pretty sure Super Mario Galaxy 3 will be announced.
Still more to come from Nintendo.
Gotta love their exclusive franchises.
:D

PlayerX4828d ago (Edited 4828d ago )

I love how Pachter is always wrong about Nintendo. Even Geoff Keighley thinks he should get a new job.

thats_just_prime4827d ago

I agree I think they will keep the focus on the 3DS in 2011. I think E3 2012 they will talk about their next console. I think its also likely that sony will announce the ps4 at E3 2013 with a release date in 2013 or 2014.