170°

David Jaffe Tries To Rescue Game Journalism

An editorial about David Jaffe’s response to the difficulties experienced by game journalism outlets.

Read Full Story >>
cgmagazine.ca
dedicatedtogamers4017d ago

Stop trying, Jaffe. It cannot be saved.

Real journalists report the news and investigate interesting topics. Game journalists are paid shills for gaming companies at worst, and misguided fanboys at best.

Majin-vegeta4017d ago (Edited 4017d ago )

Well said here's a bub.

@Galactic empire.Just download ad blocker problem solved :P.

nix4017d ago (Edited 4017d ago )

most of the "journalists" are nothing but rabid fanboys. it's so sickening. reviews like the one for GeOW by Dan Hsu are the prime example why reviews and journalists can't be trusted. not to forget the overwhelming 10 out of 10 GTAIV got. that game was crap and boring.

let's not forget this gen and the special hate for Sony and PS3. this gen was sad when it comes to game journalism.

http://images.wikia.com/vgs...

EDIT: and i've always maintained that journalist are killing the industry that they are living off from. if you keep overrating crap games people are gonna buy crap games and then soon realise it's not worth investing so much. if you keep underrating great games no one is going to buy great games and the whole developers are gonna churn out average games. in the end we will end up with nothing but crap and average games.

i like games that's why i crib about these stuffs because i like gaming and i want to play great games. but am i living off gaming industry? no. but these "journalists" are. the rate at which we are going we will end up with nothing but boring game and slowly the industry will die. and i'm pretty sure i won't be the one out of job.

ThanatosDMC4017d ago

The only reviewers i like are Angry Joe, who's somewhat of a rabid xbox fanboy from the start but finally realized that he's paying for crap, and Yahtzee because he reveals the flaws of the games he plays.

MikeMyers4017d ago

Nix, a lot of people who call journalists fanboys are often fanboys themselves. People keep going on and on about how badly Sony was treated this gen yet there's been nothing but praise for the PS4. The reality is when your biased things look differently. We see Wii U doom articles now, are they now Nintendo haters? Sony has realized the mistakes they made with the PS3, that's why the PS4 sounds so promising. They listened, they didn't whine and tell everyone that journalists were just being fanboys.

cleft54017d ago

The reality is that most gamers agree with you. If game journalist aren't respected by those who are most invested into gaming than they have no true credibility.

I may like certain personalities, but the fact that my opinion or the opinion of any other gamer is just as valid as a "game journalist" is exactly why they have no credibility. I have opinions on World news, but I would never think for a second that my opinion was as valid as a journalist that works for the BBC.

matgrowcott4017d ago (Edited 4017d ago )

Your presumption is that the opinion of any other gamer is as valid as that of a GOOD journalist.

I've played some 400 games over the last 12 months, across dozens of genres and platforms. How many have you played? 50? As much as that? 25? How many of those were from your favourite genre? How many did you finish?

If a game sucked, I had to keep playing, sometimes for tens of hours.

Presumably, a lot of the other GOOD writers are doing much the same thing.

Having that depth of experience might not mean we're necessarily more knowledgeable than the average gamer - just like watching thousands of films doesn't necessarily mean you're not going to enjoy Scary Movie 5 - but we sure as hell have more to base our opinions on.

Whether you respect that depth of experience and whether you put any effort into finding writers with that depth of experience is entirely up to you though.

The_Klank4017d ago

@matgrowcott

So because you play many worse games then the average gamer your opinion has more weight to it? Is that really what you're saying?

matgrowcott4017d ago

@klank

And what exactly is inaccurate there? Aside from the "worse" games thing you've put into my mouth. My point was that any critic worth their salt plays a lot more titles than the average gamer, and so their opinion is based on a much more solid foundation. And I can't believe you could even attempt to say that that isn't as it should be. If you found out an IGN critic only played 10 games a year, you'd be disgusted, and rightly so.

Why the hell should you trust a critic who only plays the top 5 games a year? Why should you trust a critic who can only write about their favourite genre?

Remember, we're not talking about quality here, but of the notion that a journalist is just the same as any other gamer. When talking about the people of this industry that are good or even average at their jobs, that's simply not true.

Natso4017d ago

@matgrowcott

You're coming off as pretentious with these types of comments. There's no need to be condescending with comments such as "I've played x many games! How many have YOU played?!".

It just seems childish and self-righteous; Another issue with many "game journalists" today.

Notice how you inject the word "GOOD" into cleft's statement. He never said the word "GOOD", and used parenthesis around the word "game journalist" as to imply that the people he was referring to were in fact NOT "GOOD" journalists, or even game journalists at all!

Let's use your logic for a second: Game journalists play "many" more games than the average gamer, making their opinion hold much more weight, right? Well then what does that make a game journalist to a developer? Considering the fact that a developer has actually MADE a game, and a journalist has not, should you be able to critique their work at all?

The point is, an opinion is an opinion, regardless of someone's title. You may have played 400 games this year, but I guarantee you, there IS a gamer somewhere who has played more. Does that make him more important than you?

The_Klank4017d ago

@matgrowcott

So I put the worse games in your mouth now?
Tell me this of the 400 games you have played in the last 12 months how many scored were considered a good rating?

'If a game sucked, I had to keep playing, sometimes for tens of hours.'

I actually seek out critics with my taste in genres, why would I want a critic who doesn't enjoy that genres opinion? The very same way I would expect gamers of a certain genre to give me the best possible advice on it.

So whose opinion is more valid?
The guy who plays all but is master of none
Or
The guy that sits and plays and devotes his spare time to one specific genre.

'If you found out an IGN critic only played 10 games a year, you'd be disgusted, and rightly so.'
Now whose putting words in whose mouth. If that critic was say an expert on MMOs, and that was all he played, say 10 a year, then yes I would be very much interested in his opinion
Just the same way as if I was to talk to a Gamer with similar experience.

Just because you play 400 games a year doesn't make your opinion anymore or less valid then a Gamer who selectively picks what he wants to play.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4017d ago
joab7774017d ago (Edited 4017d ago )

Maybe if the money is paid to someone by gamers then they won't be beholden to anyone. Problem is that u will need various ppl to cover everything and opinions will always be opinions. But the idea is legit.

The problem is that with the dawn of the internet and youtube etc., everyone wants to be a singer, rapper, video game journalist or anything that you love and can make money doing. Personally, I read big sites for news but not for gaming content. The gaming industry is so great with everything else because fans everywhere contribute to the hobby that they love. It has worked thus far and will continue to work until too many decide they want to quit their job and make money. As soon as that happens the motive becomes hits, and hit pieces are generated to produce revenue.

GalacticEmpire4017d ago (Edited 4017d ago )

It won't change until websites work some other way than ad driven revenue. A lot of sites care more about getting you to click through page after page (full of ads) than they do about the actual content they offer.

There's also too much pressure from publishers when it comes to reviews. With certain websites, which won't be named... I G N, getting exclusive dibs on review embargos and other shady practices.

Kenshin_BATT0USAI4017d ago

You know I honestly feel there are VERY few proper game journalists now. By that I don't mean the outlet entirely such as IGN or gamespot or whatever. I mean the actual people.

Take Greg Millier from IGN, the guy is an actual enthusiast about the industry. We need more people like that, who actually have an invested interest in the industry, and not just looking for a job because they have a journalism degree.

HiddenMission4017d ago

I think their are people who are enthusiastic but that doesn't mean they don't let their personal biased affect their better judgement.

Greg Miller is hit or miss and I'm not talking about if I agree with him or not I'm talking about making his reviews into opinion pieces. One of the biggest issues is that gamers and press alike can be very stubborn and stupid...perfect example a review is not an opinion it's a fact finding mission...when false facts are in a review they no longer exist as reviews. If facts are intentionally dropped from a review a clear image of biased comes into play.

These are some of the biggest issues and then you have hype/flame bait articles...so yeah right now trust me the gaming press industry is beyond broken...the shit is destroyed.

MoveTheGlow4017d ago (Edited 4017d ago )

@Vashlion, Giant Bomb's a pretty realistic example of what you're proposing. Yes, they're owned by CBS, and yes, there are some ads on the site, but they're also partially funded by supporters, who are avid fans who usually came to the site via their podcast (and don't have to deal with the ads due to their support, along with premium content). The reviewers and writers typically identify themselves as not in the same job as game journalists, they're part of the "enthusiast press." On the back-end, a ton of reference material they host is crowd-generated content, like a Wikipedia of games, characters, developers, etc.

That's not to say that it's a sustainable model. They work their butts off where other outlets might not have to in order to keep stuff running. They're enthusiasts, so they keep it going. It's not for everyone, but it's a burgeoning part of the games press. My favorites are definitely them, RockPaperShotgun, and Rev3, all of which deliver *personal* and honest reviews. That doesn't mean they're right, but they're personal. That's as "true" as you can get with games, I think.

I'd much rather hear about what Jeff Gerstmann has to say about his experience with a game than some hypothetically super-objective robot. Subjectivity comes with the enthusiast press. So does personal bias. But I like their brand of bias; they like games, and they like them from the perspective of an adult. They review what they can, and they leave the other stuff for the "journalism" outlets. They'll also follow an interesting game's development the whole way through with a partnership (as they did with Bastion), but they won't review that game on principle.

Roccetarius4017d ago

More often than not, i've seen gaming journalists that aren't very credible. I've been at the point of entirely lost trust for quite some time, and i don't see that changing.

If i see something i feel is worth the purchase, then i will keep an eye on it. I usually pre-order closer to release, because something that changes my mind can be revealed.

With that said, and in many cases, games are not reviewed by gamers anymore. It used to be that way, but very few will do in depth reviews.

venom064017d ago

when the "copy and past job" that was MW3 can get a 9 from that fanboy site IGN and sell millions, but be regarded as one the WORST CoD games ever created by actual gamers, and then IGN turns around and tries to downtalk what is potentially BF4, without even know anything about it's changes.... that's when the phenonmenon that's "fanboy journalism" raises its ugly head.. and sadly, that monster is out the box and cant be put back in..

Show all comments (26)
360°

God Of War Creator Thinks That The Character Of Kratos Took A Wrong Turn

Terri writes: "In a recent video released by the creator of the God of War series, David Jaffe, we can see that Jaffe is not fond of the direction PlayStation took regarding the franchise, and in particular, Kratos himself."

SinisterMister121d ago

Well, I personally think that Santa Monica did an absolutely phenomenal job with Kratos, showcasing insane character development in all the right ways.

Jin_Sakai121d ago

I disagree. God of War went from a brutal action game where Kratos was slaying gods to a boring father figure. God of War 3 was my favorite in the series.

Christopher121d ago

I much prefer the focused and purposeful with reason Kratos who still gets into brutal combat and still has to kill gods even though he tries not to. Past Kratos was just anger personified and did nothing but subvert any expectations of him being something else other than just rage.

darthv72121d ago

2 is still my favorite. Everything about that game is top shelf design. the scale and scope of things like fighting the colossus of rhodes to awakening the steeds of time... just epic. 3 was good, but 2 is the high point of the original trilogy (for me).

The direction santa monica took for the reboot was less GoW (god of war) and more GoW (gears of war). The whole 3rd person perspective, having a partner (even if its his son), and lack of verticality with no more jumping and creating crazy areal combos... it was difficult to come to terms with but i managed. the story was good though, but i still give the nod to greek mythology over norse (and likely egyptian if that is where they go next).

frostypants120d ago

I can see it either way. I agree that the series now has nothing in common with the original beyond superficial character appearances and general setting. They sort of used the IP to sell an entirely different style of game. That said the new games are well made in their own right.

VivaLaManual120d ago

Yes. The game grew and stopped being one dimensional. What a shame....

DarXyde120d ago

I don't even think Jaffe really understood Kratos, despite creating him. Or rather, he doesn't seem to understand how he created the fertile ground for this kind of character development arc.

He was always a warrior, but he had a very human element since day one. He had a chance to protect his family again in God of War I and Ares took them away... Again. He knows he can't get them back and moved forward as the new God of War. Fast forward, the Gods betrayed him (though he was still sympathetic to Athena at the time). Eventually, he waged war with Olympus.

He was part of the pantheon and that would've been the entirety of his story arc where he oversaw war for all time.

But the truth this, Kratos has changed, but he largely remained the same. His two constants were always pride in his family and revenge against those who have wronged him. You take those two together (a threat to his family and Gods looking to kill him) and the direction he's taken is pretty congruent with who Kratos always has been. I guess you can say Kratos would just be a merciless monster for the sake of it, but the old games never explore present aspects of the character (e.g., what kind of father Kratos was). We got a look at that, and with a boy, no less.

I find the franchise did well to age with the audience. I was an angry teen when the original came out. Now I'm kinda mellowed out with a family and I just get it.

I think it did an excellent job of connecting with the audience as we grew up. It's a bit like Toy Story in that regard.

Monstieur120d ago (Edited 120d ago )

Agree. I liked GoW 3 the best as well. There weren't enough unique boss fights in the reboot.

Crows90120d ago (Edited 120d ago )

Well he aged considerably. Define boring father figure exactly? Maybe your father was boring but don't put that blame on others.

As far as slaying gods ...you're right ...he went from god slaying to....hmmm god slaying.

The newer Kratos matured with the audience. They could have just kept doing the same game over and over but they saw it getting stale so they had to switch the formula...they did so incredibly well.

SinisterMister120d ago

While God of War 3 is undoubtedly excellent in its own manner, the "boring father figure" part is something I don't agree with. For starters, if the situation calls for it, the old Kratos is back on camera, like when he fights against a particular Aesir god in Ragnarok.

tombfan119d ago

He achieved his goal... he actually got the revenge he was so desperately needing and in the end what? It'd be terrible character development if he would just go to another mythology to kill more gods just for the sake of they being gods. They actually gave them a meaning in life, and even better, they got an amazing idea of how to create a new game with actual bealavility and a plot, not just merciless kill.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 119d ago
savedsynner120d ago

Agree 100% Kratos had about an inch of depth before the norse version. Now he feels like a real character, a real dad, with real reactions based on his experiences.

gold_drake121d ago

i think they did a fantastic job with Kratos.

Snookies12121d ago

Wasn't Jaffe the one who got stuck on something easy in Metroid Dread and started bashing the game because of it? From what I played of GoW 2018, they actually gave Kratos some much-needed depth. I definitely plan to finally go through the newer entries once my PS5 comes in.

tombfan119d ago

Jaffe got stuck with his young mind thinking and it really showed with his latest attempt in gaming "Drawn to Death" it was like a teenage dream that became true and also, sucked.

Christopher121d ago

This whole video was essentially him finding comments to back up his own opinion. "It looks like a lot of people think..."

Yeah, well what do the review scores, sales, user scores, and completion rates on the last two say? Anything on that?

Reaper22_120d ago

Nothing wrong with his opinion. He created it so he's earned the right to criticize. Review scores and sales have nothing to do with it. It's success was never in question.

Christopher120d ago

You should probably read the first part of my comment. He's cherry picking opinions to support his but ignoring the plethora of other opinions.

Yeah, he's allowed his opinion, but his arguing method is to act like people just agree with him and not the diverse opinions out there on the subject.

-Foxtrot121d ago (Edited 121d ago )

People won’t like it I know but he’s entitled to his opinion being the games creator

I totally disagree but it’s not going to ruin the game for us who do like it

purple101121d ago

Yeh I may or may not disagree but he created the original and without him we would have no god of war, (or maybe one that wasn’t as good). So he can say what he wants in my books

Last I heard of him he made a black ad white game with a weird sketch art style. Similar to Sega Madworld

Haven’t heard from him since
Shame

itBourne120d ago

Drawn to Death, yeh, played it at the Playstation experience, it was quite fun, an old school arena shooter. Then it came out, and everyone died quicker, so strafe battles gone. It essentially turned into die, insta spawn, use ult, get a kill, they insta spawn, ult you, you die, and just repeat that loop lmao, its was terrible.

Christopher120d ago

I just have a problem with him saying they shouldn't have called it God of War because his opinion doesn't align with theirs on the future of the IP. That part I felt was pointedly petty.

Show all comments (56)
160°

God of War 2005 Was Originally Conceived For a First-Person Viewpoint According to Creator

Game director David Jaffe reveals that the original God of War 2005 was considered for a first-person viewpoint.

darthv72926d ago

Im very glad it did not end up that way. In first person you would lose the scale the game has. That is something i really appreciate about the GoW games is the immense size and scale of the environments and how the camera zooms out to show it in a much grander view.

CobraKai926d ago

Those epic set pieces would have gone unnoticed

TallDarknWavy925d ago

In GOW3 they did an homage to the fact it was supposed to be an FPS by putting you in first person right at the end, swinging your blades and bashing Zeus' face till the screen completely goes red.

roadkillers926d ago (Edited 926d ago )

One of the unlockables in the original God of War was a first person representation of God of War. A consideration for a spin-off/sequel was presented as a FPS in modern times. The military finds the dead Titan (Chronos I believe) and goes into the mountains where Kratos found Pandora's Box. Very interesting idea and gave me Clive Barker Jericho vibes.

Npugz7926d ago

Barf I wouldn’t of played it!

NotanotherReboot926d ago

would love an arena based moba FPS in the GOW universe

camel_toad925d ago (Edited 925d ago )

Don't leave out a deck-building system and Kratos' fetch quests. "Make love to 12 different harpies".

goldwyncq925d ago

Maybe the Egyptian era for the PS6 would switch to first-person just to keep things fresh

Show all comments (10)
470°

Twisted Metal director says ‘I’d be very hurt’ if a revival rumour is true

David Jaffe says he doesn’t believe a new game is in the works; “I haven’t heard a thing".

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
brewin975d ago ShowReplies(25)
porkChop975d ago

That doesn't take anything away from his accomplishments. He still created the franchise along with Scott Campbell. If a new game is made he should at least be brought on as a consultant.

UltraNova975d ago

I wouldn't be surprised if Sony has cut ties with Jaffe considering how pro-XBOX and Gamepas (bordering shill level) he has been in recent times. I mean he is known for speaking his mind (to his detriment at times) but he hasn't learned that a certain etiquette is needed in this line of business in order to keep relationships alive. That said, I don't know why he would be surprised if Sony went ahead and revived this IP without him.

porkChop975d ago

@Ultra

As Jaffe has said, Sony came to him and connected him with the people creating the Twisted Metal show. They obviously wanted and valued his input. It would make no sense to not seek the same if they were planning to make a game as well.

Regardless of him praising Game Pass, he still maintains good relations with Sony. When his PSN account was auto-banned Sony reached out to apologize and said it shouldn't have happened. That doesn't sound like a company that wants to cut ties.

UltraNova975d ago

@porkchop

For the record, I'm a fan of his work and generally his opinions, and follow him on both Twitter and youtube. Now, I'm not saying they should cut ties with him, actually, they would do well if they seek his advice if they ever decide to revive TM. What I'm saying is that I will not be surprised if they actually have, seeing how critical he has been with Sony lately. He would go on how good Phil is and praised Gamepass while taking jabs at Sony for not having something similar. He was so into it sometimes that I couldn't help but wonder what would Sony execs who came across his content would do.

The whole PSN ban thing is irrelevant to the point I'm trying to make since he was more or less treated as any other customer and helped solve that. (being a public figure with an audience obviously helped speed up the process).

fitofficial975d ago

Disagree strongly. His last attempt at a Twisted Metal game was a miserable failure and he was basically given full control.

Jaffe has been overrated for a long, long time. He never grew.

Unknown_Gamer5794975d ago

The thing is, when a product is developed for a company, that company owns that product, regardless of who created it. If the individual who created said product is no longer part of the team, they no longer have any more to do with any future products created under that IP than anyone else who's no longer part of the team.

There is prestige in being the creator of a popular franchise, but that really only amounts to people knowing that individual created that franchise. Sure, Sony could look Jaffe up if they really wanted him back, but they're well within their right to not do so, and one of their studios could create a new Twisted Metal regardless.

porkChop975d ago

@Unknown

No one said a new studio can't make the game though. I think people are misunderstanding what Jaffe is saying. He'd just like to know a new game is in the works and consult/talk with the devs about the new game and their direction.

It's no different than the new God of War. Kratos moving to norse mythology wasn't Cory Barlog's idea. That was Jaffe's. Jaffe talked about it during God of War - Game Directors Live back in 2011. Jaffe consulted with Barlog on the new game, they bounced ideas back and forth, and it led to an incredible game.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 975d ago
Bobertt975d ago

He has worked on the majority of the Twisted Metal games and made the last one in 2012 and is consulting on the TV show. The article doesn't mention it but in the video he says he thinks if there is a game they didn't tell him about it's most likely a mobile or short game related to the tv show and not a full fledged Twisted Metal game. He has said in previous videos about a Twisted Metal sequel that he doesn't think Sony will make it because they wouldn't make enough money for the cost of a next gen AAA game. The only way it would work was if it's full of micro transactions and online only and the fans wouldn't want that type of Twisted Metal.

BLAKHOODe975d ago

IF a new game is in the works (I hope so), I don't care if Jaffe is part of it or not. There are a lot of talented game directors out there. Twisted Metal might be his baby, but Jaffe isn't a guarantee lock in developing the best version.

brewin975d ago (Edited 975d ago )

Id take remakes of the first two games at this point. PS5 needs games. Twisted metal was always one of my favorite franchises. They just focus on these big story heavy single player games, its so limiting. They need to spread it out make some smaller games why not remake the classics like twisted metal 2?

13sentinel975d ago (Edited 975d ago )

Ps5 has more Exclusives compared to its Immediate competition. If you are complaining about lack of games then you need to keep the same energy. The pandemic has also clearly affected the gaming industry and games in their early to mid development have been severely disrupted. This isn't only a 'Sony' thing. I know it's frustrating with Sony not having a ps5 future showcase event, but the silence doesn't mean they are in trouble or dont have any games in development. You'd be lying if you say there aren't any, Herman Hulst has already made it clear on the number in the works.

It's almost as if people forget about Sony's output in 2020, which was phenomenal:

Final fantasy remake
Dreams
Tlou 2
Ghost of tsushima
Miles morales
Astro bot
Sackboy
Demons Souls
13 Sentinels

Then 2021

Ratchet and clank rift apart
Returnal
Kena
Deathloop
Ghost dlc

I dont think they could've done a better job with game releases thus far, especially for the ps5.

SpeedDemon975d ago

The system has been out for 9 months and a pandemic has slowed development of games, you can't expect them to have a bunch of new games just yet.

roadkillers975d ago

Honestly, he paid for the system, he can expect whatever he wants. The only reason I'm content with Microsoft is Gamepass has been phenominal. Without Gamepass, I'd feel like I wasted my money.

deleted975d ago

Exactly - most everyone has applauded the torch exchange from Jaffe to Barlog with the God of War franchise. The originals still hold strong as pillars of gaming history, but Barlog has advanced the series forward with new breath and vision after its stagnation. I'd be absolutely fine with Twisted Metal given new vision IF handed to the right talent.

sourOG975d ago (Edited 975d ago )

Jaffe is all over the place now. Whenever he gets brought up it’s on some weird shit. I wouldn’t blame Sony for leaving him out of the mix even though I still respect his older works.

fitofficial975d ago

Well his "revival" of the franchise sucked out loud, so not sure what he expects.

Show all comments (79)