Orion: Dino Horde Controversy - Let The Battle Begin

DSOGaming writes: "You see, it's easy to bash indie or small teams. And it's easy because you can damage them. You can destroy them. You can WIN. And most people feel satisfied with that accomplishment. They do not care about the fact that a game was given for free to existing customers. They do not care for the people that worked on this. They do not care if other, triple-A companies are doing the same thing. No, indie devs can be easily taken down."

[rezzah]

Lame how people use the same dinosaurs in almost every dinosaur game. And theyre all based off the ones seen in the Jurassic Park movies.

The song for the trailer was annoying.

[zerocrossing]

It looks pretty great IMO, nothing fantastic but it's sure to be fun.

So why are people complaining?

[rezzah]

It does look much more fun than the last dino shooter I played.

The article said people are complaining because they believed the sequel to be an update to the first game.

I guess if you compare the first game and the sequel you'll get your answer, or at least a better perspective of what these people see.

But like the article stated, the improvements justify the game being a true sequel based on the practices of current gen.

To me the real definition behind a sequel is the story. What I mean is if the updates consist of gameplay/graphics only, and no story exists then it really is just an update.