150°

AMD launches a screaming-fast graphics card with 8.6B transistors

by Dean Takahashi

Advanced Micro Devices is launching a new high-end graphics card today with some serious horsepower. The Sunnyvale, Calif.-based chip maker says it has retaken the crown for the world’s fastest graphics card.

The AMD Radeon HD 7990 card, with two chips, has more than 8.6 billion transistors, and it has 4,096 stream processors that can produce 8.2 teraflops of computing power. It can support 4K resolutions on the newest monitors and TVs, and can run six displays at once.

Read Full Story >>
venturebeat.com
AkatsukiPain4013d ago (Edited 4013d ago )

I kinda found this paragraph interesting.

"AMD also has its graphics chips in the upcoming Sony PlayStation 4. Nekechuk said that AMD’s 7990 cards were in PCs that Electronic Arts used to demo its upcoming Battlefield 4 video game. In scenes from games like the top-selling BioShock Infinite (pictured), AMD showed how the lighting was more crisp and details more fleshed out using the 7990."

Shinra Tensei

RBlue_Desire4012d ago

I wonder if they mean, that maybe its 7990's chip they will be using on PS4 albeit with less clock speed and bandwidth for cost reduction.

gamernova4012d ago

Lmao Really? Is that what you read? The only thing involving the ps4 was the first sentence :P

RBlue_Desire4012d ago

xD sadly yes, I am a bit slow reader.

I am just hopeful (and bit delusional) that ps4 will delivering more than it is right now.

r1sh124012d ago

AMD were a bit unlucky in the past few years.
in 2005/6 they were about to overtake inel as the number 1 chip maker, intel stepped up and AMD got comfortable.
THey have been playing catch up every since, the ATI (Now AMD) graphics division have caught up and are biting away.
The best deal for AMD is to have their hardware in the ps4/xbox 720 - the downside..
They may level peg the graphics cards :/

But they have some exciting technology coming like video rendering in the cloud.

Nvidia have become too cocky and think they are the greatest.
This proves they arent and AMD have partnered with ARM so expect Nvidia to have some serious competition

B-radical4012d ago

Lol amd can release any card they went be on as many consoles as they want. Nvidia will still be number 1 im not saying this as fanboy or anything. But its the truth. They will make a butload money of consoles tho.

Arai4013d ago

"AMD is going to package the graphics card with dual Tahiti-based chips for $999, and it will throw in eight high-end PC games for free: BioShock Infinite, Tomb Raider, Crysis 3, Far Cry 3, Far Cry 3 Blood Dragon, Hitman Absolution, Sleeping Dogs, and Deus Ex Human Revolution."

That's a great deal IMO and goes well with such a beast of a card.

RBlue_Desire4012d ago

So approximately $320 worth of stuff with that graphic card.

But Anyone who is buying that card, i guess would have already got most of those games.

gamernova4012d ago

Ebay lol But that is a really good deal. Makes me want to jump from my green team 670.

Neixus4012d ago

For the people that drop in to read quick, the card was used in the bf4 presentation, they played Bf4 at over 60 fps on 4k resolution.. o.O

GameOn4012d ago

I think they used two actually.

GameOn4012d ago (Edited 4012d ago )

chcolatesnw, lol chill man. Nobody mentioned any console and I'm pretty sure they did use two 7990's for that demo.

Truehellfire4012d ago

It was actually two 7990's used in the Battlefield demo. Still, pretty impressive considering how much more demanding 4k is compared to standard 1080p or even 1440/1600p.

chcolatesnw4012d ago

You guys are fcukn retarded! They used a dual GPU card = single 7990 (since it has 2 gpu's one one pcb). And it ran at 3k not 4k you doofus. And it was </= 60fps, since there were clear drops in fps if you watched the less compressed 2.5gb 1800p/60ps video.
And for "I wonder if they mean, that maybe its 7990's chip they will be using on PS4 albeit with less clock speed and bandwidth for cost reduction."
AHAHAHHAHAHAHA, AHHAHAHAHAHAH
YOU WISH SON
They will use crappy 100$ gpu like the 7790/7850.
You console fanboys think yo ps4 gonna be beast when in fact its gonna be a trashy LAPTOP 8 core APU at 1.6GHz with low end of the low end GPU. HAHAHA. low settings 720p 30fps BF4 for you!!!
LOL

lonesoul654012d ago

@CHCOLATESNW

ya know...does it make you feel better to name call? IF you have a correct answer then answer...no reason to be a jerk. Funny how people with knowledge have to try and make others feel small. Lighten up my friend or your credible information just gets discredited by a poor attitude.

GameOn4012d ago (Edited 4012d ago )

http://n4g.com/news/1229206...
Now if you can count you will see two graphics cards hence you are the retard here.

NaAsAr4012d ago

A screaming fast single dual gpu card that happens to be getting beat by its little twin brothers(7970 crossfire)

the latter a cheaper option btw.

ATi_Elite4012d ago

OK for $999 I better get something GREAT cause that's a lot recycled cans and lawn mowing. After trolling Benchmarks all day long the HD7990:

TOTALLY beats the CRAP outta GTX690 and Titan CLearly. Also beats GTX680 sli in a lot of test at 1600p. Even on Triple Monitor set-ups the HD7990 is still Lord and Master.

ONly a HD7970 ghz CFX beats out a HD7990 in performance and Price.

AMD has manhandled Nvidia this Gen and only Nvidia GTX700 series will regain the crown while AMD will have GREAT cards for super Cheap thus making GTX700 not so attractive.

Oh by the way 8 FREE top quality Games is UNREAL. Such a sweat deal for those with DEEP Pockets.

HD7970 Ghz CFX, HD7990, HD7970 Ghz, HD7790 AMD has a monster Enthusiast solution Line-up and the HD7790 is a Boss at the $129 level.

Good Job AMD.

Dasteru4012d ago

Hate to say it but AMD is a year late to the game to be considered the winner of the PC GPU gen.

The GTX690 dominated the entire gen, Titan is a single GPU midway card to the 700-series. The GTX780 will be releasing soon and AMD will be clinging to Nvidia's ass as usual.

ATi_Elite4012d ago

Ummm WRONG!

HD 7970GHZ CFX Never lost! It beats the GTX690 GTX680 SLI and Titan and cost LESS than all of them too.

Besides AMD always releases it's HDx990 card late and they still sell like HOT CAKES.

I own AMD and Nvidia and I don't know what planet you line on but here on Earth AMD has won these last two GPU Gen's.

AMD GPU price and performance is unmatched by Nvidia

Dasteru4012d ago (Edited 4012d ago )

Ummm WRONG!

HD 7970CFX is a 3rd party manufacturer overclock of the normal Ghz edition with added VRam. It doesn't follow official AMD specs and therfore doesn't count.

If a 3rd party like XFX decided to do the same thing with the GTX690 it would destroy the CFX easily.

The only reason it hasn't happened is because Nvidia doesn't allow 3rd parties to freely modify their cards beyond spec like AMD does.

Just to add: The 7970CFX isn't better than sli'd 680s anyway, just checked some benches and the CFX comes out very slightly ahead in a few areas but gets completely slaughtered by near double in others.

http://www.ocaholic.ch/modu...

http://www.ocaholic.ch/modu...

http://www.ocaholic.ch/modu...

http://www.ocaholic.ch/modu...

http://www.ocaholic.ch/modu...

http://www.ocaholic.ch/modu...

http://www.ocaholic.ch/modu...

http://www.ocaholic.ch/modu...

http://www.ocaholic.ch/modu...

http://www.ocaholic.ch/modu...

http://www.ocaholic.ch/modu...

Conclusions:

"AMD's CrossFire is scaling better than nVidia's SLI looking at both synthetic (5%) and games (0-2 %) benchmarks in average. When you look closer at the different benchmarks, one by one, AMD is doing a better job for the scaling than nVidia. It was quite often that we had a very close to 200 % improvement. But there is a dark side - that's why on average the scaling is very close to nVidia - CrossFire is not always working well. For exemple as you may have seen in the graphs under Batman and Skyrim - which are quite old now - drivers should be optimized. Reality shows that they haven't been optimized and there is a downscaling with CrossFire, which means that with two cards the performance was worse than with one card. This gives AMD a big disadvantage. On the other hand we didn't have any problems with SLI, it was working well with all games we tested.

Looking at the performance index you clearly see that the GTX 680 SLI is the fastest dual graphics solution. Now from a performance/watts point of view new nVidia graphics card are clearly winning. As for the price/performance ratio at the moment both HD 7950 and GTX 670 are at the same level offering the best performance/price ratio. Then comes the HD 7970 and the GTX 680 not that far behind.

So the best single card at the moment from all those points of view is clearly the GTX 670 which is dominating. Now for those who want pure performance not looking at the price or power consumption the GTX 680 SLI is clearly the best choice"

Dasteru4012d ago (Edited 4012d ago )

Accidently double posted the second to last link, here is the intended last one.

http://www.ocaholic.ch/modu...

AMDs drivers also suck bad. Even when you do get better performance out of them, the compatibility and stability issues make it not worth it.

Show all comments (23)
270°

AMD FSR 3.1 Announced at GDC 2024, FSR 3 Available and Upcoming in 40 Games

Last September, we unleashed AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution 3 (FSR 3)1 on the gaming world, delivering massive FPS improvements in supported games.

Read Full Story >>
community.amd.com
Eonjay27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

So to put 2 and 2 together... FSR 3.1 is releasing later this year and the launch game to support it is Rachet and Clank: Rift Apart. In Sony's DevNet documentation it shows Rachet and Clank: Rift Apart as the example for PSSR. PS5 Pro also launches later this year... but there is something else coming too: AMD RDNA 4 Cards (The very same technology thats in the Pro). So, PSSR is either FSR 3.1 or its a direct collaboration with AMD for that builds on FSR 3.1. Somehow they are related. I think PSSR is FSR 3.1 with the bonus of AI... now lets see if RDNA 4 cards also include an AI block.

More details:
FSR 3.1 fixes Frame Generation
If you have a 30 series RTX card you can now use DLSS3 with FSR Frame Generation (No 40 Series required!)
Its Available on all Cards (we assume it will come to console)
Fixes Temporal stability

MrDead26d ago

I've been using a mod that allows dlss frame gen on my 3080 it works on all rtx series. It'll be good not to rely on mods for the future.

darksky26d ago

The mods avaiable are actually using FSR3 frame gen but with DLSS or FSR2 upscaling.

Babadook726d ago (Edited 26d ago )

I think that the leaks about the 5 Pro would debunk the notion that the two (FSR 3.1 and PSSR) are the same technology. PSSR is a Sony technology.

MrDead27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

I wonder how much they fixed the ghosting in dark areas as Nvidia are leaving them in the dust with image quality. Still good that they are improving in big leaps, I'll have to see when the RTX5000 series is released who I go with... at the moment the RTX5000's are sounding like monsters.

just_looken26d ago

Did you see the dell leaks were they are trying to cool cards using over 1k watts of power.

We are going to need 220 lines for next gen pcs lol

MrDead26d ago

That's crazy! Sounds like heating my house won't be a problem next winter.

porkChop26d ago

As much as I hate supporting Nvidia, AMD just doesn't even try to compete. Their whole business model is to beat Nvidia purely on price. But I'd rather pay for better performance and better features. AMD also doesn't even try to innovate. They just follow Nvidia's lead and make their own version of whatever Nvidia is doing. But they're always 1 or 2 generations behind when it comes to those software/driver innovations, so Nvidia is always miles ahead in quality and performance.

MrDead26d ago

I do a lot of work on photoshop so an Intel Nvidia set up has been the got to because of performance edge, more expensive but far more stable too. Intel also have the edge over AMD processors with better load distribution on the cores, less spikes and jitters. When you're working large format you don't want lag or spikes when you're editing or drawing.

I do think AMD has improved massively though and whist I don't think they threaten Nvidia on the tech side they do make very well priced cards and processors for the power. I'm probably going with a 5080 or 5090 but AMD will get a little side look from me, which is a first in a long time... but like you said they are a generation or two behind at the moment.

Goosejuice25d ago

While I can't argue for amd gpu, they aren't bad but they aren't great either. The cpu for amd have great. I would argue the 7800x3d as one of the best cpu for gaming right now. Idk about editing so I take ur word for that but gaming amd cpu is a great option these days.

porkChop25d ago

@Goosejuice

I have a 7800X3D. It certainly is great for gaming. Though for video editing, rendering, etc, I think Intel have the advantage from what I remember. I just mean from a GPU standpoint I can't support them.

70°

AMD storm Nvidia's Super launch party with temporary price cut to RX 7900 XT

Now that the RTX 4070 Super has launched, AMD have chopped the price of the RX 7900 XT to new lows.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
80°

AMD Radeon 700M "RDNA 3" iGPUs Recieve Fluid Motion Frames Support, Brings FPS-Boost To Gamers

AMD has expanded its Fluid Motion Frames (AFMF) tech to Radeon 700M iGPUs which play a major role in laptops, handhelds & desktops.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Tapani98d ago

The ideal FPS would be for Steam Deck 45fps which is boosted to match the 90hz screen. However, today's new games are not on that level even on the OLED version, so the successor to Phoenix Point needs to come out fast. The 2nd Gen Steam Deck needs a VRR screen as well to make this doable. 2025 should be the year for such a device.

XBManiac98d ago

Or you need to play games better suited for Steam Deck. What would be great is a more powerful version of Steam Deck with higher specs for latest games. But... it will take a couple of years, it seems, as Gabe is waiting for a real next gen Zen+RDNA really portable kit.

Tapani98d ago

You are right, it really does come down to understanding what your Steam Deck can play and how. And that to me, is a bit of a pain to deal with. For a portable, I have zero interest in tuning anything, and just want to pick up and play. To do so in the PC space, you are correct, there needs to be a real next gen APU available.

That being said, I really appreciate there are these devices and can see how people like using them. To me the Steam Deck or any PC handheld should be a device which can continue the AAA games I play on my 4090 when I'm on the go.

Personally, I'm waiting for Strix Point, RDNA 3.5 at 16CU and an OLED VRR 90-120hz screen and better memory bandwidth. This should play AAA games at low settings at locked 40 or 45 fps which would be great already for a handheld. When Strix Point is out, most of the non-Valve PC handheld manufacturers have already sorted out the kinks in their software as well, so there should be a good maturity in 2024 or 2025 in these devices.

I do think, though, that Fluid Motion Frames will be a technique that these handhelds will benefit a lot from in the coming years as it spreads.